Reddit has a perverse incentive to keep the user base frothing for engagement
There is no such incentive on Lemmy. We are toxic because we choose to be. All natural, free range, grassroots haters
Reddit has a perverse incentive to keep the user base frothing for engagement
There is no such incentive on Lemmy. We are toxic because we choose to be. All natural, free range, grassroots haters
The Lemmy userbase is human, which is more than I can say of Reddit's.
I think you're missing the point.
People are people everywhere you go. Nowhere is free of people unless you want to be by yourself.
Lemmy and the Fediverse is not about only being around people that are exactly perfect for you to associate with.
It's about not giving your thoughts, your mental energy, and your time to build an empire for someone else to profit off of.
I have often wondered about it. I mean people are people. So why should it be? That you and I should get along so awfully?
Okay, so we're different colors and we're different creeds and different people have different needs.
It's obvious you hate me though I've done nothing wrong. I've never even met you, so what could I have done?
I accidentally posted a link to some right wing borderline racist article which sounded sensible on first skim reading it. Commentators noted this. I apologized for not reading it carefully or noticing the other associated articles and the other Lemmy users were understanding. Just my experience but I think a nicer atmosphere prevails.
the point is lemmy is ours, not some psycho billionaire's.
Ik. Ik. I like that.
I was talking about the userbase.
Still love Lemmy. Despite its flaws, It's still the best one out there.
Mods do not own the servers, no.
Nothing is really ours.
If you run your own lemmy instance on your own hardware it's really yours.
this is the point i was making. You can never own anything in commercial social media, here you can own your own instance if you want to. And since instances live and die by users actually using them, each user has more agency too. reddit will keep going even without users.
Here is a general guide: https://rokibulroni.com/blog/self-hosting-lemmy/
But you an also go to !selfhosted@lemmy.world and get some advise from the good people over there.
So far I'm having a lovely experience
It's much calmer
Full agree. I would like some NSFL/more uncalm stuff, however… I love how much more organic and nicer everything is here, but the internet old-head in me would love come crunchier places as well.
The only other fediverse sites I’ve stumbled across have been a ZA WARUDO fediverse completely defederated from all of the instances here, and the subject matter on all of those sites is horrifying. Horrifying to ME, a person who’d love some NSFL/WPD-type subs here…
I'm doing my part!
PSA: you can block users. Don't be afraid to do it. There's nothing you can say that will convince flat earthers or similar stupid people.
I blocked myself so if I make any spelling misteaks I can’t see the comment.
yup. people need to use block. I swear some people have this thing against it but they have no problem people subscribing to things and only viewing subscrived. Thats like blocking every community your not subscribed to. Its two sides of the same coin.
I dont know. Not that Lemmy users are necessarily great all the time, but Reddit has decayed to the point that its barely better than a generic Facebook feed.
Yeah, my feed was pretty awful when I left reddit. Too many reposts.
Lemmy is better on that aspect.
But I feel that it should be possible for me to ask questions I couldn't ask anywhere else without people jumping on me with their accusations
Like what question do people jump on you for on lemmy here?
Personally I don't take that much offense, if someone is rude to me I give it back to them, or ignore them. It's anonymous online communication so you have to expect getting flak.
Well, I asked the question : 'Do you think strict 2 child policy be a thing?' Mind you, I didn't even say it should be. The only reason I asked that is because I wonder if it would become necessary in the future. And some guy accused me of wanting to control women and all that.
I hope you can see where, in the current political climate, questions like "Should 2-child policy be a thing?" "Should transgenders use the gender assigned at birth?" or "Should immigrants be immediately returned to their country of origin?" might seem disingenuous to the populations affected by those very real policy proposals.
Religious people were apeshit about china's two child policy. They hated it. I don't doubt you got some flak bringing it up, but it's also an issue of the government telling people what they can and can't do, which may be where more of these people are coming from.
One thing is certain, there is zero chance of it happening in the US anytime soon, because of the religious people.
but it’s also an issue of the government telling people what they can and can’t do...
There's a strong segment of Lemmy, perhaps even a majority, who have absolutely no problem with a government telling people what they can and can't do. The only thing these people disagree on is the details.
You asked if people should be forced to live a certain way and were surprised that you got a vitriolic response??? In this political climate????? Maybe know your audience a little better.
In this political climate???
I was online a decade before "Eternal September" started and having to check the "political climate" before making a post wasn't a thing until sometime in the last 8 years or so.
This kind gatekeeping has had horrible consequences for the culture of the internet.
I grew up with lesbian parents in the south in the 90s. Checking the political climate is all I have ever done my entire life, internet or not. I don’t agree that there has ever been a time when that wasn’t a requirement online or offline.
Like for real? Obama’s tan suit happened 12 years ago and you think the Internet has only been politicized for 8? You must have managed to avoid pretty much all social media before Facebook, which is weird because Eternal September happened in the 90s and came from Usenet which has been political since the 80s.
and you think the Internet has only been politicized for 8?
I didn't say the internet wasn't politicized. I said that having to "check the political climate" before making a post, i.e. self censoring, is new(ish). You gonna tell me that you never posted online that having lesbian parents is okay before it became accepted to do so? I'll bet you did and I'll bet you did it more than once.
This idea that posts running counter to the current cultural / political climate shouldn't be made is pure horseshit. Usenet was stuffed to the gills with counter culture of all kinds, it was expected and accepted. Yes there were epic flame wars but that's because people didn't self censor an unpopular opinion because of the "current political climate". I was there.
Online discourse is a pale shadow of what it once was and I put the blame squarely on the rise of this idea that people should self-censor in order to avoid giving offense. Fuck that and fuck people who believe that's how it should be.
Edit: One Usenet if a user really REALLY couldn't stomach what another user was spouting then they put 'em in the kill file. That's what "plonk" meant.
You are just saying what I said, that OP should’ve expected a flame war based on what they said. I never said that they shouldn’t have made the post. It feels like you’re ignoring what happened over the last 40 years in order to keep looking at the halcyon days of the Internet with nostalgia goggles.
You poor little baby. Maybe you can pay someone for a hug or something
Given the decline in birth rates, I don't know why you'd think it'd be necessary tbh.
You should check out one or two talks by Hans Rosling, the Scandinavian statistics prof/king. Very interesting correlations between quality of life/healthcare and family size, and he makes the info digestible for a wide audience.
Also, I would advise you generously block anyone who proves to you that they are not interested in discussing, but only in... let's say shouting.
those reposts are by AI bots, or spammers looking to warm up thier accounts. i see alot of people complain on those subs, but it usually fall on deaf ears most of the time, by mods, and certainly admins dont do anything about it, because its more advertisement potential for them. but they are quick to target accounts that arnt benefiting them.
I sometimes go to it on a computer with shitty privacy settings. It's terrible now. There is no quality content and it seems state-owned. After not using it for a while I was shocked by how bad it got since I left.
reddits is dead internet theory come true, mostly run by propaganda bots(russia, israel, and PALINTIR). OF spammers, link/url.ad spammers. FACEBOOK is what reddit will become eventually.
Reddit has decayed to the point that its barely better than a generic Facebook feed.
That is certainly not the case for a well-curated personal feed.
My feeling is that if your feed is shitty, you can look in the mirror at the one who curated it.
Not true for me.
I made a joke, and someone got upset. I explained that I didn’t mean it seriously and apologized. Then they told me they were in a bad mood and apologized for their reaction.
It's kinda like the founding of Australia - we get a ton of exiles who were wrongfully prosecuted by the Reddit government, but we also get a fair share of degenerates and murderers who also got banned and ended up here. There's even a native Lemmy group who was here before Reddit shed users and they really don't appreciate it to say the least.
really don’t appreciate it to say the least
Hahaha what’s this? Come on bust open the story
The short of it is that the creator of Lemmy and the earliest users are Marxist-Leninists, and certain blocks of them are so actively hostile to anyone who doesn't immediately agree with them that their instances are on the auto defederation list if you were to spin up your own instance.
We're talking like the communist version of 4chan levels of users amongst the worst of the group, but plenty of the other actually reasonable communities are bitter about liberals et al being on here. You'll occasionally see posts about how the new users are diluting the quality of the user base like when Reddit started to become popular.
I don't know why one would expect Lemmy to be different when it's entire userbase consists of ex-redditors.
I don't think there's much difference between platforms. Everyone is performing to either get pats on the back or to stirr up something. The moment everyone around you seems nice is when you've entered the echo chamber.
I just want headpats
it can be if you're using your block list effectively. There's a bubble of really chill people that have seperated themselves off from all the debate lords and with a platform this small you'll find them pretty easy.
Just block any 3 instances of your choice, 20 of the most active accounts that specifically annoy you, and maybe all the porn comms (it's mid anyway). You'll be left with a feed that's to your liking and nice comment sections
Because people who decide to leave something shitty are predisposed to wanting something better?
it’s entire userbase consists of ex-redditors.
I don't know that there's any decisive proof of that. There's no reason people haven't come from other social networks as well.
The userbase is largely overlapping as most Lemmy users are current or former Reddit users. The difference is largely in the communities and moderation, not users...
ffs, Lemmy's strength is in it's decentralised non corpo design, not that we users are a better quality of human. It went from Usenet, to the centralised shitiness of Reddit back to a decentralised system in Lemmy/Piefed more akin to Usenet
but, I'd also argue just by being here you're a better person.
but, I'd also argue just by being here you're a better person
Look, Lemmy is a little better than other social media. But, that's taking it a bit too far. What social media a person uses says very little about their morals.
What social media a person uses says very little about their morals.
Yes. Obviously their choices of operating systems and text editors are the largest factors.
Yeah even without ads or profit incentives we still haven't solved the social problems of social media, let alone the ethical problems in the hearts of people
Most every community has some assholes, or at least people that rub each other the wrong way. There's a lot to be said for clicking off shitty responses and not picking up the hate.
Hell is other people.
A priest explained us that hell is like a huge dinner party, lots of great food, but people have only long spoons, so they can't eat the food no matter how much they try. Heaven, well, it's the same stuff because God loves everyone, but people care and feed others with their spoon. Not really buying into the whole church business, but I always liked this picture.
Haven’t been there meaningfully in years, but when I was there regularly if I logged in and saw I had a bunch of new comments I’d have a mini panic attack. Did I say something clever or something stupid and get eviscerated?
I rarely get the number of comments here that I got there, but when I do get them they’re almost never toxic like the ones I got at reddit were, even when they are critical or disagreeing.
…I do still get a mini panic attack when I see I have a bunch of unread comments though. It’s less intense though as Lemmy seems to be slowly curing me of that reaction.
Same! Seeing replies on Reddit was always a coin flip. Are people happy or angry? Do I even want to click and find out?
Lemmy doesn't dogpile the way Reddit did. I'm not anxious about people disagreeing with me on here, because even if they do, they're more civil about it. They'll bring up points to disagree on, which is fair and adds to discussion. Meanwhile on Reddit, you'll more likely get ad hominem attacks that contribute nothing meaningful and seemingly only serve to make people feel bad for posting/commenting in the first place.
Lemmy doesn’t dogpile the way Reddit did.
It does. A bunch of us just happen to agree a lot more and the entire place is much smaller, so it doesn't come up as often. It's human psychology, people do this by default. Call me a cynic but there's no place or case on Earth where that doesn't happen in one way or another and it damn sure does here.
The coin flip was the reason I left Reddit more than anything else. I started noticing some irate comments for simple opinion stuff. Then one comment I made got a huge reaction of 'that never happened, you fucking suck, kill yourself,' in a much longer form. I was so flabbergasted that I finally gave up on Reddit in that moment. Twelve years of happily using that site slowly fell apart over the course of a few months.
If there's a dogpile here, it usually just earns the user a -25 score on the comment and many blocks, usually just one or two comments push back, which can spiral out into a chain of dozens of replies, and a ban only if the user keeps being obnoxious or clearly breaks rules.
As an example, look at this political comment I made the other day, the first level replies were of sound quality, then in the second level someone decides to be the grammar police and immediately the nested conversation turns to a squabble that's irrelevant, stupid, and not worth reading. Only the first level replies reach my inbox. My point is that good quality contributions get mostly decent quality comments back (including both praise and constructive criticism), while ragebait and flamebait begets a flame war.
There’s always going to be sad people who thrive on messing with others. I don’t think any social platform can avoid this problem, but it’s good that you’re finding a way to moderate your reaction.
Not just users. Mods/admins too.
Excellent unpopular opinion that I disagree with! Good post for here :3
On Reddit, I was CONSTANTLY annoyed in every thread.
Award edits: annoying.
Talking about awards and upvotes: annoying.
Spamming subreddits as hashtags: annoying. Rehashing the same phrase/joke over and over again: annoying.
Fake stories in all top subreddits in /all/ used as creative writing before LLMs made even being CREATIVE obsolete yet the site was clogged with bullshit and hundreds (if not thousands) of people responding as if the stories are real: annoying.
(More recently, as of when I left Reddit when the API change was made) Majority of people bots or astroturfers/shills/etc: annoying.
I constantly was shitting in comments and people on Reddit because so many comments were just… so… horribly… stupid! Asinine! Coming from a history of communities of folks that, while being overtly overwhelmingly dumb/offensive, were at least original or creative (IRC/Usenet/LUE/SA/b/specific forums) in their commenting and posts, near the end of Reddit’s life I felt like I had to dig through more oceans of shit to find a tiny gold nugget than I did when I was heavy into /b/ in the early-to-mid 2000s.
I find that Lemmy threads have an expectantly smaller quantity of idiots, rehashed ‘clever’ one-liners in every thread, ‘creative’ writing that isn’t creative in the slightest, and overall garbage commenters. Better shitposters, more furries, better grammar, and more organic stuff overall.
That’s my opinion, anyway. Your post has a lot of downvotes for a “popular” “unpopular opinion” post here which tells me you’ve posted a good one hahaha. I do agree with some of what you’ve said—I’d like some places I can post and read some more crunchy-ass shit. Not stuff like being racist “as a joke”, but with the way the fediverse is, I’d like some NSFL stuff and places where people can be free to be more crude or whatnot. Lemmy is very “safe”, which is healthy for a lot of folks. Overall though, I’ll take “safe” over “enragingly annoying everywhere” hahaha
I'm sure it's already been said a few times, but with few exceptions Lemmy/mbin/etc. users ARE redditors, or recently former redditors who, for historical and practical reasons, are more likely to be interested in
While that applies to me to varying degrees, I must acknowledge that it means we're probably sometimes going to be difficult and slow to assume good faith. I try not to be that way, it's the only thing I can do. I think the left wing politics/parapolitics is better than the usual right wing variety that was common on other reddit alternatives, but that's my bias.
Lemmy is still social media that's full of anonymous posters with no consequences to their posts so of course discourse is going to be absolute shit with trolls and disingenuous people vying for imaginary points and wearing that negative points as a badge of honor.
That said, with a smaller user base, while there are still complete contrarian, disingenuous users, I do find that the discussion on average are at least better than reddit and the one key to better conversations and debates I found after moving from reddit is I'm much, much more judicious about using that block user button and block communities button.
The difference is that you can curate the people you associate with. Find an instance whose values represent your own, or run your own, and you can avoid the people who you find the worst. You can't do this in reddit as anyone can join and you have no chance to prevent yourself from interacting with chuds.
top 100 comments