One of Britain’s most controversial cycle lanes is set to be removed at the end of August, though other road safety features, including a 20mph speed limit, road narrowing measures, and no-entry side streets, will remain

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 32 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

Briefly setting aside the logical absurdity of separated bike lanes somehow only being beneficial to drug dealers and children and not anyone else, I find it farcical that the property on the right-side of the headline photo simultaneously has: 1) a message reading "no cycle lane", and 2) an advertisement that the property is available for rent.

Hmm, I wonder if maybe the property market would improve if more people could conveniently get to this location. If only there was something the local council could do which would promote an affordable, non-polluting, flexible, and high-volume means of transportation that strengthens the community and makes people more likely to visit and spend time on this street.

Nope, can't think of a solution, no sir.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Bicycles are only used by the smelly POOR people, and POOR people don't buy stuff! No to the bike lane! The solution is more highways, more parking, more cars for the RICH people!

    ...hey hey wait why are you car drivers driving to the massive shopping centers, you were supposed to stop by my tiny shop with nothing interesting around it! I have PARKING! Come back! Buy my shit! Help!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    As a society we should start taking the right wing messaging further to hurt the people initially spreading the messaging.

    In this example, looking at that picture:

    "People should boycott the business because they don't provide parking! Those assholes don't need my business!"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    May their car traffic increase by 70%, and let the mayor never find a parking spot again. :)

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Then wouldn't that be true of all roads in general ? And cars ?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They're pulling that bullshit here too. Fascists hate bikes apparently.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No, they're not. There's plenty of new bicycle infrastructure planned here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Reminds me of that time the residents of a Dublin (Europe, mind you) suburb protested against busses running through their neighbourhood, claiming it'll tear the community apart.

    Dublin residents claim plans to create new bus corridor through villages will spell 'disaster' for communities https://share.google/k5N2eI4m4f7xRWTNQ

  • source
  • 16 comments in c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As opposed to the road, because nobody has ever dealt in or from their car.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago*

    Well, better ban shoes, then. I hear drug dealers wear shoes when they walk.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm having trouble getting at the real issue for them. Obviously this is a lie, but what's the truth? Do they hate seeing bicycles run red lights and want to punish them collectively for it (which is at least a human motivation), is it that they just want parking spaces and traffic lanes open for voter-pandering purposes, or is some kind of schizoid aesthetic rejection where they just want bike-riding sissies to stop being a thing?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Oil and petrol companies are some of the richest and most politically connected industries in the world. Each person who rides a bike is a person who does not spend money on fueling a car.

    I just assume that Exxon/BP/et al have thrown blanket bribes at every politician in every country to be generally against bike lanes for whatever reason they can pull out of their ass, so long as they don't come right out and say "BP has paid me directly to decry bike lanes".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    or is some kind of schizoid aesthetic rejection where they just want bike-riding sissies to stop being a thing?

    I am slightly depressed at how much it looks exactly like this.

    Only thing I'd say is shopkeeps have a point about their footfall being affected by the lack of parking outside their shops now. Literally every other way to address that, besides nuking the site from orbit (the only way to be sure), is a better way to address that than just tearing up the bike lane.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Its possible that the local businesses have lost business because terminally lazy people can no longer park directly outside their shops and will not walk a short distance to them, this should be extremely easy for the business to prove if its actually true, I have my doubts its a significant amount. I suspect the people most inconvenienced by not being able to park outside the businesses are those that actually work there. This is the only remotely serious suggestion I see from the anti bike lane crowd in this instance.

    My local village center is meant to be no parking on the high street, has had times its been enforced properly and times its been ignored due to pressure by local businesses. Recently they started enforcing it, directing people to the free (under two hours) car parks on the edge of the high street. Car parks were full with people who own and work in the shops, so they prevented them from parking in the car parks all day, so now they park on the residential streets off the high street enforcement area.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago*

    Tory fucking knuckledraggers

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Well that's a new one...

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Wait till he hears how often cars are used for crime

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    looks at cycle lane the fuck is wrong with that?

    Maybe they want to line the roadside with parked cars instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I mean, there are loads of other solutions to a lack of parking ffs. Look at all that green field, I wonder how many parking spaces they need. A car park would spoil their view would it? if that's the issue, they could block their view of the car park by parking cars along the roadside in front of it. Oh no wait, they'd get a ticket for that.

    But no no no, lets just jump at the opportunity to hate on cyclists because that's the fun popular thing to do amongst meatheads, pick a group that's already getting picked on and pick on them harder. Sounds like we have our own Alabama.

  • source
  • parent
  • 14 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Lets compare the amount of drugs that gets transported by cars vs bikes. If cars have transported more drugs then get rid of car lanes instead of bike lanes.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Heck, let's even make it fair and compare them on the basis of units of mass transported per unit of distance traveled. I'm sure car still wins (in the negative sense, as per usual).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 72 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Drug dealers famously don't have enough money to buy a car.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Drug dealers famously try to avoid being searched, and driving a vehicle is one of the most vulnerable methods of transport in that regard.

    By this logic they should be riding camels as that's the least searched mode of transit.

    I think you're reading way too much into this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 35 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Framing bike lanes as some kind of drug running liability is next level stupid. When you make claims this stupid as the mayor you should go straight to jail.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    iDK Lance Armstrong was on a lot of drugs and spent alot of time on a bike. There is too much of a coincidence. The safe drivers, who don't need laws to tell them to stay of drugs, will keep us safe.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 4 comments in c/bicycles@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What kind of asshole says no to cycle lanes?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    but mayor still claims scrapped lane largely used as “bike run” for drug dealers to “get through traffic”

    Curse you, drug dealers who don't get stuck in traffic! You're stealing all those uber flash jobs!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    Losing a piece of bike infra always hurts, but the 20mph speed limit is very nice if people stick within 5-10mph of it. Crazy that something that dropped bike collisions so much could be torn out though. They're blindly murdering someone for parking spaces.

    Speed limits are higher out here and the way it usual works out where I live is.

    <30mph - ride in the road <40mph - ride in bike lane if present, on the pavement if not 😈 (actually legal here) <55mph - separated paths only 55+ - too much noise, avoid

  • source