Chess "is diverse and inclusive," the German Chess Federation said in rejecting calls for a ban on trans competitors.

all 52 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 78 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 77 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because back in the day when blatant sexism was the norm, women were excluded. Women-only tournaments were an attempt to correct that.

    In a perfect world, everybody would play in the same tournaments and all genders would feel equally welcome to them, but that's not the world we live in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    There are open tournaments and women's tournaments. The open tournaments are for anyone. Women have competed in them but at the top level it is somewhat rare.

    The women's tournaments are intended to provide an environment that encourages more women to play chess. There's considerable sexism among men (not only in the chess world, hah) which is not always very welcoming.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 67 points 1 year ago

    cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition

    An unfair competition... in a damn chess game?! WHAT?!

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago

    The Times reports that she claimed some cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition

    At least with the more physical sports there's a (spurious) argument about bone structure or whatever. There really isn't that same argument wrt Chess, even if it be a bit physically taxing.

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What's the excuse here? "Afab players are too stupid to face trans opponents"?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago

    Internationally, the World Chess Federation imposed a temporary ban in 2023, preventing trans women from women’s tournaments pending further review — a rule Germany opposes, pointing out that a trans woman had already claimed a national women’s title in the early 2000s, Apollo News reports.

    I think this just completely took effect and was not temporary.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_people_in_chess
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/67127168

    The whole thing is a shitshow, because if you are MTF , FIDE does not think you are a woman, thus can't have women's titles, but also, if you're FTM , you are ALSO not a woman, so you can't keep your women's titles (Womens' grandmaster, Womens' International Master,etc).

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago

    Good on the German Chess Federation to not bow to pressure.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    Just when the world couldn't get stupider…

  • source
  • [–] 81 points 1 year ago

    Why should it prompt backlash? Did they celebrate the win by knocking over their opponent's king with their cock?

    These pearl clutchers make me want to force said pearls down their throat until they shit out every single bead or I can grab one end of the necklace and rip it out like a fucking BeyBlade!

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    they prob cry over a trans person winning uno

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    yeah, but a BiOlOgIcAl man has a huge body advantge during chess!!!!!!!11111

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    I have, and never will, understand how the fuck being trans gives you any sort of advantage in chess. Only thing I have ever rationalized about this is that the people saying it surely must be sexist cave people.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Chess “is diverse and inclusive,” the German Chess Federation said

    Lol, lmao even. It's one of the more sexist sports there are in terms of organization, often marginalizing women and most of these marginalizing structures are still there to this day. This isn't to excuse anti-LGBT rhetoric, but pretending like everything is fine with chess probably doesn't help.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    I'm tired boss

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (29 children)

    The German Chess Federation has rejected any ban

    meh.

    if they really cared, there would not be any official 'gendered' tournaments. but there are, because they want that for some reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (27 children)

    Gendered chess tournaments make a certain amount of sense. The main issues are that women are less likely to play chess due to societal and cultural factors and without their own division would have even more societal and cultural roadblocks to joining the game. This isn't touching on how getting certain titles requires winning specific events that would prove even more difficult for those same reasons.

    Basically without gendered tournaments there would be even less women in chess and it would be even more of a "boys club" than it already is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    It's also why the anti-trans argument makes absolutely no sense in chess. Like, in sports there's some room for nuance because cis men do have a huge advantage in most sports of cis women, and depending on the sport and the stage of transition, that can carry forward to trans women. It's fucking hard to have that nuanced conversation because 95% of the time it gets drowned out by transphobes, but there's still something to talk about.

    But in chess? Nobody is arguing there's any inherent biological advantage. The only reason for gendered tournaments is to create a safer space for non-men to compete in a male-dominated pastime. The only argument for excluding trans women from the Women's category in chess is transphobia. It's a real "mask off" moment for all the TERFs claiming it's about "integrity in sport" (Jesus fuck, writing that out made me realise how similar this all is to gamergate and the birth of the alt right).

    A lot of tournaments in HEMA (historical European martial arts—think fencing, but with bigger, older styles of swords than what they use at the Olympics) around where I lived have started using an "Underrepresented Genders" (URG) category alongside the Open category, instead of Women's. It's functionally not much different from having a Women's category that also accepts trans people (important possible difference: it accepts trans men as well as trans women, and enbies), but the name helps make it clearer. I quite like that as a concept.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    How does a trans-woman's socialization compromise competitive integrity? That's an entirely internal problem, and it doesn't affect any other competitors. This is really just grabbing for any excuse to be transphobic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No, it isn't. It's so women can enter the game without the pressure of going into a tournament setting mostly dominated by men. A trans-woman being in the women's tournament does not compromise that unless you don't think trans-woman are women. Being born male does not impact one's ability to compete in chess, just the accessibility of a competition dominated men. If you're already in the women's space, then that issue is entirely moot. A trans-woman faces the same social barrier to competing, and is entitled to the same protected space.

    The only argument against that is if you don't really think trans-woman are women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't agree that that is the motivation. You're confusing cause and effect. The competition space is dominated by men because of social and cultural norms, which is why they made a women's division. It's not so there's "less pressure", it's so the entire top level of the competition isn't entirely men and there's actually a meaningful competition for both groups.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How does anything you just said preclude trans-women in the women's division? Again, they have the same social and cultural barriers, and are entitled to the same space. The only reason to disagree, is if you don't believe they're women. If that's the case, say it with your chest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    The system only functions the way it does because the people prop it up. Any system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    So instead of having a welcoming space for a historically and actively marginalized group while allowing them to still complete in every other tournament we should just what? Close women's divisions, revoke all their titles, and tell them to play "real chess" instead?

    Like getting rid of women's tournaments is only a bad thing that would make the game stagnant even further to being the "boys club" game a lot of people already think it is when chess should be for everybody.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm not fond of self-marginalizing. So maybe some of us are uncomfortable. Some men will be, too. Maybe individuals are capable of self-regulating if empowered to do that. I'm sure some chuds will throw a tantrum. Block and parry, so to speak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Then play in an open tournament?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I mean, easy fix there right? Just have a women's tournament and an everybody tournament. Women can then choose which to enter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    No because there are men only tournaments too, what the poster is saying is to remove men only and only have women or everybody we think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    What chess tournament is men's only, I haven't heard of a single one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Maybe not officially, we aren't sure (we willlook this up). But there are some men who refuse to play with women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you are paired against an opponent and choose not to play against them then you get an uncontested match loss and will tank your ELO pretty quickly. This is also anecdotal but I've never met a player who would refuse an opponent of roughly equal ELO

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That specific scenario wouldn't make the tournament a "men's only" tournament, it'd just mean that a bunch of sensitive weirdos are throwing a strop because a woman is in the vicinity lol

    That's so mad though, are there really men who refuse to play chess with women???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment