The Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to combine access to the sensitive and personal information of Americans into a single searchable system with the help of shady companies should terrify us – and should inspire us to fight back.

While couched in the benign language of eliminating government “data silos,” this plan runs roughshod over your privacy and security. It’s a throwback to the rightly mocked “Total Information Awareness” plans of the early 2000s that were, at least publicly, stopped after massive outcry from the public and from key members of Congress.

Under this order, ICE is trying to get access to the IRS and Medicaid records of millions of people, and is demanding data from local police. The administration is also making grabs for food stamp data from California and demanding voter registration data from at least nine states.

Much of the plan seems to rely on the data management firm Palantir, formerly based in Palo Alto. It’s telling that the Trump administration would entrust such a sensitive task to a company that has a shaky-at-best record on privacy and human rights.

Bad ideas for spending your taxpayer money never go away – they just hide for a few years and hope no one remembers. But we do. In the early 2000s, when the stated rationale was finding terrorists, the government proposed creating a single all-knowing interface into multiple databases and systems containing information about millions of people. Yet that plan was rightly abandoned after less than three years and millions of wasted taxpayer dollars, because of both privacy concerns and practical problems.

It certainly seems the Trump administration’s intention is to try once again to create a single, all-knowing way to access and use the personal information about everyone in America. Today, of course, the stated focus is on finding violent illegal immigrants and the plan initially only involves data about you held by the government, but the dystopian risks are the same.

Over fifty years ago, after the scandals surrounding Nixon’s “enemies list,” Watergate, and COINTELPRO, in which a President bent on staying in power misused government information to target his political enemies, Congress enacted laws to protect our data privacy. Those laws ensure that data about you collected for one purpose by the government can’t be misused for other purposes or disclosed to other government officials with an actual need. Also, they require the government to carefully secure the data it collects. While not perfect, these laws have served the twin goals of protecting our privacy and data security for many years.

Now the Trump regime is basically ignoring them, and this Congress is doing nothing to stand up for the laws it passed to protect us.

But many of us are pushing back. At the Electronic Frontier Foundation, where I’m executive director, we have sued over DOGE agents grabbing personal data from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, filed an amicus brief in a suit challenging ICE’s grab for taxpayer data, and co-authored another amicus brief challenging ICE’s grab for Medicaid data. We’re not done and we’re not alone.

all 85 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 93 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Holy fuck. All of that will be stolen in 3 seconds and the minute it launches Russia will be granted special access. It was nice knowing ya'll. Not really but. Yeah.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The libertarian "don't tread on me" wing of the Republican party is hilariously quiet.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • The libertarian wing was never really very libertarian, they mostly didn't care much about weed and wanted to actually cut spending (or at least claimed to).

    Look at Mike Lee (unfortunately my Senator) he calls himself a "libertarian" because he says no a lot, but he also toes the party line when it natters and hasn't championed any social issues I'd call "libertarian." I changed my registration to Republican just so I could vote against this clown twice in one election.

  • source
  • parent
  • Look on the bright side: this way, you don't have to worry about data breach notification letters from all sorts of different companies or agencies since they'll all be coming from the same source. Really saves on letterhead.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This system will, does, or will one day know your porn preferences.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 30 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I was told if I voted for a repeat of Genocide Joe's team then we would get genocide or something. This is much better!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • I've been saying it for decades. If we get out of this alive, privacy laws will need to have a massive overhaul like no one has ever seen. In times past it was governments, not private entities that had control over everyone, and the idea that a private business or enterprise having that kind of knowledge about people was unthinkable. Even those from the Robber Baron era of the 1890s to 1910s and the Mad Men era of the 1950s to 70s would never have had that kind of overreach.

    A digital bill of rights needs not only extremely tight control over what governments can and cannot get, but even STRICTER stuff for non-government entities. I can't believe that marketing was the downfall of freedom and privacy in this day and age!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    Release the Trump/Epstein files

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The USA is turning into both shitholes, CCP run China and Vlad's Russia.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    Of course. Funnel all that info to Peter fucking Thiel's Palantir surveillance company that also has contracts with international law enforcement.

    There couldn't possibly be any problems with funnelling every bit of panopticon into a single billionaire super lobbiest's hands. Especially one that has openly stated that he doesn't believe in the continuation of the human race. Who is the closest thing to a real life vampire, regularly getting blood transfusions from healthy young "blood boys" in a hare brained attempt to prolong his own life at all costs.

    I find it a massive failure of society as a whole that this fucking charlatan wasn't laughed out of society in the 2010s when he was doing interviews about the "blood boy" bullshit and all the other crackpot shit he was doing to prolong his life. Absolute fucking ghoul. The people in power value money more than sense.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This combined with AI facial recognition, the US will be following China's example.

    The only difference is that their database will be hacked by other countries.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    Start telling people that trump is building a national database of gun owners.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    My relatives who’ve been screaming about mark of the beast and shit for years sure confuse the hell Out of me when they voice support for this while wearing their maga hats.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They want to see the mark of the beast, and the Antichrist, and the apocalypse so the end times will come and Jesus will take them all to heaven and burn their enemies in eternal damnation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    "...Much of the plan relies on Palantir"

    Owned by Sociopathic Oligarchs Peter Theil, who holds Vance's leash, and paid Trump to put him in the VP slot, and believes that infusions of the blood of young men will help him live to be 150 (not kidding).

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    As much of a prick as this guy is, I don't think that's true. The behind the bastards episode on him couldn't substantiate it at least

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    But just the blood infusion thing right? Pretty sure all the other stuff is true

    150 is probably way too young in his opinion. He's moved on to transhumanism. He wants to live for eternity

    I hope he ends up a brain in a jar and somebody stores him in the back of a closet under some old newspapers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well, guess I can't deny such compelling evidence

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yep, when it comes to MAGAs, I'll offer them the same commitment to truth that they have. They are bad people to the core, so I don't have any problems believing the worst stories about them. I'm sure they are all totally true, and if they aren't, I don't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's stupid from a comsec perspective even if it wasn't stupid for any other reasons. Compartmentalization is a good strategy as we continue to upgrade outdated and vulnerable systems. But of course, this "leader" is an idiot. So he wouldn't know that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Exactly.

    I certainly agree with agencies having some amount of open access to their data, but only for things that are actually relevant. For example, the IRS should be able to check Social Security benefits to verify tax reports, but it shouldn't see details like where their checks are being sent.

    If an agency needs access to data, they should specify exactly what they need and the source agency should provide an API to only get that into.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    PLEASE check out any privacy community on Lemmy, PrivacyGuides.org, or ugh....even /r/Privacy

    Saying "I have nothing to hide" does nothing but empower the surveillance state. You are living in a surveillance state and advertising tracking data is how you are tracked.

    privacy@lemmy.world privacy@lemmy.ml privacy@lemmy.ca privacy@lemmy.ca

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The party that used to flip their shit at the very idea of a federal database.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Can someone EL5 me on how this is different from our data being stolen under the Patriot Act for the last two decades?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Palantir creates platforms for data.

    This is creating a platform that allows somebody to access every piece of data in one centralized location.

    So example, when somebody is determining your social security payment (if that even exists in the future) they(or more likely AI) might be basing that decision not just on data relevant to income but also on something like a personal social credit score based on every piece of available government data related to a person over their entire lifetime.

    Did you get flagged as suspicious while flying bc of 9/11. Did something end up on your record by complete mistake? In this centralized data base you could have all kinds of real and incorrect details associated with you (or even other people like friends, family, neighbors, coworkers) used to discriminate against you. Data becomes destiny.

    Not to mention if they integrate it with these live facial recognition surveillance networks, something they caught you doing on camera without your knowledge could be used to make decisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Not to mention if they integrate it with these live facial recognition surveillance networks, something they caught you doing on camera without your knowledge could be used to make decisions.

    Also remember that facial recognition has trouble with minority faces so if you get put on that list because some algorithm thought you were someone else you're fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKeyscore

    "You could read anyone's email in the world, anybody you've got an email address for. Any website: You can watch traffic to and from it. Any computer that an individual sits at: You can watch it. Any laptop that you're tracking: you can follow it as it moves from place to place throughout the world. It's a one-stop-shop for access to the NSA's information. ... You can tag individuals ... Let's say you work at a major German corporation and I want access to that network, I can track your username on a website on a forum somewhere, I can track your real name, I can track associations with your friends and I can build what's called a fingerprint, which is network activity unique to you, which means anywhere you go in the world, anywhere you try to sort of hide your online presence, your identity."

  • source
  • parent
  • As far as I can tell, the NSA data was into a dataset that allowed report software to run against it. It was also largely metadata, and it didn't assign a person to the metadata.

    Meaning it wasn't an "enter a name" or "enter social security number.

    This sounds like a dataset built for each person. Now how that's going to work is a different question. Cops can already pull you over, and once they have your license plate, they can see if you've got warrants or outstanding fines, and various legal history.

    Palantir's data sounds like an efficient way to cause mass amounts of identity theft.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    The Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to combine access to the sensitive and personal information of Americans into a single searchable system with the help of shady companies should terrify us – and should inspire us to fight back.

    We should indeed fight back against the governments and corporations that for decades have been doing this shit.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disclosures

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    We need to start saying they’re adding people who own guns as a table in that database and either get conservatives onboard with stopping it, or more likely just be able to call them hypocrites for one more thing.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They'll contract musk to do it and call it X Internal Communications or XIC for short, and no one will be able to do trade or business without it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    Revelation 13:16-17

    You’d think the crowd that avoided barcodes at grocery stores and had meltdowns over “microchips” supposedly in the COVID vaccine would be foaming over this administration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As I keep telling people, they're not upset about it because their media aren't telling them about things like this, at least not in the same terms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    nice of them to put everything in one place for easier access for the ruskies.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Or anyone else, now, and in the future. We automatically think of warfare, but the danger also includes criminals who would steal everything they could get their hands on. That's probably a bigger danger for the average person.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    i can't wait until the pictures of my asshole are finally immortalized in a dark web database leak torrent of the entire government

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    That was the whole point of DOGE. Access to the main servers of every government department, not "efficiency". If this data is combined with data from social media, it's possible to make quite detailed profiles of people.
    Let's not forget Peter Thiel and the Mercers have been doing this since Brexit.
    Also scary that Palantir got a big contract for the NATO.

  • source
  • In Turkey, we have a portal called e-Devlet (e-Government) that is used for handling all government services. It stores every citizen's data, including medical records, bank account information, and almost any type of personal data you can imagine. Unfortunately, this data has been leaked several times and continues to leak. These breaches result in highly convincing scams, doxxing, and other serious issues.

    Such sensitive information should not be centralized under a single portal. We are already suffering from this situation in Turkey, but if a similar large-scale data leak were to happen in the US, the consequences would have a massive global impact.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Fucking bastard is the convergence of all evil going on in the last few years. Unless one morning they wake up to their neighborhoods patrolled by "militia" in their brodozers, what's gonna take people to shock them up into outrage, and it's not just the minorities or the progressives?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think there's a reason the right keeps their base only as informed as they need them to be. Most of them have no clue what truth is anymore. It honestly takes a trusted person on the right saying something is going on to even make people start questioning things.

    Like without Theo Von and Joe Rogan actually asking some questions about reality, I honestly think nobody on the right would have thought twice about Palestine and Epstein would have slipped back into the abyss like before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I always think about what creates revolutions (and counter-revolutions), and most cases the lack of a single thing usually causes the affected classes to rise up. Something really needs to break the bastards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    They for sure won't get hold of any notes about medical conditions (or god forbid, notes from your therapist) and use them against you if you opposed them.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Tolkien is rotating in his grave at this point with what is happening with his word Palantir. The USA Government is currently becoming a worse villain than Sauron and all of Mordor

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I wonder how we can be evil today?

    -Trump administration

    I wonder if us asenting this would demonstrate our willingness to suck Trump's cock.

    -Republicans in Congress

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    and should inspire us to fight back.

    LOL. We won't. US citizens have given up and those that haven't don't believe in anything but peaceful protests or trying to go about things "the right way". Neither of which will do anything but hand over more control to billionaires and child rapists.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I've given up because I have tried rallying people and nobody wants to rally.

    Everyone just wants to peacefully protest, which I disagree with.

    Everyone wants to just wait until midterms, which is too late.

    Nobody, dems included, have any balls. It's over.

    What the fuck have you done?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I really like your second bullet.

    A couple of the others, my only hesitation is that I am a naturalized, non-white citizen so I do sometimes have to balance the progress my actions will yield with being disappeared from the equation entirely. Thoughts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    ya and 'bil balls' and his other inexperienced friends have no idea what they are doing so you just know nothing about it is secure.

    Foreign hackers will have access to all this information, I guarantee it.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    It depends on the situation. Better information sharing is important for protecting vulnerable people and children. However, we absolutely shouldn't have every agency accessing sensitive information like medical records just cos they want to.

  • source