To this day I have no idea why the return to the office 100% mandate is an industry standard. We lost a ton of qualified people to companies offering WFH, can’t hire the people we want since those candidates don’t want to relocate, and moral is shot across the company. I’m leaving this company in favor of one that offers partial WFH and more benefits.
post
Hilarious but my organization has a policy to account for this. It's ultra bullshit.
EDIT: For context, I work for state government and support critical infrastructure, so being available after normal work hours is expected. It's still bullshit though.
Terrible company then.
Every enterprise level org I've worked for has had strong rules about not engaging after-hours.
They understand of you're working after hours you're going to be useless the next day. Consistency is more important.
HR has practically been begging me to sue them over this shit. I put in a ADA reasonable accommodation request to WFH, and they've just stopped responding at this point. It's been 3 weeks.
Wife doing the same with her job. Did ADA for WFH and they claim RTO is a essential part of her job because of oversight. But she WFH 1 day a week before covid and then 5 years during covid full WFH and then they decided to demand 2 days a week in office so still 3 days a week WFH. But they need those 2 days of oversite? She 100% works from Teams, nobody she works with is in office as they are contractors. Lawyers have been contacted.
I'm in nearly the same boat. Though they said it an even dumber way:
"Being in the office, collaborating, and not being in an individual silo is an essential job function."
Motherfucker my whole job is to write code. It doesn't matter where I do it and I have MS teams for when I do need to talk to people. They had me working from home for months.
Maybe they should return to office themselves to jerk each other off and leave us the fuck alone
When I used to go to the office I'd spend an hour just chatting with colleagues. Now in WFH I work a full 8 hours if not more and the company doesn't need to accomodate me anymore.
They should be kissing our feet working from home but they're such bootlickers for whoever is above them that they don't care.
For the curious (like me): ADA = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990
I have a very good WFH policy and I have a lot of meetings with Japan on the evening
I told my boss that the day WFH is cancelled I won't be able to attend any of those meetings (and basically all the engineering teams are in the same situation)
WFH would unfortunately not make a lot of sense for my job since its a hands on variety of work everyday and I'm one of only a few available bus drivers. (10 employee community center)
Lot of job security and consistent hours, pay could be better though. And they at least only expect me to respond to scheduling communications.
I am a massive single point of failure for my org.
Anything bad or unexpected happens to the website that I migrated on prem for us and I am basically the only one who has any idea where to even begin.
And that just constitutes one grafana dashboard I built, of many, that are used by basically every team now. I also stood up the grafana server.
There was an RTO. My boss was literally like "this doesn't apply to you."
It strikes me as mastubatory to take a discussion about working from home and making it entirely about how important you are compared to the common clay of your company.
For a small company they might be the only person who has on-call duties. I don't think the "common clay" of the company envies being on-call 24/7.
Who cares? The post is mindless bragging. Why are you interdicting criticism of it?
People will "but actually" even the most cut and dry observations, and it's sad.
People will "but actually" even the most cut and dry observations, and it's sad.
You're doing the same thing.
God forbid someone share an anecdote?
I called out a braggart for being a weirdo. You wasted everybody's time with some inane corporatist boot-licking bullshit.
Not even remotely comparable. Go home.
For all the joys of WFH, there really are employees that take advantage. WFH should still be work. The employer is still paying those hours. So consider that not everyone is like you and some people take advantage
If only management had the capability to assess performance of WFH employees through metrics other than time in the seat. Impossible without managers doing more work though, so I guess the only solution is to make everyobe come to the office every day.
I've worked fully in office jobs where I would swear 80% of the staff spent most of their day trying to find ways look busy while fucking around. Turns out if you treat adults like children, they will act like children.
So... when there is potential for someone to take advantage of something, it should be denied to everyone lest they happen to be the type that might take advantage? That more or less negates all social safety nets, charity, and acts of kindness.
Interesting that there really are employees that flourish and work more effectively when they do so from home.
How much do those who take advantage cost the employer vs those that benefit the employer? What the net gain or loss? Is it impossible to unobtrusively measure this? Maybe those who take advantage can be put on an improvement plan, brought into the office, or terminated without banning the practice.
all 53 comments