βthatβs just how Iβve always done itβ is the worst when it's used as an excuse to avoid putting effort into personal growth
post
I will not install your shitty app
If someone is trying to sell me on a cafe or restaurant by saying, 'Yeah, it's kind of expensive, but there are great deals on the app...' it's no dice from me.
The worst are the sites that just redirect you to the play/app store when visiting on mobile.
I'm surely NOT installing your fucking app after you give me a bad experience (by not showing me the content I've received a link to) while I'm a "guest visitor" to your site.
I have my main phone browser set to automatically request the desktop version of whatever I visit, so I havenβt run into this. Does it happen a lot?
One example I know is Instagram, here's an example. Can't click anywhere without being redirected to the play store.
I don't use it, it's just the first that came to my mind, but in the rare cases someone sends me a link to it I can't really view what they sent me because of this. And I surely won't make an account just to see a meme or some shit.
This is a setting in your browser.
I have opening apps automatically disabled for places where I have multiple accounts.
So real.
If I hear "I'm sure meta is a good company that will treat your data respectfully." one more time!
In relation to your hill: While you're entirely correct, that's absurdly small potatoes compared to industrial water use. Yes, we should be conscious of our water use and limit unnecessary overuse, but a higher priority ought to be regulating industrial use. Data centers are the obvious example of using way too much for bullshit that ain't worth the water or power. Speaking of power, we could reduce water use by power plants. Nearly all generate power by boiling water. I'm a power plant operator at a plant that happens to use reclaim water as our source water, and we purify on-site for the main process, and we have a brine concentrator and crystallizer on-site to recycle the cooling tower blowdown and remove the solids to a dumpster that goes to a landfill. Unfortunately we burn methane, so I can't say that we're green, but we at least discharge zero water into local waterways (except storm drains when it rains).
My hill: Vote with your wallet. If you really believe in something, stop giving money to companies fighting against it. I won't buy chikfila because the owners actively spend money on gay conversion camps and lobby to reverse the legality of same sex marriage. It's impossible to research every little thing before every purchase, and sometimes there's no reasonable alternative, but something like chikfila is easy to avoid. There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, but don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Little changes can add up, and doing anything even a little bit better is an improvement over not trying.
Bonus hill: Put your fucking grocery cart into the cart corral. It takes ten seconds and prevents cars from getting hit. It's kind of the simplest measure for societal decency. I don't believe in the death penalty, but what value are you contributing to society if you're too selfish to return your fucking cart?
www.Goodsuniteus.com is a start to seeing where your money goes. Still looking for a better alternative.
The good news is as the giant evil corporations buy up everything it gets easier to just stop buying shit in general.
Good idea, but they collect subpoenable data and nag about installing the app. Why do they need my data?
From Wallet Voting by Cory Doctrow:
Wallet-votes always go to the people with the thickest wallets, and statistically, that is not you.
It doesn't mean to keep shopping at Amazon if you hate their business practices, it just means that you & your friends won't have any impact on Amazon's business policies.
Granted, you'd be a hypocrite, so definitely don't shop where you hate, but don't expect a giant corp to change.
I read that link and I'm not sure I understand Doctorow's reasoning on the subject. I typically find people that dismiss voting with their wallet fundamentally misunderstand microeconomics but either way, both points (yours and mine) are definitely not hills I'd die on.
I think the general point is that the financial hurt that I can put on a company is peanuts compared to someone with deep pockets (ie: shareholders & businesses). Even if I were to get all my friends, family and direct coworkers to alter a shopping behaviour, it's unlikely to result in any change.
On the other hand, if I were to take that same group and be able to pressure my political representatives to do something about it (as we frequently see in California), then something may change. Similarly, me quitting my job out of disgust with a non-recycling policy won't get any attention, but if I can get my union to take it up, then the company will listen.
TL;DR: a person can't make change, a group of people can.
Love the drops-fill-buckets mindset!
Piggy backing on your comment: for folks wanting to put their money to more ethical use, here are some resources:
- Change your banking account: https://bank.green/
- Donate to charities: https://www.charitynavigator.org/
- Vote for right candidates: https://www.lcv.org/congressional-scorecard/
- Join the SHIFT is a general one for climate stuff: https://jointheshift.earth/
These are mostly US and climate focused resources since that's where I am. Would love to see other people's resources too!
I want to share my photos of our trip with you, but I don't want you to upload them to Google, or apple, or amazon, or meta, or any social media.
If it's a pic of you, fine, do whatever you want. But please don't take my whole album and store it in your google photos.
Edit: to maybe disambiguate, I go on a trip with someone else, we both take photos/videos using our own devices, and then afterwards we are exchanging what we took. Not like, me sharing photos with someone who didn't even go on the trip.
Seems a bit creepy doing that..
Taking a car for a 3km distance is unconscionable when walking or cycling are valid options.
Driving less than the speed limit will not kill you.
My biggest pet peeve is people who scalp their lawns and spray shit all over it to make it green and kill the bugs. If it didn't kill the buggies 'n stuff I wouldn't care so much but I'd still think it's dumb cause all they need to do is not mow so aggressively and plant some clover to fix the nitrogen. Like their lawn needs less maintenance not more. Stop fucking spraying shit all over your lawn please AAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
Dating apps are inherently dehumanizing
They're also profit-incentivized to keep people single and on their platform for as long as possible.
Most of them are also owned by a single company. Match Group inc. Some of the more notable ones are:
- Her
- Hinge
- Match.com
- OkCupid
- Plenty of Fish
- Tinder
As well as most of the _ People Meet apps. Ie:
- Black people meet
- Democratic people meet
- Republican people meet
- Latino people meet
- etc
So it is no coincidence that these apps suck.
I think Bernie was an idealist and I donβt buy in to a lot of his ideas while appreciating his work to create real change. Donβt crucify me for this.
I wholeheartedly believe there is an alternate timeline where Bernie won the 2016 democratic nomination and won the presidency and we avoided all this shit.
you are willing to die on this hill, but not through crucifixion?
I think I agree, but I really don't think it matters. What, are Trump's ideas coherent or something? What I trust is Bernie's overall intent. He's kind of unique in this way because of his decades of consistent political sctivism. Had Bernie been elected in 2016 somehow and we got 8 years of Bernie, the US would still be a capitalist society. It just might be slightly better one.
I think a great example of naive ideas that have dominated political discussion on the left is student loan forgiveness. Like I'm not opposed - if PPP loan forgiveness is acceptable then student loan forgiveness is infinitely more acceptable. No brainer. But the complete lack of discussion about structural reform to the college tuition situation that causes people to need such huge student loans in the first place makes me think that the whole issue was to some extent controlled opposition.
You could have gotten 100 percent student loan forgiveness - the whole thing passed and done and student loans would immediately start to pile up again the next day. Probably even higher tuition too.
To secure your stuff. Hacking and social engineering are both easier than you think and identity theft is devastating. I know most people here already know that, but having worked in tech support, it's unbelievably common to skip even the basics, not to mention my grandparents who think I'm just paranoid.
Even if you are paranoid it can happen to you
Sadly, paying attention isnβt always enoughβ¦
Keep right except to pass. The passing lane is for passing.
When I was driving in Mexico, I learned this is possible! They're very consistent with this.
California (not sure about other US states) on the other hand ... people will purposely drive in the left lane, block traffic, and then get mad at you when you pass them on the right.
Using AI is amoral and I will never use it. As a programmer, every day it feels like I'm increasingly the minority.
You cannot use an unethical mimicry tool in an ethical way. You are asking a theft engine to create for you based on others work.
I remember when I was a child and I first got experience with computers. I saw how file systems worked and thought to myself "wow I should structure my own mind this way so I can try to think as well as a computer can!". I may have autism.
AI is the exact opposite. Taking something beautiful, clear, clean, organized, efficient, definitive. And inserting all the messy, sloppy, uncertain, unreproducible aspect of our bloody electric meat brains. It's a move in the opposite direction of where I think humanity should be going.
don't give up. you are not alone. patience is key and the time where deep understanding of technology will become essential again
Damned if you do and damned if you don't. Utilize the tools or you'll end up unemployed.
In all honesty, I don't think I could live with myself and, at least currently, think I'd rather find a new career path.
Everyone deserves health care. And a decent place to live. Even people without jobs!
Could be differentiated in basic needs vs national residents rights.
You'd just need to authenticate yourself as being from the country and then you get the usual care.
Foreigners get the basic needs and anything beyond needs to be compensated by themself or their insurance.
Aka: As it's already done.
[off topic]
Have you tried replacing the grass with local flora?
Also, what your family uses is a drop in the bucket compared to what your local industry wastes.
There are probably a dozen or more open air, private swimming pools that sit filled, full of chemicals, and unused 350 days a year, within walking distance of your place.
I checked out the gym near me, lifetime, who charge $330 a month. They have a heated Olympic size swimming pool outdoors year-round, in a climate that gets a fair amount of snow in the winter. So thatβs what rich people do with our resources.
As far as water, yeah. Even in very arid places, itβs permitted to do agriculture to grow things like hay and use 80% of the local water supply. Even better, thereβs a trend in the US where people from places like Saudi Arabia grow the hay, use our water, and then export it.
The people at that gym aren't 'rich.'
The rich folks are the ones with their own Olympic sized pools.
Itβs just a matter of degree. Sure, we could take someone who has a net worth of $30 million and say well, thatβs nothing, some people have 30 billion. People who are paying over $300 a month for a gym membership have a lot more money than people who are trying to afford $25 a month.
A frog is much bigger than an ant.
Both get crushed by a bulldozer.
The 0.01% are the 'rich.'
No, those are the super rich. Say I'm battling some powers on a local level. I have a net worth of $120k and an income of $45k a year. They have a $3 million ranch, net worth of $15 million, basically own the local sheriff and town council. But they're not "rich" because there's someone elsewhere with more money than them?
Iβm very anti-lawn and would love replacing it with native wild flowers. We unfortunately donβt own the house, a friend does. I may throw down some clover seed, which uses less water as a small defiant act.
And, yes, our city has the pools, at least a dozen 18 hole golf courses and three day a week watering. Absurd since weβre on the verge of drought every year. Hopefully the powers that be known what theyβre doing
I ditched my smartphone over 5 years ago, and will NEVER go back. In fact, I don't have a phone of any kind. They are surveillance/psyop devices, and they are turning people into biological robots. The scifi show Dollhouse is basically where this is all heading.
my hill: when i post an asklemmy, i place my answer as a comment, so the thread doesn't become a bunch of replies to my personal answer, so each reply to the post relates directly to the original question
The Sound of Music is not a Christmas movie.
My wife and her family and a whole bunch of Canadians all think it is and I am so flummoxed by it.
I love that movie but itβs the first time Iβm hearing it being referred to as a Christmas movie. Iirc there isnβt even any Christmas celebration in it?
I'll stand over here on my hill and say that Return to Oz IS a Christmas movie.
I havenβt seen it! What makes it a Christmas movie?
I like the theory that the fellowship of the ring is a Christmas movie because if you read the books, they use a Gregorian calendar and if you add up travel time etc, apparently you can prove that the fellowship left Rivendell on December 25!
I hate doing dishes like that anyway. I just scrub them one at a time under running water after letting them soak in whatever water can fill in. I donβt really think of the sink as a sanitary item regardless of how much you clean it. The drain is always going to be gross.
There is no free will. None whatsoever.
Kinda true though. Free will is just an illusion, but who cares because the illusion works well enough for me.
What does it mean to truly have free will?
Your brain is billions of electrically-reactive cells and interconnections, and your consciousness is electrical impulses shimmering around those cells in a more or less stable way.
A belief in free will implies the belief that you essentially have control over the physical mechanism that makes up you. A brain may not be a fully deterministic machine in the sense that a certain input condition may not always result in the same output, but it seems like a stretch to say that "you" both directly result from and directly control that mechanism.
People should be able to transfer their vote of their first preference didn't win. Sorry democrats, being forced to vote for you isnt democracy.
Suits are weird, they feel old and out dated, like cosplaying a 20th century business boy in grandpa's pajamas. Multiple layered long sleeve shirt, jacket, and trousers doesn't make sense for the majority of weather in most cities or even more if you're inside temp controlled buildings more often. In the winter you want something heavier like denim or fleece lined or water resistant, and in the summer you want breathable fabric, wicking, single layer, shorts, etc. Overcoats don't need backup jackets, and some of the people who did wear it like a uniform last century weren't people you'd want to emulate.
ALL information, except what you can hold in your brain, should be 100% public, with no limits on use.
An unimaginable concept right now, but I think it is essential if we hope to ever trust each other and achieve global peace.
Iβll take your RSA encryption keys, thanks
Then artists could not create anything as a job.
Art doesn't need to be a job.
They certainly could. Authenticity and originality become what is valued. Everything being public means you will know who is the original.
No, because if the information is public domain, then anyone can freely copy and redistribute it. Nobody could incent anything, because as soon as you do, its public, and anyone can copy it. Nobody could create unique software, because anyone could copy it.
If an artist or creator has a unique original idea, then in your system, it is automatically public, and free for anyone to copy and redistribute.
Nobody will give a shit who the original is, if they can get the exact same thing for cheap or for free.
In the 90s, everyone knew who the original artists for music was. They still all downloaded it for free, because they could, and it was not even legal.
So, i'm afraid you're living in a fantasy world with this idea.
Intellectual property is important. But, I think it is too highly enforced in some cases and not enough in others. For example, I believe it should be the law that anyone could make an operating system fully compatible with windows, and that windows should be force to provide all information to allow that, as otherwise they have an unjust monopoly.
There are other cases like that, like, I believe every nation should make it mandatory that all social media algorithms are publicly declared, able to be copied, and able to be tested to make sure the declared algorithm is correct. This way they cant be biased to brainwash people.
But your idea goes too far, as it completely.destroys anybody's ability to make profit off ideas.
The result will be that people keep ideas to themselves.
top 90 comments