all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The ban on religon-based meals wasn't explained. Does that mean kosher and halal foods can't be offered by cafeterias? Fish can't be served on Fridays?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Pretty much. I'm all for secularism but this goes a bit too far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Way too far. I also support secularism in that I don't believe that religions should be privileged above deeply held personal preferences. This is like religious persecution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The article says

    The bill also seeks to ban public institutions from offering a diet exclusively based on a religious tradition

    I mean I would expect that no meals are based exclusively on a religious tradition, usually it's based on a combination of religious tradition and culinary art, or nutritional requirement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    This goes kinda too far? But you can get around the meals constraint just by being vegetarian.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    All of this is too far.

  • source