“PedoNazis signal intent to ignore constitution. No one left to stop the PedoNazis.”
post
So they had bench warrants before??? or is it to much for them to write in crayon totally official warrant for their officers.
can't wait for a random judge to say that they have to follow the law instead of using the last to prosecute the ICE agents that break the law.
the entire justice system is complicit
Yes, I'm allowing myself to do the same
I wonder how many non white trump donors there are that are within reach of normal people
I'm seeing a lot of non white ICE agents with accents. You really gotta stop putting this shit on the blonde, blue eyed group. If Enrique Tarrio wasn't enough, and Nicholas Fuentes didn't do it for you, what will it take.
Depends on your definition of reach. The rich like lots of windows, and those are pretty accessible points of entry to small fast moving metallic objects. The tools that use those small metallic objects are also pretty easy to acquire in most of the US for a pretty reasonable cost.
The posted article is excellent and everyone should read it [techdirt always writes great stuff]. The story's primary source is [this NYT article via archive.is. Every secondary source fail to mention "collateral aliens", and I'm here to rectify that.
ICE is already arresting people just because an officer is suspicious. the NYT article is 2 things:
-
the director changing the justification of why it's ok. That being: "the person might not be here later, so we have to arrest them now" ... In reality they call this "likely to escape" (same difference).
-
The new thing is using this justification to arrest anyone who is nearby, who they call "collateral aliens", in group round-ups.
In summary: A single ICE officer can think a dude on the corner looks wrong; can arrest him because he might not be there later; then arrest you just because you're nearby. Now you're a "collateral alien", and have no due process and cannot plead your case.
Great context and additional info. The archive link is throwing an error for me
Tried updating it. it's https://archive.is/eU1K9 And Here's the NYT article
*edit * had to update this too
Absent a warrant, probable cause, or some exigent circumstance, isn't "likely to escape" just a charged way of saying innocent person going about their business?
Like it was stopping them before.
If the authorities can now ignore the law protecting the citizens, how can they expect the law to protect them?
You’ll have to fucking kill me to get me in that van
that’s because they want us to give them “constitutional feedback” enough so they can manufacture enough consent to go even more nazi than they already have.
stop dreaming about what a world would look like during ww3; we’re in it.
I love that an agency is just running off and doing this while the rest of the government is shrugging.
STUPID Libtards! The Constitution ONLY Allows ONE Thing for Americans to do - SHOOT UP SCHOOLS! That is the ONLY Constitutionally Protected Action!
-Pro Life Constitutional Republicans!
"Yeah, we've determined that the Constitution won't let us do whatever we want, so we're going to do it anyway."
mmmm....FALSE....i'm gonna go with false, here...bit of a trick question, actually.
What he says and what holds up in court is probably different.
all 8 comments