cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40224994

I just found out that Embark used genAI to replace recalling it's voice actors. And I am devastated. It was my GOTY and now I'm boycotting it. To the point that I decided to be vocal about it.

I don't want any AI (not talking about machine learning for the way the Arcs move, I'm talking about the voice actors being replaced) in the work of art that I think are the video games I play.

To game developers: Stop using AI in your video games!


Je viens de découvrir que Embark a utilisé de l'IA générative pour remplacer ses acteurs. Et franchement je suis tellement déçu. C'était clairement mon GOTY, et maintenant je me retrouve à boycotter tout ça, au point de carrément en faire des posts pour toucher le plus de monde possible.

Je ne veux aucune IA (et attention, je ne parle pas du machine learning utilisé pour les déplacements des Arcs) dans les oeuvres d'art que je consomme.

Aux développeurs: Arrêtez d'utiliser de l'IA dans les jeux vidéos !

top 81 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 66 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Stealing? They paid the voice actors to train the model, everyone consented. What do you think stealing is?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    The job offer would read "Let us use your voice to train an AI to replace you, and if you say no, we'll hire someone else who will." Most actors are highly replaceable, so they have very little bargaining power. This is why actors have unions and why they've been fighting AI hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    I’m admittedly ignorant of all of this, but I’ll post my thoughts anyway:

    If the AI is trained on their voice and that AI is available to other studios (like leasing or buying it from the original company), the one time payment for that actor’s work is a very very shit deal. They’re out of a job in multiple places or for multiple works now since it can be reused for many things.

    I doubt that the contract says it’s only used for that one singular project. Companies are sneaky. However, I have not read said contracts so it’s a magical guess on my part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I also hope Embark do the right thing and get VAs back in to voice quests and cut scenes.
    Use the generated voice for items and locations only. Maybe, as an emergency, for continuity.

    I guess it gives them unbelievable leverage over the VAs: "We are offering you $10 to do 4 hours of voice lines. Or we will just use the model we have already trained".
    Which then puts even more downwards pressure on VA wages.

    I bet Embark has made bank, and it would be a massive PR win to get the VAs back in at an industry standard rate to do the quests and cutscenes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -5 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Stealing might be a strong word, I agree. But because of this policy, Embark won't need another recording session out of these actors. Designing the project to never pay the actors that could have worked with them again.

    To back this term ("stealing"). I consider that the genAI technology as a whole has been built on the stolen work of the whole world. ChatGPT has been built upon thousands of Github projects without their consent, I suppose Sora, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, etc have been made in the same way. Training data has been stolen.

    Even though it's a bit far-stretched, using this kind of technology to remove any future human collaboration is stealing to me.

    • Stealing (copying) their voice (in the Little Mermaid way)
    • Stealing their money (make profit with their unique trait in the future)
    • Stealing the work of thousand if not million of people around the world through the genAI technology
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    It’s not just a “strong word”, it’s incorrect. At most, these platforms are built on copyright infringement, which is not theft. And in this case, it’s not even copyright infringement since they hired a voice actor

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 39 points 10 months ago (46 children)

    But its in agreement with the voice actors. I don't get the big deal. I'm not pro AI but why would you abandon a game you enjoy for that reason? Praise them for making an Unreal engine game that looks and runs great.

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    If SAG hadn't gone on strike, Netflix would also have been making agreements with actors to use their voice and likeness without actually offering future work too. Was SAG wrong to push against this?

    Just because someone makes a deal doesn't mean it isn't a toxic business practice that's bad for the industry or the people involved in it. People also agree to work for subpar wages, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't push for higher minimum wages.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    While i think it sucks, and the only reason they take this weird approach is that the embark guy is a turbo AI bro. What i don't understand why they even bother, since arc raiders has only like 10 voice lines

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -4 points 10 months ago (42 children)

    I agree, this game has an awesome tech team making a clear counter-argument to UE5 haters (I hate UE5, they used very well imho). The graphism are cool and the art is really a work of art! I love the world design, lore, color grading, design-language, weapon design, etc.

    The voice acting got through what I consider my keen 6th sense of AI-detection (which scares me tbh). But this is something that I cannot let go, I don’t want to. Even though everything else is (for a multiplayer game) top-notch imo.

    What’s the boundary if we let them do this to one aspect of the game then? What amount of AI slop are we going to accept in the future if we allow corporations to AI-creep into everything?

    I want to vote with my wallet and with my voice to support what I think isn’t the right direction.

    Even though the voice actors signed the contract: I, as a customer/fan, don’t want workers signing off their ability to work more. These voice actors won’t ever work again with Embark now, Embark don’t need another recording session from them. Ok, actors waved that opportunity away willingly. But I don’t want the whole industry to become like this.

    It’s not because the genAI trend isn’t going away that we aren’t allowed to adapt to it. My adaptation is to fight for an AI-free label.

    PS: On another front, Embark has made millions, if not more on this game. Don’t tell me they HAD to use genAI instead of paying those voice actors for reshoot to begin with.

    I love the dev behind ARC Raiders. I hate the management team that forced AI into the project (I can't prove this claim, call that a hunch)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (40 children)

    The reason I've heard they are doing it so they can pump out dialoge faster and they don't have to let the voice actors come in for every line whenever they add a new map with new way points for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] [S] -5 points 10 months ago (38 children)

    I understand that this would be costly. But imho this isn't a good reason. There is imo only two ethic ways to solve this kind of problem:

    • Understand that the goal is too hard to handle. Abandon the voice acting on the ping system.
    • Put the means, even if this is costly*

    *: As I said, Embark is a big company, they made millions of dollars. They can afford it. It is absurd to me to allow such a big structure to "cut costs" by removing the human factors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (30 children)

    Do you know the specifics of their contracts with the VA-s? Are you certain they're not paying the VA-s for using their voice (even if it is AI generated)? What is the ethical dilemma if VA-s are getting paid whenever a new voiceline is created?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (27 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (22 children)

    But are they also getting paid after the fact? Let's say $50 any time a new voiceline is added to the game using their voice. Because Embark is using a tool to do the work someone would've done manually, they would've had to pay the person otherwise so I think a royalty-like payment any time the VA voice is used is completely fair. Otherwise it becomes what people are complaining about, that they're effectively paying a one time fee for the VA voice and then use it for free for forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 10 months ago (21 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (20 children)

    Call me crazy but I think people getting cheated out of the fruits of their labor, even if they themselves might've signed their it away, should be criticized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 10 months ago (19 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    I don't know what kind of work you do but let's say your work requires you to log into some kind a system that somehow knows to track the work you do. Now imagine you start your work and your co-worker logs themselves in your place. You do the labor, they get the benefit. Are you being cheated?

    The VA would do that labor if there was no TTS with their voice as a model. The VA labor goes into that model because it is their voice. They do the labor but someone else benefits from it? Are they not being cheated?

    And final thought experiment. If the VA-s owned the TTS system and Embark asks for a new voiceline. Are the VA-s supposed to give that new voiceline away for free just because some TTS system generated it? Wouldn't Embark cheat them out their pay if they said "You made it for free so we should be able to use it for free."?

    The intellectual bankruptcy comes from you because instead of actually thinking about the situation you hide behind the "But they agreed to it" argument. People also agreed with indenture servitude, doesn't mean it's acceptable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 10 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (16 children)

    Apparently you do think that indentured servitude, at least to the extent where the person agrees to step into servitude, is completely fine. After all they agreed to the contract.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 10 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    Since you decided to ignore my argument all I can do is attack your stupid argument, which is that the signed contract is all that matters. I'm attacking it by stating you don't have a problem with indentured servitude as long the servant accepts the contract. That is not the same thing as stating VA work is somehow indentured servitude, please be capable of telling the difference here. If the agreement is all that matters then you have to be okay with indentured servitude in the manner I originally described.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    The irony of calling someone a zealot who can't be wrong, and then straight up ignoring all criticism of your argument. You are right, there is no point in arguing with someone like you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 10 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Pretty zealous of you to dictate what is or isn't a valid argument. If my argument is so wrong why not instantly debunk it instead of playing this stupid ring around the Rosie?

    We can play the same game if you want. Your argument that they signed the contract is not a valid argument because I think it's utterly stupid and I shouldn't be addressing it in the first place. Come back with a real argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago* (8 children)

    I already did. what Embark is ding is not indentured servitude. saying it is doesn’t change reality, no matter how much you wish otherwise.

    If you had bothered to read ANYTHING I SAID you'd know that was not my argument.

    make a real one to begin with.

    I made 3 points at the start, all of which you just ignored and said they signed a contract so nothing else matters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    who is the bigger narcissist here?

    You're the bigger narcissist here. You're literally making up statement I did not make to have a point to argue against. You can't bother to read anything I say (or alternatively you can't read, doesn't really matter to me which it is). You act high and mighty every chance you get.

    So I'm not going to address anything else because talking to you is pointless. You're arguing with a wall because I don't even need to be here. You're not going to read what I say, you're going to make up arguments I never made, you argue your own made up arguments to be right and then call me stupid for having your make-belief arguments. You are the wall you're arguing with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    The fact that you think that's advice to me just shows how little you actually care about my point of view. Get out of here you narcissist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It's pretty fucking ironic of you to talk about "individuals right to self-determination is sacrosanct" while you zealously disrespect my beliefs and push your own onto me. Who would've thunk a narcissist like you is also a hypocrite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Marketing this as "text-to-speech" is oversimplyfying at best, dishonest at worst imho. People need to work, we can't blame the voice actors. But in the end they still are working against themselves/their peers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    TTS has existed for decades, machine learning for less than 20 years, genAI as we know it for less than 5.

    Those 3 things are not the same thing. Yes the genAI they used can be included as a TTS because it is one. But only in function.

    You are playing on words here. Most people know TTS as a crappy old thing, here this is something way more advanced.

    Even if it was the same thing to begin with. I wouldn't be like a company using a simple TTS capable of recreating the voice of a voice actor I like without paying them the same as if the company hired them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [S] -3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I don't know the details. And I agree that if every line generated with their voice is paid (at least partially) I don't see as big of a problem as I stated.

    But call me cynical: I don't think they were paid for generated voice lines. I would gladly be corrected on this matter though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not here to argue with you. I dont mind them using Ai. They are upfront about it. You should do whatever you think is the right thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -5 points 10 months ago

    Sorry if I sounded angry or something. My goal is to debate around this subject I feel passionate about. I'm not really sure I would call all of this "being upfront" but that may be another subject.

    I'm not an English native, so my words could be harsher that it should. Sorry again.

    And thank you for answering and participating about the whole thing. No hard feelings I hope!

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] -4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    It seems to me you are playing with words. Pilaging all internet resources to create and profit on genAI isn't unethical to you?

    Independent artists have found evidence that their work has been scraped to train most of big genAI tools for years now. That's A-OK for you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I installed Arc Raiders from my family sharing group, fired it up then closed it and uninstalled it as soon as it says I need to create YET ANOTHER account just to play this game.

    I'm done creating an account for every single game.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    I don’t think it’s that big of deal, doesn’t it just link the account to your steam/psn/xbox live? I don’t even remember making a password for the account. It’s not like you also have to log in to another worthless launcher like blizzard/ubisoft/ea games on steam. That’s where I draw the line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Really appreciate you bringing awareness and expressing concern on this, as it has the potential to abuse artists. Folks seem quick to handwave it away instead of taking the measured, thoughtful approach it deserves. Artists need to be protected first and foremost.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Do they charge real money for worthless cosmetics in this game? You think they’d be able to afford to bring the original voice actors back in to re-record some lines for updates, if that’s the case.

    Seems kind of ironic for a game that’s about capitalists fucking the earth and leaving to space while the rest of humanity is plagued by AI death machines for generations.

  • source
  • [+] -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (13 children)
  • [–] [S] 7 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    First, please stay civil. I didn't insult you. Don't insult me.

    Secondly I mark the difference between the accessibility feature of voice changer and the voice lines that could have been 100% recorded by a professional voice actor to begin with.

    Because in the second case, this is just cost-cutting in order to maximise profit on the back of voice actors imho.

    Marketing this as “text-to-speech” is oversimplyfying at best, dishonest at worst. People need to work, we can’t blame the voice actors. But in the end they still are working against themselves/their peers by allowing corporations/studios to copy their unique features to prevent working with them in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 10 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [+] -7 points 10 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    more like if lead could type.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    go back as far as you need to, you might learn something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago

    Embark already used AI voices for The Finals, it's not like this is anything new.

    Let's be real here, AI is here to stay. It's much better that they hired VAs to provide the source material than the alternative: not doing that.

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago

    The AI voice changer in Arc is a fun thing to have. I am glad it exists.

  • source
  • [+] -11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I mean, it’s a garbage game so, any reason to not play it I guess.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 15 comments in c/arc_raiders@jlai.lu view that post
    7 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post