all 66 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Please don't stop on children, no one want their clothes being stripped off without their knowledge and consent, digitally or physically.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Agreed, this problem isn't just the children - its everybody. Its actually problematic that this is how the situation is perceived, that only a minority is being spoken of. It is a problem of all, highlighting the severity of this situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Fair, but straight males will generally look at the undressed bodies of grown women and enjoy it.

    The general consensus among the same group when it comes to literal children though? Nobody really wants to see that. People who do stand out, and they are very strange to the rest of us, to the point of revulsion, anger, and malevolence. Like if it's your child, or a child under your care, and you're changing a diaper, or bathing a small child, it's one thing, but for someone posting pictures of random children unclothed, that bothers most people. People who are not paedophiles have a drive to protect our young. It's part of being a mammal; in general, mammals protect the young of the species.

    But, absolutely. One thing I will say for AI generated porn (that is not CSAM) is, it can't not consent. No human person's propriety is being violated. You could say it encourages people to seek the real thing, but you can say that for all pornography. There is a counter-argument that virtual girls can be made to do things most real women wouldn't do, but then again, there are enough who would for the right amount of money. Using AI or virtual girls, something like SFM (Source Film Maker, it's a Valve-produced tool that lets you make movies using video game characters), no real person has to do those things if the AI, virtual girl, or SFM model is lifelike enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Fair, but straight males will generally look at the undressed bodies of grown women and enjoy it.

    As a certified straight male,

    • I do not enjoy AI content whatsoever, even less if it's erotic. It's like the visual equivalent of a blow-up doll: desperate and gross.

    • I would not enjoy content obtained without consent

    Be less creepy please, or if you insist on being creepy, at least don't purport to speak on behalf of other people who are less creepy than you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    Hold up now, what I said that you quoted is not at all what you replied to.

    I measure creepiness by what people post every day. Not by what some rando (you) does or doesn't like. It wasn't aimed at you, don't take it personal. It's just an observation of what people post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Let me simplify what I said because you're apparently not understanding:

    You are creepy as hell for assuming it's a normal straight male response to be aroused by nonconsensual content. You're not "measuring" anything, you're exposing your sick sexuality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Well, I didn't want to just assume, but you keep pushing this angle... so it's a case of "every accusation a confession," as they say. In other words, you're assuming I have the same "sick sexuality" that you do. I do not. Not that it's really any of my business.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    lmao what are you even trying to say? Some "i know you are but what am I" type shit? You're not fooling anyone here. Be less creepy. Or don't and keep having women avoid you like the plague, idgaf

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 49 points 9 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Not having access to Epstein island any more must have left a void.

    What’s the latest on the Epstein files btw?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    In a shocking twist, they still have yet to be released.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I’m indeed quite shocked, yes. At least they didn’t promise to release the Epstein files…?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    It's still their wonderful secret of those enigmas every day. A secret kept by Israeli intelligence and whomever esle managed to procure the proof of a critical mass of politicians and business leaders and other swells in the US and UK fucking children, on tape.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    I seriously don’t understand why the entire world isn’t boycotting anything he touches. He’s a Nazi and a danger to the world

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    Have you considered he represents a massive investment by the US government and that he's such a massive security risk that a handfull of countries killing or capturing him could possibly cause endless headaches for the US security state.

    Edit: to be clear this is not suggesting anyone murder musk (he obv needs to go to jail for lying to get contracts and manipulating stocks) but rather than the US department of defense has made a socially stunted narcissist a key point of failure in a lot of critical projects (starlink, NASA, etc)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I’m saying they should boycott everything he touches not capture and kill him

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    How do you boycott a guy who gets like 90% of his money from governments?

    Tesla is essentially a derivative so it might crash eventually but we're already seeing his state backed companies like starlink buy up tesla products he can't sell.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Lizardman constant?

    In a new survey conducted by YouGov amid the latest controversy surrounding the xAI chatbot, a staggering 97 percent of respondents said that AI tools shouldn’t be allowed to generate sexually explicit content of children, and 96 percent said they shouldn’t be able to generate “undressed” images of minors only wearing clothing like underwear, either

    Lizardman constant!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

    So that means western governments will start doing something about it? Lawsuits? Fines? Blocking x?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    There are Western governments? I thought there were corporations and sycophants. Was that you knocking? I didn't know we still had a door.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    Hey i want to be an optimist! and i must admit i am not really very savvy at all the current workings of the governments in the European union, but yeah you got a point, in that a lot of them are looking like a bunch of corpos in a trench coat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Earlier today, I stopped myself from joking that Ford had a 100% ownership of the US government, and GM had the other 100% ownership of the US government, and Fiat-Chrysler had yet another 100% ownership of the US government...but prove me wrong. Prove me wrong about Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, and maybe even Netflix. Prove me wrong that BMW/Volkswagen/Mercedes doesn't own Germany, or that Honda, Toyota and Mitsubishi don't each wholly own Japan. I think Samsung genuinely does own South Korea, with no sarcasm or smarm, I think the East coast of Asia goes Russia, China, The People's Republic of Korea, Samsungistan.

    England? France? Italy? Who owns you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    I completely agree, i don't need to prove you wrong. The worse part is this process of shaping corporations into feudal lordships will end up turning the violence of the state inwards first, to manufacture the subjectivity of a modern serf, and then they will start to build violent crusades against each other. Again AI is a perfect tool for manufacture of subjectivity-> to Ideology -> to consent. It is also a complementary tool to automate the violence of the Feudal houses. What I'm not sure if it's that sustainable. We are already seeing the oldest feudal lords crumbling under their weight: Samsung for example and Korea. The USA is showing signs of accelerating towards a clash of inner contradictions. In the way it needs to wield it's imperial power to function and how it's overplaying it's hand on it's own people. Again call me an optimist, but i really don't think AI will reach AGI or become a super mechanism of control. I feel it's turning out more to be a wrench thrown into the system and it's outcome could either empower the late stage capitalists or obliterate the current cadre.

    As for who owns me; Work wise, probably China! Because i work in renewable energies and they are the only ones heavily investing in that!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Sure, in a survey. Words are cheap.

    Far from univeral in action, they're still on X.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago

    Exactly, this is the most important part of this whole deal. All of the people "protesting" stuff lately are doing nothing to change their own behavior and environment long term.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Man, when I read this, I didn't believe it. So I did a search and yup, this story is in EVERY major news site.

    Funny thing though. The article said 97% oppose this. Yet, when it became possible there was an image generated every minute, I guess by the 3%.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Most likely not even the 3%, but a much smaller minority pushing the system as hard as possible.

    Similar to how most successful freemium games are propped up by a tiny minority of "whales" who spend many orders of magnitude more than the vast majority of players.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago

    Nearly universal, except for anybody with any power.

    It's almost like the people in charge are irredeemable.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago

    I want to remind everyone, what his reaction was:

    He disabled the image generation! But!!! only for free users!!! He saw the CP and thought, I am fine with it if they pay me for it.

    i know, adult victims are important too. But let's focus on the children.

  • source
  • [+] 11 points 9 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Very few people use X. It's not really a platform that your average person has.

    Regardless, governments should be retaliating strongly to this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 9 months ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    If you actually believe Elon's stated user numbers then I have a bridge to sell you.

    It's a platform infested with bots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    They're reporting X's stated numbers...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    So all those people opposing it are going to stop using Twitter right?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    Headline from Hell.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The dissenters can be recognised by their fedoras, goatees and fondness for the phrase “well, actually it’s ephebophilia”

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Why even have a poll like someone needed to check if people have a problem with this

    up next a poll on whether or not cancer is bad

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Pretty important to show that nearly everyone outside the circles of power are against it, to demonstrate how evil all the people with power are, who have collectively shrugged it off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    At this point, why would anyone want to be related to this Nazi pedophile child?

    Seriously, if you buy a Tesla right now you deserve it be torched. You work for Tesla or SpaceX, and it's on you, you deserve to be ridiculed and lose your friends

    At this point, of you work for this shit, do business with this shit, or buy from this shit, as far as I'm concerned you are a pedophile nazi as well

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Yet, it continues…

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    All this spotlight on pedophilia, and these PedoCons still can't help themselves.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I hate ai and will bash it where i can, but that is not explicitly true. Teach it what a human body looks like, and what a clothed child looks like and it can do what it did if there is no rules in its system prompt or context memory to do so

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yet xAI has not made an official statement regarding the Grok generations, which some experts say could be illegal — despite facing the public for some of Grok’s previous controversies, such as when it began styling itself as “MechaHitler” during a racist posting spree. Musk, meanwhile, simply joked that the whole affair was “way funnier” than the trends started by other AI chatbots.

    Look it's 4chan in the flesh.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I'm a bit relieved to see that the debauched, degenerate, drug-addled dicks like this are finally losing their popularity. /s

  • source