Human rights
Education
Levels of medical care
Income / maximum wealth (wealth caps)
Human rights
Education
Levels of medical care
Income / maximum wealth (wealth caps)
Headlights that don't blind oncoming vehicles
Feet, yards, inches should be replaced by the metric system.
There are 2 types of countries in this world: 1. Those that use the metric system and 2. Those that put a man on the moon ;)
Funny thing is, NASA uses metric.
But their independent contractors use imperial and convert back and forth. This is how the Mars Climate Orbitor was botched.
Interesting flex. Apollo Guidance Computer was working with Metric SI units internally.
Calculations were carried out using the metric system, but display readouts were in units of feet, feet per second, and nautical miles – units that the Apollo astronauts were accustomed to.
When you can divide a meter evenly by 2, 3, 4, 6 we will talk. Until then take your crappy base 10 measurements and stefu!
It can be done just like for feet and inches, look:
Yet I only need an integer when using the imperial system, and I don't have to repeat 3 into infinity.
But then you've got a space that's 5' 7 3/8" and you need a clearance of 7/32" on each end, so your piece should be...uh... 5' 6 15/16" long. So much easier than metric, right?
In metric it would be 1711mm (or 1.711m) and you'd need to take 5.5mm off each end, so it's 1700mm. (For the record, I picked random numbers in imperial and only did the metric conversion afterwards, I just lucked into the nice round number here.)
I dunno. You need how many sig figs you need in whichever system, but switching between a factor of 12 for the feet, base 10 for the inches, and the equivalent of binary decimals for the partial inches sure does take getting used to. I've finally gotten used to it enough that I can do it in my head, but I prefer to work on metric for most things.
I acknowledge that machinists just use thousandths of an inch, which does greatly improve working with that system, but it also introduces a third kind of measurement that can't easily be interconverted with the other two. I dunno. It just feels like we're doing way too much work propping up this archaic system when literally everyone else in the world is using something simpler and we could just be on the same system.
⅓m is 1.093504 feet or 13.12205 inch. I don't see how it's more convenient.
Work in a machine shop for a week and get back to us
The entire planet's machine shops do fine.
1x1x1 metre cube holds 1000L of water, and weighs 1000kg.
Uh? Done. What happens now?
What machines do u run in what country?
What does it matter? I could say any one of the +190 countries and the answer would be more or less the same.
What matters is how many white collar keyboard warriors will sit there and act they know better as if they have a clue about machining or its history lol. I promise you in those 190 countries there are many still using SAE for lots of processes. Guarantee you not a chuck key on the planet isn't in standard even if the rest of the machine is metric 🤷 do NOT take this as me stating that SAE is somehow better, I'm just stating the fact that machining was born in SAE, and if your lathe is more than 40 years old (the lathe I work with is from the late 1930s) it WILL be in standard. In whatever of the 190 countries you are in what size drive turns your sockets? Oh right, quarter in, 3/8ths, or half in. What unit of measure is the wheel on ur car? Right, inches. Globally some stuff has just stuck with SAE for reasons I cannot explain. You don't have to like it, it's simply the facts of the world.
Born and raised on a farm, fixing farm equipment, did work on a autoshop and later gig work as welder in larger refineries and paper mills. Got my CNC operator licences too.
Only times i have seen inches in use was when i was moonlighting at the saw mill. We talked about two by fours, but the saw was calibrated with mm (50×100mm/ so it was not even the close to inches). Oh and my friends shitty transam that had the assbackwards lug nuts and was a pain to find right kind of hoops for.
If you want rest of my life too, i decited at some point i dont want travel for work and went to a culinary school where i meadured everything in grams and dl (also met my wife there.) Decited the pay was not worth of the hours and studied programming, but job market kicked my ass. Went in to sales and later found a company where i was able to use my culinary, programming amd sales history and now i have 8to16 job and my own team.
Never seen a lathe that has not used mm. Even the old ones lathes and colum drills from the 50's i have seen use mm. My home town does every august work shows with old machines like steam engines, tractors and locomotives and as far as i can remember even those have both mm and inches in the levers and knobs. I think the closest i have seen with the old machines using imperial are some cars with mph meters. (Favorite being old marshall tractor with shotgun starter, having very optimistic meter going up to 100 mph.)
So.. whats going to happen now?
Well seeing as you worked in an auto shop you know all about the continuous global use of standard measurements! Your tires are always in inches, even when a metric tire (wheel size to be more specific). Every ratchet made is in inches as well as I previously stated. You cant get away from it. I'm not sure why square drives in ratchets haven't moved to metric considering not many are made in the states anymore, you will use a Taiwanese ratchet to turn a chinese made metric socket using a SAE sqr drive. Wheels I don't understand the faith to inches either, not like most cars are made in the states. I'm impressed the equipment from the 50s wherever you are doesn't have inch measurements, as a every machine ive seen of that vintage or older is exclusively in SAE but I suppose my anecdotal evidence is every bit as valuable as yours.
Your life sounds as though it has been quite interesting, neat variety of work you have performed. If you are curious about machining history, I recommend looking into Robbins and Lawrence machine shop. I live nearby and they are the first place on earth to achieve interchangable manufacture on a practical scale. This is what led to SAE being so common on legacy machines and manufacturing for 100+ years after! It was the birth place of machining as we think of it today, but before cnc (1845).
Shit, you are right about the tires. I feel kind of stupid now. I ask you now (because of my utter unitrests to start to google anything right now.) How you guys mark the tire sizes? Like we have something like 175/65/14. 175 mm wide, profile is 65% and 14 inch diameter.
Ratchets tough, never once given even a tough about the size. It was just what fit in what ever bullshit hole it needs to fit and hopefully gave enough leverage. Sockets are in mm and those were the ones I usually needed to worry about.
Robbins and Lawrence is familiar name from school, but never really given any tought about them, nor i dont think im going to realistically ever travel to Vermont(?)
Yea it is strange the consistent proliferation of SAE units globally for certain things like tooling and tires. Not sure where else it is common, I only know about where it affects me on a daily basis with what I do for work. The tires are crazy because the aspect ratio is based off the mm width and the wheel size in inches so now units are being mixed! And square drives (like the half inch chuck key u used to tighten the chuck on ur metric lathe) could just as well be say 13mm instead of half inch, or 10mm instead of 3/8ths but the world just refuses to move on in certain areas. This is to say all the more how badly we need to standardize units of measure globally in our intertwined global world. Robbins and Lawrence was one of the first contractors for us gov to make guns that could be easily repaired with replacement parts in the field (before then all guns were hand filed and built so each part was bespoke, and repairs required craftsmen). When an industry starts with a certain standard (tools, tires, machining) that sets and industry standard which takes precedent over all other standards in that field. This is why all these things have stuck with SAE for so long, but these standards were set 100+ years ago. There is no reason not to move on at this point honestly.
If you only need integers, why are the measurements of your home hardware and tech specified in 1/8ths and 1/16ths of an inch? Stick to whole inches or shut up.
You only repeat 3 to the number of significant digits necessary.
Isn't that grade 4 math?
Easy.
Can you quickly calculate how many gallons of water receptacle with dimensions of 5 inch x 3 feet x 1 yard can hold? Extra points if you can also calculate how many pounds it weight when filled.
So you imagine that USians somehow can divide inches with infinite precision?
An open phone standard, and no, I do not mean the 'Open Handset Alliance' that doesn't even live up to its name, I mean like an ATX-equivalent standard for mobile devices.
An open-source ISA already exists in RISC-V, maybe that hypothetical ATX-for-mobile-devices standard could standardize around that for starters, as for an OS, it could standardize around non-Android Linux and maybe even some BSD mobile OSes instead of Google pulling some MS-in-the-'90s crap for Android like they're doing right now.
Nuts, bolts, and screw heads.
I know we need various sizes for various tasks, but I shouldn't have to dig through 50 different screwdrivers or ratchet heads and still not have one that'll work.
I replace crappy ones when I remove them.
I'll tolerate Phillips, but slotted gets replaced with torx. Phillips get replaced if they get damaged.
Torx are pretty great
Everything should be torx
There are reasons why you can't have Torx in some situations. For example, sanitary machine designs. Preference is a flanged hex head. If flush mount is required, then slotted is best (even though they do suck for every other reason)
Why would slotted be better than, say, Phillips for flat mount? Most of the flat heads on the equipment at work is either a Phillips or hex
Best of luck with that mate. Do you know how many different cross-shaped drives there are already?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_screw_drives
And if you really want to get upset about confused standards you should read the section of the Talk page about why JIS B 1012 was removed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_screw_drives
They ARE distinct from standard Phillips, and posidrive. If one tries to use Phillips on them you'll likely strip the head.
[...]
As discussed, the previous paragraph was wrong and (as of now) uncited, so it was removed. No information is better than wrong information.
Those are already standardized though…
There are 14 competing standards. We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone's use cases.
I'll just be happy when we phase out imperial and other weird thread types. Metric standardisation is a godsend over what came before.
The heads are a lost cause. They serve too many different purposes, with differing, competing, requirements.
All online forms.
I fill out a lot of forms and it's ridiculous. Sometimes I'll be at the bottom of the page, and I'll get a message saying that I can't continue until I fill out a 'must answer' question. Sometimes the programmer was clever enough to make it so I'm directed to the question, but more often than not I have to scroll through the entire form to find where I made my mistake.
And, when I have gotten to the end, it would be nice if there was a chance to review everything.
I'm not even going to start with the forms that make you use the calendar tool that takes longer than just entering the date.
Forms itself should be a thing of the past. They mimic paper based patterns which makes no sense for lost use cases in 2026.
What we need is standardized APIs through which you can share specific personal info if you wish to do so. E.g. SOLID implements this.
If additional info is needed a basic conversation with an agent could take the place of a form in due time (for those who wish to use this).
The “reject all cookies” button
I haven't printed anything at home in years. Just easier to go to the shop/library and pay them.
https://nymag.com/strategist/article/best-safety-razors.html
Old fashioned double side safety razors. No gimmicks, less waste, and cheap.
Job ads.
To hell with all the bullshitting.
Windshield wiper arms. Everything should be J-hook.
The j-hook is fine. What is NOT fine is how difficult it can be to remove the damn wiper blades after they've been outside for awhile and things get dried up. There's got to be a better way

We’re really all over with Spinosaurus.
I really want everyone to use the metric system. Imperial is just awful to use for most design and machine purposes.
Interesting, as somebody who on a somewhat regular basis runs a lathe and occasionally a Bridgeport at work I could not imagine using metric. Mostly because our old machines are all standard, but also because a thousandth of an inch (industry standard unit for measuring clearances) is .0254 mm so now clearances begin to involve more math. Call it lazy but I'm not converting everything on my machines lol. We build engines and some parts and everything we do has to be in SAE.
Every single one of my machines is set up to run metric so I don't have to constantly convert 64's and 8's and thou's fractional units between denominators, which is exactly why I'd rather type .0254mm than 1/1000. I absolutely cannot stand using different fractional denominators or that a foot is divided by 12, but everything else isn't. You've probably used it for years and are used to it, but approaching it with a rational mind seems like unnecessary work and risk of miscalculation.
Every number I use can easily be interchanged for another unit.
The QWERTY keyboard has entered the chat.
"We've always done it this way..."
All it comes down to is set up honestly. Our old clearing lathe is all in standard, so trying to machine anything with metric units means a bunch of conversions, each one an opportunity for error. Easier just to do it in standard when the machine over double my age is already set up for it! Plus the thread cutting portion i would have no idea how to convert. I'll keep doing it in standard until my boss wants to covert 🤷
Women's clothing sizes
It's creeping into men's sizes, too.
Depending on the maker, I'm a Large, Extra Large, 2XL, or sometimes 3XL.
And I can fit into some mediums.
And I can fit into some mediums.
I don't want to hear about your psychic sex life, bud
:-)
Men's clothes sizes are just as likely to be ill-fitted, it's just that men aren't held to the same standard of fashion. A lot of men don't mind wearing something a size too big or cinching their pants up with a belt. Nobody bats an eye.
Grocery store layouts.
Packaging. With everyone buying online the profusion of different types of packaging is wasteful. Packages are processed by machines and in many cases the packaging gets caught on things, gets stuck in conveyor belts or just slides right off. A huge number of items have to be manually processed because of the packaging. Standardised packaging would make automation much easier and lead to faster, cheaper processing. Unfortunately marketers want to use the super shiny slippery packaging with their brand all over it.
If your wine boxes are slippery they deserve to get dropped.
top 99 comments