top 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 84 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

How sad is it that supporting the most basic tencents of free speech is a win?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    a tenet is a philosophical axiom. a tenant is a resident of a particular property

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    danke schon

    I'm just gonna pretend I used the wrong one to avoid activating a sleeper agent from a Nolan film.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    while we're at it, schön (which can also be spelled schoen if umlauts are unavailable) means beautiful, and other strongly positive connotations depending on context. schon means already

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    Ted Cruz is a piece of shit.

    But, one thing he has remained consistent about is defense of free speech. Usually defending the freedom of right wingnuts to say what they want, but he did defend Kimmel and criticize Kimmel’s removal.

    That said, Ted Cruz is still a piece of shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 6 months ago

    But, one thing he has remained consistent about is defense of free speech.

    This is giving him too much credit considering he voted for Carr to lead the FCC in the first place. The one thing Cruz has remained consistent on is knowing how to improve his own reputation by saying something reasonable sounding every so often, but in terms of his actions he's a party apparatchik and total piece of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    In 8 yearsnI fear we'll look at the Cruizes like we look at Mitt these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    These people have proven to be traitors and pedophiles. There is no redemption for them, just prison. We will NEVER look back on them as benign Republicans.

    Romney wasn't even that anyway. He became a Sociopathic Oligarch with a weird religious obsession by buying companies and stripping them of their assets. He stole his fortune by destroying carefully built lifelong careers, and forcibly unemploying thousands, perhaps millions of people. He's a monster, with money to pay for nice clothes, a good haircut, and a first-rate political smile, but he's still a monster.

    The only reason that people look back on people like Romney and Bush with fondness is because the compare favorably to the absolute shitshow that occupies the government right now. That doesn't change the fact that they were still jackals, the very ones that led to where we are now. They may not like what's happening now, but I guarantee, they are still cashing in. Especially Romney.

    When he dies, that religion that he claims to believe in so much, is going to punish him harshly. I wish I believed in that nonsense so I could enjoy it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Ted cruz is a rare politician who is in politics because he fights for his convictions and wants to advocate for them

    Now his convictions are dogshit, and he does nothing but harm, but it does mean he's a breath of fresh air compared to his compatriots

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago

    Disagree. He became one of Trump's biggest defenders; even defending the capital attack, and spreading The Big Lie. Before Trump got elected the first time, Trump basically called Cruz's wife ugly, and Cruz basically told voters not to vote for Trump because he is immoral. Cruz is likely just trying to position himself for a 2028 presidential run, or being bribed by ABC or whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Behold, Schrödinger's shit sandwich. Now, a shit sandwich is when you take something shitty, and bracket it with two nice things. If you've heard of this before, you've probably talked to management, or more clearly, heard someone vent about talking to management. If you haven't, well, good on you for avoiding the notice of management.

    Now, what could a Schrödinger's shit sandwich be? Well, it would have to be something that somehow both follows and rebels against that definition above. So let's take the quote.

    Ted Cruz is a piece of shit.

    Ted Cruz defends free speech from government overreach.

    Ted Cruz is a piece of shit.

    So this could be represented as:

    We're making fun of Ted Cruz.

    We're agreeing with Ted Cruz!

    We're making fun of Ted Cruz some more.

    Yep, that looks like a classic shit sandwich, alright. But! Could it not also be:

    You're thinking of Ted Cruz.

    Someone is defending free speech from government overreach.

    Ugh! And now there's more Ted Cruz.

    Well, fuck me if that isn't a reverse shit sandwich! So which is it. A shit sandwich? A reverse shit sandwich? Both at the same time‽ Schrödinger's Shit Sandwich!

    But you can only be sure which one it is by taking that bite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    He wouldn't be saying shit if ttumps approval rating didn't drop 2 points after an assassination attempt.

    I can't wait till we hit 27% approval rating

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I guess he thinks Trump is about to crash and burn.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    We're at a point where America's great public protectors of free speech and baseline decency are:

    1. The "Veejay" of a clip show of shortened airline-food standup sets.
    2. One half of the duo who brought the world "Girls Jumping on Trampolines."
    3. Zazu from the bad version of the Lion King.

    They're doing good work, but christ on a cracker they shouldn't have been tasked with this job.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
    1. The "Veejay" of a clip show of shortened airline-food standup sets.

    I got that the latter two were Jimmy Kimmel and John Oliver. You lost me on this one.

    Edit: Also, don't forget 4. The man so good at satire that he simultaneously convinced stupid right wingers he represented them and only slightly less stupid left wingers that satirizing the right meant that he actually represented them until he got a new non-satire show and turns out he's just a left leaning centrist with an expert level knowledge of The Lord Of The Rings lore, but still calls a fascist a fascist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I get your point but I do think it's a little reductive to gloss over the fact that Oliver and Stewart have done an actually-good job of covering news all these years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I was sort of intentionally being reductive to make the point that it's pretty fucked up that our bravest and most trustworthy media figures all come out of comedy, some of it pretty low-brow.

    There's some decent voices in the American mainstream media, but most of them are so terrified of getting canceled by the so-called free-speech absolutists that the satirists (if one can even call Kimmel that) are having to do real work in spreading information and speaking truth to power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Are we sure that wasn't actually Bobby Moynihan?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Trump has not been doing governments job since day one, but if he'd pull his head out of trumps ass far enough he'd see that

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It must be that time of day. I am agreeing with a broken clock. Honestly, I will agree twice within a 24 hour period.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    its his turn to pretend his party has gone beyond the pale. The party is so beyond acceptable to me its really hard for me to imagine they have lines somewhere out in that trumpin trump.

  • source
  • 43 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 78 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Ted Cruz can go fuck himself.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    In all other things, sure. But I won't stick my nose up at an otherwise spineless person growing a small degree of structural fibrous cartilage against the Trump administration.

    After he stonewalls the FCC, then he can go fuck himself for everything else. Unless this amounts to no more than political posturing, in which case he is free to start at his earliest convenience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    growing a small degree of structural fibrous cartilage against the Trump administration.

    That's not what's happening here, he's not actually doing anything to obstruct any of the administration's plans, he's just a liar saying some shit into a reporter's microphone

    It's worse than useless because it somehow gives people the mistaken impression that Ted Cruz isn't and hasn't always been a giant piece of shit who would say or do anything for more power

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Absolutely, but I also know that Trump is the sort of person who takes these offenses personally.

    I'd never count on Ted Cruz to do the right thing when push comes to shove, but I'm hoping Trump thinks the walls are crumbling around him when even people like Rafael over there don't immediately fall in line behind him.

    The two have had spats before, and maybe something like this could be Cruz's "Marjorie moment" where he loses the mandate of MAGA and the right fractures just a bit more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I... agree with Ted Cruz? fuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Oh man, if Rafael Cruz is trying to appear to be better than maga brandon carr then maga is in some trouble. Cruz is vile and will sell out his own kids to look better than he is and here he is going against the maga grain.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago

    Aaaw look! The little Texas pedo protector suddenly wants to do the right thing.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Insert "person you hate just made a great point" meme.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    And it's not Senator Ted Cruise's job to flee to Cancún when a snowstorm causes Texans to lose power...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Am I going crazy? I’ve just agreed with Ted Cruz.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Ted is likely positioning himself for another presidential run in 2028. Part of that involves making statements that are broadly popular. "The government shouldn't censor speech" is about the most non-controversial thing he could possibly say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Didn't you guys call it muh freeze peach earlier

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Yikes. Do you think people on the left don't value free speech?

    The "freeze peach" shit is used mockingly when arguing against people who think the first amendment means they can say racist shit on private property with no consequence.

    Context matters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Why hasn't Ted Cruz's family honor killed him yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    more to the point why do Texas voters keep reelecting him ? I guess they feel he's the best person for the job!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I've been doing my part to get rid of him and corny... And the others. The weirdest thing is that no one likes the person. The people who keep voting for him do it because he's still running as Republican and they can't force themselves to vote differently. Also they are usually racist

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago

    Great. Now do something besides just talking about it.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I do not like that man, Ted Cruz

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    I heard that Ted Cruz pees his pants because he likes the warm feeling between his legs.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    He’s not wrong, but he’s still an asshole

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Ah so now Ted is positioning himself for a run at POTUS, just like Tucker.

    Rats from a sinking ship

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Except when you're making fun of a Republican, with their own words.

    In that case, you should incite a mass vigilante mob.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Ted Crook.... eh puta merda. 🖕

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    He'll get back in his lane in 3...2...

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Cruz is probably just trying to sound sensible for election season.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Careful Ted, your integrity is showing.

  • source
  • Ted Cruz is a consummate piece of shit, but this is absolutely a stopped clock moment, because he’s absolutely correct on this one point.

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 28 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago
    [–] 14 points 6 months ago*

    Maybe it shows that the FCC shouldn't be under the control of the President because it presents too much temptation to censor the public?

    I'm sure it could be successfully challenged if the president didn't bride the Supreme Court but it would still take to long time to resolve and ABC would lose a lot of money in the meantime

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Whoa, when did Raphael 'Ted' Cruz find a vertebrae?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    He clearly disagrees with you Cruz, why don't you look in to impeaching him for abuse of power?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Damn you universe, you made me agree with Ted Cruz!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Cruz has not caught up with his party. His party looooves to talk about free speech, but talking about it and being free are two different things, and the cons HATE freedom.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gu2ouJNmXc

    George Hanson: Oh, no. What you represent to them is freedom. Billy: What the hell is wrong with freedom? That's what it's all about. George Hanson: Oh, yeah, that's right. That's what's it's all about, all right. But talkin' about it and bein' it, that's two different thangs. I mean, it's real hard to be free when you are bought and sold in the marketplace. Of course, don't ever tell anybody that they're not free, 'cause then they're gonna get real busy killin' and maimin' to prove to you that they are. Oh, yeah, they're gonna talk to you, and talk to you, and talk to you about individual freedom. But they see a free individual, it's gonna scare 'em.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago
    3 comments in c/usa view that post
    [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    He'll say that, but he won't do anything about it. It's grandstanding for an election year.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    From the guy that denied our privacy rights.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I do not like that man, Ted Cruz.

    I do not like his political views.

    He does not care about free speech.

    He only cares about being a leech.

    He supported Trump's rise to the hill,

    and despite what he says, he supports it, still.

    He's part of the problem, that man, Ted Cruz,

    him, and all of his political views.

  • source