top 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 99 points 6 months ago (4 children)

In some places the nice beaches have been privatised by local hotels or clubs so you gotta pay them to sit on the beach or go sit somewhere less nice. Coming from Western Australia where we have the nicest beaches in the world (all free), I take this concept of "owning beach space" as a personal affront.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 6 months ago*

    They don't even have to be privatized. Some municipalities in the US require a "beach tag". I lived on a barrier island growing up, and we had to buy ours every year, or go to the beach two towns over where it was free (...except where it was privatized).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago*

    looking at you greece ಠ_ಠ

    but seriously.. it's hard to eek out an existence in sydney... everything is so fucking expensive.

    but peddle to the beach and read a book, it's free and the best thing in town.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

    TIL that "loitering" does not mean leaving garbage in public spaces. Ive heard the term but never expected it to mean standing around idle, this is so stupid.

    EDIT: nvm i was thinking about “littering”. english is hard.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    You are thinking of littering. Loitering is standing around idle on another person’s property. It’s usually used now adays to move vagrants along but the law has jim crow origins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Oh wow, you just blew my mind. I am in fact thinking about littering! I was a bit suspicious about me not realizing the true meaning sooner, but did not look into it further. This makes a lot more sense now, thank you for clearing this up. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It's baffling to me that you can get fined by just standing somewhere doing nothing...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago* (16 children)

    In Finland we have "Everyman's Right" which is the right to access nature on private land without needing the owner's permission.

    You can walk, hike, cycle, swim, pick berries/mushrooms, and camp temporarily, as long as you stay away from homes, gardens, and cultivated fields. Making a fire is however not allowed without permission.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    Yes I've heard of that and I'm happy for you all over there.

    But are you allowed to just lay around doing nothing in a public space?

    Whatever the case, laying around doing nothing in public is pretty much illegal in the United states. It's considered loitering, which is a crime. Except for on beaches.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    It's much more nuanced than that. What is illegal is:

    • Loitering with intent to commit a crime (e.g., drug dealing, prostitution, harassment)
    • Blocking sidewalks or entrances
    • Loitering in certain restricted areas (schools, government buildings, etc.)

    Simply just hanging out in public is perfectly legal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    My friend was thinking about buying a house in one of the suburban neighborhoods, and once went there to walk around and see if he likes it (as if he could distinguish one suburban neighborhood from another). He had cops called on him, and they threatened to cite him for loitering. For walking on public sidewalks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)

    Can you clarify: your friend isn't white and took a walk in some known for being ultra white pieces of shit neighborhood (he never knew about it, because what for, in healthy person's mind) and some dudes or gals saw him out of the windows of their caves and took preventive measures against... dreadful sidewalking crime? And cops were [n]ice scum and they were ultra chinazi kkk? 0 sarcasm here unfortunately btw Just curious about em details

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    The fun part is, he's white af, not American by birth, but white. Nobody told him why he was harassed, cops just told him that loitering is a crime, asked him where he lives and where his car is, and checked that he actually drives away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    This is very exemplarily story. It shows us that race or any other differences between people never were the real problems. Problems are psychopathic schizophrenics with dementia who think they're irreplaceable wise rulers of everything.

    Wishing all the best to you and your friend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    This is a single anecdote, it doesn't show anything. Statistically, this happens to people of colour way more than white people, so the racism is also a big problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago*

    Racism is a problem, but it is additionally artificially stimulated by intelligence to divide people even more, so they are the real biggest problem. Not like there's no natural racism. But some extreme shit that usually comes from some ultra[any shit here] is artificial and is stimulated. Denial of this seems more like already brainrotted-lobotomized brain thing to me, so not sorry 😐

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Technically true, but iny entire life, I've never known anyone who's gotten a ticket for loitering.

    Loitering is one of those "catch all' laws, that cops can pull out in almost any situation if they want to escalate. If they want to give you a hard time for running your mouth, they can always hit you for Loitering or Resisting Arrest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Don't lump the entire country in with wherever you are, because I can go to plenty of places within walking distance of my home -- in the United States -- and just hang out, hard, and it's fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 30 points 6 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    In Scotland under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 you can walk, camp, and explore most land in Scotland—even if it’s private—as long as you’re respectful, don’t cause damage, and give people (especially homes and farms) their space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    It's not perfect, but there are cleaners with enzymes that really fight dairy spill smell. They're primarily marketed here as pet odor destroyers. A spilled spring latte came back to haunt my car carpet in the summer despite my best cleaning efforts initially. I sprayed with the enzymatic cleaner and cut it in half within a few days. I sprayed again a week later and got rid of most of it. If it sits for a few days in the heat, I could smell it upon entering, but it easily got evacuated with open windows for a minute. Like 4 years later it's still there very faintly, but now it has to sit for like a week in the summer and it's only identifiable because I know what it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 55 points 6 months ago* (14 children)

    Few places nowadays is it legal to lay around & do whatever you want outdoors, usually getting cited for loitering or something.

    What kind of shitty place are you living in?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I always find it funny to figure out that stuffblike loitering isn't something the Simpson invented. It's something americans are not allowed to. But freedom is very important to them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Loitering laws are mostly just racism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    The US is a shithole

    I once went to a park sat on a bench and right in front of me was a no loitering sign. It's a park, what else am I going to do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago*

    I once went to a park sat on a bench and right in front of me was a no loitering sign. It’s a park, what else am I going to do?

    That is hilarious (well, sad actually, but you get what I mean). Also kind of reminds of that one politician once saying that "breast are not suitable for small children" in the public breastfeeding debate ...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Most of those "no loitering" signs only exist to give the police a legal crowbar against homeless people. Realistically if you're just sitting and minding your business nobody will actually come along and eject you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I immediately thought of homeless people when I read this. I mean I could probably lollygag a lot of places but if you look a certain way, have long hair, dirty clothes, a few bags with you, you start attracting the wrong kind of attention fast. Often in the nicest places of all. Shittier places leave you alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    In Canada, a very old arrangement dating from the creation of the country, says that navigable water is a federal matter. Whether it's on the side of the ocean, a big lake, or a river, the water and anything below high tide is Crown "land", and public. There are obviously exceptions and access by land can be controlled but not by water. At least not the beach itself.

    It leads to weird situations, like a provincial park that can't stop boaters from using remote parts of "their" beach. Or another where boats band together between some islands, and party and jetboat among kayaks and SUP.

    But this also prevents owners of big houses around lakes to claim a part of that lake, or the foreshore.

    We don't have the right to roam in general here, with some exceptions for Crown lands, and it happens that bodies of water and rivers is Crown land.

    Anyway, that's how I understand this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    More of this country is crownlands than privately owned lands. Except for the National or Provincial Parks you can roam free without registration. There is no cell signal when you head out there, you need a sat phone or one way emergency beacon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    Yeah but my biggest issue is that I live in the south of Quebec without a car, and most land here except water is private. If i want access to Crown land and wild camp, I have to cycle for a few solid hours up north. Like, at least 100 km.

    AFAIK even with a car, it's like this for most of my province. The vast majority of the population lives concentrated around the archipelago and they have to drive a few hours north to get away from private land. Plus, it's not easy to be certain what is Crown land or not.

    All the red is private.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (17 children)

    Blm land? National forest? Can lay around for 14 days straight.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (12 children)

    The land billionaires are salivating to carve up, log and develop? That land?

    EDIT: I realized that this comment seems a little to pessimistic and doomer. I didn't mean it to sound like we should just roll over and accept that these beautiful areas are taken from us and others. We absolutely need to fight back, and you'd be surprised, that even most conservatives (save for the ultra-MAGA people) actually care about this land too and are deeply against it being privatized.

    Now... Does that also say something about them caring less about POC than land, yes. But this is one of those issues you really don't have to push very hard to get people to care about. Even if they're not annual park visitors, a very large chunk of citizens in the US seem to care about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    We just can't get a break from you guys, can we? Doesn't matter what the discussion is about, it always gets turned into US political grievances. This is what's killing this platform and making every sane person leave.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    This is a post about the legality of resting in different areas (apparently in the US), it's inherently political.

    I could understand if this were a sub about bunnies or something, but it's not. I don't think the fediverse is dying, and I dodn't think you have to seek out reasons to clutch your pearls and be offended that people dare talk about the politics that affect their lives...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    It's a showerthoughts community. Nobody subscribes here for politics. There's a time and place for that kind of discussion and this isn't it and clearly I'm not the only one feeling that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    So glad you get to live in a world where you get to ignore politics. Also, I'm assuming you live in another country, and that's why you're frustrated things default to the US. So do I. I fucking hate that the US Empire has Earth by the balls, though that is ending (thankfully).

    And unfortunately, anything billionaires do here is often a sort of trial run for other countries. These assholes (Tech Asshole Billionaires, Heritage Foundation and theocratic asshats, Trump and Wallstreet, etc) want to carve up this entire fucking world and enslave us, like full on chattel slavery. That is, those of us they haven't sent to death camps. We need to do everything we can to stop this.

    You might not be a leftist, so the term endstage capitalism may or may not mean anything. But we are living in those times, and a few outcomes await us. One of them being techo-feudalism and surveillance dystopia, or a better world where we break this shit apart. Either way, politics is quickly affecting every single aspect of your life, because these assholes want to privatize every single minutia of your life if they can.

    Maybe one day we can sit back and ignore 'politics' (as they are defined now), but until then, I believe we have a LOT of work to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    It's not a binary choice between consuming all the politics or none of it. It can be done on your own terms when you choose to, rather than being perpetually consumed by it all day every day. That's an extremely unhealthy media diet that nobody should advocate for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    But it's not consumption of media that's the issue here. You're offended that we're mentioning political issues in a post about legality. You can ignore what you want, but everyone else doesn't have to be silent or pretend they're unrelated to make you happy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    I actually hear you and greatly sympathize with this. I absolutely need days when I just don't pay attention to the news or politics, outside of my local community organizing and action. I really look forward to a world where politics means what the etymology does "the dealings of the city", and not catastrophic, firehose levels of information about every single thing, each one of which is existential. I look forward, and work towards, a day when either I or those who come after me (don't have kids and won't) live in a society where politics means mostly things like planting community gardens, neighborhood groups, and distribution of commodities in a local environment. Where even the bigger issues are amazing, like high speed rail and massive green energy projects, space stations, and megastructures that benefit all, not just the elite.

    I really want you to know that I really feel where you are coming from, and I desperately want this torrent to stop. It feels so inundating and all encompassing. I applaud you for taking days where you recharge and take a break. In a sense, there is a privilege involved to those of us who can afford to do so, but also I will use that privilege for that, so that I can then go and also use it to fight back and make a change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago*

    I can only speak for myself here, but it's not even about taking days off. It's about protecting the remaining non-political places from being poisoned by political discussion. There are so many more appropriate places for it than the Showerthoughts community. I don't think anyone subscribes here for politics - rather as an escape from them.

    It's just my one-man fight against the wind. I keep at it not because it makes a difference but because I care. Still, if I manage to make even a few people more conscious of it when posting, I consider my efforts worthwhile.

    I also apologize for my harshness. I aspire to one day be able to take criticism the way you did.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I understand you, I do.. And often the rich and (in the case of the US president, or) powerful pull this shit anywhere in the world. That Dubai palm tree-shaped beach nobody lives in, the Trump golf courses in Scotland.. I'm not American and I have grievances against capitalist pigs destroying good land.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    It's actually BURNlNG MAN land with a typo'd lowercase L that's gonna unnoticed but it's too late to change the records now.

    (burning Man is on BLM land and happens to also be where the land speed record is currently held - salt lake city salt flats weren't big enough, apparently)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago* (5 children)

    Loitering is illegal in the US because public spaces are free. Why are you just sitting in a public space for free when you could be sitting in a cafe or restaurant and contributing to the economy? Oh you don't have that money? Well then you're worthless to society and just shouldn't exist, obviously.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Why would you seat doing nothing instead of making money to donate them to some FOSS projects, that are desperately needing them? And there are many such projects. Time to invest in good things, go grab some buzz and donate to your favourite FOSS project(s)! Then we go chilling in the forest with moon partisans and being worthless to regimes around the globe... together.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Is this another stupid American thing? I've never heard anyone getting in trouble for just laying around on public property

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    There's plenty of places by me where you can do this, and I live in the most dense state in America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    “Loitering” aka “standing while young”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Let's be fair, here. You can also get done for "standing while homeless," and "standing while poorly dressed," and also "standing while black and/or Hispanic."

    Curiously enough, you'll never get nicked for loitering if you appear to be doing something vaguely socially acceptable. I suggest showing up with an easel and paints; you can hang around all day without anyone bothering you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Except in Italy, nearly the totality of the coast is privately handled and you must pay to access it...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    It's like that all up the US Pacific and Atlantic and the US has a lot of coast.

    The gulf is for the poors to play in the oil every now and then as a treat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Shoutout to Daniel Burnham and Montgomery Ward for keeping Chicago's lakefront free and open for the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I've been there. It felt so odd being able to go to a government park, after sunset, against the water, and just have it be filled with people (like 100 people in sight, across the 600ft of lakefront I could see). When does it officially close, like 10pm? One cop-type was making rounds in the parking lot but not actually enforcing anything. There were occasional fireworks. I'm sure there are altercations sometimes, but the most I saw in my hour there was unruly kids (10 year olds). It was so peaceful.

    I come from the coast where there is only private land and government land that closes dusk to dawn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›