all 62 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 105 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 39 points 9 months ago

    Select, bespoke, artisanal, reserve

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Financing available

    Curated

    One of a kind

    Invitation only

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago
    [–] [S] 30 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Boutique. Designer. Choice. Select. Prime

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I always see premium nowadays as β€œnot the absolute bottom of the barrel”

    • Premium hotel room: not the cupboard in the basement with a single mattress and a broken TV but the next one up. No view or anything though unless you upgrade to a deluxe or higher

    • Premium economy seat on a flight: basically cattle class but with one inch extra leg room and fake leather seat cushions. Still can’t lie down or access better loos like in business or first class

    • Premium spirits: supermarket own-brand spirits but in a glass bottle rather than the super cheap shit they sell in plastic bottles

    Etc…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Exactly. It's a variant of "military grade" for those products where it would sound odd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    In my job, I need to use materials that have a mil spec; that means it's literally military grade, but it's just saying that it meets or exceeds a certain specification for X product that is used in the military in some way. IMO, if something says 'military grade', but isn't listing the mil spec(s) that it complies to, then it's essentially meaningless.

    I do have a compass that I think was advertised as military grade. It's the same lensatic compass that is currently used by the military (...when they aren't using GPS...), except that it doesn't use tritium on the face. The half-life of tritium is about a decade, so it didn't seem like a great idea to pay a ton extra for something that would barely glow in the dark in 20 years or so.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Oddly enough, I've always associated claims of being premium in advertising with it actually being garbage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I think it definitely has gotten a tarnished reputation. But even modern software tiers are standard, advanced, premium and premium means you get all the features at a huge price

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    "Made with ingedients you can pronounce"

    If you took the time to expand your vocabulary you wouldn't need to pay a premium.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    Market price

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago
    [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Anything marine or aeronautical

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago
    [–] 9 points 9 months ago
    [–] 8 points 9 months ago
    [–] 8 points 9 months ago
    [–] 8 points 9 months ago
    [–] 15 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 15 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    When I say to a client "this is a particularly complex area" it means they gonna pay.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, when I've heard that my immediate thought is "welp, guess I'm on my own".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I can't speak for everyone but I wouldn't apply that kind of pricing structure to someone who couldn't afford it or wouldn't get any value from it.

    I'm an accountant and tax consultant.

    Suppose a client contacted me, they're semi-retired with very little income, they need to resolve some business affairs from years ago in order to collect a pension or whatever. I'm going to tell them the hackiest workaround to achieve their goal, and tell them how to do it themselves, hopefully without really having to charge them even for the consult.

    On the other hand if someone wants to sell their family farm for several million dollars and wants to know the tax ramifications, they're going to get the "particularly complex area" pricing, full written report, and so on and so forth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    That's good of you. I can't imagine every accountant is so flexible. Lawyers straight up have to charge most of the time, I think.

    It could also be a technical expert, or the government (in which case, refer to the lawyer).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I think any accountant and lawyer does this to some extent, if I'm honest.

    There's no obligation to take on any client. If a client has a problem to be solved but very little money, of course we're reluctant to get involved. If it's a situation where a potential solution is "you should call the tax office and tell them XYZ." then that's really just a polite way of telling them you don't want to get involved.

    Lawyers will work in a similar way, but are more likely to truncate their advice to "You should call and ask them what to do".

    I've often heard of lawyers explaining to potential clients that the costs in pursuing their matter would be unreasonable given the likelihood of success.

    It's not really altruism, although I'd like to think that I do my best to help people when I can. It's really just a natural way of avoiding doing a heap of work for someone who can't afford to pay you. Additionally, if you can make the client feel like you've helped them instead of just rejecting them then they will be more likely to recommend you to their friends and family who may be a better fit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    β€œName Brand”

  • source
  • R-r-r-r-r-itzy!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I’ll come back tomorrow

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Exclusive, luxury

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago*

    The irony is that there's two kinds of consumers here. Either it's a rich yoga lady buying from an influencer, or it's, like, an African person buying from another African person. Anyone in the middle just enjoys the wonders of industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Apple and Mac come to mind.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Depends on the context ie: Out of our price range vs β€œWe live comfortably”

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I haven't seen gourmet yet.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Best In Class

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago
    [–] 2 points 9 months ago
    [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Chic or Patrician if you want to be fancy about it.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Does that shit flies or what

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    If you see my saying 'God Damn' as I'm looking at items it means they expensive as fuck.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Swank Bougie Highbrow

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Buji

    Frou Frou

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I’m friends with Epstein

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment