[–] 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

FYI, if you are on Debian and have daily updates on(unattended-upgrades is your friend) you most likely already have the patch it came out yesterday.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    no idea, but supposedly they are part of a sympathetic party/group to lula and haven't complained or spoken out about it. that doesn't necessarily mean it's all good but I like to assume kind/warm gestures are what they seem to be (kind/warm gestures).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    To opt out:

    Discoverable server admins can opt out their servers or even individual channels by going to Server Settings, then Web Presence and choosing which channels you want to be visible. But, if you don't change anything, public channels will have the setting enabled by default.

    If you're just a user in one of these huge servers, and you don't want your messages to be viewable from Google, you can also opt your own messages out. Simply go to User Settings, then Data and Privacy and disable 'Show my message content from Discoverable channels on web pages.'

  • source
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 week ago

    pretty Ironic in my mind that this agreement with europe would most likely only help Quebec but Plamondon probably figures that there's nothing he needs to worry about in the agreement so why not score some cheap political points instead. I hope quebecers see that.

  • source
  •  

    Posted: Oct 27, 2026 8:20 AM EDT | Last Updated: 2:20 PM EDT

    By: Journalist - Boshko Maric - CBC Montreal.

    Quebec Premier Paul St-Pierre Plamondon will not be allowed to speak at this week's Canada-EU summit, according to the Parti Québécois (PQ).

    The summit is set to take place Oct. 29 and 30 in Montreal.

    St-Pierre Plamondon wrote in a statement Tuesday that the federal government refused his request to make a speech at the event, despite the fact that it will be held on Quebec soil.

    In the statement, which was published on the social media platform X, the Quebec premier accused Prime Minister Mark Carney of disrespecting Quebec and holding a vision of Canada that "directly contradicts the principles defended by our government, specifically the respect for our autonomy and areas of competence."

    St-Pierre Plamondon argued that Ottawa is "refusing to consult Quebec and involve it in the negotiations" with the European Union.

    Carney responded to St-Pierre Plamondon's message, telling reporters on Tuesday afternoon that his government has already held three consultations with Quebec regarding Canada's agreement with the European Union.

    The prime minister added that St-Pierre Plamondon was invited to a dinner at the event, but refused.

    "It's his decision to leave the chair empty," Carney said.

    A source in the federal government also pushed back on St-Pierre Plamondon's claims, telling Radio-Canada that Ottawa will hold direct discussions with Quebec and that all provinces will be consulted as negotiations between the two sides progress.

    According to the PQ, the federal government also refused Quebec's request to host a reception on the sidelines of the summit, which it said was made over a month ago by former premier Christine Fréchette.

    In a statement released Monday, Quebec's Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs Marie-Claude Sarrazin quoted a phrase from Carney's lauded speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, earlier this year, when he said, "If you are not at the table, you are on the menu."

    Sarrazin added that the federal government's decision shows a "basic lack of respect for Quebec and a denial of the role of our parliament, which reminds us of the need to be in control of our own destiny." Summit creates tension between Quebec and Ottawa

    Industry Minister Mélanie Joly, who is also responsible for economic development for Quebec regions, told Radio-Canada that St-Pierre Plamondon, along with every provincial leader, is invited to attend the event.

    Joly also emphasized that this is a federal summit, adding that "we need to make sure we can reach an agreement with the European Union. It's what Quebecers want. It's what Canadians want."

    According to a source in the federal government, Quebec was offered an opportunity to welcome foreign dignitaries in Montreal, accompanied by representatives of the federal government, which it refused.

    Conservative Party of Quebec Leader Éric Duhaime reacted on Tuesday to the controversy around the summit, telling CBC in a statement that it is "always disheartening to see the federal Liberal government refuse to allow Quebec to take its rightful place."

    Duhaime added that the PQ "must not, in the name of its referendum obsession, sacrifice the interests of Quebecers by choosing to boycott the summit." Canada strengthening ties with Europe

    This week's summit comes just over a month after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen proposed creating a path for Canada to become the European Union's first associate member.

    In the face of tariffs from the United States, Carney has also advocated for a stronger alliance between Canada and the EU, particularly in areas of critical minerals, defence, artifical intelligence and energy security.

    In a news release published ahead of the summit this week, the prime minister wrote that in response to a more dangerous and divided world, "Canada and the European Union are building on each other's strengths — deliberately, systematically, and rapidly — to form a new, ambitious alliance."

    On Monday, St-Pierre Plamondon announced in a social media post that he had spoken with French President Emmanuel Macron.

    The premier wrote that he plans to travel to France for a meeting with Macron in the coming weeks, and that their conversation spoke to the "solidarity and natural chemistry between our two nations."

    [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    no one in this thread has said anything denying european colonialism go reread the thread. if the only link you have is that the us wouldn't exist without european settlers or is connected because of historical events that has no bearing on the US being there now. colonialism doesn't force any form of current military action IN THE COUNTRY THE COLONIALISM STARTED IN. either pull your head out of your ass or go talk about this in the appropriate venue and maybe not a Ukraine community. you make a serious topic like colonialism look like a shitty tactic to avoid talking about the Ukraine war and America becoming more of an impediment to europe than an ally. If you still don't get it you obviously are either willfully ignorant, or taking part in some kind of targeted AstroTurfing.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    European colonialism has absolutely nothing to do with Europe changing its view on troops in its borders from a country actively harming its interests and undermining it. to be clear they're not even disagreeing with you, they're saying its unrelated and a non sequitur(AKA Formal Fallacy). All it looks like you're trying to do is derail the conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    just downvote and move along with shit meme's intended to get a stir, the fact that it starts off with "state run single payer healthcare" like it has any bearing on the charter right that would exist with or without that healthcare being state run single payer etc. tells you this isn't about a funny meme, just being a shit disturber.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That's devastating, the kind of power behind that and with how fast it must have moved I doubt there was much of a chance for those in the way to escape. Not much you can do to stop a massive glacier like that from collapsing in this warming world. The people affected by this have my deepest sympathies.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Now's the time to simply match the tariffs dollar for dollar and refuse to respond to anything but a concession by the US. If they keep playing dumb games like changing the agreement last minute they were never interested in a deal. Maybe Carney can be more specific now on what is affected and who specifically is targeted. it'd be great if there was a list of business' affected and their products so we could buy more domestically. the list of tariffs sounded weirdly targeted at certain business' to me.

  • source
  •  

    Lets assume that genies grant wishes literally, but will twist your words. How do you wish without unintended consequences? Typical rules of no more wishes, no resurrection, no forced love, no altering the past, can't defy logic, can't break physical laws, can't create paradoxes, and can't affect higher powers (this is one tough genie!).

     

    June 10, 202612:07 PM EDT:

    WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - U.S. President ​Donald Trump ‌said on Wednesday ​that he ​might not renew ⁠the ​USMCA free ​trade deal with Canada and ​Mexico. Speaking ​at the White House, ‌the ⁠president said he was ​discussing ​the ⁠matter with Mexican ​and ​Canadian ⁠leaders.

    Reporting by Bo Erickson ⁠and ​Gram ​Slattery; Editing by ​Doina Chiacu

    archive.org archive link: https://web.archive.org/save/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Fworld%2Ftrump-says-he-might-not-renew-usmca-2026-06-10%2F

     

    Is having a lot of posts in a community preferable to asking that people expand on their posts a bit more or put more effort then simply adding a title. For some reason i keep asking myself this when looking at certain communities with seemingly only one poster (on a completely separate and totally unrelated topic I'm going to go shred some dairy products)

     

    From Jan. 9, 2026, 11:15 PM UTC By Alexandra Marquez, Sarah Dean and Dareh Gregorian

    President Donald Trump on Friday ramped up his rhetoric on Greenland, saying the U.S. will take action to acquire the longtime ally. “We are going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not, because if we don’t do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and we’re not going to have Russia or China as a neighbor,” Trump told reporters at the White House. The remarks come days after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that Trump could use the military to “pursue this important foreign policy goal.” That came on the heels of major European allies issuing in a joint statement saying they would “not stop defending” the values of sovereignty and Greenland’s territorial integrity. President Donald Trump during a meeting at the White House on January 9, 2026. Saul Loeb / AFP - Getty Images Greenland is a semi-autonomous Danish territory that’s strategically important militarily and contains vast mineral wealth. The U.S. already has a military base on the island, and officials there have said they’d accept an expanded military presence. Asked by a reporter Friday why he hasn’t accepted that offer, Trump said, “When we own it, we defend it. You don’t defend leases the same way. You have to own it.” “We’re not going to allow Russia or China to occupy Greenland, and that’s what’s going to happen if we don’t own it,” he said during the public portion of a meeting with oil and gas executives at the White House. As for what he’d be willing to pay for the territory, Trump said, “I’m not talking about money for Greenland yet. I might talk about that, but we’re going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not.” The continued pressure from the president comes a day after the top representatives to the U.S. from Denmark and Greenland met with White House officials to seek a better understanding of U.S. policy, a source familiar with the discussions told NBC News. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is scheduled to meet with the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland next week. Greenland’s representative to the U.S., Jacob Isbosethsen, also met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Thursday and told NBC News afterward that “Greenland is not for sale.” Republican leaders on Capitol Hill have said it would be inappropriate for the U.S. military to use force to take over the Arctic island.

    view more: next ›