top 90 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 66 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Not reviewed in this eval:

  • DeltaChat (though would likely score similar to Signal with more points for decentralization)
  • IRC
  • XMPP
  • Lemmy/PieFed/Nodebb (if he's going to include Discourse..)
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Some other alternatives not reviewed:

    • Spacebar
    • TeamSpeak
    • Root
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago*

    Spacebar sounded really promising when I checked them out years ago.

    The big Discord.com features currently left unimplemented or with partial implementations are: Voice/Video support (WebRTC protocol support implemented, but lacking UDP protocol implementation)

    Unfortunately, seems like it’s still not at a point where it could cover basic Discord functionality.

    Edit: I should be clear, I’m not trying to discourage it. I really hope it succeeds to the goal of parity with Discord! Love to hear from someone who has used it a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it was immediately clear based on the scoring that he was super biased toward Discourse. It's not a Discord alternative, and had no place in that list at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    I mean, it certainly is an alternative to all three morons using discord as some sort of forum for an app or similar. The same way discord is the worst for easily searchable info like a forum is basically the converse for discourse. And exactly the opposite for real time chat obviously.

    He at least mentions outright it's a forum tool. The real problem is having to include it because people misuse discord.

    Kind of like anyone using SharePoint for anything. It's not meant for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Why is SimpleX not mentioned anywhere in the article or the comments here? I thought it is similar to Discord. Am I wrong?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    Not a single reference to Zulip either (edit: I meant in the comments on this thread)

    Personally, I really want Matrix to succed though, hope this discord diaspora (?) gives them enough push to smooth their problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 117 points 9 months ago (21 children)

    Top three are:

    1. Discourse
    2. Rocket.chat
    3. Matrix
  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 167 points 9 months ago (16 children)

    I don't really see how someone can position Discourse as the number one Discord alternative. Surely most people looking to ditch Discord want live chat, audio/video calls, and screen sharing... Or am I just in the minority here?

    For the record, I think Discourse looks awesome and even thinking about how I might use it for a project, but I do not see it as a Discord alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Lots of communities use discord as a replacement for a forum despite it not being fit for it at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Sure, but that’s not an argument for replacing Discord with forums. The two serve entirely different use cases, and should be treated like two entirely separate products.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Isn’t it though? A forum wouldn’t do all the things discord does, but the argument is that trying to use discord for a forum was a mistake in the first place. So replacing discord with a forum and then a dedicated chatting app makes sense, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I think we’re essentially saying the same thing in different ways. Yes, I 100% agree that forums should be separate from whatever the new Discord replacement ends up being.

    I was more arguing that we can’t only use forums to replace Discord, because the realtime communication aspect would be a different use case. I’ve seen lots of “lol just use forums” types of posts, which completely ignore the realtime side of things. There would still need to be some service to replace the realtime aspects that Discord does serve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Although there is some kind of fun with "real time chatting" on a forum. Back then, It kind of became that way when it got heated. It's like a turn based game where all the players take their moves and execute at the same time lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I thought Discourse was bought by Roblox, merged into Roblox, and then discontinued outside of Roblox?

    I'm thinking of something else, I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Discourse isnt free

    And its been described as more of a forum than a chat service

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    This is misinformation.

    You can self host it, for free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    That doesn't seem to be communicated very clearly on the website, though I could always be missing something.

    It also doesn't seem like the average Discord user is the target audience. The website is for sysadmins, and the goal seems to be selling a Slack/Teams alternative to a business or government organization.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago

    Matrix uses a similar end-to-end cryptography scheme to Signal. "Rooms" (chats, channels) are not encrypted by default, b

    I don't think that's true anymore. it has been encrypted by default for quite a few years now

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 9 months ago

    It’s very important to call out this dude either doesn’t understand what a community is or comes from this new generation that thinks docs should be on Discord and not easily accessible.

    Functionality: can it do everything required of a platform for building, organizing, and sustaining a community?

    Somehow Discord gets a 4 there. A chat server is a community of a kind but it will never rise the level of a platform’s community because it is, by definition, somewhat ephemeral and just a bunch of chat logs. There’s a big difference for example between IRC and bash.org for things like AzureDiamond.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    what are the best alternatives for non-tech folks to join and use?... because that's who I am going to have to convince

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago*

    Spacebar.chat is a really easy one to join that I found. And it's really a straight clone of Discord but without all the crap. It's decentralized so you can self host or join and instance and start your own "server" on there.

    You don't have to understand any of that to use. It just works and looks like Discord.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 9 months ago* (9 children)

    If Stoat (formerly Revolt) can integrate screen sharing capabilities soon enough, they will be the closest, user-friendly experience to Discord. Even the UI is familiar, if you come from Discord.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I can't even create an account on Stoat yet. New account confirmation emails take hours to arrive and by the time they do, they are already expired.

    This is not a discord alternative yet and not be for a long time most likely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    They're having issues with their email provider due to the hug of death effect, they did not expect to get so much traffic so fast

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I understand, but they are losing the train I guess. People are giving up easily when they need a solution fast.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Their loss. They have at least a month to migrate, probably more before most users get forced to verify, there is no rush. That and an ad-free hobby-run project like Stoat doesn't gain anything from a massive user increase unless it correlates to an increase in devs or money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I‘m surprised Stoat is gaining so much traction here. It‘s no open source and will likely go down the same path as Discord if given the chance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 9 months ago (23 children)

    We need to bring back the forum platforms. That is how communities looked and it was great

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Discord became big because of the seamless audio / video / screen sharing. Forums are not even in the same stratosphere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    i know, but for casual conversations and banter and a place where to store some knowledge about some topics forums were awesome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (14 children)

    It was so great, people ditched it immediately the second any alternative arrived.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Discord is just objectively terrible for knowledge. It's not search indexable or archivable. It's more or less a memory hole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Discord is a communications platform with tacked on features that resemble forums mostly as a means of organization. It's not a KB or repository under any circumstances outside of misuse, so why would it have to be good at being searched/indexed?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Because not everything is a bug. People frequently want help and having a searchable place for past discussions it is helpful. Also this was in response to people complaining about forums and implying what came after is better so misuse is very much relevant here. Every modding community and a lot of other dev groups use discord for everything and it is from experience a trainwreck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    I hope you're not implying an old forum search was any good

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Most decent forums were publicly readable online and thus got indexed by actually decent search engines unlike discord. Hence "search indexable"

    I'm not sure why people think that discord search is some kind of gotcha. Its shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Not denying that it's shit, I don't know anyone who's actually happy with it. But old forums also weren't built nicely.
    You say search indexable as if it's a panacea, but you find whatever you want to find with your search engine, click the link, and it is:

    • moved somewhere
    • renamed, so now the link is dead
    • was actually a part of badly implemented endless scroll so it now points to nothing
    • was edited to remove crucial information
    • was put in private and now you need to have 25 karma across three boards to open it
    • someone got butthurt so it's now defaced
    • all of the above and more.

    So you know that the info was there at some point, but you can't access it.

    The whole of IT is different levels of shit all the time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    That's why I also mentioned archivable. Public forums can be archived. If I hit one of those issues I look for archived pages. Deleted discord comments are just silently gone and deleted servers are lost forever

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    At some point, when you're combing through archives looking for the exact version of a closed forum post that contains exact info you have, you understand that this system also sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    They slowly ditched better services for convenience. The account/login struggle is the barrier to entry that myspace/facebook/discord "solved". A unique login for each forum, a different set of rules between each, some auto-deletion of supposedly inactive accounts, no photo hosting capability until death bed, yet another set of credentials for the latest photo host, and so on. Nothing was immediate because it took time to build the replacement communities and libraries. The problem is, it took years to realize how inaccessible the information became.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago

    If the old service is less convenient that fucking Discord, it's not better.
    The information is as inaccessible now, just in different ways.
    We never had a good solution. We had different bad solutions, each bad in it's unique way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    maybe you are right. i think people just forgot about it because of all the noise and because all these new platforms force bad habits. just imagine if those platforms didn't exist where would openai and anthropic be without all that stackexchange/stackoverflow data scraping.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    I mean the masses are pretty fucking stupid and I don't think following them is a good strategy for life.

    Also, reddit was and somehow still is pretty popular and stack exchange is being killed by AI not discord, so that's not really accurate anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    I am getting flashbacks of the mid-2000's IM landscape. Soon we'll be using 10 services bundled into some hackjob app that doesn't support all of the features but keeps the chats in one place.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Pidgin was good; it did what needed to be done and wasn't that bad at it.

    The last service I was using it for was a self-hosted XMPP server for a small group of friends that were all refugees of other defunct services. We ended up finally moving to Slack or Discord (the group bifurcated along game-playing lines).

    Now I've got to find something new yet again!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 57 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    No, he hasn't been running a discord server. It's a channel. Discord is running the servers.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    God, I hated that terminology when I needed to talk with people about discord.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I can only assume it's on purpose so average users really understand it wrong to avoid the associated negative view. Clever, really. But absolutely evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    This wasn't intended to be misleading. The term "Server" as in a Discord Server is because, be fore Discord were the days of Ventrilo and TeamSpeak. For many of us gamers used to have to run or pay for their own actual server to have that kind of functionality. Then we'd combine direct calling with Skype for small groups and video. The term made sense at the time, but hasn't held up to the test of time. Basically Discord solved a problems of having to pay for those servers, and having to use two separate programs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    I'm a it professional (working in enterprise DCs) and have been running ts2 and murmur myself. It was misleading from the beginning and while I do understand your point I can not see a company doing this in good faith, I am too old for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago

    I highly doubt that when you start a “Discord server”, there’s any new machinery spun up. There is a near 100% chance it’s just an entry in a database. Nobody’s running a server just for him. So I don’t think there’s even reason to be charitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago

    The older terminology, which is still used in the API, was a lot better.

    It was Guild. It was a Discord Guild. Probably because Stanislav was working on it after he abandoned Guildwork.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    Users (and I think Discord too) call the communities servers, and channels are the individual topics/threads in a community. It might not make sense from a hosting perspective but people do call it that

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    40 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    17 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post