This seems to suggest that shitting on our allies, behaving erratically, and stabbing them in the back (and front) isn't the best way to build a broad coalition devoted to mutual interests, to say nothing of a narrow coalition devoted to obvious imperialism. I look forward to learning more about this hypothesis in The Art of the Deal 2.
post
This is really stupid, just from a strategic point of view, let alone from a moral or political perspective. Sending ships into the Strait just puts those ships in the line of fire...so, why would anyone actually agree to send ships there?
Iran has the "high ground" here. There is no way for ships to take back control of the Strait this way. All the US is doing, is asking allies to take losses for no reason.
My opinion is he knows ships will be sunk so he wants it to be someone else's ships. Let's not forget Iran has a ton of mini submarines probably sitting quietly waiting.
Or… he’s asking them to take losses because he doesn’t consider them allies. World conquest would be easier with the Chinese and UK navies out of the way.
The fact he included China is the funniest part. Chinese ships are already passing through the strait with Iran's blessing, why the fuck would they ever help lmfao
He really thinks the Chinese navy is going to help?
He loses nothing by asking….
I lose nothing by asking out Angelina Jolie but she's going to say no and I'm going to look like a twit.
He's lost any shred of credibility he might have had.
There is no way for ships to take back control of the Strait this way.
Yep. The only way to actually take control of the strait is a bunch of ships and occupying/controlling all the nearby land within drone/missile/artillery range.
As it should. NATO is a defense alliance, not a pedoking/kingbibi distraction gone bad. I hope the EU can keep holding on, because the influx into far right parties and EU election tampering has become noticeable enough to possibly change this in the future.
Why isn't the Orange ShitGoblin using the 'Board of Peace' to sort this trifling issue out?
The next world war is gonna be governments vs people. World civil war
I dislike increasingly elaborate insult names, absolutely no one who cares about it really needs convincing, they just make it unnecessarily long and random nonsensical jibberish. And I like mangos.
If they don't make any sense to you, you might be clueless. Two words, too "increasingly elaborate" for you, and one of them is literally used by the supporter's of whom I was referring to.
But what if they're hilarious, like Drumpf
/s
NATO only does humanitarian bombing.
Don't you laugh, damn you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia
"NATO framed its bombing as a humanitarian intervention"
A purely defensive humanitarian bombing, mind you, according to astute international affairs observer TheObviousSolution.
Now, let me tell you about a country called Russia. They don't do humanitarian bombings. That's quite silly of them since all they needed to do is "frame" it as such.
But what can you expect from a country that can apparently invade all of Europe with a single washing machine CPU.
Let's ask one related question so everyone can decide whether any argument here will be handled in good faith or not.
Do you believe Bosnian Serbs were commiting genocide?
Original conflict was about Kosovo. 1000 years of progroms by both Ottomans and Serbia to the region. Serbian claims of Albanian gangs doing mean stuff certainly had a basis. Serbian army intervening is like Russia defending Donbas, or like NATO intervention for Kosovo/Albania (both picking a side), and more legitimate than US recent bombing of Carribean fishing boats.
Fighting in Bosnia, even if groups had arms supply support from different sides is much harder to make the usual political BS warcrime accusations that comes from home grown political narratives, and political BS against specifically Bosnian Serbs is an extreme stretch that has never stopped US+Colonial empire scum before.
WHAT!! It was "ethnic cleansing". And what does NATO have to do with this? They have these humanity-loving impulses only in certain cases, it seems.
Sorry to offend your favorite country's pedoking ally that you had to go several decades into the past. Funny though, the love relationship between Trump and Putin, and how offended people like you seem to get when either are criticized.
NATO is a defense alliance. That it has or hasn't lived up to the designation isn't a good segue into your propaganda spins and attempts at talking bullshit about other users, it can be criticized when it hasn't just as it is being criticized now.
NATO was formed by america to control Europe as pawn against soviet union, it has nothing to do with defense.
NATO had many nazis as generals initially, had it been defence alliance they wouldve accepted soviet union in NATO just after WW2 when soviet union asked so, but no their whole intention was to make an enemy and fund lockheed martin
Death to NATO
The scary far right parties tend to be against NATO. CDU implemented all of the hateful anti-immigrant legislation the AfD wanted. Its those "pure liberal hearts" that want war on Russia, and digital ID surveillance.
Sorry bud, Russia launched the "three day" invasion of Ukraine, not the other way around. Digital ID surveillance, that's not party dependent, how blind do you have to be to not see Palantir over in the US. From the power hungry to the people seeing fake Internet theory work out in social networks, they all want "digital ID surveillance".
Good. Fuck the US, Israel and Trump. And fuck anyone and everyone that supports this pedophilic nazi piece of shit.
The United States needs a regime change
And a system change to boot. This is a symptom.
Personally I think this is a Yugoslavia type situation. Better to just dissolve it all and contain all the stupid shit to one country, who's the Serbia in this situation though since all the old regions of the US outside of the Carolinas are ambivalent at best towards this shit.
He is just looking for someone to be left holding the bag that he has already filled with shit.
Israel.
Israel is the perfect scapegoat on this, all trump has to do is pull his ships back and stop being a defense for Israel.
That's literally what the American Christian right has always wanted with their support of Israel too.
Their doomsday prophecy is:
-
Jewish ethnostate in Israel
-
War in the Middle East, started by Israel
-
Israel getting wiped off the map which causes the rapture
-
Nonbelivers have to experience Armageddon
Which was cool with Israel up to step 2, but we just passed that a few weeks ago...
Damn, wasn't it like 5 days ago he said he didn't need the Royal Navy?
Yes but reality and Trump have never been comfortable bedfellows. He claimed that Iran's entire naval fleet had been completely wiped out and it turns out it was just one ship they sunk. And now the world's most powerful military are apparently unable to secure a patch of water about 20 miles across.
If he had consulted his allies BEFORE starting this mess, he would now receive more than indifference and contempt.
After mistreating all of his allies, after humiliating Ukrainians in the Oval Office, and after saying he already won this thing multiple times, he keeps requesting others to take risks for him.
Other countries should wait for his navy to get there first before risking their ships and people.
Please stop sane-washing calling any of the military or government "his". It's supposed to be our government and our military. Don't let him normalize that it belongs to him.
until Congress authorizes a war with Iran (and they explicitly refused to restrict the 30 day do whatever you want authorization wrt Iran) it most definitely is "his". the Statesian people's representatives ceded their rights and responsibilities over the military to the despot.
The world should say "Drop the tariffs and we will talk"
Then say "No".
I'm not sure the American people have learned their lesson yet. I say let the Tariffs continue until they realize they should never elect another Republican again. I say that as an American paying for the tariffs. The answer should just be "No."
There's a very simple solution to it. The US fucks off. They've made things a lot worse for themselves and everyone else as it is, so pull out now and we'll all try figure out how to clean this mess up over the next year or two.
He's spent the last year alienating all of the United States' allies and in some cases, directly threatening their sovereignty. So of course nobody wants to get involved in his mess.
Why should any sane country even respond? This is an American-Israeli undertaking. They started it out of folly, they deal with it.
Maybe he should ask his "Board of Peace" for support. There are more than enough bootlickers.
Or the ships should simply follow the law of the seas: the country responsible for the ships' security in such cases is the one they are sailing under. Let's see how Panama, Nigeria, Philippines (or whatever is the cheapest flag of fancy at the moment) run to help.
Maybe some FIFA warships will do the trick 🤡🤡🤡👌🏻👌🏻😂😂 Sorry i can't... its the only way for me to digest this timeline xddd
If someone should protect the strait, its UAE, Saudi-Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and everyone who’s exports are dependent of it.
According to Iran, some of the strikes on those territories are black flag ops by Mossad/Israel. Israel would do this to keep GCC allied with "US mission". GCC is faced with choice of attacks by Iran or by axis of demonism. All of the countries you listed, KSA excepted, have outsourced their military to the US.
All of the countries you listed are opposed to the war, and would be thrilled with full cease fire, and Iran giving everyone permission to transit Gulf, and trade.
So we’re out of nato but we expect nato to help? Eat a brick trump
"CLEAN my MESS! CLEAN my MESS!"
So far, the US has not sent its own navy ships to escort tankers through the strait.
Then why would other countries send ships to help in a war that the United States of Israel started without consulting them??? Trump, again, shitting himself and expecting others to clean him.
Were we not in a trade war with everyone all year? Why would they help us? Should have got the details worked out before starting shit if you were going to need help you stupid orange fuck.
Technically the straight is vital for all countries. So Trump went and fucked the world with his war mongering. And countries may be wishing to workout a deal that if they help him, they get something if he is successful, but imo, that would be a mistake, since his agreements aren't worth shit.
So, to me, the only solution is to wait and see and leave trump on his own.
He will definitely use that later on and accuse of not helping etc... but thats fine. If countries do help, it wont score them with brownie points, because trump always wants more, so if he can back out of a deal, and you dont have much leverage to force him not to, he will just TACO right out of it.
I'd sooner help Iran secure the straight, and china, and bring the entire american economy to its knees, before I helped it win its war.
And if I ever DID consider sending ships, I'd ask for 20 billion$ up front, and once the check clears, i will send my ships.
Yeah, agreed, this sucks for everyone but if they help it will only enable him further and he'll have forgotten about it when he starts up on whatever the next distraction is. They'd be better off making a deal with Iran.
Ya, unfortunately Iran, Russia, China, these countries all suck as well. But Israel/US are a much more immediate threat. Unless you're Ukraine, as russia is obviously the more immediate threat, and you dont want to help Iran for that reason, since they are team russia, but I agree Trump should not be enabled. Let him waste his resources and Iran's and russia in a fight together, and we will pay the cost of inflation for it. It's not a bad deal.
I thought he had already won the war? Why does he need help again? We wouldn't be any help any way. We wouldn't be anywhere near the front lines according to him.
This looks like a job for the Board of Peace!
Apparently it’s illegal for US ships to escort foreign vessels. Seems hard to believe but if it is the case then Trump is really begging.
Apparently it’s illegal for US ships to escort foreign vessels.
And now the Trump regime suddenly cares what is and isn't legal!?!?
Apparently it’s illegal for US ships to escort foreign vessels.
Would be par for the course for Americans if it was illegal for their ships to help foreigners
I mean, the US escorted ships there during the Iran/Iraq war in the 1980s...
Can't ships change flag while at sea? That one taking stuff from south America to Russia carrying who knows what did a few months ago. So all the ship would be to do is declare itself American while it goes through the strait, the revert back to its original flag after.
Is that more illegal than bombing fishing boats? At any rate, just make the totally certain to be successful escort mission use US oil tankers and ships, because the US has so many ships to spare, and the mission is being done because they've totally won the war and no one can touch greatest military ever.
Trump’s attitude towards the entire world has been nothing but arrogant disrespect. He deserves the same in return.
top 100 comments