Joseph Stalin was a communist leader friend with Leon Trotsky

Trotsky was a communist revolutionary and intellectual. He once wrote "In politics, obtaining power and maintaining power justifies anything" in his book "Leur morale et la nôtre"*

In this book, Trotsky justifies the use of lies, manipulation, bribery, spying, infiltration of other political parties, even hostage taking. He says absolute ruthlesness is necessary to wield political power. He concludes "We are acting for the greater good. We can't be restrained by normal morality"

Joseph Stalin took Trotsky's advice literally. So he murdered Trotsky because he saw him as rival. Stalin also started killing people because he believed they could be sympathetic to capitalism or opponents to his personal power.

Matvei Bronstein: Theorical physicist. Pioneer of quantum gravity. Arrested, accused of fictional “terroristic” activity and shot in 1938

Lev Shubnikov: Experimental physicist. Accused on false charges. Executed

Adrian Piotrovsky: Russian dramaturge. Accused on false charges of treason. Executed.

Nikolai Bukharin: Leader of the Communist revolution. Member of the Politburo. Falsely accused of treason. Executed.

General Alexander Egorov: Marshal of the Soviet Union. Commander of the Red Army Southern Front. Member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party. Arrested, accused on false charges, executed.

General Mikhail Tukhachevsky: Supreme Marshal of the Soviet Union. Nicknamed the Red Napoleon. Arrested, accused on fake charges. Executed.

Grigory Zinoviev:: Communist intellectual. Chairman of the Communist International Movement. Member of the Soviet Politburo. Accused of treason and executed.

Even the secret police themselves were not safe:

Genrikh Yagoda : Right-hand of Joseph Stalin. Head of the NKD Secret Police. He spied on everyone and jailed thousands of innocents. Arrested and executed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genrikh_Yagoda

Nikolai Yezhov : Appointed head of the NKD Secret Police after the killing of Yagoda. Arrested on fake charges. Also executed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Yezhov

Everybody was absolutely terrified during this period. At least 500 000 people were murdered. Over 1 million people were deported to Gulags, secret prisons in Siberia, where they worked 12 hours a day.

Joseph Stalin decided to crush Ukraine for resisting communism and supporting independance. In 1933, he seized all Ukraine's food. In the next months, 5 million Ukrainians were starved to death. The situation was so bad that thousands of Ukrainians turned to cannibalism. When Nazis invaded Ukraine, some Ukrainians thought they were saviors

https://cla.umn.edu/chgs/holocaust-genocide-education/resource-guides/holodomor

https://www.history.com/articles/ukrainian-famine-stalin

Hitler was a monster, but we really don't talk enough about how bad Stalin was.

top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 161 points 7 months ago (49 children)

All my life I’ve seen Stalin listed with people like Hitler and Pol Pot as murderous despots. How the hell are we “not talking enough about how bad he was?”

  • source
  • hideshow 49 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I live in Canada, the general vibe we get through our culture and education is that Hitler was #1 worst guy in history, everyone else was a close second.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    This. Even in my psychology of genocide course in uni, a lot of it was focused on Hitler being the worst, and not much about Stalin.

    Sort of related sort of not, I learned in the last few years how awful the British were, too. Different levels of awful, but I'm thinking because Canada is a commonwealth country and was pretty much run by the Brits back in the day, the Brits excluded from our education the bad things they did, ie to native Americans/First Nations people, Africa, etc. I didn't learn about any of that.. So I think what they wanted people to learn and what they wanted people to forget shaped what was taught in Canadian schools.

    So, like many others, I was awed and excited by the royals. Now that I know what they've been trying to hide, meh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 115 points 7 months ago (29 children)

    We're on Lemmy. A not insignificant percentage of the crowd are tankies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (17 children)

    It doesn't have anything to do with Lemmy. American education has always given a pass to Stalin, probably because he was an extremely helpful ally in WW2. We are taught in America that WE saved the world when we entered WW2, but the reality is that the Soviet Union lost many, many more lives at the hand of the Nazis than the other allies, including America. The Soviet Union's contribution was easily as significant as America's. When the Soviets finally defeated the Nazis in Russia, and started marching toward Germany, one Nazi general said "If they treat us half as bad as we treated them, were in big trouble."

    So coming out of the war, school curriculums taught about the current cold war propaganda, but Hitler was the bad guy they focused on, not the guy that helped us beat him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    American education has always given a pass to Stalin

    Really? Stalin's Soviet Union is why Americans have such a knee-jerk reaction to the concept of communism. We had entire moral panics that people might be brushing their teeth in a particularly Soviet way. The Soviets have been rivals or enemies a lot longer than they were allies. You find me an American that doesn't agree with the statement "World War 2 was won with British intelligence, American steel and Soviet blood."

    My American Education included...what Americans know as the Berlin Airlift, I'd be curious to learn what the Germans and ex-Soviets call this incident. That Germany as a whole was divided East/West, with the Western half being controlled by the capitalist allies, and the East being controlled by the communist Soviets. Berlin was too, despite the city being located well into the Eastern half. So there was this little enclave of capitalism in communist East Germany, some barbecue in the borscht.

    Boiling this down a bit (there was some nonsense about Russia resisting the west introducing the deutchemark) Stalin blockaded the city with the ultimatum "become communist or starve." The West responded by flying in supplies by air, using the rationing expertise the British had developed during the war along with USAF and RAF airlift power. One pilot started dropping little parachute bundles of candy to the children who would hang out near the airport watching the planes, and when President Truman heard of this he ordered the candy drops increased.

    It was that easy to come off looking like the Big Damn Heroes in this situation; they come bearing cold and starvation, we answer bearing fuel and food.

    If anything, it's the Japanese our schools go easy on; Imperial Japan were easily peers of the Nazis in the atrocity department, yet more American textbooks contain the word Auschwitz than the word Nanking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I grew up in the Cold War era, and I hardly ever heard any real talk of Russian leaders, which was mostly Breshnev when I was growing up. Instead, it was a just a general hatred of the entire Communist/Soviet system in general. The guy at the top was just considered a figurehead. He certainly didn't seem to have the same vicious stranglehold that Stalin had. The purges seems to have mostly died with him.

    So we didn't learn much about the people over there, mostly just the names Lenin, Stalin, Kruschev, and Breshnev. Occasionally Trotsky's name came up. But mostly we just heard "Commies Bad. Don't be a Commie."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I was born about a week after Reagan said "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." Growing up in the 90's I didn't get the childhood "better dead than red" stuff, we didn't practice hiding under our desks from nuclear bombs. We did fire and tornado drills. As an aside, being an American school kid in the 90's felt sane in a way I don't think it did before or since? The Metroid were eradicated, the galaxy was at peace.

    From our perspective, we had won the Cold War by default. With the iron curtain down, it was fairly easy to take a look at our old adversaries and we saw...very little we wanted. A few nice symphonies and ballets, a warehouse full of really cool rocket engines, and precisely one video game. By my era, we said "Don't be a Commie, or you'll end up like that."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    From our perspective, we had won the Cold War by default.

    The ironic thing is, while we were celebrating our win, they never stopped fighting the Cold War We took our eye off the ball, and they didn't, and our current situation is the result.

    But more to your point, I remember reading that after the fall, we discovered that not only was Soviet technology not up to our standards, they didn't even have the machines to make the machines that it would take to make technology at our level.

    But that was back in the 80s. They've had a lot of time to catch up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • We felt like right gits having built the F-15 in response to the Foxbat. What's Hisnameski defected with a Foxbat, the West finally got a look at it, and said "oh. Heheh. Shit, did we overreact."

    My favorite thing ever said about the F-15 is "The last time we took (Russia) seriously, we built that thing."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    As Eddie Izzard joked about mass murderers like Stalin: "The reason we let them get away with it is because they killed their own people, and we're sort of fine with that. Oh help yourself! We've been trying to kill you for ages!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Her^[For anyone that doesn't know, Eddie Izzard is now Suzy Izzard] bit on Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk_pHZmn5QM

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It kinda makes sense, though. She was a "transvestite" for a very long time, and I guess just finally realized she was a she. :) For a while, she said she didn't mind being called Eddie or Suzy, but more recently said that actually, she would prefer Suzy, although I suspect she's pretty relaxed about it. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Social contagion, possibly. Not that it makes it inherently wrong, just saying that this seems like evidence towards that theory.

    She seemed to be quite effortlessly a "male lesbian" when she was more actively touring. That was a part of a joke though, so might have meant nothing also.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Or how about you fuck completely and all the way off with that bigotry.

    You should learn a bit of history.

    I'm not here to teach you. I'm here to tell you to fuck off with your bigotry and block your bigoted ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Uh not my public California school. They were pretty clear about the whole biggest genocidal murderer in history thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    That's interesting. I don't recall hearing a word about Stalin in school. I knew he was a bad guy for some reason, but chalked it up to typical Commie hating. It wasn't until I was out of school, and cultivated an interest in history, that I read more about him, and learned that he and Hitler seemed to be having a competition to be the worst guy ever.

    You can probably blame the difference in there being 50 different public school curriculums, for some reason. Some states get a different education than others, and I suspect that one of the biggest differences is history. 2+2=4, CAT spells cat, in every state in America, so why do we have 50 different curriculums, many specifically created by Treasonous Pedophiles to groom and indoctrinate children into their cults? Education should be Federal, and the Federal government should create a comprehensive curriculum, and the MAGAs will have to go along with it, or they can just homeschool their kids to be morons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child)

    My American education, and that of everyone I’ve discussed the topic with, reamed stalin a mfing new one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    It may have a lot to do with the era you were educated, and where. Mine was the 60s and 70s, so the Cold War was always looming in the background of general life, but I honestly don't remember hearing much about it in school. I don't recall ever hearing Stalin's name in a class, other than as an ironic WW2 Ally.

    Also, every state creates its own educational curriculum, so American educations are very hit & miss, depending on what state you're from. I heard nothing about it, while your state might have emphasized it. I remember living in one place, and every year we had a history unit on Native Americans that had lived in our region. Then we moved to a different state, and I never heard another word about Native Americans. I was unhappy about that, because that was always my favorite part of history class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    the thing I love about tankies is they hate the US as much as I do 🥰

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    Tbh I love America to my core. This country is amazing, and if the government was fixed it would absolutely be the best country in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    oh yikes; you might be on the wrong instance there, too - I don't think loving America is consistent with being solarpunk, fyi

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Why is loving people and culture against solarpunk?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child)

    If someone claimed to be a solarpunk but said said they loved Nazi Germany, would you think there was some kind of inconsistency or hypocrisy there?

    Solarpunk is politically opinionated, it's not agnostic or neutral about its political and ethical positions (about climate, about colonialism, about capitalism, etc.) - solarpunk is very critical of the United States because of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I am not saying I love anything about the state, in fact I generally despise our state. You specifying Nazi Germany means you are referring to the state, otherwise one would just say Germany. Which, I also love the German people and culture. I also love virtually all peoples and cultures.

    Virtually all states are abhorrent actors. Very few if any have a clean record. Are all the anime fans against solarpunk because of Imperial Japan? All the classical music fans against solarpunk because of European colonialism? Should states stop us loving culture and people? Should I just give up on my love of the world because of stupid governments?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    I don't think any "tankie" is going to have their minds changed by this post. Unless they're a 90 year old Russian who has gone out of there way to avoid "western propaganda" they've already heard all these points a million times over.

    If anything posts like these reinforce their identity because they can dunk on them with their prepared rebuttals to all of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Nah, it's just the same as any other ideology - people follow it not because they're ignorant and don't know something, but because they expect a different outcome than you do, given the same inputs.

    Every ideology has weak spots.

    • Tankies can easily slip into left imperialism, which then locks them into an authoritarian trap and detaches them from reality on the ground
    • Regular socialists and communists are yet to balance the incentives in relation to the more ambitious individuals
    • Liberals are waging an impossible war against economic laws, trying to have a cake and eat it too (i.e. giving businesses incentives to grow while also fighting monopolies)
    • Conservatives are inevitably undermining the very workforce they rely on, checking just how much they can cut before people fall off

    Etc. etc.

    Yet everyone thinks they'll be able to manage the system in a way that always evades the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago*

    I'm sorry, no, they're definitely in a cult. Have you spoken to tankies here recently?

    which then locks them into an authoritarian trap and detaches them from reality on the ground

    You mean like a cult

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I had probably 10 times as many educational hours dedicated to Hitler and the Holocaust as I did learning about Stalin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Israel weaponized the Holocaust and drilled two falsehoods into everyone's head:

    1. Jews were the only victims.
    2. The Holocaust is a special genocide that hasn't happened before or since, is the worst crime in recorded history, and no one should dare question that.

    This allows them to genocide Palestinians while calling everyone who questions their ethno supremacist expansionist colonial project a Nazi.

    6 million Jews were murdered, out of 17 million victims.

    Genocide of Indigenous Americans (1492–1832): it is estimated that 90% of the indigenous population, amounting to over 55 million people, died due to violence, forced labor, and disease after European colonization.

    Mao Zedong (China, 1958–1961/1966–1969): Historians estimate that between 30-70 million people died due to famine, persecution, and forced labor during the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution.

    Mongol Conquests (13th Century): Under Genghis Khan, it is estimated that 30-60 million people were killed, representing about 10% of the world's population at the time.

    To name a few... Hitler was a monster, but he was hardly the worst monster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    Even if there are genocides worse than the holocaust. The entire point of the Nazis were to kill everyone eventually in order to create their dumb idea of an ubermench.

    Most genocides are about keeping power. But the holocaust was about creating a whole new humanity by killing anyone that wasn't blue eyed, blond haired super people. It would affect the entire world eventually. Definitely not just Jews.

    If we'd let them, the Nazis would have easily caused the worst genocide in human history, with no equal in reality except for the atrocities in sci fi like Warhammer 40k.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    All your life you’ve lived under capitalism and have been exposed to anti-communist propaganda, because to date communism has been the only successful alternative to capitalism.

    Somehow OP thinks that a lifetime of anti-communism isn’t enough anti-communism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    It's a natural pendulum moment. We are flooded with anticommunist propaganda, so when you start lifting up the curtain and seeing more and more of the lies, you can start wondering what else was a lie.

    That's the moment all sorts of ideologies jump out of the woodwork to recruit you, and given most of your education was a subjugating lie you probably don't have the tools to distinguish them that well.

    And that's how you end up with people denying the holocaust or thinking covid is fake or saying Stalin wasn't so bad actually.

    So as we're dismantling capitalism we're going to have to constantly help people find their footing in reality, including helping them reaffirm the parts of capitalist propaganda that were true enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

    Most of the focus is on how bad communism is, not how bad its leaders were.

    Edit: people are assuming that I took a stance vis-a-vis communism but I’m really talking about where western propaganda focuses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    *how bad a straw man version of communism is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    To be fair, having authoritarian government means you'll absolutely have an oppressive regime at some point.

    If anything, Stalin was the one to cement authoritarianism as the system of power in USSR and make sure it cannot be reverted without massive issues in the form of separatism, civil disobedience, and more. The subsequent leaders could only open the valve of democracy so much without breaking the country apart.

    So, it's not just leaders, it's the system of authoritarian power and imperialism. Communism and socialism must be democratic and directly managed by worker's councils, bottom to top (i.e. Soviet in its original sense), lest you fall into the same trap with any leader eventually.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 7 months ago

    You don't have to be a psychopath to obtain power, but it makes it easier. You do have to be a psychopath to want the power to murder indiscriminately.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Also crazy that he just died from a cerebral hemorrhage at the age of 74. If it weren’t for that, he’d probably have another 20 years in him.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    It's possible he was assassinated.

    People forget there was around a dozen actual documented assassination attempts, the first in 1931.

    That's always the problem with being in power, there's almost certainly someone who wants to get rid of you, but the more paranoid you behave about it the number of people who want you gone increases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't say that an alcoholic in his 70s who died from cerebral hemorrhaging was assassinated.

    Stalin spent the last 15-20 years of his life getting blackout drunk every single night. He also forced all of his top ministers and generals to join him in this drunkenness.

    The full story is wild.

    Then when Stalin died, everyone sort of knew that he was having a medical emergency, and they left him laying on the carpet to die for hours.

    Which is also a wild story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 79 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    Honestly, the guy was a real jerk.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    the more I read about this Hitler guy the more I don't like him

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Adolf Hitler? The art student?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Shocking, right? I was similarly surprised when I heard about the extracurriculars of Ted Kaczynski, the mathematician.

    Some people need better hobbies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    I disagree with a lot of Ted Kaczynski's reasoning in his manifesto. But he wasn't wrong that we are destroying the environment and letting consumerism ruin everything. Honestly, I think most of the people on this site would agree with his assessments even if he came to the conclusions under faulty assumptions.

    Half the people on this site are advocating for stochastic responses to the current U.S. government anyway. So whats the difference?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    "In politics, obtaining power and maintaining power justifies anything"

    I mean if that doesn't sum up most big name politicians I don't know what does.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (7 children)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niccol%C3%B2_Machiavelli

    wrote an influential book in 1500 to argue exactly the same point. it caused quite a lot of ruckus because it deviated from medieval philosophy where even kings had to adhere to morals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Read the book bro, that's not at all what he argues

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I think it was originally meant to be satire? I could be misremembering though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    No, I’m literally asking what he says; I’ve not read Machiavelli.

    There’s one dude saying “that’s what Machiavelli said!” then another saying “no it isn’t you cockforest” and now you saying that what he said is satirical.

    But what did he say?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 82 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Is this post satire?

    "Stalin was a communist leader inspired by Leon Trotsky"??? The two were massive rivals with completely different ideologies.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Joseph Stalin was a communist leader inspired by Leon Trotsky

    Obvious factual error in the first sentence. Sigh. They don't make nazis like they used to.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    while overly simplified - the statement is technically correct - Trotsky was a big proponent of state terror campaigns and disproportional use of force to quell civil unrest. Stalin took this framework and developed it further into fully functional system. Trotsky also started the camp system that evolved into GULAG. He was also very dismissive about comrade Coba and this arrogance eventually did him in and led to his exile and later assassination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    The prison system in the soviet union was pretty similar to the system in place by the tsar - gather the problems up, send them to siberia. A new system that gestates in the womb of the old will have to struggle to shake these things, or whatever marx said.

    but nah man, stalin invented prisons, go off

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    the tsarist prison system was nowhere near as elaborate and infrastructurally sophisticated as GULAG and it wasn't integrated into the economy so the comparison is dubious at best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Gulags were a practice that started under the tsar, deaths went down under soviet governance and eventually they ended it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    Not arguing for or against the gulag point but this graph doesn’t prove anything apart from the fact that in 40s-50s there were medical advancements that reduced mortality rate of prisoners (duh) Proof that works here would be number of prisoners in gulag per capita for example (which would paint completely different picture btw)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›