them: yaaah safe from the censorship of the fediverse
me: defederates
post
Funny rule

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
So being sexist towards a Canadian is a warn but being sexist towards an American is a ban?
I presume they were attempting to clarify that the type of xenophobia that they most likely expected to see was directed at themselves due solely to their nationality.
But you could test this by making xenophobic comments against both, and see what happens. Then perhaps make an alt and perform in reverse ordering.
This is just universal monk jerking themselves off.
I'm so glad we can always rely on Satan's Maggoty Cum Fart for honest and reasonable assessments of situations.
I can believe that. The shitstain avoids having a life like the plague
They're welcome to it.
As far as I'm concerned, this is the entire benefit of lemmy/piefed/etc... They can have their space, and any other instance can choose not to federate with them so we aren't forced to listen to them, unlike the alternative, where an algorithm forces them into everyone's face.
Rather than telling them they don't have the right to speak, we simply have the ability to shut our window and not listen to them.
Let them bitch at each other.
Can we build a wall around them?
but I'm on Lemmy.World and I'm too stupid to understand everything.
I disagree with them being welcome, if we have more fascists over here eventually we'll get overrun. Best to shut that door immediately.
Them making their own space actually lets us much more easily reduce our exposure to them - without their space we get them everywhere and each of us have to ban such users individuals to avoid their poison, whilst if they're congregated in a server we can just ban that server and/or its forums.
In terms of the NAZI bar metaphor, this is more like the NAZIS setting up their own bar and congregating there rather than trying to take over other bars - everybody else can very easilly avoid even looking at the NAZI bar, much less going there and listening to them spreading their ideology - yeah, by default the sound of their activities does leak to the street, but in Lemmy we're the ones who can chose to close the door, not them.
Compare that with, for example, how the Zionists captured news@lemmy.world and even up to a level the server itself, by seeking moderation and admin positions there: subverting an existing large traffic forum and the biggest Lemmy instance is way much more pernicious than what the other kind of NAZI are doing by setting up their own - easily avoided - corner.
You raise good points, but for me the issue is, the Nazis then still have their own bar. And that creates a hub for them to advertise, spread, and sow hatred. And eventually, to try to buy the owners of the media platform. This is the literal "embrace, extend, extinguish" playbook they're using. Is that not a problem too? How could we combat it best?
I think it's better if we shut down their bar and bar them from even coming to any bar.
They want to go to a bar? Either don't be a fascist or shut up.
They would have one either way - I mean, just look at Twitter, Reddit, FOX News. Even when there weren't such NAZI spaces bought and paid for by billionaires, NAZIs had their own websites, mailing lists and whatever.
Weakenning the freedom inherent to the Fediverse's implementation just because the NAZIs might use it to create their own space is just indirectly constraining yourself because of the NAZIs, which IMHO is the opposite of what we should be doing.
Would you defend changing HTTP(S) and HTML to somehow stop NAZIs using it because as they are now they can be used by NAZIs to spread their message? How about e-mail? How about pen and paper?
You can't just throw the baby with the bathwater "because NAZIs".
If you really want to stop NAZI messaging altogether you can't do it by Technical means, you have to do it by Social and Political means - Laws Censoring NAZI messaging - and even there, look at Germany that does it and all they seem to have achieved is that the NAZI symbology is hidden whilst a large part of the NAZI way of things is widespread in society (hence the AfD success) and some elements of it are even shared by the majority (hence Germany's very overtly race-justified unconditional support of a nation commiting a Genocide). De facto Germany's banning of NAZIsm hasn't stopped the kind of Fascism like in the US right now or the AfD there, were they use the NAZI propaganda techniques and share many ideological elements with the NAZIs but just don't use NAZI symbols.
Barring them from everywhere would be ideal, but if not that, barring them from as many places as possible would be good too. Billionnaires have too much power and they are the powderkeg, in my view, that enabled fascism. So imho, we need to reduce their numbers and wealth, redistributing it to everyone.
I defend barring fascists everywhere, and not compromising the resilence of the fediverse to censorship from fascists.
And as for social and political means... in Germany, the AfD has had fewer votes as a % of turnout, than what the Republicans got in the US. I think the real cure is to combat algorithms by the root, and to seize the power over them back to the left and anyone non-fascist (or not as insane).
I understand the feeling.
I also look at it Logically and that yields a more subtle take.
My point is that thinking that ANYTHING is acceptable to contain the NAZIs (even when it hurts the rest) is forgetting that the whole point of stopping the NAZIs is to protected everybody else and their freedoms.
I'll give you a parallel example: start by "Everybody should be thrown in Jail to make sure all criminals are in Jail". Whilst it would work, this is obviously senseless. Once that's accepted the discussion becomes "how far should we go to make sure criminals go to Jail" and onwards to "how many innocents wrongly in Jail is acceptable" and "how many criminals who evade Jail is acceptable".
All that is what lead to things like a Justice System with Presumption of Innocence, different sentences for different Crimes and an Appeals System.
When it comes to stopping NAZIs the same reasoning applies - "ANYTHING is acceptable" is obviously senseless (killing all human beings would certainly stop the NAZIs, but I expect we both agree that it's a bit too much) so the discussion is then moved to "how far are we willing to sacrifice the rest in order to stop the NAZIs", which is the area of thinking anchoring my original point - if the NAZIs are contained (by their own choice, even), then maybe it's not worth it to sacrifice the freedom of the rest by mangling the Fediverse if all that would deliver as a result is the near-zero impact outcome of barring the NAZIs from their own separate space in the Fediverse whilst they can still gather elsewhere.
In my view by wanting that you asked originally, a far greater number of people than the number of NAZIs would sacrifice a lot for something that will make the NAZIs lose very little - or in other words your idea amounts to "throwing the baby out with the bathwater".
I don't think that "lets' fuck up what's important for almost everybody in order to barelly inconvenience the NAZIs" is a wise position, even if I understand the impulse to "just fuck those sons of a bitch no matter what".
But, how would you inconvenience the Nazis then? How would you deter them from the fediverse?
Deterring them from the Fediverse (as in not letting the use the protocol) is a near zero impact for them outcome, possibly technically impossible (it's an open protocol and the software is open source) and possibly with a lot of negative impact for everybody else (it risks undermining the main point of the Fediverse - Freedom).
Much more important is deterring them from spreading their hate to other people (in general) and as it so happens, when it comes to the people in the Fediverse, them segregating themselves in their own server actually helps with that: other servers can simple defederate, taking away their audience, hence they're not actually spreading their hate to others in the Fediverse.
With them not being self-segregated it's a lot harder because it they'll do what they are doing right now: join servers all over the place, post comments all over the place, so in response they get banned if they go too far (and then just open a new account) and others tend to try and nullify their poison by downvoting them or pointing out the with logic the stupidity and/or inconsistence of their position, all of which is a lot more fallible than just defederating the NAZI instance.
More generally, there is no perfect way to "deter them from the fediverse" (just try to actually analyse the problem space and you will soon find that there's no foolproof method), and hence the discussion has to be about how far should we go and what the delivers the best results, which brings us around to the point I was making: having the NAZIs in their own instance does more to stop them spreading their poison the Fediverse audience than somehow blocking that and keeping on trying to stamp them down individually when they're mixed with the general fediverse population.
True, freedom is important, but I feel like the paradox of tolerance also could apply.
Wouldn't it then be a better idea for one of us to secretly install a 'mole' instance for the far-right? Once a critical mass is reached, all users from there can be banned, and someone loyal to us can make a new mole instance, claiming it's free from their censorship. And then again, rinse and repeat.
The Paradox Of Tolerance is about how we should not tolerate the intolerant, not about what sacrificing ourselves to inconvenience the intolerant, must less sacrifice others to inconvenience the intolerant.
It's really only about the Tolerant tolerating the Intolerance leads to an increase of Intolerance, and doesn't really cover how far and justified is to make onself or others lose something to inconvenience the Intolerant, or in other word, the devil in the details part of any solution.
That said, your idea has merit and it has parallels to what some of the right does - for example, how the right creates spaces which they pass as leftwing to attract leftwing people and then when enough of a critical mass arises they use it to spread rightwing-distortions of leftwing ideas or even just outright rightwing ideas: look at Twitter or, even better, Reddit or even what the DNC has done to the Democrat Party in the US.
The discussion there is not anymore "how much is right to sacrifice the rest to inconvenience the NAZIs", but instead is "how moral and ethical it is to create fake NAZI spaces to fuck with the NAZIS" - so it doesn't involve sacrificing the rest at all - and personally I think it's pretty damn ethical and moral to fuck with the NAZIs like that (after all, they want to do far worse to other people than merelly honeypot them into an online space that just gets closed after a while, so it's not even close to how harshly they deserve to be treated)
How easy or hard it is to pull that off, especially repeatedly, is a different matter, as the Technical bit of setting up such instances is easy, the hard part is to attract the NAZIs to the honeypots, which is a Marketing problem.
I mean "welcome" in the most generic, passive aggressive Canadian sense of the word. Shutting the door is exactly what the strength of federated/defederated social media is all about.
Except that what I call for is a collective defederation from those fascists.
The ones sectioning themselves off are the fascists by virtue of holding repulsive ideologies.
And further it ‘should’ help build support for Lemmy et al’s right to exist
1 month later: why is our new instance filled exclusively with incels and edgelords and fuckwits?
1 year later: President Trump signs executive order requiring everyone to federate with MAGA
damn, i gotta check out that place later. i wonder how MAGA will interact with the fediverse. like, how can you be anarchistic and bootlicking at the same time?
edit: this is hilarious.

bootlicking: check ✅️

"especially towards Americans"

well, at least this one i can understand. Now i have to think about What the Turtle said to Achill, somehow.

this gotta be a troll account. Why is there an "antifa" community on the https://maga.place/ instance?
Rule 2 seems to negate most of the defining characteristics of the MAGA movement, no?
I think a couple troll accounts sprang up on instance after my post, the actual admin though is seemingly a serious right-winger with all the trimming that entails. But does seem to be allowing those to exist ig for "free speech" lol

"No hate... transphobia..." wow the admin surely follow their rules
-
I do not respect an illegitimate, unconstitutional government.
-
"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others."
100% a parody instance: https://maga.place/post/2245?scrollToComments=true

Even mention Epstein+Trump like that would be a site-wide shadowban posted on /r/conservative.
It's good though. It's plausibly pro trump.
r/thedonald started out as a parody subreddit but quickly got overrun by chuds who didn't realise it was a joke
No, that's another user trolling on there.
Hates fediverse, still wants to be part of it.
safe from the madness and censorship of the fediverse.
Sounds like they explicitly don't want to federate. Unless it's a parody site, I guess.
It's entirely possible it's a spectacularly successful trolling mission by one person.
Seriously, look how many people are up in arms about an instance with one user.
Yeah and why the big deal? I didn't notice any signs saying the fediverse is only for lefties. I may not agree with conservatives but that doesn't mean I think they should be excluded.
Sure they should. Their entire online presence revolves around hurting people they dislike.Has there ever been a forum they contributed positively too?
Too many people give these jackholes the benefit of the doubt. "They don't think trans people should exist. I don't agree, but we have to hear them out" is a cowards line that puts their freedumb of speech above trans people's right to exist.
I hope we've learned that lesson by now. Sure, wait for them to break a rule or whatever. Maybe this is just one guy and maybe it's just going to sit there. But the moment they start talking—because we all know what they're going to say—give them the bums' rush.
Oh hey no I don't think we have to hear them out. Especially not if they're coming out with hate speech - that shit should always be smacked down hard. When they start doing that, we can defed the fuckers - but they haven't done that yet.
Maybe I'm too soft, I just don't wanna see lemmy turn into an echo chamber.
I mean, have you ever interacted with Hexbear? The right doesn't have a monopoly on being awful.
Why tolerate the intolerant? They can host whatever they want, but there's no reason not to exclude them if they intend on bringing harm. Tbh the word "excluded" doesn't really fit, exclusion would be like someone getting kicked out of a bar, defederating would be more like the bouncer not letting you in.
At the end of the day even if it's gonna be defederated by every other instance, nobody's gonna forbid them from starting their own "bar" like the one shown, which means they're not really excluded from the fediverse.
I don't think we should tolerate them. This is what we always hear from them when we tell them to fuck off - how many times have we seen "So much for the tolerant left!" Yeah, we are tolerant of pretty much anything that doesn't harm others - aside from intolerance itself.
I dunno, I just don't like the idea of defeding ppl just because of their political leanings. I'd rather wait til they start spewing hateful shit and then defed the fuckers.
But I can understand ppl who wanna keep lemmy clean of bigots. I just think we gotta wait til they show their colours then kick them to the curb. That's me, though, I respect that others don't feel the same.
Bad faith answer, though. MAGA cunts aren't "conservatives", they are outright fascists.
If you want conservative, you'd have to look at people who just want the status quo. In other words, the more milquetoast Christian democrats.
The fediverse is for 'everyone', but that doesn't mean we put up with fascists. It's only for people who aren't batshit insane. In other words, not for fascists and transphobes.
If you identify with conservatism, as in, going to Church, wanting a traditional family yourself -- by all means you're welcome! so long as that means you let others also have their own life that might not involve those, and don't hate or question their lifestyle.
but if you're a fascist or transphobe, then get the fuck out here and go touch grass
MAGA cunts aren’t “conservatives”, they are outright fascists.
Conservatism IS fascism, with "nicer words"... Until they seize power, then the nice words stop.
The good thing is that all sane instances can just defederate and we won't have to deal with them. They can use the software all they want, and we can shut them out from our spaces all we want.
Yeah I guess I failed to distinguish between maga and conservatives. I don't want to see lemmy become an echo chamber, and usually you can disagree but debate with conservatives. Fascists, not so much. Don't get me wrong, I think Nazis should be stomped online and out in the world - I just haven't seen anything yet from this instance to justify that.
I actually feel kinda sorry for oldskool conservatives - I don't agree with em, but they must feel politically homeless these days.
But yeah, bigots can fuck right off.
Yeah I guess I failed to distinguish between maga and conservatives
To be fair, the entire Republican party seems to be all about blurring that line right now. I think the big challenge is Trump awakened something in folks who haven't been politically active in a very long time, and because they haven't been politically active, they aren't coming into politics with a clear ideology or set of policies they want to see passed other than "I like trump!" Which is probably a big part of why we just have a bunch of attempts at turning his presidency into a dictatorship and state-sponsored racism as the only clear policy trump actually cares about, and any policies that are directly enriching large businesses are just a case of those with deep pockets cozying up to folks in power with loose morals.
But let's be real, the Republican party hasn't been about conservatism for quite a while. They've definitely been coasting off of pure brand recognition with occasional injections of christofascism and state sponsored violence against minorities to help maintain their old jim crow roots. They've successfully cultivated a culture of being Republican, so they can do what they want policy-wise and still reliably win around a third of the elections in the country without resorting to voter suppression, and they can reliably win about half of the elections in the country with voter suppression
I think the big challenge is Trump awakened something in folks who haven't been politically active in a very long time, and because they haven't been politically active, they aren't coming into politics with a clear ideology or set of policies they want to see passed other than "I like trump!"
Yeah I wanna slightly amend that - I think their ideology is certainly "I like trump" but I think the reasons behind that are they see him as a big strong leader who validates and legitimises their prejudices - and will allow them to act on those prejudices. Suddenly the hate they felt for their immigrant neighbours, or their fear of gay people, whatever - suddenly they have a leader saying that's okay and he's now supporting their discrimination with military deployment in US cities.
This is how fascism happens - it's not always forced on a population, a lot of times a lot of people want it.
And the oldskool republican party was essentially a corporate mouthpiece.
Scary fuckin times, mate. The snowball is rolling down the hill and it's growing and it's accelerating.
I used to be one of those oldschool conservatives. I'm much more progressive now, but what I do think helps, is the following.
Fascists won't listen to progressives. So what will pull them out of that black hole, is having them listen to more 'boring' people, but without the opportunity to overtalk them. Let fascists listen to normal views and don't let fascists take over the discussion. Youtube videos with comments disabled, PDFs by anonymous authors, and so on, that can help.
The common man's best ally is reaching out to the milquetoasts, and having the fascists listen to them and you while also not listening to them. Never yield to their beliefs; have a red line beyond which you won't discuss with them. Use their own tactics against them.
I used to know one. Whenever they still wanted to discuss their batshit crazy views, I told them I declined discussing that stuff with them, and wouldn't interact with them unless if they could shut up about that.
It usually worked (though not 100%), so I consider that a general-ish success.
Maga is conservatism. Stop trying to separate the two, they are the same fucking thing.
It's reactionary, not conservative. If they'd been conservative, they'd not actively try to revert the US back to the colonial age.
They're not the same.
It’s reactionary, not conservative.
Those are both the same thing.
What do you think conservatives are trying to "conserve"? Because it ain't nature.
As I mentioned, the status quo. So basically the average Joe that doesn't care much either way, isn't gonna hate or support, but also not apathetic. Basically people who just want stability, not fascism (which is inherently unstable in that it perpetuates a state-led chaos and terror).
As for nature, the whole "X is UnNattural" is nonsense fabricated by religious fundamentalists, tbh. Nature is wilder than whatever they can cook up.
I've seen lots of people lately attempting to distance conservatism from MAGA, and I'm sorry but it has failed. You need to extricate yourself from the hateful ideology that you (presumably) subscribe to.
As I mentioned, the status quo.
The status quo of systemic white supremacy and the patriarchy... So... fascists.
that doesn’t mean I think they should be excluded.
Well, I think they should be excluded. Due to the Nazi Bar phenomena.
I remember when /r/the_Donald was just "parody". Remember what happened there?
I mean, remember what more recently happened with /c/conservative?
I don't think that I do
it is a parody seemingly, according to @gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de's comment
top 90 comments