Paywall removed: https://archive.is/KNzH9

top 83 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 227 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Millennial here - gen Z has retirement savings???

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Not if they're dipping into it at 30. That's going to kill any kind of compound interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I'm about to be 29, and have literally zero savings to speak of. I've been paycheck-to-paycheck pretty much my entire working life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    If it's any consolation it took me until I hit 33 for me to have any savings at all.

    Anything I put into the account I used for savings went out the same month so I didn't go into an overdraft.

    Funny enough the only thing that changed is I passed my qualifications and got my first "real" job... Though I may have also spent the past 8 or 9 years isolated in a way that regular people only got to see during the 'rona times

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    The best investment at your age is in training/education to improve your take home pay or ability to relocate. Fuck retirement savings, you have to eat for 30+ years to get there first. Invest in yourself, not in the fucking casino controlled by billionaires that is the stock market.

    My wife made a career swap 5 years ago after getting a master's degree. We used our retirement savings to pay for the schooling because the ROI was under 1 year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Ah yes, telling the person that just admitted they're paycheck-to-paycheck to pay for education, perfect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Training isn't a bad option, though, especially since some jobs will pay you for it. Some trades do paid apprenticeships - the pay isn't great, but it's better than paying for training.

    Alternately, manufacturing jobs can be pretty good. I had a friend who got a job working in a factory right out of high school - he started at $20/hour, with a sizeable raise after the first year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The only way off the hamster wheel of paycheck to paycheck living is to find a way to make the paycheck larger. The entire system is designed prevent you from doing so of course. You can not save money out of poverty wages.

    It's counter-intuitive but financially going $10K into credit card debt just to survive, while paying $10K for targeted education/training from disbursed 401K funds is a better use of the money. You can increase your pay by $20-30k or more per year with marketable training/education. If you pay off the credit card it will just come back if you don't increase your wages. Bankruptcy also can't take away the education/skills you've gained.

    Swapping jobs frequently for a higher paycheck is required today. Every 1-2 years in your 20's as you fight the experience/poverty wages bullshit. Every 3-5 after that just to beat inflation. When you swap jobs the 401k becomes available for withdrawal. Instead of using it to pay down debts etc., pay for education/training to make the next job pay more. Usually signing up for the minimum amount of the 401K makes almost no difference to your take home pay but a nice little bit of cash at each job change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "the system is designed to prevent you from saving your way out of poverty" Followed immediately by "go 10,000 into credit card debt to pay for education"

    While "Bankruptcy can't take away your skills" it can 100% leave you on the street.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not really, but that's a myth that credit card companies want you to believe. Creditors really want to be repayed and make a profit. So they want you working, eating top ramen and paying them back. Homeless & jobless = no money for them.

    Property owners want somebody with a job, a history of paying rent, and enough income to cover it. I was always able to get a place to live even when my credit rating was sub-500's due to credit card charge-offs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    lol right? Must be nice to afford to put more than your employer’s match into your 401k

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    What the hell is an employer match?

    • Millennials, probably
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    As far as I understand, I don't have a 401k. I have nothing. I have never considered retirement to be a reasonable outcome for anyone in my generation or younger, but even still, it's not like I would have been able to save more than a scant couple thousand after decades of work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    for anyone in my generation or younger

    You think no adults entering the workforce in the last ~20 years if going to be able to retire? What little bubble are you living in?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    The bubble where the entire concept of retirement will be lost. Where society will crumble into wearing tribes fighting over arable land and fresh water. That one. That bubble. The bubble where this will begin in earnest in our lifetime. The bubble that says this fascist wave around the world is just the precursor and that as people get more desperate, things will only get worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Also you have to watch out for those expense ratios. I once worked at an employer where the only funds available in the 401k plan had expenses and fees around 2%. Managed mutual funds statistically perform no better than just cheap index funds. So paying those fees doesn't actually earn you a higher rate of return. But plans with usurious fees are cheaper for employers to provide.

    What was so egregious about it is that when I ran the numbers, I found that my employer's 401k plan was actually worse than investing in cheap index funds in a regular taxable brokerage account. The 401k could be contributed to with pre-tax money, but all the tax benefits were cancelled out by being trapped in high expense 401k plans.

    I contributed enough to get the match and invested any money above that elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Have you looked into the high yield accounts from Marcus (Goldman Sachs). if you have any money Sitting around in a checking account or even Another savings account but you don’t need immediately you should consider this. The APY is 3.65%, which is a lot better than anything a regular bank will do. And you can transfer money between them with their app. of course they also offer no penalty CDs and standard CDs

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 83 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    I had 14 grand in a 401k. I had to spend it to survive for a year while I looked for a job. All of it.

    Now I know 14k aint shit. But that is where we are.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    14k would have been $132k in 45 years when you would have otherwise retired.

    The power is in the interest. Even if you max out your 401k in the future it cannot make up for missing interest earnings on early deposits. Having to use it it now means nobody in this entire generation will ever retire, ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Just to put it into perspective, if the inflation rate for the past 45 years predicts the next 45 years. $14K today = $55K in 45 years. A $75K household income today would be $294K in 45 years.

    So $14K in a 401K saved for 45 years is a pittance and should never be considered a retirement "program". It's all bullshit to decrease and eliminate the cost of actual pension programs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    You don't just put $14k into a 401k, you keep contributing to it. Getting more and more money to compound upon itself.

    If you put $4k into it every year (remember, this is pre-tax money and often has an employer match), and it grows 8% per year on average (S&P 500 actually does more like 10%, but we will be more conservative and say 8%), we will also be conservative and assume you won't increase contributions, even as you earn more later in life, then you have $1,546,022 after 45 years of working.

    Yes, this is something you can retire on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Gotta include inflation in there.

    $1,546,022 in 45 years with the same inflation we've had for the past 45 years would only be worth $529,400 in todays money.

    If you only plan on living for 10 years or less after retiring, then, Maybe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You only get the 401k when you retire in US? This is not in addition to normal Social Security?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Most of us that are younger than the Boomers or maybe Gen X don't want to count on Social Security because we've been hearing our whole lives that Social Security is on the chopping block because the government is in so much debt. And at this point we kinda just expect that ladder to be pulled up behind the Boomers before we get anything, because that's already happened in so many other areas like home ownership.

    I also think people need to remember that Social Security is their own money that they paid in over their lives, and they are owed it back.

    And also that even though the US government has a large amount of debt, we've also spent the last 50 years giving tax cuts to the rich, we'd probably be just fine if we went back to a 90% marginal tax rate on the top earners like we had in the "good old days" of the 1950s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Most of us that are younger than the Boomers or maybe Gen X don’t want to count on Social Security because we’ve been hearing our whole lives that Social Security is on the chopping block because the government is in so much debt.

    Thinking about it, the chance that Social Security money will be stolen and transferred to the 1% is quite high. Not because of the debt but simply to make the rich even richer. They will probably just say that the current system is not sustainable and move all the money into pension funds controlled by private banks which will then gamble with it pocketing the profits and socializing the loses. But 401k is the same so putting money there is not really a solution. The solution is to run away but obviously not everyone is able to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The money has already been yanked from SS and other programs. It's included as part of the National Debt figure. They have taken the excess funds for decades and spent it. Having private banks hold and invest these funds instead is highly unlikely.

    The government also relies on investment funds to buy treasury bills. Most 401K's at are set up to give the owner very little control over how they invest their money. All of the offered selections usually include treasury bills. So the government is borrowing money from 401K's and promising to pay it back as well.

    That's all fine unless something happens to erode the trust and willingness of people around the world to lend money to the U.S. government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    I had $20K a 401K and $15K in school loans when I swapped jobs in my late 20's. Guess what I did with it.

    3 years later I was able to purchase my first house because I saved up money instead of paying the student loans.

    Right now I should be maximizing my retirement savings according to all the advisors. Instead I am using the money to pay for my kids college so they can start off in life above zero instead of -$50k like my wife and I did.

    I figured out a long time ago that there is no way in hell I can retire and remain in the U.S. The system is rigged against me. So my goal for the next 10 years is to learn Spanish.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    14k is worth 14k, and you can live a very spartan year on it apparently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 81 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Gen X here, same fucking story.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

    Which generation isn’t doing this? I don’t think it is a generational cadre thing. I think it is a class thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    I pretty much said the same thing about my own experience then was downvoted to all hell and accused of being a boomer who caused all this. Wth is wrong with people, no wonder we can't escape this shit no matter the generation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Late babyboomer and early genx are doing just fine for the most part. I mean they've spent the last 5 decades pillaging from their children and grandchildren's futures to keep the stock market booming.

    If you put a $100 investment in the S&P 500 at the start of 1980, with dividends reinvested, it would have grown to approximately $17,427.60 by early 2025. This is the reason the vast majority of people who vote for Republicans are 55 and older, because they don't care about anything but securing their own bag.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you put a $100 investment in the S&P 500 at the start of 1980, with dividends reinvested, it would have grown to approximately $17,427.60 by early 2025. 

    WHICH CAN BUY YOU A HOUSE IN 1963.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    I think the point is the 174x growth, not the final number based on the arbitrary $100. If you'd invested $10,000, you'd have $1,740,000 (simple extrapolation not accounting for dividend reinvesting, it's too early for math)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    But a ton of these people got completely obliterated is 2008 too. My point isn’t there aren’t rich people, it’s that there are poor in each generation and the wealth gap is increasing across demographics, even if not uniformly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    There are poor people in each generation but post boomer generations are doing less well off compared to their parents.

    I frankly don't see have how new technologies can help post boomer generations. It is just like the French revolution. Each generation is worse off than the one before. Eventually people will revolt.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You only got obliterated in 2008 if you took your money out of the machine.

    With the S&P500 as an example, within 4 years it was back to where it was. By now, it's worth 4 times what it was in 2007 at the peak before the trough.

    It's all about being able to save. If you can't then capitalism won't work for you. I feel it's worse now, but there's always been the poor and always will be. The world ain't about to get fair any time soon. They just rely on the welfare state a lot more. Which is fine. I suspect some of the people struggling the most just aren't claiming what they're entitled to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But a ton of these people got completely obliterated is 2008 too.

    And even more made more money than ever with the bounce back. The market recovered its losses within 4 years, but wages didn't recover until 2015-2016.

    there are poor in each generation and the wealth gap is increasing across demographics, even if not uniformly.

    For adults the poverty level is around 10% all age demographics, however the important thing to evaluate is the difference in wealth.

    The median net worth under age 35 is about $39,000, but this rises to approximately $364,500 for the 55-64 age group.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    True, some people made that money back. But crucially, some didn’t. Partly due to market fears causing sales of positions and partly because they just had to retire in that window or because their annuity was invested poorly for those conditions. Some people did get wrecked and not always because they messed up.

    But yeah, some people are doing well. More yet in the older age groups as you point out. I’m just saying the problem is more directly linked to class than generation. People need to increase class consciousness if the end is ever to be in view. A poor 50 year old is sinking in the same leaky boat as a poor 20 year old.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • But yeah, some people are doing well. More yet in the older age groups as you point out. I’m just saying the problem is more directly linked to class than generation. People need to increase class consciousness if the end is ever to be in view. A poor 50 year old is sinking in the same leaky boat as a poor 20 year old.

    I never claimed otherwise.... I'm just pointing out that there are clear overlaps when it comes to class and generational divides. I never claimed there weren't poor people above the age of 55, as I said earlier poverty levels for adults is around 10% across the board. The difference is that the vast majority of people above the age of 55 are in a different class than the rest of America.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago

    You guys have retirement savings?

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago
    [–] 45 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Billionaires have all our money. Maybe we could ask for it back nicely.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Soon there will be a critical mass of people who have nothing left to lose

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • the media-spread call to "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" was a call for the population to "unroot" and "weed out itself". The people give all of their life force to companies, and when late-stage capitalism ends, people will be laid off and thrown away like empty husks.

    The last 20 years have lead to widespread social division [link], isolation ("atomistic society" is a term to refer to a society that consists of many individuals instead of being a cohesive fabric) and loneliness. I don't think people will form unions and fight back.

    I think it would be very un-American to help the people in need. The american spirit is one of enterpreneurship and adventure, and standing still and being lazy is unacceptable. The american movement is like the wind, if it stops moving, it stops existing. (it turns into thin air). As long as there's progress to be made and big projects to be realized, people will have jobs and income. America can not last, it can only be first. America cannot stay, it can only go forward, it has to leave. It has to leave the world behind and venture into the stars. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    Gen Z has retirements? 🤔

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's amazing how badly small amount of people can treat large amount of people and get away with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I learned this lesson when I was in middle school. Our school cafeteria sold students expired food. Not, "Oh it's a few days late, these dates are estimates so it's probably fine." I mean food several months past dates, with obvious changes to consistency and taste. Two examples I vividly remember were moist cheetos and ice cream that looked like foam.

    I thought it was disgusting and unsafe. I personally stopped trusting all such school cafeteria food from that point (and never touched it again.) My friends, however, didn't seem to care? Somehow?

    Every time a friend took a bite and asked, "Does this taste weird?" I'd examine the food. If it was a packaged food, I'd check the date. Every time, the expiration date would be from last semester. I know this, because at one point I started keeping records in a notebook about it.

    But before I started doing that, I encouraged the affected friends to tell the lunch ladies and ask them to exchange the expired package for a fresher one. They refused to. They were terrified of "causing trouble." I was like, "It's just a simple exchange. I'll go do it for you." But they begged me to just stay there and say nothing, like the rest of them. They were so scared to potentially upset someone.

    Must be quiet. Must behave. Must not dare consider speaking up for our own well-being, even if it means we must literally eat garbage.

    I'll give 'em this, the long-game authoritarians from the 90s and early 00s did a bang up job conditioning the kids to accept fascist rule in 2025. Want to know why so many Americans aren't fighting back? Because we've been raised to accept this abuse. Many are active enforcers at worst, or spinelessly compliant bystanders at best. Anyone outside that spectrum is a trouble-maker that the first group would gladly make suffer (while the second group "minds their own business.")

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Millennial but I've been doing this for the last 4-5 years at this point

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Wait, do you actually have retirement savings?

    I'm on the leading edge of millennial and my retirement plan is to die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    My job has a 401k I was putting into when I started 12 years ago and they allow to borrow against it so I've had to do that to survive for a while now. Whenever I inevitably get fired or leave my job I'm gonna take the opportunity to just cash out and take the huge tax hit because I find it highly unlikely that I'll make it to actual retirement age at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Oh, you'll make it to retirement age, you just won't be able to retire at that age, or ever.

    That's what I expect at least.

    I figure that I'll be able to retire when I have my house, and all other debts paid off in full, and I'm collecting my government pension (we have a national program here in Canada). And that assumes that the pension payments can cover my day to day and month to month expenses, which, at this point, with inflation the way it's going, I have absolutely zero confidence that it will be enough.

    So I keep working and working, and creating value for shareholders.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago

    Millennials be like…

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    53 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post