top 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 93 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I remember Rush Limbaugh saying, in his book, that the video played on the news was looped...

    Even if that was true (I don't know if it is), the cops were still hitting a guy who was already on the ground, with batons...

    It would have been swept under the rug if someone hadn't videotaped it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I grew up with a (very racist) dad who claimed the video cut out "the part where Rodney was attacking the officers and they couldn't get him under control".

    I also remember upon seeing American History X where the main guy in a flashback repeated the same lie my dad did damn near verbatim.

    America has always been racist and the racists have always used the same unoriginal playbook time and time again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    I've always wondered about the Venn Diagram between Racists, Fascists and Narcissists. …

    Because everything they do is summed up perfectly in the poem

    "the narcissist's prayer"by Dayna EM Craig

    That didn’t happen.

    And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.

    And if it was, that’s not a big deal.

    And if it is, that’s not my fault.

    And if it was, I didn’t mean it.

    And if I did

    You deserved it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -26 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    ......I'm not sure if I'm that old, or if you think America is that dumb. I never thought the name "Rodney King" would need to be explained.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Sir/Ma'am, this is a Wendy's international network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I really like Saer as a gender neutral honorific, it's used in Baldur's Gate :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Yeah you're that old. I'm that old too. Rodney King is a forever unforgettable name, and I'm just some white guy in what's basically the midwest.

    But for the name to have such an impact on somebody, they need to have lived through that cultural moment.

    This is pretty early 90s we're talking about here. Without a doubt there are GRANDPARENTS alive in this country right now who are mainstream media consuming normies and they do not remember Rodney King.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Honestly having grown up in the 80s I feel that racism is tolerated a lot less today. Most places will fire openly racist people now, but I worked with guys in the 90s who would have flat out racist conversations in the break room and the only black guy there couldn't say shit or he would get fired, after all they did tell him "you're one of the good ones" so why would he be mad?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    I worked with guys in the 90s who would have flat out racist conversations in the break room

    I work with people today who have flat out racist conversations in the break room -- and I'm a fucking school bus driver in a fucking very liberal school district (Harris signs outnumbered trump signs by about 30:1 last year). They just use the word "native" instead of a worse n-word, although I had one coworker who used the worse n-word repeatedly. Another guy uses the g-word whenever somebody mentions that they like Chinese food. I enjoy watching his head melt when I say I'm going to get Korean or Ethiopian food. I almost got him to try Liberian food until he found out where Liberia is lol.

    On the plus side, these are all older people in their 60s or 70s. The kids themselves are far more egalitarian. I also grew up in the '80s and although us kids were not really overtly racist, you still had kids segregating themselves racially as far as social groupings were concerned. Today I see lots of groups of mixed kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, that's the one. Since it's always in the context of Asian food, he also goes off about them eating dogs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • oh yeah, that's still a big part of it. people will very frequently say they're not racist but then start stereotyping Chinese food as being cats and dogs and I'm just sitting there like "uhh, that's racist bullshit, let's fuckin not"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Jesus dude, I live in a smallish Southern town and I can't remember the last time I heard a slur in public or private.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yes but what color are you? What do you look like?

    I am in the deep south, and white. I absolutely could hear it daily if I didn't shut it down either explicitly verbally, or by not looking like them by what I wear.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    I'd generally agree, but say that for folks who still feel a need to get their racism bone exercised they still do. racism is a lot quieter now. on an uptick, but still orders of magnitude better than the 80s and 90s, which had to have been orders of magnitude better than the 60s and 70s which I didn't experience. But there weren't folks getting hosed down by the fire department just for the gall of attending integrated schools in my decades growing up. We had apartheid bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Honestly having grown up in the 80s I feel that racism is tolerated a lot less today.

    I don't know about that. I think we were only starting to make progress, and the push back from the racists is a big part of where Trump came from.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    geez, the way people talk about the US you'd think they did genocide, chattel slavery, concentration camps, apartheid, lynchings and mass incarceration of certain groups of people. fortunately the country was always harmonious until this one guy got elected despite everyone being not bigoted at all. twice. just a little glitch in the matrix.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    If we just go back to when all the cars were lead fueled boats and one hard working man* could support a whole household by working a fairly paid job…then it’ll all be great again

    *terms conditional upon skin color and ethnicity of surname of said man. Anyone black queer or other need not apply

    GREAT!

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 46 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Bud did you see the shit they pulled during Obama's presidency

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    White people just lost our minds when he got elected. I remember riding by one of their protests near my workplace back then, and a bunch of them just had straight up effigies or signs of Obama being lynched.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    conservatives specifically, i once followed some asian tubers, before they went full magat. they were already showing signs of disdain towards OBAMA and biden being elected, everyone in the(fans) knew they. they usually just drop the issue, but covid BROKE thier minds(couldnt deal the stress with another female employee in thier ranks), and they were quick to come to TRUMPs defense when he won, and when got shot at.(older milleneals asians can be notoriously conservative like thier immigrant parents that came to the USA.(especially if they had religious household/or dysfunctional).

    its not just white people, but POC thinking they can be white by being conservatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Wow. Read a god damn book. How could anyone ask the question, and not immediately slap themselves in the forehead? Slavery? Jim Crow? MLK? Rosa Parks? You've heard of none of these?

    This must be what Christian right home schooling produces.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Or just public school in the south.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm from Texas and work in public education. Can someone read your comment to me so I can decide if I should be offended?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Hitler based his treatment of German Jews as lesser people in the ‘30s on the way the US treated its black population. That’s why he thought he’d get away with it. After all, the Americans got away with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Did they though? 1860s was slavery, and there was a huge war. Bloodiest war still to this day in American history. With the end result being that slavery ended.

    Now, you can say racism didn't end after that, and you'd be right. Racism never ended to this day. But on the scale of atrocities, racism, then slavery, then mass extermination camps.

    So, if the extermination camps are farther down the line than slavery, and America DID NOT get away with slavery, then your logic does not hold up.

    I'm not defending any of what happened. I'm just saying if Hitler looked at an already failed policy, then he couldn't possibly use it as justification with what he did.

    A far better line of logic is saying he used Americas killing of Native Americans as the blueprint for his camps. Which he absolutely did, and which America absolutely did get away with. Still to this day Native American population numbers just might be the lowest of all the races, simply because of how very very close to total extermination they came 200 years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    there was a huge war. Bloodiest war still to this day in American history

    That the slave states started in order to force other states to allow slavery. And only the bloodiest American war on American soil. The US military has killed a lot more people in subsequent wars.

    With the end result being that slavery ended.

    Only chattel slavery. While unquestionably less horrible, penal slavery was explicitly allowed by the 13th amendment and is practiced to this day.

    There's significantly more people legally enslaved in the US today than there was before chattel slavery was abolished.

    Now, you can say racism didn't end after that

    If you want to go for the understatement of the year award, yes, you could do that.

    But on the scale of atrocities, racism, then slavery, then mass extermination camps.

    As I explained above, slavery is still a thriving industry, more so now than ever.

    As for extermination camps, it's just a matter of time now that the fascists have taken over and started building the first concentration camps.

    America DID NOT get away with slavery

    America IS getting away with slavery.

    your logic does not hold up

    clears throat

    I'm just saying if Hitler looked at an already failed policy

    He didn't. The Jim Crow laws that inspired him were EXTREMELY successful at oppressing and marginalizing black people and continued to be so until long after Hitler's defeat and death.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Good writeup. An additional thing I would like to add are the "well regulated militias" whose initial purpose was to act as thugs for big plantation owners (the untouchable billionaires of yesteryear), and their continued authoritarian white supremacist heritage…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The war was more between two giant economic interests, not an indological one. If it was they would deal with the losing side, not kept their statues in official federal buildings, etc.

    And natives didn't prosper that much after the civil war.

    So yes, USA got away with it, generational wealth remained mostly intact, only southern enterprises lost some of their revenue (bcs paychecks or no labour).

    A future civil war could be between two billionaires, like it was between kings.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Fuck the LAPD.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I have a list of white supremacist cops in California I'm working on. There's a LOT.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    thatsbait.gif

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I'd say that the underlying hate has actually gone down slightly over time (which I will explain in the next paragraph), but that what Trump has done is allowed people to be very open about their existing bigotry.

    The reason I feel comfortable saying that the hate has decreased is that, for example, we tore down quite a few confederate monuments recently, and honestly, it wasn't all that long ago that the monuments were erected, long after the Civil War ended. Many of those monuments were erected in the mid to late 1900s as a way of saying "fuck you" to minorities while pretending it was about heritage.

    I actually think that Hollywood and the TV industry helped quite a bit with their focus on including people of many races in the media we consume. I seem to recall that there were studies that showed children who grew up watching various races interacting normally on television tended to be less racist.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Y’all tried to genocide my people, you’ve always been monsters

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    But that was all okay because the guy had committed some crime.

    At least that was the narrative I recall.from back in that day. Was fox News a thing already? I think so, because it was all "Everyone is poor Rodney, but they completely forget he was a criminal!!!"

    So what? Maybe he was, and that excuses that police Beat the stuffing out of him?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    At least that was the narrative I recall.from back in that day. Was fox News a thing already?

    The heavy right-wing stuff was cordoned off in AM Talk radio. Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, and Michael Medved being some of the more popular shows. But I believe both future VP Mike Pence and Texas Lt. Gov Dan Patrick got in on the act in their early years.

    So what? Maybe he was, and that excuses that police Beat the stuffing out of him?

    The systematic beating was both the cause of and result of Rodney King's police chase. King feared the wrath of the LAPD/LASD and the police believed repeatedly beating suspects would make them less likely to complicate arrests by fleeing in the future.

    Sort of a vicious cycle of violence used to justify the next round of violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    America was founded because some “philosopher” slaver farmers got pissy when the King refused to overrule the elected Parliament and allow them to genocide the natives for their land. This they called “tyranny”. They haven’t learned any better in the ensuing centuries.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    i mean my area of study was elsewhere, but i focused the financial back and forth between the crown and the colonies back in college (so you know, undergrad level of understanding 20 years ago) and taxation seems to be more than just a slogan ("taxation without representation"). it was kind of the straw that broke the camel's back where the locus of control of their supposedly democratic form of government was removed from them, and they were still expected to bear (what the colonies somewhat unreasonably, somewhat reasonably felt were) undue burdens necessary to maintain an (ceaselessly warring and expanding) empire.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    The colonials paid 10% of the tax paid by those in England. Tax was massively overhyped by the rabble-rousers. When else in history has anyone protested against a 90% tax discount?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    i'm too tired to remember what the actual tax rate paid by the colonists was, but take a minute to read the acts that were passed and see some of the shit that was passed along with the tax rates. there's a constant erosion of rights over a decade. they just happened to coincide with the tax acts. specifically... i think it was the townshend acts?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They will consider "woke" history but if you ignore significant parts of history like abuse of people then that's not education, that's propaganda. This is why "woke" to me will always mean educated.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    To me, woke isn't "educated". It's more in line with "aware".

    Give you an example. I'm white. At the time of Rodnry King I would have been about 9 years old. So, my whole outlook of the world is based on the adults around me, and the tv.

    Rodney King was a one of those pivoting points for America. My family was shocked by what they saw. Police? Abusing their authority? That's unheard of!

    And at the time, most white people had ZERO idea that was a regular occurance. The video tape is what changed that. The woman who filmed it shined the first light onto injustice that had been going on for centuries.

    At the time I went to an all white school. I think there was 1 black kid. He was 2 grades above me, so I never really talked to him.

    The next year, when the Rodney King trial was going on, I had changed schools. I was in a mostly black school now. And it was a TOTAL shift from what I had known.

    I started learning that I saw Rodney King as four corrupt cops who did an outragious, totally out of character set of actions. I saw it as an isolated incident in a rare time of cops being violent against someone.

    What I was then told is story after story from students that never made the news. Stories of their own lives. Stories of our local cops doing similar things. Maybe not as harsh as 4 cops beating one man, but we all know today the types of stories I heard in 3rd grade.

    Point is, yes, I was educated back then on the harsh realities that black families go through, and have gone through, for generations.

    But the difference between being educated, and being aware, is that I told my sister everything I heard back then.

    Two years ago in my apartment building my upstairs neighbor was being absurdly loud.

    I was on the phone with my sister at the time. She suggested I call the cops on them. I said "No. I want them to be quiet. I don't want them dead."

    And this is where educated vs aware comes in. My sister had been educated just as I was in the 90s what had been happening. I was aware NOT to call the cops. My sister thought I was being difficult and dramatic.

    Now, I don't KNOW the cops would have shot my neighbors. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe they would have written a fine and left. But the fact that it's a very real possibility is still something I'm very aware of. While my sister had been educated, she isn't aware on a day to day basis that her life is different than others purely because of her background. It's not something that she's thinking about, even if she's been taught.

    Thats educated vs aware.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Don't forget all the online comments (after more recent stuff like Floyd) about how "he was probably a drug addict or a criminal and that he deserved it for resisting the cops"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    Just since 1776

  • source