[–] 3 points 5 days ago (4 children)

They were paying huge war repetitions after WWI. So in a way, if they weren't forced to do so, WWII wouldn't probably happen because people would simply not vote for him.

But things were completely different, back then they had hyper inflation.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    And right now China is trying to catch up with that technology. They might be lagging today, but they are a huge market, and they will eventually catch up, maybe not completely but enough to be competitive.

    Plus their LLMs need a lot less hardware resources for inferences.

    Don't forget that all US frontier models are operating at a huge loss, because if they need to charge market rates their market will shrink significantly.

    So this GPU crunch is forcing Chinese labs to innovate and find clever ways to achieve higher intelligence with constrained resources.

    And cloud and computing cost will only go up now, due to exploding hardware prices, which will make the whole business model of the US frontier models even more unprofitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    The whole transportation business run on diesel. There are currently no good truck EVs and if there are they will require special charging stations, so it would be very difficult to change to renewables and EV overnight.

    We will still be dependent on petrol though, but much less, but petrol is needed in the chemical industry for the production of plastic, for plane fuel, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children)

    Check the second hand options. I bought a brand new Pixel 10 Pro at the beginning of the year for 600€ from the second hand market from a guy who got it with his contract renewal for free. I think back then the regular Pixel was costing 500€, so I can imagine that you can find a Pixel 9 for 300-350€ in a very good condition.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago

    Thanks for the detailed feedback. I think I am also leaning towards Opnsense right now. I think for a relative newbie like me, that would be better.

    I know that I can build and host everything on my own on a pure Linux distro, but I would like to have some life left at the end of the day and not spend days of building testing and debugging network related problems.

    By the way another user suggested that with VyOS you can build an LTS target yourself and that they provide build instructions.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • VyOS or Opnsense (lemmy.world)
     

    I read today about VyOS and I really like the idea and approach but I am not sure how it compares to Opnsense in terms of performance and features. I know it doesn't have a GUI, which is a bit of a bummer for me.

    I have purchased a mini router PC and I was thinking to build a dedicated router and firewall on it. I also have another PC that I am planning to run as a Proxmox host and install a couple of VMs and LXC containers, as well as Home Assistant along with Omada, as I am thinking of purchasing some TP-Link AP compatible with Omada.

    But would love to hear some feedback from people who used both what they think.

    Keep in mind that although I am technical and have a fair understanding of networking and VLANs I am not exactly an expert in networking. Does it make sense to go into the VyOS route in that case?

    The end goal is to have a dedicated network and routing for the IoT network, dedicated Wireguard, guest WiFi, etc.

     

    I am running Bluefin immutable distro and I would like to test Niri. I found on the net that the cleanest way is to use systemd-sysext and I have managed to install Niri using the community extensions.

    Now I would like to install Dank Material Shell, and it has a couple of pre-requisites and I am clueless how I can add them again with systemd-sysext.

    I tried to look for additional information, but found very little on the matter. Do any of you have experience with this?

    Wireguard over IPv6 (lemmy.world)
     

    Hi all, I am behind CGNAT, but my ISP router is allocating real IPv6 addresses to my devices that can be exposed. I have a Proxmox and I have installed Wireguard on an LXC container and configured it to listen to the IPv6 address.

    I was wondering if I need to do something else to protect my Wireguard installation? I have exposed only the default UDP port to the outside and port scanners are not working on UDP ports as far as I know. Shall I do something else to protect my installation or the attack vector is already minimal and doesn't require further hardening? What's your opinion?

    view more: next ›