116
Android Sideloading: New Rules, Advanced Flow & What Users Need to Know (2026) - World Today Journal (www.world-today-journal.com)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As announced a couple of weeks ago, power users always have an option to enable sideloading of unregistered APK files through an advanced flow that requires an authentication step to confirm they are taking this step of their own volition and a one-off, 24-hour waiting period to deter scammers.

Sure. That's the reason why they're introducing a 24-hour delay. Not because they want to make it miserable so people stop side loading.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 6 months ago* (7 children)

Check out the OP, lots of good info there about the differences.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I remain as lost as I was.

    The only differences I noticed are the ones google is forcing through with their new "advanced flow", but that does not constitute a "functional difference".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    LOL you are grasping at straws so hard and I don't know why. Of course it's functionally different. I don't know how you could possibly assemble an argument otherwise.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    For something so apparently obvious you sure seem reluctant to put it to text.

    Thus far I have given you the benefit of doubt, but you have yet to come with a real argument.

    I cannot, nor will I argue against what I have to imagine your opinion to be. Either say what you mean or say nothing at all. Until then your point is moot.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    It's already in the text in the OP. If you can't read it or refuse to acknowledge it, me rewriting it is not going to help you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Clearly we are reading different articles in that case, or I must've really missed the bit you're so staunchly referring to.
    Or maybe you can, I dunno, quote whatever bit of text you're so staunchly referring to?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent