UK and Japan among countries that are considering options but yet to commit warships to blockaded shipping route

Countries including the UK, Japan, China and South Korea have said they are still considering their options but without making commitments after the US president, Donald Trump, urged them to send warships to the strait of Hormuz to secure the vital shipping route.

The effective closure of the strait of Hormuz by Tehran, in retaliation for airstrikes by the US and Israel, has proved catastrophic for global energy and trade flows, causing the largest oil supply disruption in history and soaring global oil prices.

However, the international response to Trump’s call for the dispatch of warships has so far proved vague and reluctant, with countries unwilling to commit to a military response that could prove treacherous for their navies.

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 220 points 7 months ago (12 children)

This seems to suggest that shitting on our allies, behaving erratically, and stabbing them in the back (and front) isn't the best way to build a broad coalition devoted to mutual interests, to say nothing of a narrow coalition devoted to obvious imperialism. I look forward to learning more about this hypothesis in The Art of the Deal 2.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Everyone is heavily incentivized to watch Trump sweat a bit more.

    I imagine there are very few leaders who wouldn't be happy to see Trump replaced.

    Why would we come to his aid to mitigate this catastrophic unforced error.

    The US has fucked everyone. I've literally been angry about it for a decade now.

    The dildo of consequence rarely arrives lubed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    There isn't a lot of reason for any world leaders to help Trump at the moment. Our strategic oil reserves had some oil in them, it's always a good idea to make sure you have lots of reserve oil before attacking an petrostate, so we can just sit it out for a couple of months.

    Also it takes time to ready a naval fleet they're not just sitting around on the off chance that some despotic old fart causes an international incident for literally no reason at all.

    So between taking the time to equip and it being strategically advantageous to hold off for a while no one's coming to help any time soon. Also the war is extremely unpopular with the public so there's not a lot of reason for international politicians to damage their reputations, it's not like Trump would be grateful.

    If Trump doesn't TACO in the next 6 months then maybe there will be some ships.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I don't think Trump really can TACO on this one. I'm certain that he would like to turn this one off but Iran will continue attacking US allies in the region.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    The economic situation will force Trump to negotiate with Iran or the general public will lynch him. Iran's big problem is that the Americans are attacking them so if they stopped doing that and went away Iran could spin it as a victory and Trump can just lie about it and claim that Iran gave massive concessions which never happened. It's not like MAGAs will fact check.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I dont think thats true at all.

    An external aggressor allows the Iranian regime to consolidate their support.

    I dont think they have much incentive to end this war.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    An easy offramp without resolving nuclear issue is the US will agree to leave if SoH shipping is open to all but Israel. Israel and Iran can make their own deal. This is harder to spin as a victory than buying Iran's uranium, but it's something Iran would agree to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    There isn't even "a nuclear issue" that's just a made-up nonsense story from the White House with absolutely no basis in fact.

    Does Iran want to develop nuclear weapons, well probably. Are they developing nuclear weapons, no.
    So what's the problem?

    In terms of a country likely to develop illicit nuclear weapons I would be much more concerned Israel ramping up their supply but surprise surprise Trump doesn't think that's a concern.

    The United States itself is well outside weapons range, it's not even clear that they could hit Northern Europe, (Cyprus is the most northernly target they've hit so far) so this war is only happening because the US has military forces in the region. If they just left, the war would end, by necessity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    While the real motive for Iran antagonism is to permit more Israel genocide and expansion, there is a lot of "political capital" invested in ending Iranian nuclear program. Buying Iran's uranium at a high price can satisfy both US victory over denuclearization, and Iran's demand for reparations as well as trade normalization.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    This is really stupid, just from a strategic point of view, let alone from a moral or political perspective. Sending ships into the Strait just puts those ships in the line of fire...so, why would anyone actually agree to send ships there?

    Iran has the "high ground" here. There is no way for ships to take back control of the Strait this way. All the US is doing, is asking allies to take losses for no reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Or… he’s asking them to take losses because he doesn’t consider them allies. World conquest would be easier with the Chinese and UK navies out of the way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    He really thinks the Chinese navy is going to help?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    He loses nothing by asking….

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    There is no way for ships to take back control of the Strait this way.

    Yep. The only way to actually take control of the strait is a bunch of ships and occupying/controlling all the nearby land within drone/missile/artillery range.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 7 months ago (22 children)

    As it should. NATO is a defense alliance, not a pedoking/kingbibi distraction gone bad. I hope the EU can keep holding on, because the influx into far right parties and EU election tampering has become noticeable enough to possibly change this in the future.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    The next world war is gonna be governments vs people. World civil war

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Isn't that what MAGA claims Jan. 6th was about? People are getting increasingly put into bubbles to work against their own countries by networks bought up by billionaires exactly for that purpose, and they are spinning it just as you have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I dislike increasingly elaborate insult names, absolutely no one who cares about it really needs convincing, they just make it unnecessarily long and random nonsensical jibberish. And I like mangos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    If they don't make any sense to you, you might be clueless. Two words, too "increasingly elaborate" for you, and one of them is literally used by the supporter's of whom I was referring to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    It's obvious, elaborate means that they're getting longer and varied and more contrived. We don't need a million variations of insults for someone that is already reviled.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (9 children)

    NATO only does humanitarian bombing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Don't you laugh, damn you.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia

    "NATO framed its bombing as a humanitarian intervention"

    A purely defensive humanitarian bombing, mind you, according to astute international affairs observer TheObviousSolution.

    Now, let me tell you about a country called Russia. They don't do humanitarian bombings. That's quite silly of them since all they needed to do is "frame" it as such.

    But what can you expect from a country that can apparently invade all of Europe with a single washing machine CPU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Let's ask one related question so everyone can decide whether any argument here will be handled in good faith or not.

    Do you believe Bosnian Serbs were commiting genocide?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    Original conflict was about Kosovo. 1000 years of progroms by both Ottomans and Serbia to the region. Serbian claims of Albanian gangs doing mean stuff certainly had a basis. Serbian army intervening is like Russia defending Donbas, or like NATO intervention for Kosovo/Albania (both picking a side), and more legitimate than US recent bombing of Carribean fishing boats.

    Fighting in Bosnia, even if groups had arms supply support from different sides is much harder to make the usual political BS warcrime accusations that comes from home grown political narratives, and political BS against specifically Bosnian Serbs is an extreme stretch that has never stopped US+Colonial empire scum before.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    Sorry to offend your favorite country's pedoking ally that you had to go several decades into the past. Funny though, the love relationship between Trump and Putin, and how offended people like you seem to get when either are criticized.

    NATO is a defense alliance. That it has or hasn't lived up to the designation isn't a good segue into your propaganda spins and attempts at talking bullshit about other users, it can be criticized when it hasn't just as it is being criticized now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    NATO was formed by america to control Europe as pawn against soviet union, it has nothing to do with defense.

    NATO had many nazis as generals initially, had it been defence alliance they wouldve accepted soviet union in NATO just after WW2 when soviet union asked so, but no their whole intention was to make an enemy and fund lockheed martin

    Death to NATO

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The scary far right parties tend to be against NATO. CDU implemented all of the hateful anti-immigrant legislation the AfD wanted. Its those "pure liberal hearts" that want war on Russia, and digital ID surveillance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Sorry bud, Russia launched the "three day" invasion of Ukraine, not the other way around. Digital ID surveillance, that's not party dependent, how blind do you have to be to not see Palantir over in the US. From the power hungry to the people seeing fake Internet theory work out in social networks, they all want "digital ID surveillance".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 7 months ago*

    Good. Fuck the US, Israel and Trump. And fuck anyone and everyone that supports this pedophilic nazi piece of shit.

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The United States needs a regime change

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    And a system change to boot. This is a symptom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Personally I think this is a Yugoslavia type situation. Better to just dissolve it all and contain all the stupid shit to one country, who's the Serbia in this situation though since all the old regions of the US outside of the Carolinas are ambivalent at best towards this shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    He is just looking for someone to be left holding the bag that he has already filled with shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Israel.

    Israel is the perfect scapegoat on this, all trump has to do is pull his ships back and stop being a defense for Israel.

    That's literally what the American Christian right has always wanted with their support of Israel too.

    Their doomsday prophecy is:

    1. Jewish ethnostate in Israel

    2. War in the Middle East, started by Israel

    3. Israel getting wiped off the map which causes the rapture

    4. Nonbelivers have to experience Armageddon

    Which was cool with Israel up to step 2, but we just passed that a few weeks ago...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 41 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Damn, wasn't it like 5 days ago he said he didn't need the Royal Navy?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    Yes but reality and Trump have never been comfortable bedfellows. He claimed that Iran's entire naval fleet had been completely wiped out and it turns out it was just one ship they sunk. And now the world's most powerful military are apparently unable to secure a patch of water about 20 miles across.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    If he had consulted his allies BEFORE starting this mess, he would now receive more than indifference and contempt.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 7 months ago

    I thought he didn't need any help with the war he had already won?

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    After mistreating all of his allies, after humiliating Ukrainians in the Oval Office, and after saying he already won this thing multiple times, he keeps requesting others to take risks for him.

    Other countries should wait for his navy to get there first before risking their ships and people.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Please stop sane-washing calling any of the military or government "his". It's supposed to be our government and our military. Don't let him normalize that it belongs to him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    until Congress authorizes a war with Iran (and they explicitly refused to restrict the 30 day do whatever you want authorization wrt Iran) it most definitely is "his". the Statesian people's representatives ceded their rights and responsibilities over the military to the despot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    The world should say "Drop the tariffs and we will talk"

    Then say "No".

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not sure the American people have learned their lesson yet. I say let the Tariffs continue until they realize they should never elect another Republican again. I say that as an American paying for the tariffs. The answer should just be "No."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago

    There's a very simple solution to it. The US fucks off. They've made things a lot worse for themselves and everyone else as it is, so pull out now and we'll all try figure out how to clean this mess up over the next year or two.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago

    Not completely muted. Spain and italy made it very clear how they felt.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    He's spent the last year alienating all of the United States' allies and in some cases, directly threatening their sovereignty. So of course nobody wants to get involved in his mess.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Why should any sane country even respond? This is an American-Israeli undertaking. They started it out of folly, they deal with it.

    Maybe he should ask his "Board of Peace" for support. There are more than enough bootlickers.

    Or the ships should simply follow the law of the seas: the country responsible for the ships' security in such cases is the one they are sailing under. Let's see how Panama, Nigeria, Philippines (or whatever is the cheapest flag of fancy at the moment) run to help.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    If someone should protect the strait, its UAE, Saudi-Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and everyone who’s exports are dependent of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    According to Iran, some of the strikes on those territories are black flag ops by Mossad/Israel. Israel would do this to keep GCC allied with "US mission". GCC is faced with choice of attacks by Iran or by axis of demonism. All of the countries you listed, KSA excepted, have outsourced their military to the US.

    All of the countries you listed are opposed to the war, and would be thrilled with full cease fire, and Iran giving everyone permission to transit Gulf, and trade.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    So we’re out of nato but we expect nato to help? Eat a brick trump

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    "CLEAN my MESS! CLEAN my MESS!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago

    So far, the US has not sent its own navy ships to escort tankers through the strait.

    Then why would other countries send ships to help in a war that the United States of Israel started without consulting them??? Trump, again, shitting himself and expecting others to clean him.

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Were we not in a trade war with everyone all year? Why would they help us? Should have got the details worked out before starting shit if you were going to need help you stupid orange fuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    Technically the straight is vital for all countries. So Trump went and fucked the world with his war mongering. And countries may be wishing to workout a deal that if they help him, they get something if he is successful, but imo, that would be a mistake, since his agreements aren't worth shit.

    So, to me, the only solution is to wait and see and leave trump on his own.

    He will definitely use that later on and accuse of not helping etc... but thats fine. If countries do help, it wont score them with brownie points, because trump always wants more, so if he can back out of a deal, and you dont have much leverage to force him not to, he will just TACO right out of it.

    I'd sooner help Iran secure the straight, and china, and bring the entire american economy to its knees, before I helped it win its war.

    And if I ever DID consider sending ships, I'd ask for 20 billion$ up front, and once the check clears, i will send my ships.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, agreed, this sucks for everyone but if they help it will only enable him further and he'll have forgotten about it when he starts up on whatever the next distraction is. They'd be better off making a deal with Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Ya, unfortunately Iran, Russia, China, these countries all suck as well. But Israel/US are a much more immediate threat. Unless you're Ukraine, as russia is obviously the more immediate threat, and you dont want to help Iran for that reason, since they are team russia, but I agree Trump should not be enabled. Let him waste his resources and Iran's and russia in a fight together, and we will pay the cost of inflation for it. It's not a bad deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I thought he had already won the war? Why does he need help again? We wouldn't be any help any way. We wouldn't be anywhere near the front lines according to him.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    This looks like a job for the Board of Peace!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Apparently it’s illegal for US ships to escort foreign vessels. Seems hard to believe but if it is the case then Trump is really begging.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Apparently it’s illegal for US ships to escort foreign vessels.

    Would be par for the course for Americans if it was illegal for their ships to help foreigners

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Can't ships change flag while at sea? That one taking stuff from south America to Russia carrying who knows what did a few months ago. So all the ship would be to do is declare itself American while it goes through the strait, the revert back to its original flag after.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Is that more illegal than bombing fishing boats? At any rate, just make the totally certain to be successful escort mission use US oil tankers and ships, because the US has so many ships to spare, and the mission is being done because they've totally won the war and no one can touch greatest military ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago

    Trump’s attitude towards the entire world has been nothing but arrogant disrespect. He deserves the same in return.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    2 comments in c/world view that post