Canadian here. Interesting points. I feel most Canadians would be cautiously open to the idea. How do EU regular people feel?
post
Canadian here, yes please
Article is too long...
It'd be a little weird as Canada is not in Europe but other than that it'd be a perfect fit. Much better fit than Turkey or even Hungary...
Could rename it to the Earth Union and keep the acronym
Atlantic Union?
AU is taken, mate. But I reckon Australia would be bloody on board too.
Cyprus is in Asia, and is a member of the EU and was allowed because it was "politically and culturally European". It could be argued that Canada would qualify under those same circumstances.
We even have something that Cyprus doesn't, and land border with an EU country (Denmark), and a sea border with an EU country (France).
And while we were independent of the UK from a governmental point of view, we were still a dominion of the UK until 1982, which means we even have historical precedence in the EU as an overseas territory, though never in an official way.
Neither is the South American continent but part of it is in the EU too.
EU here, yes pls. Iโve never been there but Iโve always loved the idea of Canada. Hospitality, human rights, healthcare, โฆ all values we should hold high and unite over.
Australia as well please, love to join the grand EU project. Anything that brings people closer together in a fractured world is a good thing.
As Canada isnโt in Europe, some renaming has to happenโฆ perhaps Freedom Union?
A union of nation states that value freedom.
United States of Freedom?
That term has been thoroughly tainted.
How about Canada becomes an EU colony overseas territory instead of a full member?
I'm Canadian. Sign me up! I remember as a lad in the 1960's that commercials on TV compared Canada to the nordic countries, not america. That's right around the start of "capitalization" when "business administration" students were pushed out of colleges in huge numbers and everything slowly went to hell.
I like the idea, although our provinces would have to give up quite a bit of their sovereignty which would be a hard sell politically. We have more trade barriers between our provinces than the EU has.
We're a good sized market, but not so big that the EU would be willing to put up with 10 exceptions to their rules.
would have to give up quite a bit of their sovereignty which would be a hard sell politically.
You say that like we don't want to work together.
But I'm sure provinces in Germany and Spain get to have their own squabbles like our petty ones.
10 exceptions to their rules.
Provinces needing their snowflake exceptions get annexed by America. If the UK could join the EU there's nothing stopping us but nostalgia; and I hear that's not a strategy anymore.
Ultimately, we're gonna have to one day decide whether we're Canadian and quit the in-fighting. If we can't learn the lesson of Queenston Heights then we deserve what we get.
Better start practicing your Canadian then.
After reading the article, I am still not sure whether that's a good idea because such an expansion likely comes with additional conflicts. Wouldn't mind a EU & Friends though. In general Canada has been very stable, reasonable and constructive in the last years.
Ooh, can you imagine the freakout that would happen in Washington?
I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here: I'm against this because many European projects are incompatible with Canada. In some parts, Canada's infrastructure is as bad as the USA's. Look at public transport, for example. Everything is car centric, and if you're not rich enough to own a car, you're basically excluded from public life, I don't mean this in an elitist type of way. Even Germany has significantly better public transport than Canada. Many of the other networking projects such as TEN-T or ETCS do not make sense as it is quite literally separated from the EU. Common standards are only useful when everyone agrees to use them. But as Canada would be the only EU state on the North American continent, they would be the only ones using it. Enhanced political cooperation and trade is always a positive thing, but the EU is more than just FTAs and other diplomatic pleasantries. IMHO.
many European projects are incompatible with Canada.
That can change, itโs just matter of will.
Everything is car centric, and if you're not rich enough to own a car, you're basically excluded from public life
Amsterdam changed.

Seriously, visiting North America is โweโve tried adding a [car] lane to the highway and canโt figure out why nobody is cycling or taking transit.โ
Transportation networks indeed make little sense when thereโs an ocean in between. Too bad the USA canโt play nicely with others.
Common standards would be a challenge, in some areas -canโt do electrical because 50hz vs 60hz and deep integration with USA grid. The NEMA plugs are a bit of a nightmare. But for vehicle safety and emissions it would be a step forward; more countries adopted the EU than US standards there.
It's actually changing here too, at least in cities. Bike lanes being added, streets being repurposed back to foot and bike traffic. Improved public transit.
I don't even think the electrical changes would be hard because of US integration, it would be hard because of so much of it. We could switch. Most houses already have a 240 circuit needed for things like car chargers, dryers and ovens. You could easily retrofit a house. But the grid feeding that house would need to be rebuilt from the ground (pun intended) up.
Edit: re electricity: We apparently did this in the early 50s once already. We were on a 25hz system, and power technicians went to every single house and retrofitted them to go from 25 to 60hz. Wild. I just learned that.
There might be some goals/milestones required for joining and doing something about things like this could be one.
I also like it that their King Charles III has no say in it while some other parts of the commonwealth left EU in recent history.
To join EU, a country needs to comply with several conditions. The conditions for economical and political stability are OK, I assume. But Canada would need to adapt to EU laws. How big is the gap between the laws in Canada and what EU requires?
Is it anything that stops EU and Canada from agreeing on free trade, open borders etc. even if Canada is not a part of EU? That would be weaker since one side can elect a weirdo and suddenly stop all agreements but it could be faster to implement and Canada could join later.
Although I'd welcome the idea, there is an important caveat : Canada is a financial sovereign now but would have to give that up. All countries in euroland use a foreign currency called "the euro". We have a central bank but no central government. Members are expected to finance themselves on the private market. Where as today Canadian government can buy any local goods and services it wants as long as they're priced in canadian dollars. EU is great but needs to fix its design faults before we can expand again
There are still a few eu countries that have not yet start using the common currency. But i would say that it's getting harder and harder to argue that staying outside is something positive. Sure it might feel like a big step but you gain so much more.
You're missing the point. There's 2 kinds of economic schools: Tax first, then spend it. And the other school that says 'decide democratically what you want to do, then do it by buying goods/services in your own currency. When the invoice arrives instruct the central bank to pay for it. Why do you still need taxation ? To force the locals to accept your currency for them to pay your tax. That also a big part if how money gets created in the first place. And the recognition that 'the state' is a source of wealth instead of the tax satan between buyers and sellers. I love the EU. But we need that democracy and government that issues policy and injects wealth. China and US understand their fiscal power. But we're stuck with stupid Dutch and Germans who don't understand what Nixon really did.
Not sure I want the EU to share a border with the US
As a European, I have no interest in Canada joining the EU. It's not even in Europe, nor near it, nor an overseas possession of its countries.
It'd also give us a large border with Fascistland.
However, I do think we could have association partnership with Canada - basically the closest to being a member state in all but name, membership, and voting rights. I also want labour rights to remain protected; and thus to ward off the influence of techbros.
I was partially in favour, but this article changed my mind. There are many ways to cooperate on everything if this is the point. In the article there is little understanding of what the EU is
And the articles said nothing about what joining would bring Canada.
I think the main things would be free trade and no borders. Fancy living in Ireland or the South of France for a bit? Hop on a plane. No questions asked.
I donโt think that will work. We canโt have centralized decisions being made for Canada in Brussels and through consensus with a bunch of countries who we donโt even share a continent with. That being said, we exist because of mother France and father Britain (who unceremoniously left the family). So we will ALWAYS be aligned with Europe.
As a Swede I feel kind of the the same, but regarding joining the Euro. But what are our options? Sure the Krona could survive another 100 years but the full access to the inner market seems pretty rad. But yeah we need to have a serious talk about democracy with Hungary and a talk about sustainable finances with some countries.
No thanks. We don't need another layer of bureaucrats to make everything even more complex and slow.
all 68 comments