Naturally the commercial systems are going to be strictly better, but the best models I can run on my 3090 have been good enough for me for a couple years now, and have massively improved over that time. Currently mostly use qwen3-coder which is really solid. It just feels so much nicer to use knowing it's private and not being datamined for who knows what,

$3-10k...not getting the speeds and quality

I mean, that's true. But the hardware that OpenAI is using costs more than that per pop.

The big factor in the room is that unless the tech nerds you mention are using the hardware for something that requires keeping the hardware under constant load

which occasionally interacting with a chatbot isn't going to do

it's probably going to be cheaper to share the hardware with others, because it'll keep the (quite expensive) hardware at a higher utilization rate.

I'm also willing to believe that there is some potential for technical improvement. I haven't been closely following the field, but one thing that I'll bet is likely technically possible

if people aren't banging on it already

is redesigning how LLMs work such that they don't need to be fully loaded into VRAM at any one time.

Right now, the major limiting factor is the amount of VRAM available on consumer hardware. Models get fully loaded onto a card. That makes for nice, predictable computation times on a query, but it's the equivalent of...oh, having video games limited by needing to load an entire world onto the GPU's memory. I would bet that there are very substantial inefficiencies there.

The largest GPU you're going to get is something like 24GB, and some workloads can be split that across multiple cards to make use of VRAM on multiple cards.

You can partially mitigate that with something like a 128GB Ryzen AI Max 395+ processor-based system. But you're still not going to be able to stuff the largest models into even that.

My guess is that it is probably possible to segment sets of neural net edge weightings into "chunks" that have a likelihood to not concurrently be important, and then keep not-important chunks not loaded, and not run non-loaded chunks. One would need to have a mechanism to identify when they likely do become important, and swap chunks out. That will make query times less-predictable, but also probably a lot more memory-efficient.

IIRC from my brief skim, they do have specialized sub-neural-networks, which are called "MoE", for "Mixture of Experts". It might be possible to unload some of those, though one is going to need more logic to decide when to include and exclude them, and probably existing systems are not optimal for these:

kagis

Yeah, sounds like it:

https://arxiv.org/html/2502.05370v1

fMoE: Fine-Grained Expert Offloading for Large Mixture-of-Experts Serving

Despite the computational efficiency, MoE models exhibit substantial memory inefficiency during the serving phase. Though certain model parameters remain inactive during inference, they must still reside in GPU memory to allow for potential future activation. Expert offloading [54, 47, 16, 4] has emerged as a promising strategy to address this issue, which predicts inactive experts and transfers them to CPU memory while retaining only the necessary experts in GPU memory, reducing the overall model memory footprint.

Pretty sure having someone else host it somewhere else is the opposite of self hosting anyways.

I was under the impression that self hosting meant your own hardware on your own property. Buying a VPS was never self hosting in my eyes.

Can we have it affect the oligarchs and authoritarian fascists, too?

Using the fucking GPT is the privacy invasion.

So yes, once the company has the logs and detects any criminal or dangerous activity, it should report it.

Stop using chatbots in the first place.

Fair points.

One thing I think we all miss: what happens when an overzealous government makes something a crime retroactively? Say, um, disparaging two Cheetos in an ill fitting suit masquerading as a world leader.

That’s part of why we should care about privacy and why we should care when data we expect to be private isn’t.

Most tech users are victims in a system they don’t understand. We might complain that they don’t want to understand but the truth is the providers don’t want them to understand - as it’s easier to sell them whatever crap they’re shilling.

This isn't directed at you necessarily, but AI and LLMs/image gen are not interchangeable. AI has had a hand in sciences for a while already and has been increasingly helpful in recent years as there's been more investment in the technology. LLMs don't seem to be a net positive, and may never be, but AI as a tool can do some amazing things that people just cannot without it.

dumping a bunch of trash all over my screen

If by "trash" you mean "bespoke anime tiddies" then... well the answer is still no, but it's what AI is best at I'm afraid.