Donald Trump’s authoritarian drift in his second term places the country on a par with Hungary or Turkey, according to a ranking by Sweden’s V-Dem Institute

Democratic backsliding is advancing in the developed world. The annual report from Sweden's V-Dem Institute leaves no room for doubt: almost a quarter of the world experienced democratic backsliding, or a shift towards autocratization, in 2025, and six of the 10 newly regressive countries identified in the research are located in Europe and North America, including G-7 powers such as Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

But the most unsettling conclusion reached by the Swedish institute is that the United States


once a proud beacon of the more or less free world


is no longer a liberal democracy and is now on a par with countries like Hungary or Turkey, thanks to President Donald Trump. Autocracy is also spreading throughout Europe, but its reach extends far beyond the Old Continent: 41% of the world's population (3.4 billion people) now live in countries where democracy is eroding.

The institute, which belongs to the University of Gothenburg and uses 48 metrics in its evaluation, is one of the most reliable sources when it comes to rating the state of governments around the world, and the conclusion of its 2026 study confirms the worst fears about the authoritarian drift of the U.S. under Trump's leadership.

all 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 76 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Let's be honest, the US was no shining beacon of democracy even before Trump. The system was rotten and everyone knew it. However, those with the power to change it have no incentive to do so. It was basically held up because the poeple in charge had some common decency. At that point it's just a matter of time before someone came along that didn't have this basic decency.

I think the people of the UK should take a long, hard look at how the situation has evolved in the US and decide if they want to change their system to avoid having only two parties dominate the political climate. Ironically, being a monarchy means they are probably more resistant to going down the same route, but I suspect the parties are going to get more radical as time goes on and the royals aren't terribly popular these days.

(Opinion to be taken with a pinch of salt. I am no expert in these things and don't live in either country; We've got our own radicalization and issues with our own democracy.)

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    the US was no shining beacon of democracy even before Trump

    he didnt create that corrupt system, hes just taking advantage of it..

    actually he and the other pedo billionaires did help to create the corrupt system who am I kidding?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    WWII changed everything about the USA. Everywhere else in the world, manufacturing was bombed to oblivion, the populace unable to rebuild without a coordinated effort from governments and NGOs.

    The US became a hub of manufacturing. We exported our culture, and our products, all over the world. Our currency and our language became the standard in business.

    Everything since then has been a slow walk backwards, so that the ultrawealthy could exert more control and line their pockets. A return to the "real" American values of exploitation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    The US became a hub of manufacturing. We exported our culture, and our products, all over the world.

    only because the rest of the world was bombed to shit. As soon as they rebuilt, they did everything better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I think the people of the UK should take a long, hard look at how the situation has evolved in the US and decide if they want to change their system to avoid having only two parties dominate the political climate.

    There are currently 5 parties vying for position here, but your point is still generally true. Hopefully with the rise of smaller parties, we might start to see a move towards a more proportional system, but I'm not holding my breath.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (2 children)

    There are currently 5 parties vying for position here

    I know you're not disagreeing, but I find it absolutely hilarious (in a bad way) that UK political parties will put out flyers of who is most likely to win, as a way to convince people to vote for them.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zDLxgEquxA0

    All while having rejected bringing in preferential voting at a referendum, not even that long ago.

    As an Australian, may I say, you royally fucked up on that one. We have issues in our electoral system too, (mostly around lower house electorates being single-member, and not say 3-member to more accurately represent the electorate), but thank Christ we have preferential voting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    As an Australian, may I say, you royally fucked up on that one.

    I take exception to that. The law which allowed for the referendum required Royal Assent, but that is the same law which would have allowed for the implementation of preferential voting. It was the statutory repealing of that law where things really went bad.

    I would say we statutorily fucked it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    the poeple in charge had some common decency.

    The people in charge were scared of the public a little bit. It was not their decency that was stopping them, it was the danger of losing next elections if they took it too far. Bush attacked Iraq and he didn't lie about the WMDs out of decency. He lied to cover his ass. Lindsey Graham was the same guy he is now back then. He didn't lose his decency along the way. He realized he can be himself and people will still vote for him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 7 months ago* (16 children)

    Worldwide, democracy has regressed to its lowest levels since the mid-1970s

    I've been saying over and over again here, that it's generally been going backwards since the 70's. This goes for democracy, respect for human rights and minorities, and the peace movement.

    And many people here simply don't believe it. (I'm guessing younger ones)

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago* (7 children)

    Let’s talk about what this really means, though. Why would that happen?

    Could it be anything like:

    • Because power is a fickle structure by nature and therefore democracy is an unstable system?
    • Because technology advanced so fast that it yields control to whomever sits at its forefront?
    • Because society chose not to make theoretical laws for technology that had yet been invented?
    • Because (e.g., Russian) state propaganda was allowed to become so powerful that it actually destabilized global democracy?
    • Because we were naïvely assuming we had a stable democracy, when in fact we never really did — it just hadn’t been under enough stress to show its flaws?
    • Because institutional capitalism with monarch style governance is an economic system that necessarily leads to authoritarianism?
    • Because the libertarian value tolerance of debate is an ill founded ideology, and we actually need more intolerance (e.g., limitations on free speech)?
    • Because social media is not respected by the masses as the enormous medium of control that it wound up being in actuality?
    • …

    What’s the next big realization here for mankind?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    Americans doing regime changes, mostly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I mean, sure. But shouldn’t something be said about what that means for democracy? Would it be:

    “Democracy only works if you don’t try regime changes in foreign states, otherwise it starts to experience a phenomenon where the democracy withers”

    …?

    I’m doubtful it’s that simple. If it is, then democracy seems rather unstable in its current form. All it takes is one bad leader to trigger a chain reaction toward failure? Again, I’m doubtful.

    There’s got to be a bigger story here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The rich people are in an exclusive club and collude without meeting because what's good for one is good for the other. They've also been a big driving force for change in the world from consumer based economic models to "supplier" based models. IE themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    When you put it that way, it sounds like democracy requires a global effort to continuously thwart such collusion, such wealth, maybe such exclusively? Something… It sounds righteous to me, but also like something that can become equally oppressive in perhaps many different ways.

    What you describe is something that I understand to have been the case for most of human history, if not all of it. How do you resolve that issue? And, if that’s really the issue, what do you make of modern democracies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    You seem to miss the fact that we lost control of society with both political parties being captured by the oligarchy, unions being infected with the mob and beset by law enforcement, and all other parts of the long game of the business roundtable of 1971 to seize control.

    Everything you mention is after the fact. We were disunited, and rallied around controlled opposition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    Yeah but even that doesn’t really get to the root of things. Did that happen because we had not accounted for its possibility when constructing the democracy? Was that always happening? Is oligarchy a naturally occurring problem and foe to democracy?

    Why were they able to seize control at all, if we had a function democracy before then? Surely if it were a “functioning democracy,” then their seizure of control would have been democratically acquired — right? Obviously wrong, but why?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It's not just younger ones. I talk to a large group of boomers and they are all in the same boat of "everything is fine, we'll just vote the next election. We've had presidents like this before."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    We’ve had presidents like this before.”

    On that they are seriously mistaken, of course there have been bad presidents like Bush, but Trump is a whole new class of bad.
    I hope they are right, and that all this can be solved by a simple election, but I'm not betting on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    We need a second hippie revolution. And I don't mean the half-assed underground "comebacks" from the late 90s and 2010s, a real movement that actually influences policy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    The pedofile class doesn’t want democracy

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    As far as I'm concerned, everyone who is a billionaire has to prove they had nothing to do with Epstein or pedophilia in general.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    I feel like that’s reasonable but billionaires should automatically be abolished also

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Let them try to get by on $999,999,999.99

    If they pinch their pennies, show some restraint on...what was it? Avocado toast, Netflix subscriptions, smart phones, and big screen TVs, they just might get by on a mere penny less than one billion....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Nah, that's still too much money. I know you're being sarcastic but realistically it'd be way under 100 million.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I dream of a world where anything above 10 million net worth need to be reinvested or donated. Like, you can gift your kids until you and them and worth ten mil each, and their kids and whatnot, but it would limit wealth accumulation even with a hundred family members. Something like that anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    That's more reasonable, they still have a lot of money but cannot just buy politicians left and right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago* (7 children)

    I can remember when lots of the reactionary centrists and not a few on the left, oh, and of course, the right wing blow-hards, were playing Tone Police for everyone in 2016, and 2020 and again in 2024: lecturing us all about how uncivil it all was to be talking about fascism in relation to conservatives.

    I wonder where all the WELLACKTUALLY guys are now.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    not a few on the left,

    Nah, was a lot actually. I know a lot of people that were really upset after the election and after the first few months. Then it stopped being a problem. "You're overreacting." "Don't think about it." "We'll be fine next election."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    lecturing us

    Also about not understanding the law system, that it takes time and Trump was done. Really condescending shit. I noticed just before I got permabanned from Reddit that they were disappearing or gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

    They're going to let him tear the country apart, and then 25th amendment his ass just after January 20th 2027. That lets Little Smokey take over, and he's still eligible for 2 full terms. Mark my words...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I think they're just gonna kill him. Leaving him alive risks the chance of him sending whatever is left of MAGA after them. It also risks splitting their support base.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    If they were going to do the smart thing and off him, they would have done so long ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Why would republicans have done that? It wasn't in their interest to kill him while he still had enough sway and the populace still had some power. Now though, they know they can take over without risks since they've managed to accumulate so much power in the presidency that, so long as they can hold on to the senate, they can do whatever they want with the judicial having abandoned any semblance of control over the executive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Yep, they will prop his rotting corpse up as long as they can, the plan is to having him be the wrecking ball, take all the blame, but by then the fixes are all in for the next one in line.

    Not sure if they will foist vance on us, I don't think they believe he can be the front of a cult but by they maybe the power will be consolidated enough that they don't care since he's just a puppet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    He's making moves like he's expecting to be around another 50 years when he probably has 10 at the most. I'm way more afraid of who he might be paving the way for.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    No way he has 10 years in him. Motherfucker is mentally gone as is. Weekend at Bernie's.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    He could die tomorrow. Pandora's Box is already open.

    For the remainder of our lives we will see copycat politicians who strip more and more of our rights away when they gain power because they all watched and saw and know they can do what Trump did and more without suffering repercussions.

    America put up a big sign letting them all know we are too weak to make them pay. They will take advantage. Why wouldn't they?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago
    [–] 9 points 7 months ago
    [+] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Weird how everyone who was told they were overreacting are not being told that anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The Citizens get lazy under a Democracy, because they're comfortable, but there are always those who want to everyone to do things their way, or else. Lazy Citizens let those people get their way too much, and it gets exploited, and the next thing you know, the Lazy Citizens have to do a lot more work to take control again, than if they had just been vigilant in the first place. It's important to slap down the dipshits as soon as they get froggy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago*

    many countrys and similar groups brake down solely due to corruption of the systems that got the country to where it was in the first place. many think about building the country but forget to set things in places to preserve the country their after. anti corruption laws need to be overbearing to deal with this upcreep imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    It went from being four weapon manufacturing companies pretending to be a democracy to four weapon manufacturing companies pretending to be a dictatorship.

  • source
  • [+] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    The sooner everyone recognizes this, the better

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    No one will grow a ball and stop him, so it's already too late. If you're an American, your life will never be the same.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It's not a single person issue. The entire system is broken. Taking out one leader is not going to fix anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    But will it make things better? Worse?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Who knows? On one hand Trump's dementia means he's acting erratically. On the other it means that it's harder for the Nazis to follow whatever plan they have for the US. The next leader may stabilize things but the fall of democracy may be even faster.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    He's on his way out. And despite the inevitability of the party fixing elections with the controlled opposition we have that these motherfuckers still trust somehow, in time, a true leader will emerge and lay waste to the oligarchy, it's as certain as spring finally arriving.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Bad news, guys

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    In 1963 they murdered the democratically elected president in front of the whole world. Do you really think we’ve been a democracy since then?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Us was always an electoral autocracy, you can vote an autocrat, it was never a democratic nation. Only a country which follow effective proportional representation system of democracy can be claimed as a democracy

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Given that elections are the defining feature of a democracy, I think it would be prudent to wait until after the mid term elections to start proclaiming the demise of American democracy. Granted, the Republicans are trying their best with mass disenfranchisement, but it remains to be seen how effective they will be.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    But there's already such a long list of laws and rules he just ignores and seemingly gets away with. It's madness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Let's also not forget all the broken campaign finance election laws that preceded his win. No accountability followed because the winner keeps the spoils

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    And let's not forget that THE LOSER of the election still gets a BILLION DOLLARS in their coffers (that we know of).

    Imagine what the spoils are for the winner; we'll never know the extent of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    They ALL get away with breaking a long list of laws and rules, that's what makes the election of Trump possible!

    Back in the 1970s, the FBI would bust reps for accepting cash bribes (Abscam). So, the reps made bribery legal with the help of the supreme court. Now Super PACs are the way. Highest bidder wins.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    We don't have actual "elections"

    We have two private organizations (Ds and Rs) who have through law crushed all possible opposition.

    So we get two candidates to chose from, both curated by the billionaire "donors" running each party. This is not a conspiracy, see Super PACs for more.

    They won't cancel the "elections", there's absolutely no need.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago*

    Giggle. We've been playing "wait and see" for a decade now.

    Elections don't solve this. We've seen that high-level Democrats are no different than high-level Republicans. Biden refused to investigate the Epstein files, he refused to prosecute Trump, and he refused to target gerrymandering/election interference.

    There's no version of this where the old America magically returns. That's the same logic trap that ushered in this entire mess. There are plenty of MAGA who truly believe that they are shaking up the system and that just one more election will solve everything.

    THIS. IS. THE. FUTURE.

    We are living in it. The trajectory is set. We didn't stop militarization of the police when they stepped on our rights. We didn't stop data collection when we were warned. We didn't stop gross financial mismanagement, corporate influence, gerrymandering and all the other things that make a democracy work.

    We aren't living in a fascist takeover. That happened years ago. We are living in its aftermath. We are frogs in a simmering pot, watching the bubbles float past us and wondering how to turn off the heat. It doesn't matter now, the damage is done. The momentum takes control.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Wait... did they think we were a liberal democracy under Biden, Obama, Bush, Bush Jr., Clinton, Reagan?

    Goofballs

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)