all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

I'm sure Marriott or Wynn got them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 58 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 192 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    Move sparks praise but chain says hotel independently operated and cancellations ‘not reflective of Hilton values’

    I thought official press statements were supposed to cast the brand in a good light.

    “Hilton’s position is clear: Our properties are open to everyone and we do not tolerate any form of discrimination.”

    Words just don't mean anything anymore, do they?

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 119 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    We do not tolerate any form of discrimination apparently means We provide hospitality to the worst perpetrators of discrimination

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It means "We won't discriminate between people who give us money. Whether they kill each other afterword is none of our concern."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    That is what they mean by it, but the fact they chose to express it as "not tolerating discrimination" as opposed to "not discriminating" or "not engaging in discrimination" really highlights that they are engaging in the social contract of tolerance with entities that are explicitly breaking said contract. This kind of weak willed "inclusion" for the sake of virtue signalling/profit is part of what makes fascists think that the paradox of tolerance is some killer argument against empathy

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Psst, Hilton: it's ok to discriminate against fascists actively using your hotel as a base to violate the Constitution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Psst, Hilton: it’s ok to discriminate against fascist

    Might want to look up Conrad Hilton's political beliefs. Dude was blue blooded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    But in a good light to who?

    Us, the crowd that ended up finding the fediverse? No.

    They are cozying up to another hotel owner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 86 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    “They have taken immediate action to resolve this matter and are contacting impacted guests to ensure they are accommodated,” Hilton’s spokesperson said. “Hilton’s position is clear: Our properties are open to everyone and we do not tolerate any form of discrimination.”

    A physical manifestation of the Paradox of Tolerance. I wonder how many staff members of that hotel decided to quit suddenly.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    They backpetaled:

    The company then pointed to a statement on Everspeak Hospitality’s website, saying this was the respective hotel. “Everpeak Hospitality has moved swiftly to address this matter as it was inconsistent with our policy of being a welcoming place for all. We are in touch with the impacted guests to ensure they are accommodated. We do not discriminate against any individuals or agencies and apologize to those impacted,” the statement said.

    Actual Link: https://www.404media.co/hilton-hotel-that-refused-dhs-reservations-backpedals/
    Archive Link: https://archive.ph/e3TJN

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    They still got disowned and dumped by Hilton corporate:

    Hilton removing MN hotel that denied ICE bookings from its system

    Corporate scumbags throwing the hotel owner under the bus so they can continue profiting from the Gestapo. How can a hotel full of ICE thugs be a welcoming place for all?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    They should just behave like Trump's admin: making a statement while actually not doing anything to "accomodate the guests", keep taking their reservations and cancel them at the last minute again, for a different bullshit reason every time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I really hope it was a last minute cancel like saw the guy walking in the door last minute

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 49 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Trump is going for the rare Third Amendment Constitutional crisis

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    This makes me wonder how much money a day our taxes are paying in hotel rooms for people who we have already paid for their offices/bases for them. Seems like a giant waste of money for areas that don't want them there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago*

    That was a topic I saw going around before Trump's election, people had done some math for that. When he stays in places like Trump Tower and all the secret service etc do too we are paying millions of dollars in taxes to fund luxury vacations essentially, to people that are also getting paid for it by taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    That's called Capitalism, boys. The Free Market rules.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I suspect that front office manager may have fucked up. Seems like a big decision that should be sent out through the gm or marketing.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I don’t understand why a corporate GM would be at an independently operated hotel. Marketing doesn’t need to be involved in canceling some reservations. ICE is just making a big deal out of this because they are little bitch babies. Get another hotel. Sleep in a barn. Jump off a cliff. Whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Not a corporate gm. The property general manager. If you are denying the government lodging that's a big deal. They are owned by the everpeak resort group. They have there own layer of marketing and possibly a government relations person. Front office manager is usually a very limited scope.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Good! Protect Omar!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    We do not discriminate against any individuals or agencies

    Really??? I mean depending on your definition of "agency", that might be a bad call.

    Would you offer rooms to isis? What about illegal organizations in general? What about when you're unsure, but suspect that an organization may be illegal?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    The third amendment is about forced quartering, it doesn't apply to voluntary renting. If the government forced the hotel to quarter them anyway, then they might have a case.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -11 points 10 months ago*

    HA .... Take that!!!!!!.... n@zi corpo whorshiping ladder pulling imperial reprobate stinky turdz.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 46 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    But sadly, the Hilton chain ditched it.

    So remember: if you're in Lakeville, MN and you need a place to crash, this hotel seems like a decent one. As for the other Hiltons, I guess I'll find me another hotel to stay at, because I don't like collaborators and fascist enablers.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Companies should be punished for aiding POS ICE and DHS

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 16 points 10 months ago*

    Well, this is one of the precious few things you can do as a consumer: give your money to companies and individuals that behave honorably and decently.

    And if enough people do it, it has real weight. The only thing corporations care about at the end of the day is their bottom line: they suck up to Trump because they think there's money to be made doing that, and they'll stop the minute they realize there's a silent, critical mass of people who choose to reward those who don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    chain says [...] ‘not reflective of Hilton values’

    And what are those values?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Sounds like I won't be visiting a Hilton hotel ever. I hope everyone follows suit.

    Fuck your kowtowing to bullies.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    In a statement, a Hilton spokesperson said the brand’s hotels “serve as welcoming places for all” and that the hotel that canceled the reservations was independently owned and operated. The cancellations “are not reflective of Hilton values”, the spokesperson said.

    I see the problem here. This particular hotel realized that being tolerant and welcome to all means that you have to not tolerate intolerance. Hilton corporate misunderstood this as the Paradox of Tolerance and wrongfully assumed they needed to tolerate these pieces of shit.

    Had they understood that tolerance is a social contract and need not be applied to those who didn't follow it, this whole mistake could have been avoided.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 23 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    ...and then immediately kissed the boot, apologized and made the gestapo be warmly welcomed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Wish they would've stuck with it...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Damn. Bold move. I mean, I assume the owner is probably an Indian man in his late 60s who lives in Canada.

    But ICE could probably come back in a week, and kidnap the owner. I mean, that's what we're all doing these days, right? Kidnappings are all the rage right now.

  • source