Death rates correlate with education levels, urbanization rate, alcohol consumption, car size, driving laws, speed cameras, and road design.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBPkI3CCY8o

all 54 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

Am I stupid? Where's New Hampshire?

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Fatalities per capita is probably less interesting than fatalities per unit of distance driven.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There are states in Australia that can swallow Texas whole. Long distance driving is unavoidable, so it's less useful as a metric because it can't be changed easily. It would mean improving public transport, subsidising domestic flights, etc - and we all know how likely that is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Notice how the states you'd be trying to leave or drive through as fast as possible are all grouped at one end of the scale?

    I'm not saying this is the only reason. But it can still be a reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's always fun when your beliefs are confirmed. If I were to guess the top 10, it would have probably been those listed maybe a dabble of Wisconsin given their lack alcohol laws and enforcement compared to other places.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Nah, Wisconsin has weather that requires more cautious driving a big chunk of the year.

    A lot of the higher end states from the US in the graph are in southern parts of the country which are largely red politically which likely means reduced safety regulations, and have more consistent road conditions and weather through the year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (13 children)

    Pretty clear pattern with the US states. The lowest death rates are decidedly blue and the highest are decidedly red.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Like Tal said, a confounder for that would be distances driven. There are probably similar ones like rural/uban populations etc. It would be great to see a study allowing for these.
    I couldn't find one but I didnt look very hard.

    edit: coundn't

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Presumably, people drive more frequently and for longer distances in the red states. Everyone I know back in my home red state commutes between 30 minutes to an hour, sometimes more, everyday. They're not sitting in traffic either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    I don't know why you think people would spend any less time in traffic in blue states.

    Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    The main issue is distance (and speed), not time. Your far less likely to be in a fatal car crash (or crash out any kind) in slow-moving city traffic jams vs driving from your rural house to your job in the next small town doing 85 mph on a 2-lane highway, which is the scenario a lot of folks in rural areas have every day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    From the linked source, #1 is miles driven. You can keep copy/pasting the same thing in response to people hypothesizing miles driven is the biggest cause, but it won't change the fact that you are wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Correlation is not causation. They never addressed speed or distance, which are clearly the biggest factors in the chances of fatality and the chances of having a wreck at all (respectively)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's not time in traffic. It's time NOT in traffic. Traffic is slow and not often deadly. Driving for an hour at 70mph is much more dangerous than an hour at 25mph.

    And blue states often have bigger cities with slower traffic and shorter commute distances.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Unless I miscounted they seem to be missing a few states.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • Arkansas at #3. I am not remotely shocked. People here drive like complete morons who are oblivious to everyone else on the road. Just on your average trip to Bentonville -- which is about 8 miles from me -- you're almost guaranteed to see half a dozen cars blow through a red light. I've had more close calls than I can count.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Currently live in Louisiana, close to Arkansas border. The roads are just as bad as the drivers. I learned to drive when I still lived in Cali. I've had to find tune my predictive idiot sense living where I do now. I legit think vehicles are sold here without blinker fluid

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm willing to bet half those BC stats are actually Albertans driving into the mountains. Significantly more westbound than eastbound fatalities in the Rockies. If you fall asleep at the wheel in Alberta you wake up in the middle of a corn field. If you fall asleep at the wheel in BC you don't wake up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm from Washington and I'm surprised we're not higher. In the winter it's dark during both morning and evening rush hour, meaning most people are doing their commutes in the dark. It can feel pretty dangerous sometimes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Look closer at the ranking of states. This isn't about weather or external causes. Wisconsin and Minnesota have much worse weather in the winter and are almost as dark in the winter as Washington with similar death rates, but their rates are much lower than Mississippi and Alabama who have no snow and more sunlight in winter. The three are lower even than Arizona, which is usually sunny and rarely has snow.

    External things like how many miles are driven on average by the people in the state is huge. Also things like speeding culture, average car safety (poor states have shittier cars or old trucks), and road maintenance are all big impacts, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm genuinely surprised Utah isn't higher on this list. I've driven in many states, and that state has by far the worst drivers I've encountered.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    In the UK in 2023, it was about 2.5 per 100,00 people.

    Sauce

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    It doesn't have 50 american states, 10 provinces 3 territories, and 8 Australian states (sorry I don't know if they are classed otherwise)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Where does it say it was supposed to? I don't say anything about all states anywhere in the title or in the graphic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It says that it is for the 3 countries then breaks it down by region. It then doesn't have all regions. The graph or OP doesn't mention the exclusions.

    Putting it behind a link seems like building a narrative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    No it says it's for major states and provinces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Major is subjective. If you are going to use terms like that and only give a graph you should define the term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    And that's completely legitimate argument to make, though I think you'd have trouble arguing that any of the ones left off this graph constitute major. However you'll note that it's a completely different argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    There are a lot of missing people underwater in their cars, in the South and Midwest.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    14 missing states, including South/North Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Nebraska, Alaska, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Delaware, Rhode Island, Hawaii, and West Virginia. Most of those states barely have 100,000 people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Those 14 are the least populated states. However, with the exception of Wyoming, Vermont, Alaska, and the Dakotas all of them have populations over 1 Million. Wyoming, the least populous state, has a population of 590,000.

    I wouldn't exactly call that "barely 100,000."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    As a MA resident, I have always said that we're highly aggressive drivers but overall pretty safe as long as you can walk the walk. Just never show fear.

    Its actually really easy, don't be a fuckwit and you won't get fucked with.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    God fucking damnit I knew it wasn’t confirmation bias when I moved from Illinois to Alabama and though, “god damnit, people don’t know how to drive down here.”

  • source