by catador_de_potos on reddit

all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 113 points 11 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 43 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    For a moment my brain thought "Mazel tov Cocktail."

    Molotov is a different word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 118 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Just takes a few people to get it started.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 125 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    "No, I'm afraid I have no idea how the fryer caught on fire. Or why HR's door was blocked by the latest shipment. Or why the truck that delivered that shipment happened to have broken down while barring HR's window. It's all very unfortunate."

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    It's simple really, a universal rule: "You get out of it, what you put in to it".

    This applies to stuff like LLM's (shiity prompts give shitty output), but also to relationships and especially company-worker relationships. There's this time old saying "The boss makes a dollar, I make a dime. That's why I poop on company time". So this is not something new.

    What has changed is that companies have calculated the "pooping on campany time" into their calculations now. They expect their workers to deliver the least acceptable amount of effort. It is a calculated risk, a business model. So if you do that, you are just playing by their rules. Fuck their rules! Burn that motherfucker down! Organize! Show them that this is not how you treat people and that employees are people and that there are more employees that boss's.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I do agree with the message overall, but the "You get out of it, what you put in to it" part is just another "you are responsible if you don't get enough tips anyway" situation and is just not true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I see how it can be interpreted that way, but that's not how I meant it. It is clearly not flawless.

    I meant it from the perspective of an employer. If you want a good workforce that puts in effort, a worforce of probkem solvers that want to help the company be th best it can be. Than you gotta put effort into those employees, offer them the oppertunities to be th best they can be, that includes things like a good base salary, security, support.

    Sort of the difference between the Rhineland model and the Algosaxon model of organisation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Turning into the Joker seems like an odd choice. Visually it works very well, but I would look for something more like Fight Club.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    The movie about a mentally ill man who set out to destroy the society that wronged him is much better than the movie about a mentally ill man who set out to destroy the society that wronged him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Joker was always just an odd criminal trying to make a buck in his original incantation. I guess I still picture him like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 11 months ago*

    Gotta blame the "immigrants" before looking up.

    !twnw@fedia.io

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    This hits so hard.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (11 children)
    1. sue for assault
    2. teach the capitalist a lesson
    3. remove the parasite
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (3 children)
    1. Sue for assault
    2. Settle out of court for a pittance
    3. Pay legal fees
    4. ¿Teach myself a lesson?
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Settle out of court for a pittance

    Why‽

    Pay legal fees

    The assaulter would pay this.

    ¿Teach myself a lesson?

    That self-sabotage is bad‽

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Sorry, I got the context wrong then. I read some of your comments in this post and got the gist that you would be suing the customer and not your employer for negating a living wage. In that case it is possible to win in court. I am glad you got yourself justice as you said in another chain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    Oh, the employer I wrote down what to humble them with on point #2.
    catador_de_potos choose a 2-panel format to convey different scenes, for a total of 4 scenes. Scene one is clearly an assulter that needs to pay for their crimes.
    Scene two requires a little bit more creativity for our protagonist to acquire her living “wage.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    I hear you. 🤡

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Find peace in Ante 8. Balatro is love, Balatro is life.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago*

    I think a great “expanded edition” would be something like

    Republicans: it’s the immigrants fault!
    Democrats: we will create a pilot program for female SVPs to become CEOs!
    Greens: you get what you deserve for voting Democrat and Republican!
    Leftists: Xeno genders are real, you’re not a comrade if you clap at meetings!

  • source