On Thursday, Ontario Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack introduced Bill 60, the “Fighting Delays, Building Faster” Act. The bill contains sweeping reforms that remove tenants' legal protections. The Tories’ claim this legislation, like their other housing bills, is intended to build more homes by cutting red tape.  “Delays and backlogs at the LTB [Landlord and Tenant Board] are hurting both tenants and landlords,” said the Tories in their technical briefing. “It is important for the government to take action to stop bad actors and improve speed, fairness, and accessibility at the LTB to help resolve disputes faster with the goal of eliminating the backlog.”  Effectively, Queen’s Park intends to clear the LTB’s backlog by streamlining away any tools tenants had to defend themselves or seek accountability at an LTB hearing. The bill effectively nullifies Section 82 of the Residential Tenancies Act, which allows tenants to raise issues of poor maintenance, harassment, and illegal rent collection at a hearing where the landlord makes claims against the tenant for non-payment.  The government is seeking to impose measures including but not limited to: In the middle of a national housing crisis, Ontario’s landlords, with strong representation in the provincial government, are being given an opportunity to charge greater rents.  By abolishing security of tenure, landlords now will be given free rein to remove a tenant at the end of a lease and charge higher rent on the same unit.  According to a report released in January of this year by the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, almost 640,000 Ontarian households, or 12.1% of all Ontario households were considered in core housing need, meaning that housing is unaffordable, inadequate, or unsuitable, with no other local options available.

L’article Ontario PCs Seek Abolition of Tenant Protections est apparu en premier sur The North Star.


From The North Star via This RSS Feed.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
18 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While standing behind a sign that literally says "Protecting Ontario"....

Fiction couldn't make this timeline any more fucked than it is if it tried.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    There was a printer error on the sign, mistakes happen.

    it's actually supposed to read

    Protecting Ontario Landlords

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I feel doubly bad the for the poor minimum wage drone at the Staples copy centre that's going to fired over this, then...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I'm sure the Ontario PCs let their landlord know as well so they can kick them out at the end of the lease.

    Edit: Fuck, i just realized, without that protection, someone could literally bribe a landlord to kick you out at end of the lease.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    The party of institutional psychopathy.

  • source
  • That's fair, they're working in their class interests, and you should too by seeking the abolition of landlords.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    To save everyone a click, no, not all of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    @CanadaPlus @NightOwl To save more clicks, after an overwhelming torrent of backlash and complaint, they're already walking it back:reminetwork.com/articles/bill-GF is a residential and rental LTB stuff lawyer who works mostly for landlords and everyone at her firm was like "whoa, no. This bill is fcking EVIL."When the lawyers on your side are like "no, this is bad shit", you're bad and you should feel bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    So the really controversial provision was letting landlords evict tenants at the end of a lease term, because that would essentially kill rent control, which apparently Ontario has. I can both see why Doug Ford would do that and why there would be an outcry.

    Who's GF? I'm not sure what you mean with that part, and lawyers going against their clients interests would be more than just unusual.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    GF = Girfriend. Not suprising this is lost on lemmy users /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    OK, all of the changes they made are inhumane but this one...

    Abolishing “security of tenure,” the guarantee that a tenancy be maintained on a month-to-month basis on the terms of the previous lease when a lease lapses or expires.

    Holy shit.

    That's how you never get to live anywhere without a (NSFW)

    spoilerlubeless ass fucking every year.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Is there a list anywhere of who's pushing for this?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Can we abolish fascist ford and all his minions instead please.

  • source