I agree on the sarcasm of it not working one bit, but that layer should also have been completely irrelevant, the real problem is that Trump is a sociopathic criminal that was never arrested for his crimes. Not even when he attempted a coup.
A fucking traitor, who was allowed to run again, despite it was clearly illegal, and he should have been in prison.

Seen from Europe the problem is not just that Trump was elected, it's the complete failure throughout American society to stop him.
The judicial failed, congress failed, and the people failed.
Also the democratic process within the Republican party failed, where they have turned away completely from traditional Republican, American and democratic values. AND we saw similar problems in the democratic party with Biden not stepping down as promised, and back when Bernie was running.

Problem is that the entire system AND the majority of the population are toxic, and Trump is allowed to act way outside the scope of his presidential powers, and clearly contrary to the constitution without being stopped.

The roundup of immigrants and detainment without seeing a judge, and being sent to prison in foreign countries alone, is violation of the constitution on 3 counts. Yet it is allowed to continue!?!?!

You mean the electoral college? It would probably have worked if we hadn't broken it by choosing electors by popular vote instead of having them appointed by state legislatures.

Palestine has been a bipartisan bad take for the US the whole time. Any single issue is a bad issue to get hung up on. "Lines in the sand" are a fragmentary psy-op to get you to ignore the big picture.

Yes, every big deal is a big deal, but there are hundreds of big deals. Taking a stance on this one didn't make it any better, arguably made it worse, and also let a whole lot of other big deals get bigger.

Single-issue voting is how we got in this mess in the first place. We aren't going to single-issue vote our way out of it.

None, but with her the US would not be destroying itself as quickly, and USAID would still be a functional agency.

I try to be a realist, and looking at Trumps regime, I don't see Harris causing more harm in total.

Considering that in the US' two party system, you can have a winner who lost the popular vote, I'd say that the US is a deeply flawed democracy.

Any democratic system that includes first past the post is a flawed system

That is EXACTLY my point!

She probably wouldn't be any different, but she would be remarkably different on US policies, immigration, trans care, USAID.

People who refused to vote for Harris, you forgot about the biggest fact in politics, you never vote for the best candidate, you vote for the lest bad candidate.

No one will be able to convince me that Harris wasn't the least bad candidate between her and Trump.