cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/58282514

jackpots in 2025 averaged 2.06 billion won ($1.41 million), which falls to 1.4 billion won once taxes are deducted.

That after-tax amount is below the average price of an apartment in Seoul, which was 1.5 billion won in December 2025, according to separate data compiled by KB Land, the property data tracker of KB Kookmin Bank.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

Seems like a short term problem. The birth rate in Good Korea is so low that before long they'll have vastly more housing than people to live in it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    You haven't been paying attention to late stage capitalism so far. The landlords simply pull enough housing off the market that the prices for the remainders continue to rise. They'll let entire buildings rot if it ensures the prices for other buildings remain high.

  • source
  • parent
  • 43 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 95 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    TFW regular lottery money isn't enough for an average apartment in Seoul, let alone living expenses and upkeep costs.

    13058

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Is it The Fuck What? I have no clue. I'm old enough to remember that ROFL was a thing, gramps ain't keeping up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    no wonder they have the lowest fertility

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    What Fatboy Kim loves to capitalize on, the awful costs of living south of the DMZ.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Seems like they are misrepresenting the costs of buying and renting. It’s the same in the US. If you tried to BUY an apartment they’d easily charge you close to 1 million in New York. It’s the same concept. Obviously rent in Seoul doesn’t cost 1 billion won per month.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago

    I don't think they are misrepresenting it. Between the NY State Lotto, Powerball and Mega Millions, the state lotto has the lowest estimated cash payout post-tax, and it's still $1.6 million prize. You might be priced out of Chelsea and Soho, but there are plenty of decent enough neighborhoods in the outer boroughs where you can find an apartment for $750,000. The Powerball is the next smallest pot, with an estimated lump sum payment of $29.4 million, which would certainly let you buy an apartment just about anywhere in NYC you wanted, and still have plenty left over for living expenses to not have to work again.

    Even then, the NY State Lotto has a smaller jackpot than typical at the moment, considering the average jackpot is $10.26 million, according to the state's website. So, at least in this case, the NY State Lotto still offers one a feasible, if not reasonable, path to homeownership, while the Korean Lotto doesn't offer that with its average jackpot for those who live in Seoul.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (25 children)

    Buying lottery tickets to get a house... Maybe this man should get a financial advisor.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 9 months ago (17 children)

    Yes, because it's totally normal for apartments to cost over $1 million/1.5b won.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 9 months ago* (16 children)

    That is not what I said? Lottery tickets are just throwing money in a fire... Which is counterproductive when saving up for a 1,5 billion home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago (13 children)

    I think saving up 1,5 billion with a normal job is not... realistic. At that point winning the lottery is the more realistic chance, as crazy as it sounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 9 months ago (12 children)

    Yeah but at least you end up with more money to live somewhere affordable...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    And where do you plan to live while you amass this money...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 9 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago* (7 children)

    Nothing like the perspective of getting milked forever… building someone else’s capital while tumbling towards old age. I say let them buy some hope…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    You are just filling another scammer's pockets. At least you get a roof above your head out of one of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    You know one can afford rent AND lottery tickets right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    Just because you can afford it, it doesn't make it a good financial decision to buy a lottery ticket.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Not everything in life needs to be a « good » financial decision… when it’s financially inconsequential while bringing pleasure it’s fair enough. Same for a lot of things that brings you pleasure. Unless you indulge in absolutely nothing your stance is quite hypocritical.

    And if you indulge in nothing maybe consider the experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The issue isn’t pleasure, it’s expectation. Buying a coffee or a movie ticket reliably delivers the thing you’re paying for; a lottery ticket is designed to almost certainly deliver nothing. Calling that “financially inconsequential pleasure” glosses over the fact that the pleasure is mostly manufactured hope, not the product itself.

    Enjoyment isn’t immune from criticism just because it’s cheap, and pointing that out doesn’t require living like a monk. You can acknowledge that people do it for fun while still recognizing it as a statistically bad trade-off compared to most other small indulgences

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, I buy up to a dozen lottery tickets a year next door in Japan. Paying off the house would be first and, were I not already a homeowner, buying one would certainly top the list. Those lottery tickets amount to something like 3600 JPY a year which is probably like 20 USD or so. It's not a financial plan, but I wouldn't complain if I won. I used to spend more than that at starbucks in a month.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Spoiler alert: you won't win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    Ah but I have won... just not enough to do more than pay for about a year's worth of tickets. It's not an investment strategy; it's entertainment. If I ever get rich (and I don't expect to), nice bonus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    The chance of you playing your entire life and never winning a significant amount is much much much higher than you winning decently once.

    Because those lottery businesses aren't going to give out more money than they make. Your chance of getting more out of it than you put in is none.

    But you do win every time you don't play.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    People waste their money on all kinds of dumb shit. Posters, pictures, plastic toys that will just end up in some landfill, etc. This is mine and I almost certainly spend a lot less on it (again, $20-$25 a year in USD depending on the exchange rate). I almost never eat out. I have real investments. This is entertainment.

    Edit: to clarify, dumb here means not necessary. Support art and artists, but don't by plastic stuff that's going to end up in a landfill

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    This is more a small lottery, if the US had lotteries that were that little it would be about the price of a house here too, not to say $1.4M is cheap for a house but the US lotteries can easily be <$40M.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments