all 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 6 months ago (1 child)

No, it's like college football: when you get a new country you have to choose a rival. If you don't, then it defaults to France.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago

    Of course, there are many countries in the world with not much history of engaging in conflict at all. Many of them are very small or located in places that have no strategic or economic value to anyone.

    The first country I thought of is Liechtenstein.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago

    Costa Rica doesn't have an army. They spent that money on the environment.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    Lichtenstein seems pretty chill, but I don't know much about their history

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I've always associated Switzerland with consistent neutrality, but someone with more historical knowledge may correct me on that.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Their mercenaries were famous throughout Europe and the dependency of the great European powers on those mercenaries led to Switzerland being left mostly in peace.

    That's what I've read, but I'd love to be corrected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I personally think it's geography. The Irish, Scots and Germans were important sources of mercenaries and that didn't stop anybody from attacking them.

    Also Switzerland fought quite some wars throughout history against great powers like France and Austria too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Davos is in Switzerland btw. So of your country has a problem with the WEF, and corporate corruption in general, Switzerland is to blame. Palentir has recently bought some media companies in Switzerland as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago*

    They're militarily neutral but their banks are super corrupt and stocked with fascist. So much nazi plundered wealth went into Switzerland and never came out. You read that right cheeseholes, Switzerland is a beautiful, well run country and the corruption of UBS alone will collapse Davos into a black hole.

    @violet08@lemmy.world defend your home. A history lesson has been requested

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (5 children)

    Vatican City. San Marino. Vanuatu. Palau. Lichtenstein. Costa Rica.

    Also gotta remember: Some countries are less than 50 years old. Like South Sudan is only 17 years old at this point. They may not have had enemies or conflicts in the short period of time they existed.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (3 children)

    The country of Vatican City has never been to war.

    Brings up the question as to where OP draws the line. If a country was established after a violent revolution, would that count if that newly established country has not yet gone to war or would the war for their independence have ruined that? Or in this case, the influence of the church getting other countries to fight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Not sure what you're talking about, I was not saying the Papal States were influencing other countries to fight, they were doing the fighting. The Pope was the head of state, sure they have a new name now, but the power structures and traditions have a straight line between the Papal States and current day Vatican City.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I am saying exactly what you just reiterated. The church was the main influence, but Vatican City wasn't a country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Meh IMO a country created out of the ashes of the Papal States with the same power structures is functionally the same country. But you are correct, Vatican City has not fought any wars after signing the deal with Mussolini that officially ended the Papal States.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    I don't think this answers your question, but this might interest you if you haven't heard of it before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentinelese

    It's an island with a tribe of people who have no contact with the rest of the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    It definitely does not answer their question, as the Sentinelese seem to consider everyone and everything that comes near them an enemy. Given how colonialism usually plays out and how contemptible other people are in general, I can't say I particularly blame them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    The Swiss have managed to stay out of wars for a very long time and are famously neutral.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    @zxqwas @Patnou what's swiss knife then ??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    They did not stay out of war by not being armed, rather the opposite. A mountainous country with a large army would be very difficult to invade in the first place and then very costly to control.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Canada? We've been in a bunch of fights but haven't picked them ourselves. Consider the bloody battle for Han Island as an example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whisky_War

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Canada was an open participant in the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, and a clandestine participant in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which kinda sounds like picking a fight to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago*

    I don't have an answer for Afghanistan. We suck. Iraq? My understanding is that we wouldn't go without a UN resolution which was not forthcoming. We have officers posted in other countries for various exchanges and they fought with their host countries. So we had a few hundred people there in various roles. I don't know about the clandestine participant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    The Inuit might have something to say. The children found in the mass graves by churches can't really speak. Canadians speak English & French. Remind me where England and France are, and what their history is with colonialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Imo, if you go back far enough, it is unlikely. No matter how peaceful or charitable a country may be now, they had to lay claim to their land at some point. And making those claims usually meant displacing or conquering someone else.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Fun fact. When Captain Vancouver sailed up the strait eventually named Juan de fuca, he spotted an aboriginal group in canoes, painted aggressively and paddling furiously. He passed a village, near what was ripple Rock, occupied by another band, soon thereafter.

    On the return trip, that village was occupied by the group he saw in the canoes earlier.

    Even before Canada was a country, the people occupying it were displacing others.

    Of course, the Clovis people may have something to say about displacement as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Germany i think

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    During WW1, Spain stayed neutral, and then went on to have the "Spanish Flu" named after them. Even though it didn't originate from there, they were just neutral during the war, and had no quarrels in announcing their deaths, while the countries at war didn't wonna announce that their soldiers were dying at a high pace.

  • source