you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Honestly, it'll be more efficient to have memory in a datacenter in that hardware in a datacenter will see higher average capacity utilization, but it's gonna drive up datacenter prices too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Not sure I agree. Centralizing storage, and especially memory, creates incredible round trip costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    I mean, efficient in terms of memory utilization, like. Obviously there are gonna be associated costs and drawbacks with having remote compute.

    Just that if the world has only N GB of RAM, you can probably get more out of it on some system running a bunch of containers, where any inactive memory gets used by some other container.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    As a dirty commie, I agree, but unfortunately under capitalism it is just an avenue for exploitation. Large companies are deciding what we can or cannot have access to and setting the price for it in a manner completely divorced from what they're offering.

  • source
  • parent