"The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must"
We are back in a period of great power actors. I should brush up on my Thucydides.
"The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must"
We are back in a period of great power actors. I should brush up on my Thucydides.
Lebensraum
If it weren't for double standards we wouldn't have any standards at all.
Fuck Russia, fuck Israel, fuck the United States, fuck China.
That is how get all the STIs.
Where has China been imperialist in the past 15 years.
Hong Kong
China's doing imperialism... in China
Wth what did China do
It does seem a bit unfair to include them and not India
As an Indian young adult not too invested in politics, may I please learn why and what for?
As a Canadian, first example that comes to mind is the apparent involvement of a killing in Canada.
But nothing personally against you or any other Indian, same as nothing against any Chinese.
I am always dubious of people who claim they have nothing against "the people of " just the government. See it doesn't fit with lived experience.
I get called upon to answer for every crime (real or imagined) of the Chinese government because I'm perceived as Chinese for these reasons:
So I'm basically accused of being a Communist Party of China shill (despite, ironically, my not even being permitted to join the Party if I wanted to … which I don't), being a "brainwashed" Chinese citizen, despite holding a Canadian passport—and never another—for about half a century, and in general treated with contempt and suspicion.
Despite, you know, "nothing against any Chinese".
So … perhaps you're the exception to the observed rule? But I won't be putting myself on the line to test it. I've got well over half a century of testing completed.
edited to add
I have the perfect parallel, actually. Fundamentalist Christians who babble about "love the sinner, hate the sin". Their actions constantly belie their pretty words. Same for "love the , hate the government" crowd.
I don't really know to respond to this. You're projecting things onto me that I can not defend against without divulging too much about my personal life.
And I also don't mean to invalidate your experience. I do not doubt that you have gone through that countless times. Nothing I can say can convince you that I'm sincere. And why should it?
But that leaves me in a weird place. Should I have said nothing? Just criticize a government and make no statement on its average citizens? Assume the sentiment will be implicit? I'm not comfortable with such assumptions on the modern internet unfortunately. I'm not happy with the state of things either.
But I strive to form my own opinions and always see the individual. Whether you can recognize or trust that or not I feel I have to go on that path.
I appreciate your input. Even if, or especially because, it led me to think a lot.
Oh, like kill 50 million + citizens through internal war and poor planning.
Take away individual liberties and develop the most insane surveillance culture in the world.
Commit to a slow burn genocide of Muslims.
Pump out more billionaires than the US for the last two years while massively increasing the income gap.
They did raise hundreds of millions of people out of abject poverty so you have got to give them that. But then immediately take it away when you learn they are the fourth/fifth largest supplier of arms in the world.
Oh look someone who denies the enormous loss of life.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine
The CIA doesn't give a shit about Genocide. This has been detailed by Amnesty International and other human rights groups and researchers since the concentration camps began.
Found the human right's abuser.
Says the guy denying human rights abuses.
Wow, you just keep acting more and more dumb. I guess that is what happens when you can't refute the truth. Disgusting human rights abuser.
Ignoring 50 millions deaths because "they" are the bad guys - Priceless
Ohh only 10 million!? Well that just makes it all better. Never underestimate the callousness of someone who excuses human rights abuses because they are a campist.
Taiwan, among other things.
Oh shit did they invade?
Not to my knowledge, but I’m sure they’d like to and don’t recognize Taiwan as separate from China.
Call me crazy, but that doesn't feel as bad as
Third one is Israel, got lazy.
I definitely think you’re right in that there are degrees to the evil these countries are perpetrating on the innocent.
I feel like the OP was just saying fuck X country who does evil, which is far from the complete list, haha.
Well, China didn't invade anyone in the last decade because they've already annexed the territories they wanted. It's not like Uyghurs and Tibetans stopped getting genocided because their territories are already internationally recognised as part of the PRC.
And they do fund multiple conflicts outside of their own country, like the aforementioned invasion of Ukraine.
Aside from all the politic shit. They tried to end my existence via the enforcement of the One Child Policy. I was the 2nd child in my family, they nearly ended me.
Thank god I got lucky and somehow lived.
Not the user you responded to, but I got a vendetta against PRC, it's personal.
I thought the penalty was a fine?
That's if they don't catch you.
My mom told me the first hand account of how women would just get forced abortions.
Like there are lots of women that was pregnant with their 2nd unapproved child, then the government found out and they'd force you go get an abortion.
My mom managed to hide me till like month 8 of the pregnancy, then like someone found out but they turned one eye blind and didn't report it.
I mean I don't exactly understand the full story either, its not like mom wrote a diary on it.
Basically it was a combination of many factors that lead to me surviving.
There was an issue of jurisdictions, they mostly left it local governments to enforce, mom was from Taishan and she was working in Guangzhou when she had me, and she was supposed to submit a pregnancy test every 3 months and send results back to their hometown. But mom told me she got another woman to take the pregnancy test for her under her name.
So like, the people working for the Guangzhou government didn't enforce it as harshly because she wasn't registered in their Hukou.
Perhaps a god exists and they intervened? idk, not really that religious...
I barely lived, and yes there's a fine, like somewhere in the ¥20000-¥30000 rmb which was a lot in the 2002s.
Yeah totally impartial to never accept critism of a state, you're not drinking the Kool aid at all
People who use liberal as an insult immediately out themselves as untrustworthy pigs to be shot. Thanks for being so quick about it.
"IsRaEl HAs A RiGhT To DefEND iTSelF" - Absolute Brainlets
The zionists only think they have the right to defend themselves. Palestine, Lebanon, and Iran don't have the right to defend themselves from the attacks of Israel.
See I take the ever so nuanced stance of yes Isreal is entitled to self defense, BUT and stay with me here it's important, what they are doing isn't self defense anymore and needs to be stopped
Israel has successfully argued what they're doing is self defense by claiming Palestine wants to do genocide to them, so by genociding Palestine first they "get the drop on them"
This is not how self defense works but the US heard this and went "seems legit"
It basically has never been self defense.
There's legal invasive annexation?
Edit: Wait. No. I get it now. It's annexation when there's a believably responsible reason for it. It's illegal annexation when there isn't. Control is just, whatever, including annexations of all sorts.
Israel and their claims to lebensraum in Lebanon is as disgusting as it is heart shattering.
Now let's play the game : does the poster mean both should be legitimate, or both condemned ?
That doesn't seem to be the message. Instead, it's that the NYT (along with the rest of mainstream/establishment media) self-censures criticism of Israel, by using more neutral terms.
Suppose I say "if you're ok with X then you should be ok with Y, because X and Y are equivalent" and "if you're not ok with X then you should not be ok with Y because X and Y are equivalent". Do I mean I'm ok with X or not?
NYT is a Zionist publication and Zionists are literal Nazis, only with some nouns shuffled around in their Nazi ideology.
a publicly traded entity controlled by the Ochs-Sulzberger family, who have held authority since 1896. A.G. Sulzberger is the current chairman of the company and publisher of the newspaper, representing the sixth generation of his family to lead the organization.
Just another multi generational dynasty. Inbreeding may be less popular these days but I've met some rich families and they raise horrible human beings.
My impression as a Russian is that annexation of Crimea was silently allowed by the US and the EU politicians. Putin has become a pariah after invading Donbass
If by “silently allowed “you mean “Trump
Nah, the politicians that let Putin get away with a slap on the wrist for annexing Crimea were pre-Trump. Mainly Angela Merkel, actually. Fuck her.
Trump has of course also enabled Putin since the full scale invasion.
Trump was too busy being so corrupt with his own bullshit that the United States didn’t do its duty as the global protector of democracy
Crimea annexation was before Trump went into politics
I am very much enjoying watching them kicking your asses
I'm just glad that I'm not a piece of shit like you are.
top 93 comments