all 56 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 76 points 1 year ago
[–] 33 points 1 year ago

He wants Iran to not have missiles because then Iran will buy his missiles

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Those who do US crimes get airtime; those who expose them get canceled.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Those white and rich who do US crimes get airtime

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    You don’t have to be rich or white, you only have to be useful in furthering US state propaganda. Condi Rice is still gets plenty of airtime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Does she? I havent heard that name in what feels like a decade

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You don’t have to be rich

    Proceeds to name multi-millionaire.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I was naming a non-white person. Also, people who carry water for US imperialism tend to be well compensated. You don’t have to be rich to do it, but you will likely get rich by doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Republicans don’t go to jail for committing crimes.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    we think it started with trump, but Reagan did so much illegal BS.

    He should have spent the rest of his life in jail for trafficking cocaine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago

    "He has experience so we can trust him!"

    -Fox News viewers

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    To be fair, he's annoyed at them having missiles, he had no problem selling them as long as he could profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Related to nothing but Ollie, I rode an elevator with him and some police in the US courthouse in DC during his trial

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    Giving this traitor a television platform instead of a prison cell, was one giant step in making Republicans feel untouchable, no matter how poorly they behaved. Even treason is excused, and rewarded.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    George HW Bush pardoned him on the advice of William Barr, giving Barr the start of a career helping presidents avoid responsibility for their illegal activities.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Lmao no fucking way, really?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    there's more to the story, like using the US military to traffic cocaine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well, it didn't really happen like that, but yeah, the Iran-Contra Scandal contributed heavily to the onset of the crack cocaine epidemic. The fact that they couldn't use the US military in this operation is why cocaine became involved.

    They needed to smuggle illegally purchased weapons to Central America, so they hired drug smugglers to smuggle guns in the other direction. What does a drug smuggler do after he's dropped off his weapons, and finds himself in Central America with an empty plane, a fistful of dirty money, and CIA cover?

    That's right, he fills it full of cocaine, flies it back to America, and quintuplets his money. And they did it over and over and over, until there was so much coke on the streets of America, that it went from being the drug of the wealthy and celebrities, and became the drug of the ghetto.

    And how do we know this? Because smuggler Eugene Hasenfus was captured, and he spilled the entire story.

    The only question was: Was the CIA aware of the drug smuggling? Some think that they used it to raise even more money for their cause, but I've never seen any real evidence of that, other than speculation. OTOH, I find it hard to believe that they didn't know their pilots were smuggling cocaine back to America. If they didn't know, they should have, they're the CIA. Besides, it's not exactly a big leap to realize they would do this. They didn't hire commercial cargo pilots to do some side gigs, they hired drug smugglers specifically because they were smugglers. They aren't going to fly an empty plane home. Of course, they're going to smuggle Coke (or weed), back in their planes. Duh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    well, you can't argue that he hasn't learnt his lesson.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Heard about him in Killer Mike's Reagan song. Great song

    Oliver North, a retired Marine Lieutenant Colonel, played a key role in the Iran-Contra affair, a major political scandal during the Reagan administration. He was involved in the sale of weapons to Iran, with the profits being diverted to support the Contras in Nicaragua, despite a congressional ban on funding the Contras. 

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Do they put anyone on screen for ratings?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Well Fox News has been, since inception, the propaganda arm of the GOP. So not only will they do anything to get and keep eyeballs, they have a deficit of ethics and ethical contributors. So if they need to spray paint a shit log and call it a gold nugget then that's what they're gonna keep on doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • Just another bucket of slime sloshing whichever way gets him a seat at the table.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Hear me out, theoretically this is actually cool?

    Like, theoretically, take away the Fox propaganda and shameless lack of disclosure. Picture this guy presenting himself as a CI, like a convicted hacker, former cartel, defector or something. He has real experience with Iran, missiles, the whole Contra affair. He knows what they’d do with them, how they get them, what the buyers are like because he shamelessly sold them.

    That’d be a cool perspective.

    It’s of course not reality, but still.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Theoretically sure. But the regime he sold it to go toppled like three times over. So it's not the same people anymore and the context he could provide is out of date and ... checks notes still based on his treasonous actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    No. The current constitution is what they got after the revolution in 1979. Khomeini was supreme leader until 1989. Khamenei somehow got himself appointed to successor just in time. The successor he replaced was against mass executions and stuff. Funny how it goes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I'm sure as hell not defending him, but your point is valid and why him being against them having missiles isn't necessarily a contradiction. "Them" isn't the same them that he sold to. Again, not defending him and I haven't listen to anything he's said recently to know his stance (nor do I really care to), but just keeping my own logic in check.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Land of the free.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm hardly surprised - just seems like a US thing. I mean, who else would leave it up to Trump of all people to decide whether the Epstein files should be made public?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Don't get me wrong. The Iran - Contra affair was a terrible circumvention of U.S. law and North deserved to go to prison and Reagan should have been impeached.

    However, this post is a mischaracterization of that event.

    This was part of an overall plan to get American hostages released.

    That being said, we sold arms to Iran, who was fighting Iraq (a U.S. ally at the time), and one of the intermediaries we used was fucking Israel.

    Yup, Israel helped us sell arms to Iran. So Iran can turn around and use them against an ally.

    North was then made a fall guy.

    I was younger when this happened but I recall, at the time, it was characterized as we just sold them parts for their airplanes and defensive arms.

    Man, we just can't stop fucking our face with our own foot.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This was part of an overall plan to get American hostages released.

    It was part of an overall plan to commit treason in order to sabotage Carter by preventing the hostages from being released before the election so that Reagan would win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're mixing up your Reagan-era Iran scandals.

    First, there was the Iran Hostage Crisis, where Iranians stormed the US embassy and took a bunch of hostages in 1979. While I have no doubt there was Republican fuckery going on, Carter really didn't do himself any favors with his handling of that. The hostages were finally released, after more than a year, the day Reagan was inaugurated

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis

    Iran-Contra was a scandal where the Reagan administration sold arms to Iran (who was fighting Iraq, then an American ally), circumventing Congress. They then gave the money to the Contras, a group of rebels in Nicaragua, again circumventing Congress:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

    You are correct that part of the goal was to release hostages, but those hostages were taken by the Lebanese well after Reagan's first election.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    This reminds me how there’s a world of difference between learning history and living it. In my mind’s eye, I can still see Walter Cronkite saying every evening that it’s the XXXth day of the Iran hostage crisis. And still I remember Ollie North’s trial. There’s no way I’d mix them up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    North wasn't the "Fall Guy." That makes him sound like a scapegoat, which he wasn't, he was the guy managing the entire operation.

    Also, it wasn't part of an operation to get the Iranian hostages released. They had been released back in 1980, as soon as Reagan had been inaugurated. The Iran-Contra Conspiracy happened later, but the wound from that humiliating episode was still stinging in the American psyche. The fact that North was selling weapons to our bitterest enemy at the time is only one of the things that made this such an egregious violation.

    Iran-Contra was about providing weapons, training, and support to the conservative soldiers fighting the establishment of a Russian-supported regime in Central America.

  • source
  • parent
  • 8 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    In the 80s, there was Cold War drama We fought the Commies inside Nicaragua Our friends were the Contras, freedom was their mantra So we sent them lots of money for guns and landmines But Congress stopped the Contra money flow Just 'cause they moved a teeny bit of blow But then a hero came forth, his name was Oliver North He and Reagan went around the sissy Congress

    Ollie North Ollie North

    You see, North secretly sold missiles to a harmless country called Iran, who would always be a grateful ally Then he gave the profits to the Contras Genius But the sales were uncovered by the press Reagan and North began to stress 'Cause what they did was technically high treason But it was totally justified North volunteered to take the blame To save Reagan from prison rape shame The truth he did bury with his hot secretary Thanks to her shredder, he got off totally scot-free

    Ollie North Ollie North

    He's a soldier And a hero And a novelist And now he's on FOX News

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Makes sense considering Fox is full of deplorable shit bags who pretend to be journalists.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Wasn't he on Fox like 20 years ago? We don't have to share old stuff to express how bad they are. There's enough bad shit going on today that we can talk about.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    i know that in a world i should expect, these people will ultimately be held accountable and will pay for their crimes. i also know that i don't live in that world, and it's getting harder and harder every day to keep on doing this dance.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Fuck Oliver North.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    If you're ever afraid of doing things that can make you look bad...

    Just remember.

    You can literally sell illegal weapons to terrorists... And then work for Fox News.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Considering how much time has passed, he could just change his opinions like a normal human being

    Should you trust a public person to share their true personal views? Not really

  • source