517
Hate it when this happens (slrpnk.net)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

all 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 208 points 10 months ago (5 children)

nobody came;-)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
    • [–] 165 points 10 months ago (11 children)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Now fix it so POV is used correctly

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Just change it to "my POV" because it's what the photographer is currently seeing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Which then again makes it totally redundant... Just do not use it for something like this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
    • [–] 154 points 10 months ago (34 children)

    You can’t say “bukkake” on the internet now?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
    •
  • [–] 75 points 10 months ago* (24 children)

    I think it's funny, because bukkake is just a noun, kind of meaning to splash or pour something over something else. There are even dishes called bukkake, e.g. bukkake soba. But since in the anglosphere it pretty much exclusively refers to the sexual act, that just has a very different connotation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    Sorry to pick nits, but if the definition is "to pour something over something else," that's a verb.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    ぶっ掛け (bukkake) is a noun, like "a splash of coffee."

    ぶっ掛ける (bukkakeru) is a verb, like "I like to splash around."

    Granted, bukkake isn't that kind of splash, it's rather "they splashed water on the flames."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    i would change your first example to "a splash of cream in your coffee". in english that implies the sense of scale.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (6 children)

    No, they're explaining it to primarily Americans, who typically don't get a splash of cream in their coffee, so much as they get a splash of coffee in their milkshake.

    Thus, it works correctly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    since you're going to pedant, pedant correctly. they don't get coffee in their milkshake, they get espresso. when they get coffee, they get a splash of milk.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    No, I am talking about Starbucks drinks, Frappucinos, which are basically milkshakes, that have vague hints of actual coffee in them, where the majority of the 'coffee' flavor somes from flavored syrups or chips or powders of some kind.

    Those are far, far more commonly imbibed in the US, compared to the rest of the world, than the more traditional coffee with a splash of something, or a dirty 'whatever' via adding an espresso shot, a traditional latte, etc.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    idk what any of those milkshake things are (i know they exist and everyone here buys them, i just have taste), whenever we get given starbucks gift card i buy drinks that are about 1:1 espresso:milk

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Well, then I'm glad that you have better taste and more general concern for your health than a great deal of modern US 'coffee' enjoyers.

    Really, a frappucino everyday is... quite a lot of sugar... not good for you, and I've known a lot of people who are basically addicted to the things.

    ... I think my favorite actual, proper, caffinated drinks are a dirty chai latte, and a dirty london fog.

    I've also found that a tiny dab of actual, real butter, into a cup of fairly dark coffee, and then maybe a splash of milk... that seems to be how I like to take my coffee.

    You?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    at home, i take it dark with a dash of cinnamon in with the grounds and maybe a tablespoon of oat milk. at my favorite coffee shoppe (they are fancye enough to deserve the e) i'm very basic i just get their cappuccino like half the time. there's a really good cuban place down the street what just opened that's got a cortadito to die for though (I normally don't add sugar - not a diabetes thing, a I want to eat candy thing so I eat a diabetic diet and get my sugars in later thing. Hedonism can get weird.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    It's the noun form of the verb bukkakeru. Japanese is weird.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    "fondant" is an equivalent, from the French "to melt" its now a noun.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Not quite the same, although interesting!

    In this case, "Bukkake" is a noun in both English and Japanese. "Bukkakeru" with the "ru" on the end is the verb form that the noun comes from. English didn't change it, the picking of nits above just wasn't quite correct.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    So basically, bukkake/bukkakeru is nearly a direct translation to 'splooge'.

    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/splooge

    Where you can splooge your splooge all over someone, and then you'll have splooged your splooge on them.

    And maybe you can be splooging untill the sun comes up, and people will say 'nobody else splooges like that guy'.

    So, silly examples, but you can see 'splooge' is both the noun for the... resulting liquid, and also the verb for ... 'creating' it, expelling it.

    Not exactly the same, grammatically, but pretty close.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    You mean that soba wasn’t supposed to have cum on it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 25 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I'm too lazy to remake this meme because of censorship. Unfortunately, this is how memes are trending thanks to AI and algorithms

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
    • [–] 55 points 10 months ago* (10 children)

    The fuck's the point of getting bukkaked if you're gonna wear a hairnet and goggles?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 98 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    It's required PPE in the state of California for all orgies. Safety first.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The irony is that the shower cap & goggles cause cancer in the state of California, so we just can't win over here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I wonder how many references I am missing daily.

    I've watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
    I read 1984, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
    I watched Idiocracy, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
    I switched to Arch, and then started seeing references to it everywhere, btw.
    etc...

    And it doesn't stop. This has to mean I still keep missing many. I'd probably scroll past this comment if I didn't see that label on some Adata drive, since they don't seem to be that common in EU.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I'm no fancy bukkake expert, but I'd wager cleaning is easier and less risk of eye infection.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Goggles seem valid, but hair? Should rinse right out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Only with cold water. Semen has a lot of protein in it, which means it will curdle and harden like scrambled eggs when it gets hot. Lots of women make the mistake of trying to use hot water, (because hot water cleans better, right?) but that has it immediately gumming up and getting sticky before they can even get the shampoo lathered.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Also, try Conditioner, not shampoo to get “proteins” out of hair.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • load more comments (-1 replies)
    • [–] 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Does it count if there are goggles involved?

    Not kink shaming but definitions matter damn it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Goggles? Shower cap? TISSUES???

    What kind of podunk bukkake is this?! No wonder no one showed up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    tbf, some people have sensitivity issues and are grossed out by cum on hair/eyes, they are still allowed horny and covered in cum if they want to

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    "Yes I had a question about tonight's bukkake, I am allergic to cum, do you have a vegan alternative?"

    Let me tell you, I was involved in organizing gangbangs in a major city, this was not once a thing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Now give your sister a hug, and tell her you love her

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    He could be a good big brother and help her out /s

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Idk what the original context of the image was supposed to be but I don't even care tbh. 😂

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 41 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    I can tell this is fake because "man passes up opportunity for free, consensual sexual act" is so far beyond fiction it's not even funny.

    Although that does sound like an Onion article title.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 50 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I can think of several men I know, including myself, who would not want to attend a bukkake

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I'm entirely capable of standing around and jerking off on my own, without driving across town, without having to interact with the kind of people that would show up to an impromptu bukkake party.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Sounds like you want to plan yours out then. If you do so at your own home, we’ve solved most of your hurdles here!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    I mean, I would consider going to (or organizing) a planned sex party or something like that, but the problem for me here is mostly that it's just bukkake.

    If the uh, the set of activities were a bit more diverse, or interesting, maybe me sitting around and not doing any work, like a lipstick party... or any number of things that actually require, or are considerably more enjoyable with another person or multiple people...

    That'd be more appealing.

    That, and, frankly, I kind of just find the idea of a bukkake scene inherently demeaning to women... or I gueas just any uh, subject, regardless of sex/gender.

    Sure, probably some ladies are into that, some guys are into that, etc.

    Just gives me bad vibes, don't like the idea of treating someone's face as a collective group cum dumpster, even if its consensual, just feels gross to me.

    Further, you'd need to vet the participants, screen/background check them generally, also screen for STIs/STDs, etc.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    From a misspent youth, I can tell you that many people, even straight men, ghost sex parties/moresomes, even with attractive cis women, even after paying a deposit in advance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    They didn’t cum because she covered her eyes and hair. That’s the whole point isn’t it? AIM for the eyes

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    a bukkake is crazy

    also shouldn't it be nobody "came"? it'd be more funnier (incorrect grammar intended)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Is it just my observation or are tattos a requirement for porn actors?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago

    If you don’t watch porn, then you’re speculating. Porn aesthetics aren’t a simple mirror of “societal trends” they’re shaped by platform algorithms, niche markets, and performer branding.

    Dragging in right-wing moral panic and some AI anecdote is just noise. Without firsthand exposure or actual data, this is guesswork, not insight.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [+] -26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It's probably because of the tattoos.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • load more comments (-1 replies)