As announced a couple of weeks ago, power users always have an option to enable sideloading of unregistered APK files through an advanced flow that requires an authentication step to confirm they are taking this step of their own volition and a one-off, 24-hour waiting period to deter scammers.

Sure. That's the reason why they're introducing a 24-hour delay. Not because they want to make it miserable so people stop side loading.

all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 6 months ago

You know what. Fuck Linda Park, fuck this ass-kissing Google loving article. "designed to protect users from malicious software and scams" and the article keeps this tone throughout. This is not about protecting users! It's about tightening the grip on control of the app ecosystem.

Consider android authoritys article https://www.androidauthority.com/google-android-sideloading-unverified-apps-new-rules-3650343/

That at least has a little survey where you can express your take on this change

If you want a better perspective of the real impact of this for devs :
https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/24/google_android_developer_verification_plan/

  • source
  • [–] 112 points 6 months ago (34 children)

    Man, I hate the term 'sideloading'. It's just installing an app, for fuck's sake.

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    People forget that it's called sideloading because, in the beginning, most android apps were sold without the ability to install 3rd party apks. You had to use adb to sideload the apk to the phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    adb sideload is for installing an OS or OS update. The command to install an app is adb install.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 6 months ago (24 children)

    It's distinctly different from just installing an app.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    It's distinctly different from just installing an app *via the play store

    But is otherwise just installing an app.

    Do I "sideload" Steam on windows too if I don't go through the microsoft store?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago* (9 children)

    But is otherwise just installing an app.

    Yes, other than being different.

    Do I "sideload" Steam on windows too if I don't go through the microsoft store?

    No because there's no functional difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (8 children)

    Please do elaborate on this functional difference the play store has and the microsoft version doesn't. I'm a little lost here.

    I can use my F-Droid apps just as well as their play store counterparts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 6 months ago* (7 children)

    Check out the OP, lots of good info there about the differences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I remain as lost as I was.

    The only differences I noticed are the ones google is forcing through with their new "advanced flow", but that does not constitute a "functional difference".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    LOL you are grasping at straws so hard and I don't know why. Of course it's functionally different. I don't know how you could possibly assemble an argument otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    For something so apparently obvious you sure seem reluctant to put it to text.

    Thus far I have given you the benefit of doubt, but you have yet to come with a real argument.

    I cannot, nor will I argue against what I have to imagine your opinion to be. Either say what you mean or say nothing at all. Until then your point is moot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    It's already in the text in the OP. If you can't read it or refuse to acknowledge it, me rewriting it is not going to help you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Clearly we are reading different articles in that case, or I must've really missed the bit you're so staunchly referring to.
    Or maybe you can, I dunno, quote whatever bit of text you're so staunchly referring to?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (6 children)
  • [+] -8 points 6 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)

    I checked and it doesn't answer the question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Its literally the topic of the entire article, from beginning to end. You can't possibly have read it and still not understand this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    It isn't and this is the one of many replies in which you haven't provided even a single example.

    This is because you can't provide something that doesn't exist.

    Even if your reading comprehension was at such a level as to genuinely think there was an example of what you are saying in that text, you'd provide it.

    I can't see a scenario where you aren't trolling for engagement.

    I expect some personal attacks, continued feigned ignorance, perhaps some bargain basement deflection , all very standard and boring and that's OK, if that's your skill ceiling i won't hold it against you.

    But.. i'm willing to be surprised if you have something novel, perhaps some obscure fallacy I’ll have to look up, something that sets you apart from the basement dweller trolls, something noteworthy, perhaps enough to get you elevated to troll management?

    You got this, i believe in you.

    Also, i'll save you some time , a reply that doesn't contain a quotable example of what you've claimed will just be ignored, no more engagement for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    What? To 'sideload' an app, I do the following:

    • Open F-droid
    • Search for an app
    • Tap the install button

    How is that different from the Google Play workflow?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    The process is different the first time you install an app, regardless of from where. And you know this. Its also detailed in the OP. I'm not sure why you're pretending not to, except to be a contrarian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 11 points 6 months ago

    What about apps that are already installed? Are they going to be blocked from running a soon as I upgrade?

    My launcher is from F-Droid.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Good thing people on GrapheneOS, LineageOS and other Android OSs don't have to worry about this ...yet.

    Edit: striking the "...yet" portion as it's irrelevant.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Really holding out on Motorolla to add their announced GrapheneOS support because I want my funni flip phone lol

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    *downloading

  • source