top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 222 points 10 months ago (15 children)

Do it. I know which OS will run fine on 8G of RAM and which one won't.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Someone's smelling the year of the desktop

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I built a gaming PC last year with 32gb, and it’s time to upgrade my MacBook…

    So, logically, I just moved my workflow to my desktop. I would say dual boot for the win… but honestly most of my games run great on Linux, so I think I’m just good there until and unless this blows over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    They don't care, my parents laptop was decently mid-range spec bar storage, manufacturer put in a 5400RPM spinning rust drive. It was damn near unusable, crap from the factory.

    Was forced to use it once when visiting and noticed the performance, put an SSD in it and it's been a fine laptop since. They're perfectly willing to hobble a laptop to save a buck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    You're thinking of CP/M, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Can CP/M address >= 2^32 bytes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    No OS if fine with 8GB if you use it for anything other than browsing memes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 98 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    Hah, guess they're gonna have to run Linux. Windows 11 would choke on 8 GB RAM.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    I agree, funny enough they require minimum 4 GB, but I had problems with it with 16 GB. 8 GB is nowhere near enough, especially if you use excel, teams, and that crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I have to use windows at work, have 32gb and regularly get browser tabs unloaded for low memory. I'm not running VMs or anything. Usually just Firefox, visual studio, and slack.

    Personal computer is Linux with 16gb and that's more than enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Same here. Modern 32 gb machine from work is a slog. 2 minutes from wake to actually working, can be 10 seconds just to use the start menu sometimes. Older thinkpad with 16gb and linux/cosmic desktop - wakes almost instantly and perfectly snappy for most things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I have 64gb 32 for vm and 32 for host, security software eats it all. I pity the poor bastards on the 8gb work laptops. My project is funded separately from all the others so we got to order our own laptops. Our previous laptops sucked at 32gb total.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Most bloated apps like outlook and teams etc regularly use nearly a gig of ram each in my experience. Brutal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 10 months ago* (17 children)

    Maybe this will be a boon. The entire reason the ram requirements got so high as it is is because software optimization was put on the back burner. Maybe a ram shortage where people can't obtain the ram needed will force the big name software devs to start being more frugal with ram. (talking to you chrome... whom currently is using 2 gigs alone just trying to show a twitch stream...)

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Or more realistically be used as an excuse for always online cloud based services a la office 365. "We would let you download the app, but most users don't have the computing power so instead we'll just make this a helpful subscription!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Idk, trying to load up a couple spreadsheets in Edge is going to consume 8gb of Ram in no time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    "Oh don't worry, you won't have to actually load spreadsheets anymore, just give our AI full access to your files and it will do whatever you ask :)"

    Ideally, you're correct though and companies start investing in optimization. I don't see it going that way, but a girl can dream.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Honestly, it'll be more efficient to have memory in a datacenter in that hardware in a datacenter will see higher average capacity utilization, but it's gonna drive up datacenter prices too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Not sure I agree. Centralizing storage, and especially memory, creates incredible round trip costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    I mean, efficient in terms of memory utilization, like. Obviously there are gonna be associated costs and drawbacks with having remote compute.

    Just that if the world has only N GB of RAM, you can probably get more out of it on some system running a bunch of containers, where any inactive memory gets used by some other container.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    As a dirty commie, I agree, but unfortunately under capitalism it is just an avenue for exploitation. Large companies are deciding what we can or cannot have access to and setting the price for it in a manner completely divorced from what they're offering.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    At least one studio, Larian, has confirmed this is the case for them.

    When discussing the pressures the company faces when releasing a game in early access, such as audience expectations, Vincke told us, "Interestingly, another [issue Larian is facing] is really the price of RAM and the price of SSDs and f**k, man. It's like, literally, we've never had it like this."

    He continued, "It kind of ruins all of your projections that you had about it because normally, you know the curves, and you can protect the hardware. It's gonna be an interesting one. It means that most likely, we already need to do a lot of optimization work in early access that we didn't necessarily want to do at that point in time. So it's challenging, but it's video games."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    How do you take that from the comment above?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Not the person you're responding to, but "most likely, we already need to do a lot of optimization work in early access that we didn't necessarily want to do at that point" indicates to me that optimization was not a top priority. It's not unusual for people to optimize after a proof of concept or something, but I imagine in gaming (I don't do game dev admittedly) you don't want that too late in the process. If they're not planning on having it in early access, then their early consistent user base will be more worried about other things. If min spec is 8 then people with 4 won't get it or won't complain about poor performance because technically it's their machine that's the issue. Lack of complaints about that and feedback about other things further shifts the priority away from optimization. Plus, anyone who's worked in dev spaces or probably any kind of deliverable knows that there are things that just don't happen despite your best intentions. Things like optimization are the first to go in the dev space, so by openly admitting to putting it off, it does feel like an admission of "we were probably just not going to get around to it". In my experience, the further out you plan to optimize, the more man hours you end up wasting, so I don't see a company investing heavily in that at any point, but doing so post early launch seems wasteful if they legitimately cared about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 73 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    So RAM costs them more now, and they need to pass those costs onto customers. However, it seems like they’re also trying to redefine what “mid-range” means to us all, as if we aren’t fully aware of what computers are capable of and what amount of memory is good vs not. Making the various ranges cost more is intuitive. Enshitifying the ranges to sell them at the same price is just antithetical to the whole concept of the ranges…

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    Isn’t the issue here the newest generation? I keep reading they’re way less tech savvy than the rest of us. Blended in with the propensity for young people to have an iPhone or Android and no PC, well, this junk will likely slide right by.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    So our generation will be the first to have to teach both our boomer parents AND our millennial offspring what “RAM” is?!

    (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Large computing will exist solely in the cloud where you will pay a subscription for it. Can't have these grubbing consumers buy anything we elites don't get a monthly cut of.

    I wish this was sarcasm.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I am honestly not sure if that's a bad thing aside from the capitalism of it all. Almost all tasks normal people do could be done with a 10 year old computer running Linux.

    I will find it hilarious if this RAM pricing issue causes people to move to Linux rather than have slow ass Windows 11.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I'm positive its a bad thing. It will mean the end of ownership. Our children will be born and their only worth with be as consumers for which they can crushed for any reason the owners see fit. Its slavery and feudalism nothing more nothing less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    8 GB of RAM would be enough if every fucking application didn't use Electron.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    thank you. came here to say this.

    or, well, it also doesn't play well with ARM, i.e. on macbooks the ram isn't the bottle neck, its the CPU struggling with electron despite objectively being faster than x86 equivalents.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 10 months ago* (9 children)

    Soldered in, or upgradeable at least? The former would be a huge reason to never buy the newest gen of laptops.

    EDIT: Missed in article, yeah this would suck if they stick to soldered RAM for ultra-thins.

    Another problem manufacturers face is with notebooks that ship with soldered DRAM. In particular, ultrathin designs would need to be revamped to modify their configurations.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Those soldered low RAM ones are going to be in the dump a lot sooner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    @ThisGuyThat @Arghblarg Excellent. Hopefully some of them will have hardware that supports #openBSD that I can pick up for pennies on the dollar. I believe the #thinkpad x1 carbon is already on soldered RAM. I can see many in the #Linux crowd stand to profit handsomely from this, given their much more broad hardware support 😜#frugalComputing #BSD #recycle

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 43 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 43 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Let's see how this plays out with windows 11 😄

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Swap is a thing. It'll kinda suck, but not as much as it would have pre-nvme. Except that now there's an nvme shortage... and an SSD shortage.

    Ugh, I guess I'll just put Windows 2000/ME on there to complete the retro look.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    concidering they were shipping windows 11 systems on 4 gigs of ram and selling it, I expect it won't change much. They worked like shit but they still sold. You make it cheap enough people will buy it regardless of flaws or speed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 10 months ago

    Time to switch to Linux people lol. Windows is barely usable on 8GB these days.

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    better start removing AI from Windows then... holy fucj my 16gb is barely holding up with windows11 that in forced to use on my work PC. slow as BALLS, it's just raping the entire system performance constantly

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    I wonder what's going to happen to the electron frontends if machines are bottlenecked by ram so bad. Wasn't facebook just planning to switch whatsapp's frontend to webview as well? And win11's desktop is electron too. Everyone was acting like ram is unlimited.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Don't worry, you'll just need to subscribe to My Windows Copilot Cloud+ to get access to a virtual PC with plenty of RAM from anywhere! It'll be powerful enough you'll barely notice us logging all your actions and blocking anything we don't like.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I have win11 on a work surface laptop pro with 16gb and I'm consistently at 15+GB used. This is corporate bloat. How do I know? I have a personal surface pro 6 with win11 and 16gb and it runs like a breeze.

    Corporate bloat is such bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Security is all theatre. When NIST says make secure passwords and never change them but your fortune 500 infosec policy tells you to rotate your password every 30 days?

    LOL

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    tbf a lot of that crap is mandated by insurance compliance requirements

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Company computers often come with pre-installed spyware which is notoriously RAM hungry. My company laptop immediately after boot uses nearly a full 16gb before you open any programs. Luckily our IT department realizes this and only allows us to purchase machines with 32GB and up. They're probably not happy with the current prices, but being a F500 company they can afford it...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

    ...do we really need to use the word "raping" to talk about PC performance or can we agree that there are a hundred other words that fit better in that spot?

    EDIT: Wooo free downvotes. Y'all are a bunch of snowflakes. I tried to make a point on behalf of others, since there are people who have traumatic lived experience with the concept of "rape" and would probably prefer not to be reminded of it. Nobody serious about computing is going to go out and say "this process is raping the performance" because it's just not a good idea. I bet you (if in tech field) wouldn't say it in front of your boss. But sure, call me sensitive and pull out a semantic argument.

    I can smell you through your screen. Go take a shower and try being human.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    sometimes facing fears is a better way to overcome problems. hiding or making everyone avoid things that bother you or were a traumatic experience doesn't help anyone.

    I used this word because it's definition applys to the scenario. It's the act of pilaging and plundering of my system resources by microsoft and other monitoring tools with no recourse but to abandon them. rape is a perfectly fine word to use. if it was strictly limited to sexual acts, I wouldn't have used it.

    edit: I use this word at work too and have no issues with it both verbally and written. moreso verbally because people can't apply multi definitions of words and always assume 1 main definition

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I know it's hard, but you'll get through this. One day at a time, step by step, things will get easier. Some days it might not feel like you're making any progress; Some days you'll feel like you're moving backwards. But time heals all wounds. You've got this, eventually you won't even remember their comment existed. Stay. Strong. Keep fighting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    45 comments in c/hardware@lemmy.world view that post