top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 10 months ago (1 child)

This is exactly like hitlers SA. The Gestapo is coming if we let it

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    They‘re the brownshirts given a badge.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago

    ICE and the Heritage Foundation are both government sanctioned domestic terrorist organizations.

  • source
  • [–] 52 points 10 months ago (45 children)

    When are the people going to fight back?

  • source
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    I'm copying and pasting from another thread I posted in just a few hours ago on basically the same thing.

    If you're wanting a good faith explanation:

    The folks who own guns are almost all conservative and live in red states where there is positive sentiment towards ice. The people who are protesting are all left wing and very likely don't own a gun, and bringing a gun to a protest is easily how you make what could be a day of bruises and cuts into a day of bloodshed. I've been to several protests, and the big message is "don't give them any reason to mow down the crowd".

    Let's also consider why we don't organize like they do in Paris. You get arrested? Fired from your job. You get fired from your job? There goes your healthcare. There goes your housing. Our resistance is slow, not because we aren't passionate or are too complacent and dumb, it's because the sad fact that sick, starving, and homeless people make for poor resistance, and I doubt anyone wants that fate.

    The system we have is against us in ways far more sophisticated than what you deal with in other countries. We are surveilled by are government, controlled by our cops, and sold by our corporations. But we aren't dumb. We aren't weak. We see the hellfire and somehow still go out to do what we can, it's just we are up against the most powerful domestic military force in the world.

    Anyway, I gotta go teach children who didn't ask for any of this. I don't know how to keep it together, but somehow they do. If you're in Chicago, I'll see you in the streets next protest.✊

    PS: the kids are alright

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    I cannot stress enough how vital is the work you are doing by teaching kids.

    It's paramount that we teach the next generation human values of kindness and solidarity.

    They are probably the last generation to learn directly from humans, and not corporate controlled AIs.

    Best wishes to you and keep on the good fight!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago*

    This is so true. The way I see it, there are two ways to shift the status quo. The less likely one is to build labour power by mass unionizing, thus remove many of those factors that make civil action so costly. The more likely one is for shit to get worse for enough people with nothing to lose that the price of civil action drops to zero for some 20-25% of the population. The world has seen that play out before - during The Great Depression.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    The folks who own guns are almost all conservative and live in red states where there is positive sentiment towards ice

    I don't think I believe this. The US has 1.2 guns per person including children. You're telling me they are all owned by less than half of the adult population.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Anecdotal but of all the gun owners I know, none of them own just one gun.

    I just looked it up all the guns are owned by approximately 32% of the population.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] -10 points 10 months ago (34 children)
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Everyone's already pointing out "well doing nothing isn't helping" but I'd like to point out there are many steps between Doomscrolling and Suicide By Cop, such as talking to your neighbors and joining community projects to build your local resiliency.

    Go to the library or search up stuff like "charitable orgs [zip code/city/whatever]" and see what you can do. You can't do anything if everyone around you is too broke and stressed, anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (26 children)

    These people don't get it. Im working with a magat that supports the killing... what can I do that doesn't completely ruin my kids future? Attack him and get arrested? It isnt so simple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (22 children)

    Are doing nothing or attacking that particular man truly the only 2 options you feel you have available?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (19 children)
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    Damn, I hope your brain gets better!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    I might have a chance. Youre condition seems perm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago* (16 children)

    *Your

    And nope, I can imagine many things besides those 2 options. Sorry you can't. Hope your condition improves!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    I can imagine myself on the moon, but that doesn't mean I'll be able to get there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    Oh wow, you imagined a 3rd thing! Incredible progress.

    Maybe soon you'll be able to imagine one of the normal, reasonable things on the massive spectrum between your inane scenarios.

    Keep at it, champ!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (12 children)

    Why are you incapable of anything but silence or violence?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Anything else you're having a cartoonish amount of trouble understanding?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    What don't you understand about my are attitude?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Why are you so triggered by it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    They always have been. No need for them to exist, period. I prefer open borders over THIS.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    eyup. I understood having to control a border but if the payment to do it is this. Then let it go be whatever it will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    The whole DHS has been that since its inception.

  • source
  • [–] 87 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    Wild to see this fervor after a white woman was killed, this is like the fourth or fifth time ICE has murdered someone in a year but now our "worst fears have been realized." They certainly weren't an anti-civilian paramilitary when they were fucking raiding American ghettos with helicopters and kidnapping people in unmarked vans off the streets. We don't care about that, obviously, but now they've crossed a line!

    This country fucking sucks.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    His policies have killed millions. Stories of white women being brutalized have always pulled at Americans heart strings. We better learn to use it to our advantage, for the sake of everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    We better learn to use it to our advantage

    While you're still talking about learning, they've already mastered it. Your brutalized white woman is a terrorist in their narrative and people are already buying that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Stories of white women being brutalized have always pulled at Americans heart strings.

    If decades of school kids getting shot in their schools doesn't motivate Americans to take action, I'm not hopeful that this will either.

    I really want my cynicism to be proven wrong, but after watching the Americans for over 50 years, I don't expect it will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    this is like the fourth or fifth time ICE has murdered See, I didn't even know about this and I like to think I follow US news quite closely. I must have missed it or my brain shorted out because of the constant flood of awful news coming out of that country.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Camel, straw, back. If this becomes the tipping point so be it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It won't be, but even if it were; would you really want to fight side by side with someone whose only motivator is fear?

    Sounds like the kinda person who would immediately sell you out to the fascists if they were promised a deal that would protect themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago*

    ice has always been anti-immigration paramilitary force for both parties, they hire the exact people that usually hate immigrants in general, otherwise no normal citizens are going to do it, it just that DRUMPF lowered the bar so much that anyone can join.

  • source
  • [+] 30 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    It's probably due to the reports talking about either her "partner" or her "wife".

    Not erasing part of someone's identity is not confining them to extra boxes.

    Also, queer encompasses bisexual and pansexual, so the fact that she had a child and was married to a man is irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    Yup. Friend of mine finally cut loose her deadweight husband after 2 kids. She started dating an amazing woman and I've never seen her more happy. Luckily she also got custody, and her kids are awesome human beings.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (25 children)

    "Queer woman?"

    First I've heard that, where did that come from? I've also heard "devout Christian," but that seems to come and go. Probably not a lot of "queer devout Christians" out there.

    I'd like to know who she actually was. Her second husband died, so she doesn't seem to be gay, but what to do I know?

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (23 children)

    All this bullshit is irrelevant. They shot one of us. In cold blood. Just for being there when they were carrying out their illegal operations. We are all next.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (22 children)

    No, we have to humanize her, that's what makes the normally apathetic wake up. They want to define her as a monster, and dehumanize her, so they can rationalize and excuse murdering her.

    We have to remind everybody, especially MAGAs, that she was exactly like them, a mom of 3, a Christian, a widow, etc. When people see that she isn't the monster they claim, they start to realize who the real monsters are.

    We have seen over and over that Conservatives will shift their opinion when it hits their own life. Dick Cheney, as conservative as any Fascist Nazi, was extremely gay-friendly because he had a gay daughter whom he loved. He could bomb the shit out of foreign brown people because they aren't real to hom, but he supported gay rights, because gay people were real to him.

    When we get MAGAs to see others as fellow humans, it makes a difference to many. Not all, many MAGAs are unsalvageable psychopaths, but some will respond to this. We have to keep whittling away at their approval ratings, and humanizing their victims is an enormous help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (21 children)

    They want to define her as a monster, and dehumanize her, so they can rationalize and excuse murdering her.

    Right... Unfortunately that's why they're calling her queer 😬

    I get what you're saying, but that's exactly the opposite of what the media is doing. They are telling the public she wasn't like them. That she wasn't Christian, she was a liberal rioter with three children by two men and her lesbian lover beside her in the car when she was out maliciously running over law enforcement in her SUV. Bootlicking Maga chuds with hot jelly in their skulls don't need much to know a person was evil and deserved to be put down, and so for headlines like this the writers know exactly what they're doing; boiling this woman's entire life into one word that shows she's Not Like Us^TM

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    So... let me make sure I'm understanding you correctly...

    You're saying the media outlet called "lgbtq nation" described this woman as queer in order to dehumanize her and show people she isn't like them?

    Kinda strange... Who do you think reads lgbtq nation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Is that supposed to be a clever comeback?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Nuance on the word media, not specific to the publication posted here. The media is trying to dehumanize her by calling her queer because to the average MAGA queers are pedophiles wanting to destroy the nation with socialism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    So is that why the lgbtq nation called her queer? Just curious.

    Cause it seems like right-wing outlets aren't focusing on her queerness. They're just calling her a terrorist. Or a "liberal communist," whatever that is (do they not realize communists hate liberals as much as magas do?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    No, Fox News definitely called her a pro-noun using lesbian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Oh, see I wouldn't know that cause actually I don't follow right-wing media, and since OP's source article is from lgbtq nation, I don't think that detail is even relevant. Go complain in the comments of a fox news article.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    And of course the news and memorials about the queer woman one of their ilk murdered shouldn’t mention the fact she was queer, because that might make the MAGAs celebrate her death more than they did from the second they heard about it.

    If you think this is better than the 90s era ‘don’t mention someone on our side is queer because it’ll make us look bad’ attitude, you are wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (2 children)

    jesus what in the pancakes waffles is this? You assumed a lot of things in that last line (and no I don't think that)

    I never said they should not use that word I just explained how the media (most of it on US is MAGA related) will use her queerness as a weapon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Sorry for the misfire if you’re not actually against it. I have been seeing shitheads advocate against mentioning that she’s queer for that exact reason all day, and I’m really tired of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    No problem I get it, as a gay man it would make me mad if they erased my queerness, but at this point we need to understand how the media manipulates all this to serve a narrative to the average US citizen (and you know who they voted for)

    For us, yeah it is maddening to think queerness could dehumanize someone, for them it is just another minority to hate

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Let’s put a dead queer woman back in the closet, because people that already hate her might still hate her. Oh boy, I can feel the acceptance, it’s totally different from all the homophobia I grew up with!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Not wanting someone reduced down to just their sexuality is not shoving them back in the closet and I don't appreciate the insinuation that I'm prejudiced for calling it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You yourself are advocating for her sexuality not being mentioned at all! If you were trying to advocate for something else here, it absolutely doesn’t come across.

    Queer people are constantly erased in death, by prejudiced family and media. Reconsider supporting or saying anything resembling that, such as by going ‘oh no why did the headline of a queer news site have to mention she was queer??’

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I wasn't advocating anything, I was explaining why the news media plastering her sexuality in every headline is an attempt to dehumanize her and send a message to those both inside and outside the mentioned minority. I apologize if it came across to you as queer erasure, that was definitely not what I was going for, but I do understand now how that's how it could come across, so thank you for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Honestly thank you for being open to listening, I appreciate it especially since I came out the gate hot and sarcastic. It was coming from a place of reignited trauma, but it wasn’t good.

    I’m of an age and from a place where that erasure and silencing in the media happened literally, to queer people around me. That being a national problem was a huge part of why queer newspapers exist to begin with, so acting like they shouldn’t be highlighting her queerness just brings all that up at once. It’s scary to think about how we’re heading back in that direction in a lot of ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Probably not a lot of “queer devout Christians” out there.

    Many, many more than you'd think. Plenty of denominations have no problem with queer people. Even the Catholic church has walked back a lot of their anti-queer messaging in the last decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Oh, but it was fine before?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›