top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 99 points 7 months ago

Human rights

Education

Levels of medical care

Income / maximum wealth (wealth caps)

  • source
  • [–] 81 points 7 months ago (19 children)

    Headlights that don't blind oncoming vehicles

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Seriously... I hate my own damn headlights! People flash their high beams at me as if I have mine on, but they're just the stock headlights... I've been seriously considering going to a mechanic to have dimmer lights installed lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    A lot of vehicles have a beam dip adjuster in the cab. Mine pops out when I press the center of the light control selector.

    Officially, they are to correct for a heavy load in the back. Unofficially, if you tweak them, you can flip between longer range, and polite as required.

    If you watch your lights, there should be a fairly sharp cut-off at the top of their coverage. If that line ever hits a window or mirror, it will look like you are flashing them. If it's too high, either fix it yourself (generally quite easy) or get it fixed.

  • source
  • parent
  • My cars low to the ground and only has halogen lamps, so if I'm ever flashing high beams at an SUV with overly bright lights, it's only so I can continue to see the road. LEDs are insane and the governments too busy facilitating record defense contractor earnings to do anything about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    If you're in Canada, they're developing standards and they're asking for feedback. There's a survey to fill out on the Transport Canada site.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    That's what sealed-beam headlights used to be before composite housings which are proprietary to a given vehicle were legalized.

    In fact, sealed-beams are still widely used in commercial vehicles because of their standardization to a point where they can be picked up anywhere and they're just gonna work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    OMG, light pollution in general has become my current "white whale," and the gods awful headlights on these ridiculous cars makes the most of it!

    We should be able to see the stars at night, I don't think we have to sacrifice a dark night for the sake of "safety," maybe use a different color of street lamps, or get the lights on the walkway with just enough to find your way around

    Please, I don't want to lose the Night!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    i'm not normally in support of taking control away from owners, but automating headlights seems like a big one. make radar and/or lidar, along with LED headlights, a requirement on new vehicles and have them automatically reduce brightness when a vehicle approaches. my old mazda would at least automatically turn the high beams off if a vehicle was a certain distance away from me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    No; personally i find those annoying as hell when a car with those is behind me. Having partial high beams on either side from behind, that also come on and of with oncoming traffic, is really distracting. Never mind the "less good" implementations, that blind you through your side mirrors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Reminds me of the Simpsons episode, where they design the "perfect" family vehicle - and it costs too much for a middle class family to afford.

    Meanwhile, it's impossible to find and affordable car with manual transmission, locks and windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 7 months ago (26 children)

    Feet, yards, inches should be replaced by the metric system.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    There are 2 types of countries in this world: 1. Those that use the metric system and 2. Those that put a man on the moon ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -23 points 7 months ago (19 children)

    When you can divide a meter evenly by 2, 3, 4, 6 we will talk. Until then take your crappy base 10 measurements and stefu!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (15 children)

    It can be done just like for feet and inches, look:

    • a half meter: ½m
    • a third of a meter: ⅓m
    • a fourth of a meter: ¼m
    • a sixth of a meter: ⅙m
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (14 children)

    Yet I only need an integer when using the imperial system, and I don't have to repeat 3 into infinity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    But then you've got a space that's 5' 7 3/8" and you need a clearance of 7/32" on each end, so your piece should be...uh... 5' 6 15/16" long. So much easier than metric, right?

    In metric it would be 1711mm (or 1.711m) and you'd need to take 5.5mm off each end, so it's 1700mm. (For the record, I picked random numbers in imperial and only did the metric conversion afterwards, I just lucked into the nice round number here.)

    I dunno. You need how many sig figs you need in whichever system, but switching between a factor of 12 for the feet, base 10 for the inches, and the equivalent of binary decimals for the partial inches sure does take getting used to. I've finally gotten used to it enough that I can do it in my head, but I prefer to work on metric for most things.

    I acknowledge that machinists just use thousandths of an inch, which does greatly improve working with that system, but it also introduces a third kind of measurement that can't easily be interconverted with the other two. I dunno. It just feels like we're doing way too much work propping up this archaic system when literally everyone else in the world is using something simpler and we could just be on the same system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    ⅓m is 1.093504 feet or 13.12205 inch. I don't see how it's more convenient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    Work in a machine shop for a week and get back to us

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (6 children)

    What machines do u run in what country?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    What does it matter? I could say any one of the +190 countries and the answer would be more or less the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    What matters is how many white collar keyboard warriors will sit there and act they know better as if they have a clue about machining or its history lol. I promise you in those 190 countries there are many still using SAE for lots of processes. Guarantee you not a chuck key on the planet isn't in standard even if the rest of the machine is metric 🤷 do NOT take this as me stating that SAE is somehow better, I'm just stating the fact that machining was born in SAE, and if your lathe is more than 40 years old (the lathe I work with is from the late 1930s) it WILL be in standard. In whatever of the 190 countries you are in what size drive turns your sockets? Oh right, quarter in, 3/8ths, or half in. What unit of measure is the wheel on ur car? Right, inches. Globally some stuff has just stuck with SAE for reasons I cannot explain. You don't have to like it, it's simply the facts of the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Born and raised on a farm, fixing farm equipment, did work on a autoshop and later gig work as welder in larger refineries and paper mills. Got my CNC operator licences too.

    Only times i have seen inches in use was when i was moonlighting at the saw mill. We talked about two by fours, but the saw was calibrated with mm (50×100mm/ so it was not even the close to inches). Oh and my friends shitty transam that had the assbackwards lug nuts and was a pain to find right kind of hoops for.

    If you want rest of my life too, i decited at some point i dont want travel for work and went to a culinary school where i meadured everything in grams and dl (also met my wife there.) Decited the pay was not worth of the hours and studied programming, but job market kicked my ass. Went in to sales and later found a company where i was able to use my culinary, programming amd sales history and now i have 8to16 job and my own team.

    Never seen a lathe that has not used mm. Even the old ones lathes and colum drills from the 50's i have seen use mm. My home town does every august work shows with old machines like steam engines, tractors and locomotives and as far as i can remember even those have both mm and inches in the levers and knobs. I think the closest i have seen with the old machines using imperial are some cars with mph meters. (Favorite being old marshall tractor with shotgun starter, having very optimistic meter going up to 100 mph.)

    So.. whats going to happen now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Well seeing as you worked in an auto shop you know all about the continuous global use of standard measurements! Your tires are always in inches, even when a metric tire (wheel size to be more specific). Every ratchet made is in inches as well as I previously stated. You cant get away from it. I'm not sure why square drives in ratchets haven't moved to metric considering not many are made in the states anymore, you will use a Taiwanese ratchet to turn a chinese made metric socket using a SAE sqr drive. Wheels I don't understand the faith to inches either, not like most cars are made in the states. I'm impressed the equipment from the 50s wherever you are doesn't have inch measurements, as a every machine ive seen of that vintage or older is exclusively in SAE but I suppose my anecdotal evidence is every bit as valuable as yours.

    Your life sounds as though it has been quite interesting, neat variety of work you have performed. If you are curious about machining history, I recommend looking into Robbins and Lawrence machine shop. I live nearby and they are the first place on earth to achieve interchangable manufacture on a practical scale. This is what led to SAE being so common on legacy machines and manufacturing for 100+ years after! It was the birth place of machining as we think of it today, but before cnc (1845).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Shit, you are right about the tires. I feel kind of stupid now. I ask you now (because of my utter unitrests to start to google anything right now.) How you guys mark the tire sizes? Like we have something like 175/65/14. 175 mm wide, profile is 65% and 14 inch diameter.

    Ratchets tough, never once given even a tough about the size. It was just what fit in what ever bullshit hole it needs to fit and hopefully gave enough leverage. Sockets are in mm and those were the ones I usually needed to worry about.

    Robbins and Lawrence is familiar name from school, but never really given any tought about them, nor i dont think im going to realistically ever travel to Vermont(?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Yea it is strange the consistent proliferation of SAE units globally for certain things like tooling and tires. Not sure where else it is common, I only know about where it affects me on a daily basis with what I do for work. The tires are crazy because the aspect ratio is based off the mm width and the wheel size in inches so now units are being mixed! And square drives (like the half inch chuck key u used to tighten the chuck on ur metric lathe) could just as well be say 13mm instead of half inch, or 10mm instead of 3/8ths but the world just refuses to move on in certain areas. This is to say all the more how badly we need to standardize units of measure globally in our intertwined global world. Robbins and Lawrence was one of the first contractors for us gov to make guns that could be easily repaired with replacement parts in the field (before then all guns were hand filed and built so each part was bespoke, and repairs required craftsmen). When an industry starts with a certain standard (tools, tires, machining) that sets and industry standard which takes precedent over all other standards in that field. This is why all these things have stuck with SAE for so long, but these standards were set 100+ years ago. There is no reason not to move on at this point honestly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Easy.

    Can you quickly calculate how many gallons of water receptacle with dimensions of 5 inch x 3 feet x 1 yard can hold? Extra points if you can also calculate how many pounds it weight when filled.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    An open phone standard, and no, I do not mean the 'Open Handset Alliance' that doesn't even live up to its name, I mean like an ATX-equivalent standard for mobile devices.

    An open-source ISA already exists in RISC-V, maybe that hypothetical ATX-for-mobile-devices standard could standardize around that for starters, as for an OS, it could standardize around non-Android Linux and maybe even some BSD mobile OSes instead of Google pulling some MS-in-the-'90s crap for Android like they're doing right now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    You need an equivalent of ACPI in the x86 space to catch on in ARM/RISC-V if you want a general purpose OS to be viable on phones

    There's sort-of kind-of SystemReady in ARM but it's a far cry from the standardization of ACPI on x86 desktops

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 7 months ago (17 children)

    Nuts, bolts, and screw heads.

    I know we need various sizes for various tasks, but I shouldn't have to dig through 50 different screwdrivers or ratchet heads and still not have one that'll work.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    I replace crappy ones when I remove them.

    I'll tolerate Phillips, but slotted gets replaced with torx. Phillips get replaced if they get damaged.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    There are reasons why you can't have Torx in some situations. For example, sanitary machine designs. Preference is a flanged hex head. If flush mount is required, then slotted is best (even though they do suck for every other reason)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Best of luck with that mate. Do you know how many different cross-shaped drives there are already?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_screw_drives

    And if you really want to get upset about confused standards you should read the section of the Talk page about why JIS B 1012 was removed:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_screw_drives

    They ARE distinct from standard Phillips, and posidrive. If one tries to use Phillips on them you'll likely strip the head.

    [...]

    As discussed, the previous paragraph was wrong and (as of now) uncited, so it was removed. No information is better than wrong information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Those are already standardized though…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    There are 14 competing standards. We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone's use cases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    I'll just be happy when we phase out imperial and other weird thread types. Metric standardisation is a godsend over what came before.

    The heads are a lost cause. They serve too many different purposes, with differing, competing, requirements.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    All online forms.

    I fill out a lot of forms and it's ridiculous. Sometimes I'll be at the bottom of the page, and I'll get a message saying that I can't continue until I fill out a 'must answer' question. Sometimes the programmer was clever enough to make it so I'm directed to the question, but more often than not I have to scroll through the entire form to find where I made my mistake.

    And, when I have gotten to the end, it would be nice if there was a chance to review everything.

    I'm not even going to start with the forms that make you use the calendar tool that takes longer than just entering the date.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    Forms itself should be a thing of the past. They mimic paper based patterns which makes no sense for lost use cases in 2026.

    What we need is standardized APIs through which you can share specific personal info if you wish to do so. E.g. SOLID implements this.

    If additional info is needed a basic conversation with an agent could take the place of a form in due time (for those who wish to use this).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago

    Civil rights

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The “reject all cookies” button

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago

    powertools' batteries.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Job ads.
    To hell with all the bullshitting.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Windshield wiper arms. Everything should be J-hook.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The j-hook is fine. What is NOT fine is how difficult it can be to remove the damn wiper blades after they've been outside for awhile and things get dried up. There's got to be a better way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    See, if everything was j hook, blades wouldn't have their own array of adapters, some of which get stuck even on j hooks.

    If you have trouble, just break the plastic off. You're replacing it anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    We’re really all over with Spinosaurus.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I really want everyone to use the metric system. Imperial is just awful to use for most design and machine purposes.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Interesting, as somebody who on a somewhat regular basis runs a lathe and occasionally a Bridgeport at work I could not imagine using metric. Mostly because our old machines are all standard, but also because a thousandth of an inch (industry standard unit for measuring clearances) is .0254 mm so now clearances begin to involve more math. Call it lazy but I'm not converting everything on my machines lol. We build engines and some parts and everything we do has to be in SAE.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Every single one of my machines is set up to run metric so I don't have to constantly convert 64's and 8's and thou's fractional units between denominators, which is exactly why I'd rather type .0254mm than 1/1000. I absolutely cannot stand using different fractional denominators or that a foot is divided by 12, but everything else isn't. You've probably used it for years and are used to it, but approaching it with a rational mind seems like unnecessary work and risk of miscalculation.

    Every number I use can easily be interchanged for another unit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    All it comes down to is set up honestly. Our old clearing lathe is all in standard, so trying to machine anything with metric units means a bunch of conversions, each one an opportunity for error. Easier just to do it in standard when the machine over double my age is already set up for it! Plus the thread cutting portion i would have no idea how to convert. I'll keep doing it in standard until my boss wants to covert 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It's creeping into men's sizes, too.

    Depending on the maker, I'm a Large, Extra Large, 2XL, or sometimes 3XL.

    And I can fit into some mediums.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    And I can fit into some mediums.

    I don't want to hear about your psychic sex life, bud

    :-)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    There was a post recently.

    [paraphrase] Guys who make jokes about their big dicks are usually assholes, but guys who joke about how small they are are usually cool and fun.

    Reply = I have a medium dick. It can contact the dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Men's clothes sizes are just as likely to be ill-fitted, it's just that men aren't held to the same standard of fashion. A lot of men don't mind wearing something a size too big or cinching their pants up with a belt. Nobody bats an eye.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Oh man, I use a shopping list app, which lets you sort the products into aisles, so that you can just walk through the store and complete the checklist top-to-bottom as you visit each aisle.

    This would be excellent for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    Packaging. With everyone buying online the profusion of different types of packaging is wasteful. Packages are processed by machines and in many cases the packaging gets caught on things, gets stuck in conveyor belts or just slides right off. A huge number of items have to be manually processed because of the packaging. Standardised packaging would make automation much easier and lead to faster, cheaper processing. Unfortunately marketers want to use the super shiny slippery packaging with their brand all over it.

    If your wine boxes are slippery they deserve to get dropped.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›