all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 70 points 1 year ago

If you’ve ever wondered what the pillars of conservative moral authority of the Reagan era were doing now, there you go.

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

    I think it’s actually constitutional law that everyone is allowed to buy a perogy.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    He defended Epstein and Trump. I will allow a small business the right to refuse him service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

    Fun fact: pierogi is plural. A singular one is a pierog.

    Edit to fix terrible typos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I thought it was like squid and squid where the plural and singular are the same but wouldn’t it make more sense if it was like octopi and the singular of pierogi is pierogus?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Octopi is actually a false cognate--octopus comes from Greek, not Latin, so the plural would be octopodes. Octopus and octopuses are the generally used terms in modern English.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Yeah but pieroguses just doesn’t make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Perogie of Happiness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Video in question:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj5XriNtuBc

    Political opinions are not a protected class under American law. IANAL, but suing seems a non-starter, as in, any given judge would refuse to hear the case.

    Yes, even a judge siding with Dershowitz would see where the case was going. Yes, judges toss bullshit cases every day, and most lawyers won't take them on. You only hear about the crazy shit, because it's crazy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Not for nothing this may be one of the most Jewish things I've ever read. 🤷

    It sounds like something that happened to Adam on cumtown. I can hear Stavros laughing at him

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Dershowitz the friend of Epstein? Or some other pedo?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Kiddy-fuckers like perogies? Dammit, that's another food I have to stop eating, like hamberders.

  • source