Following Trump’s attacks on Iran, an admin official tells Rolling Stone, “The intelligence assessments have not really changed”

After Donald Trump’s decision to strike three Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday, administration officials are barely bothering to pretend the unprecedented — and potentially calamitous — attacks were motivated by new intelligence suggesting Iran was on the brink of having nuclear weapons.

Just months ago, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to Congress, in her opening statement, that the U.S. intel community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon” and had not reauthorized its nuclear weapons program.

While Trump recently publicly disputed Gabbard’s testimony, according to two administration officials with knowledge of internal deliberations in recent weeks, the president’s decision to strike was not driven by any new U.S. intelligence on Iran.

all 85 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

"I'm going to need someone to go over the vibe code. Looks like the vibe drones are unable to capture controller input, and thus unable to engage in vibe strikes."

  • source
  • [–] 254 points 1 year ago (19 children)
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Seemed pretty obvious that Bibi wanted Trump to win and intentionally stalled Gaza ceasefire agreements to make Biden/Harris look bad.

    This may have been Trump returning his end of the bargain (or Trump is just a shortsighted and stupid piece of shit).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Bibi's got kompromat on him, Epstein may have been Mossad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    lol Republicans don't give a shit about anything he's done or could do. They like Trump and there's nothing in this world that could change that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    More accurately, his girlfriend is, he’d probably be consider an asset. An important distinction on whether you protect them when they’re in trouble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Epstein claimed at least once to be Mossad, and Maxwell's dad apparently was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Maxwell’s Dad was an interesting guy if you read up on him. The dude had a lot of enemies via his business dealings and him being a literal spy for MI6/Mossad. Some believe Mossad even assassinated him, but I don’t really believe it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Seemed pretty obvious that Bibi wanted Trump to win and intentionally stalled Gaza ceasefire agreements to make Biden/Harris look bad.

    And biden/harris fell for it. they looked weak and complicit because they're democrats and that's their brand.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The Intel probably came in the form of a new deposit clearing in Trump’s bank account

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They were based on Trump being pissed that his little birthday parade was humiliating.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What a year, first we got vibe coding and now vibe bombing... I wonder what's next

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 98 points 1 year ago

    But women are "too emotional" to be president. Fucking hell, just choke on hamberder already.

  • source
  • [–] 116 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    It’s interesting to note that Biden didn’t bomb Iran.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Vranyo.

    You know I’m lying, and I know that you know, and you know that I know that you know, but I go ahead with a straight face, and you nod seriously and take notes.

    The bald faced lies are like the final insult. Even during the lead up to Iraq they made a show of trying to fake intelligence enough to suit their goals. Now it's just, fuck it we ball, and say whatever, who cares, and who cares if they know we're lying, they can't do anything about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You thought vibe coding was bad? Welcome to the age of vibe bombing...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    There is no intelligence in the whole administration, we know.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "There is no intel" describes the entire regime

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [+] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Why not use the full word? "There is no intelligence" is much more apt.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    vibe coding and now vibe warmongering

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Vibe Warfare. Where Skynet doesn't have control of the military, but everyone does what it says anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Really nice knowing that Nuke country #1 is governed by absolute senile murderous freaks for over at least 10 years now

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe the CIA can initiate another coup…ffs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    They weren't based on vibes, they were based on orders. Trump's foreign handlers told him what to do and he did it.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Who does he think he is? A Bush family member? /jk

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    FTFY: the president’s decision to strike was not driven by any new U.S. intelligence on Iran.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ship Trump to Iran and let them do what they will

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    How about making that "Deport Trump to Iran and tell their president this is the asshole who gave the order to attack the nuclear facilities in your country, and then leave them and get the hell out of there while leaving them to do whatever the hell they want with him"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    the president’s decision to strike was not driven by any new U.S. intelligence on Iran.

    FTFY.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Wasn't the picture of 1970s Iranian women (dressed like US 1970s women) just floating around a couple months along with the attached comment stating "pictures of places before Muslim rule floating around means the US is about to bomb them" or does that just happen every year

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Iran was a liberal democracy before the US helped topple it and install the Ayatollah.

    The US is complicit in all the violence they did to their people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Not quite. It was a liberal democracy until the US helped topple it and install the Shah, who was then toppled by Khomeini.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Many such cases of liberal democracies being toppled by the Us in favor of dictators

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I’ll bet the decision had something to do with trump’s massive ego.

  • source
  • His whole life is based on his gut feeling and mood

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I mean, if Israel has nukes, and Iran has nukes, that should lead to peace, right? But peace isn't what Israel is after. This isn't about peace. It's about eliminating all that think and look different.

  • source
  • There's certainly no intelligence to be found anywhere in the Trump administration.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    o ok that makes it ok then nvm my furious outrage. gj buddy.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Iran's theocratic regime aside (which the US is largely responsible for creating), why exactly are the US (and a handful of other countries) somehow more worthy of having nukes than others?

    It's some bullshit if you ask me.

    The question of "do we really want X country having nukes?" seems to come off as: "it's okay for country Y (the US) to have nukes".

    I for one, am not a fan of anyone having nukes, but if we're not planning on getting that number to zero, not sure how it's justified to say a certain country doesn't deserve them, other than maybe North Korea who are completely unhinged, but how can we draw the line? The USA is literally just committing acts of war because they've unilaterally decided that Iran has nukes, without evidence, and that means they're justified in doing pre-emptive strikes.

    I don't think any country is ever justified in pre-emptively striking another without extremely strong evidence.

    I'm thoroughly unconvinced that any war the US has fought other than World War II has been justified.

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    2 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    1 comment in c/usa@midwest.social view that post