misleading cover (media.piefed.zip)
🀣 1

top 74 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 84 points 8 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 70 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    There's a market out there for literally any kind of smut you can think of. It might be a small market, but there will be a market.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago*

    There's a market hungry for smut about literary agents who reject manuscripts for Amazon prime printing being pounded up the butt by their own rejected manuscripts. If you can think it, Doctor Chuck Tingle has written it being pounded up the butt. I think that's rule 34L

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    An overwhelming amount of booktok/bookstagram (and their mentally challenged brother, bookbook, close relative of Moon Moon) is very much in love with e.g. Morning Glory Milking Farm.

    WARNING: Look that book up at your own peril. You've been warned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    From what I heard that book is actually surprisingly tame and wholesome

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Compared to some dark romance? Sure. I mean, very, very few things will top the femur scene in I Will Break You (the trigger warnings specifying "inappropriate use of thigh bone" were NOT joking), so compared, indeed tame.

    But for your average non-smut reader, there's a lot of emphasis on... milking.

    Though still not as full of smut as e.g. Kiss Of The Basilisk. Which is like, 98% pure porn.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 52 points 8 months ago

    This is fantastic. Thanks for posting the reddit link, which has now been edited further:

    EDIT 2: Apparently I also owe an apology to the small (but vocal) contingent who really wanted this to be minotaur smut. I'm doing my part. Now get typing.

    Be the change you want to see in the world.

    And the linked thread is basically a writing competition that the author is hosting with a $100 prize. The title is "Announcing the 2026 Beefhammer Prize For Excellence in Minotaur Erotica". Lovely!

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    Fantasy smut sells! This dude could make fucking millions off this. I would rewrite the whole thing if I were him.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    roll a D8, the result determines the outcome of your conversation:

    1. the minotaur fucks you
    2. you fuck the minotaur
    3. the minotaur attacks you
    4. a trap door opens under you dropping you into a sex dungeon
    5. the minotaur starts crying (you monster)
    6. the minotaur proposes
    7. you trip and accidentally stab the minotaur to death (you monster)
    8. the minotaur fucks you

    I'd play the shit out of that game

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago* (5 children)

    That's literally just the text adventure video game Corruption of Champions (CoCs). The sci-fi version is Trials in Tainted Space (TiTS).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    ....is that real or a clever pun you just made up? I really want to know without using Google.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I don't understand what they were thinking

    "The Staff: A Different Kind of RPG", and the picture is a naked minotaur looking down at a topless buff dude.

    You might as well have called it "The Really Big Dick: This Aint For Kids" and had the minotaur's cock on the dude's head. That's the only way it could possibly have been any more suggestive.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The drawing is super suggestive, that Minotaur is ripped, face looking down while his chest pump up showing physical dominance while his "enemy" with his height only achieving the bare minimum to cover his massive huge humongous...personality

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Also the title is literally called "The Staff"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    It's cute that he thought "Gay Minotaur Sex" would be a brand new sentence somehow.

    My sweet, sweet summer child...

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

    I didn't even have to search much...

    Minotaur Smut

    My motto is if a thing has a hole or a pole someone wrote about fucking it. I say "it", because whatever it is can be an anthropomorphic toaster. Probably called "Hot Toasted Love" or "Butter my Bread".


    Edit:, now I started down a dark rabbit hole... Which is also fucked in a book most likely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Chuck "Pounded in the butt by my book "Pounded in the butt by my own butt"" Tingle is cheating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Ouch. Seriously, what was he thinking with that cover. Or the artist for that matter. Should have shopped it out to at least one friend and asked β€œbased on the cover, what do you think this is about?”

    I mean the name literally has β€œThe Staff” in it!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    He's upset because everyone made the wrong assumption, it's actually a story about a sentient staff that gets revenge for being used as a sounding rod for 30 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Well then judging by the title it's about a group of coworkers?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago

    Oh god, I’m launching! I’m launching!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    "Jason knew that this was beyond him. And some deep inside him rose. A deep knowing that he could take this the minataur. Sterlingly strong, the minataur stood with a knowing going in his eyes. This wasn't his first rodeo. "Don't fail me now" Jason thought as he gripped his staff ever tighter."

    "The minataur thrust himself at Jason. A tangled mess of limbs and horns, they jostled for position. Jason held the minataur's head down by the horns. "I've got you now" as he moved to thrust his staff deep inside the ... The world a twirl, Jason found himself on his back, lurching. Something gored him and the man-beast had struck the first blow. He had never felt anything like this before. The power. The grace. The yearning for release. He was no longer in control. When was the last time he wasn't in control?"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • don't think its gonna sell as good with a different cover. also "A NOVEL NOT ABOUT GAY MINOTAUR SEX?" should be its byline

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    I feel like I want to start minutar smut now

  • source
  • I'm not convinced that there isn't a whole lot of gay minotaur sex in this book.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I kinda see a bat's face in the thumbnail

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Why is the minotaur's left "leg" purple and engorged?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    The Ε taff

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    You need to include tags. I don't read fanfic but they probably have a tag for sex-free writing. Assuming there is any.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 8 months ago* (11 children)

    Reading gooner "literature" needs to be shamed, at least when it's read in public. It shouldn't be as popular as it is, I'll tell you that.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    This company has existed since the 1940s; reading erotica is not even remotely a new phenomenon and you're fighting a losing battle if you think you're going to change that. Maybe you should instead get comfortable with the fact that a healthy sexual appetite is normal and people have been engaging in various forms of mental masturbation since literally the dawn of humanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    There's a difference between writing things to satisfy a "healthy sexual appetite" and some of the honestly disgusting and insane things that get published. I guess I'm more against literary depravity (like shit involving falling in love with your rapist or family stuff, many Wattpad stories are like that) than I am against just erotica.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    The question is where do you draw the line? I'm sure that in Victorian times, something like sex with the lights on or anything not heterosexual is

    the honestly disgusting and insane things that get published

    and

    literary depravity

    I think a better question is how do we prevent people from getting hurt in real life, not what do you personally find disgusting. I personally cannot watch horror, pimple-popping, even had to look away during some action movies because I think the injury shown in these is disgusting, I actually have a pretty visceral reaction to it, but I don't argue for these things that will live rent-free in my head in a negative way to stop existing for everyone. I just don't consume it, and ask people to tag content appropriately if I see it untagged. But of course, if you injure a person in real life and not just on film or a book, then by all means throw the book at them.

    I do get your discomfort with seeing things in public. I wouldn't want the shot of the slasher in the middle of violently killing someone on the public ad. I think if it's got a visual component do not show it in public, but if it's text you are probably too close to the other person's book/phoneβ€”I don't try to snoop on strangers in public and still sometimes see what is on their phones, but I don't look long enough to read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    It's brain poison, and you can waste your time with things that are not nearly as depraved. Stop your perspectivism, at some point these things are just morally wrong and shouldn't be published (any literature that praises/paints in a good light things like rape, assault, abuse, etc just because it makes people wet). Do I think it's a big thing overall? No, because this is porn for women and women aren't outside murdering and raping, that's almost entirely the domain of men. I do think that, especially for those that come from an amoral, postmodern culture and that never knew what it's like to have a proper male role model, or what male love should be like because their fathers either weren't at home or were confused and amoral, it can be somewhat dangerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    What you find disgusting some will find normal, and what you find normal some will find disgusting. You do not get to be the arbiter of morality for me any more than I get to be the arbiter of morality for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    No, that's nonsense, things are or aren't more on the side of virtue than vice and vice versa. If you wanna stand for rape, abuse, coercion, weird age gaps, bestiality, etc. in your literature because it turns you on, that's you, but it's depraved. And we all get to speak about it, and you don't have to agree with what I'm saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Literature seems a safe space to explore taboo and challenging ideas to me. Do you carry this same standard for violence* in media? Plenty of books feature grotesque depictions of violence and gore which similarly seeks to titillate, just perhaps not sexually; do you think we should be sounding the alarm on violence in media as well?

    edit: non-sexual violence, to be clear, as you seem to be focusing on rape fantasy in fiction which is, of course, itself violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    No ideas are being challenged by these low-brow smut books, come on, it's just literary porn. Sometimes considering heretical thoughts is the path to enlightenment, but this isn't relevant when discussing porn, lol. The difference between these books is whether it allows for people to fantasize about unhealthy, morally questionable kinks and maybe even normalize the things I talked about in the previous post, or not, that's it. And yes, there's a limit to everything, I also oppose positively framing pointless non-sexual violence, or just having it in for pleasure/titillation, ofc, who wouldn't?

  • source
  • parent