Yep according to them every hunger related death under a communist government is communists fault but the many famines under capitalism don't count against their favorite system.

They don't care.

Also they will claim that the death of communism is some widely agreed upon number that is corroborated by numerous organizations and sources.

In reality it is literally like the one single 'study' that proved the autism/vaccine connection. It came entirely from the Black Book of Communism in 1999, and all but the main author disavowed it, and despite the obsession with wanting to reach 100 million. The absolute max it could find was 94 million with a 'most likely' number of 64 million.

So when they give a death toll of 'conservatively 100 million' they are literally pulling it out of nowhere.

Wait... are the liberals actually surprised? Or being sarcastic? And why would liberals be either one of those?

Liberals crying about the death toll from communism, when said made up number includes Nazis killed in the Easter theatre.

Liberals mourning nazis out of sheer ignorance seems telling

What communist country would you like to live in?

Anyone know where this image is from? I keep trying to find it but have never been able to.

The difference is that for the people dying under capitalism, the system is working as intended, and for the people dying under communism, it is not. In both cases, the leaders don't really care, because it works for them.

People* who talk about the death toll of communism when you bring up 10-20 million dying to poverty caused by capitalism every year.

Both are true, this is a dumb argument and common bad faith fallacy.

Lol as if we can't hate both.