edit: WHICH ONE OF YOU FUCKING MEMELORD FOUND MY ADDRESS AND SENT ME THIGH HIGHS AND CAT EARS?

top 62 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 1 year ago
[–] 28 points 1 year ago

You're welcome, and welcome to the club

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    edit: WHICH ONE OF YOU FUCKING MEMELORD FOUND MY ADDRESS AND SENT ME THIGH HIGHS AND CAT EARS?

    Ok but how did they fit tho

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Mazel tov. The next step down the rabbit hole is to get a tiling window manager like i3.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I haven't switched to it full time, still happy with KDE... but niri is really nice too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Just finished my basic niri install on NixOS. Seriously loving it. Had been wanting to ditch Hyprland for a while, but kept hitting walls with tutorials and blogs trying to convince me to use flakes and home manager. Finally last night I sat down and completely rewrote my config to just be simple default config style and got niri working. Feels like the window manager experience I’ve been dreaming of my whole life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What issues were you having with hyperland? I've been running awesomewm for about a decade and I know my days on x11 are numbered. Hyperland was going to be my next trial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    I don’t like the dev. If you want more details I can maybe go find sources, but yeah… I no longer want to support the software.

    And I was too lazy to go edit my config to suppress the donation request popup, so completely refactoring my system was the obvious, lower effort, answer 🀣

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    you are now a femboy (BTW!)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    You know... It you don't want those stockings or ears πŸ‘‰πŸ‘ˆ

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Meowwwwwwww!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    I do use an arch-based distro tho I've never like gotten the bad sides? Maybe my distro maintainers are just that good

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    There isnt any bad sides, not really.

    It used to be hard to install but that is also not the case anymore.

    People think its unstable because it has the latest packages. I mean, sometimes i have had issues, sure. A few times, bluetooth stack was bugging out in the newest kernel. Another time plasma had bugs with graphics, which I reported and it was fixed just a few weeks later.

    Nothing that broke the entire system. Just small issues.

    But this is much better than running Debian which has very old packages, full of old bugs. They used to be a full generation behind in plasma for example, and using a kernel that was over a year old. Those things leads to poor hardware support, getting bugs solved over a year ago and so on.

    I really dont understand Debian users because ive never experienced how an updated system is worse than a very old one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    That tells me you don't understand what a "stable" release branch is. The Debian maintainers do a lot of work to ensure that the packages not only work, but work well together. They don't introduce breaking changes during the lifecycle of a major branch. They add feature updates between point releases, and continuously release security updates.

    In the real world, that stability is a great value, especially in the server space. You'd be insane to use Arch as a production server, and I'm saying that as an Arch user.

    Something, something, sword of Damocles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well yeah, I wouldnt use it as a server.

    I know Debian is trying to make software work well together but they are still on ancient versions full of old bugs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I mean, they distributed the xz attack, and then rolled it back when a debian sid user signaled it. This is just not a viable way to do things, especially if the number of users increases. You need a stronger testing policy before the update hits the users, you shouldn't just assume everything can be fixed by further updates. Debian stable is a bit on the extreme side of that, but Debian testing or Fedora feel much more reasonable long term to me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Yeah I remember that. It was a very rare event though. For Linux users that want the latest versions, this will happen and there is no way to avoid it.

    We take risks either way. Either by using old bugs or new bugs.

    I think all apps should be much more sandboxed than they are today, but it would require a new way of writing and running apps. We have Flatpak though, its a start.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    The old bugs will not send your ssh keys to an unknown network address. If they did, they would get patched or not published. These bugs are known in advance, they are not risks, they are issues. You can make a decision to use them or not, and then you're set for 5 years. Like, they are both bugs, but they work out very differently if you want to rely on your system.

    The thing is that Fedora or Debian testing (and derivatives) bring the latest version fast-enough for the vast majority of people. They don't make bugs last longer like Debian stable does. When an app is bugged for two weeks, you encounter the bug one month after Arch users, then you get the fix two weeks later. The total bugged time stays the same, but the risks of something really bad happening is much lower. The downside is being one or two month late, and most people don't care about this kind of delay. (obviously when bugs are found, it can be much more than one or two months)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    I know from experience its just not just a couple of months if we are talking Debian stable.

    Here is what chat gpt is saying, even though the versions is already outdated:

    Debian Stable lags behind Arch Linux by roughly 1–3 years on most core packages:

    Breakdown by category:

    Linux kernel6–18 months behindRolling, latest1 year

    GCC / LLVM / Clang~1–2 major versions behindLatest stable1–2 years

    Python / Node / Go1–3 versions behindLatest stable1–2 years

    GNOME / KDE / XFCE One major release behindCurrent1–1.5 years

    SystemdUsually current βˆ’ 1Current6–12 months glibc / coreutilsOften within ~1 yearCurrent6–12 months

    Security patchesBackported rapidlyUpstream latest0 delay on fixes

    In practice:

    Debian 12 (Bookworm, mid-2023) ships kernel 6.1, GCC 12, GNOME 43.

    Arch (today) has kernel 6.11, GCC 14, GNOME 47.

    So Debian Stable is about 2 years behind Arch overall, though security backports mean it’s not β€œoutdated” for production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, Debian stable and testing are two very different things. Testing is essentially a slower rolling release that only takes packages that have been tested in Debian unstable, which is a very fast rolling release. Similar thing with RHEL, Fedora is a quasi-rolling distro that takes packages after testing in Fedora rawhide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yeah. Maybe Debian testing is fine. Couple of months delay is not a huge deal, even though i really want the latest packages myself. When a new version of plasma or gnome is released, im right there waiting for it immediately... :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    How hard would be for me to switch coming from catchyOS? And would it be worth it lol

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Cachy is Arch based so unless you really want to customize your system its not worth switching IMO as you're likely already receiving the Arch benefits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Something that I really like about Catchy is that it's been a really smooth experience so far. I wouldn't even know what to customize other than the DE, to be honest... so I'll keep running Catchy then :) As for the Arch benefits; I've always used Ubuntu and it is true that problably someone asked xyz so you'll find the answer on some forum but the archwiki is so good that it helps not only to fix sutff, but also to learn stuff lol. That's been for me the benefit. (That and also the pac-man-like animation when updatind the system lol). Thanks for the answer!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    CatchyOS is based on Arch, so it shouldn't be too hard. I have never used CatchyOS so this is from the perspective of a Fedora user who used ArchInstall.

    Arch is quite barebones in the sense it doesn't do GUIs for install and shit, it is terminal centric, that being said it is very fast and efficient and effectively you build your own set up (even in archinstall). Here's what I will say though (idk how much you've looked into it or what your skill level is)...

    • If your installing over wifi, iwctl is how you connect to a wifi network. There's plenty of tutorials on this and there's the Wiki, so there's that. It's actually a piece of piss once you understand it.
    • archinstall is your friend.
    • File systems look confusing? Just use btrfs.
    • In Audio systems you can choose what audio system you want, but I just use pipewire.
    • Don't forget to set your network options to "network manager".
    • Under profile, you can choose if you wanna set up a desktop, server, or whatever and in desktop you can choose whatever DE or WM you want. You won't get the full suite like with other distros, but you will get enough to operate your choice.
    • waybar isn't installed automatically of if you are installing hyprland or such, bare that in mind. You will need this to access the nm-applet. Also you can fix the missing symbols in waybar by installing otf-font-awesome either before in Additional Packages or after with sudo pacman -S otf-font-awesome
    • You can choose from the whole archlinux package repo in additional packages and here you can install anything additional you might need. I would recommend flatpak if you can't find what you want via pacman, whatever VPN you use, steam, a browser (take your pick) and waybar and otf-font-awesome.
    • The wiki and DuckDuckGo are your friends.
    • If you are not used to WMs but wanna use one, install a DE as a backup.
    • Every morning/every evening/before you shut down for the night, open up a terminal and type sudo pacman -Syu to look for updates and install them. There's no "Updates available" notification for system shit here.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Back in my day we had Unix beards, unkempt hair and no sense of fashion.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Im boxing with fedora at the moment myself. I hate that arch was easier.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Ubuntu frustrates me more than arch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Arch has glorious documentation. That is literally the only thing that blows me away about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Arch wiki is so good it’s useful even when you’re not on Arch

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I fall pretty squarely into the script kiddie category compared to a lot of people on here and arch wikis has been an incredibly valuable resource.

    β€œI want to do X like Y. Surely someone much of done this by now.” Arch wiki: β€œfunny you should mention that. Here is free documentation that is pretty up to date, has lots of detail and examples, but don’t drown you.”

    Seriously, I look at red hat and debian documentation and little ADHD brain hamster just strokes the fuck out on his wheel. Arch wiki is a comfortable ride. It’s just…digestible if that makes any sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fedora was also my first choice, but the allure of the AUR was too strong at the time and I didn't last a month...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Selinux makes me homicidal and fedora always seems to be choking on….something. But it’s the most updated stable thing I can find.

    The AUR is irresponsible. Put a wili entry showing how to did something. Don’t just write a script and post it that you KNOW nobody is actually going to comb over.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I feel this. I had to give up on connecting to my home wifi on windows server edition.

    This was right after I daily drove openbsd for 2 months. I was connecting to PEAP encrypted networks using wpa_supplicant and now I couldn't connect to my phone's hotspot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    why didn't I get any thigh highs or cat ears 3:

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    i have to install pre-packaged arch images because my laptop doesn't have a ethernet port.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments