top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

Humans never evolved past tribes.

  • source
  • [+] 150 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It'd be regions/land-based, probably. "Southern pride," etc...just without the racism. Fuck those star-bellied sneeches across the river.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Having lived in a majority white city where they divided themselves between countries of origin, this would happen.

    Until a large Hispanic influx northeast PA had Italian sections, Irish sections, Lithuanian sections, Polish sections, etc. When my ex’s grandmother met me she asked me “what are you?” despite us both being white.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    In the show All In The Family, Archie isn't just bigoted against non-caucasians; he's bigoted against the polish, Irish, Italians, etc... He's less bigoted against those groups than he is against non-whites, but still bigoted. He's also bigoted against catholics

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Exactly. This is why people say race is a construct.

    If we all became the same race then some self labeled ingroup would construct (i.e. create) new criteria to label others as an outgroup eventually creating new races.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 72 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Uh we are the same race. There do not exist multiple human races in any biological sense. So what would happen is what is happening now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)?wprov=sfti1

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Virtually all racism boils down to colorism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Don't forget that people hated the Irish too. Color ain't the only reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I remember a little while ago when it was in the news for a very short time that they found several mass graves in PA of Irish who were brought over to be indentured servants. I don't remember if they had determined what the cause of death was, whether it was illness or murder, but it stopped being news pretty quickly because no one really cared.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Cholera, mostly, but also violence. It says they were turned away from getting help because the locals feared contagion, so perhaps that's some of the violence. They also made practically no money but had a generous whiskey allotment, which would likely contribute to violence. They were working on Duffy's Cut for some time, and the mass grave has been described as a garbage dump for bodies, not like they were lined up and shot or something, not that it makes it any better. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/irelands-forgotten-sons-recovered-two-centuries-later-9194680/

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They'd still argue over religion. And what sports team they cheer for. And whatever else the billionaire owned media could decide to distract them with.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If I really wanted an excuse to hate people, I'd hate people who make dumb complaints about movies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You... You really think we wouldn't find some other trivial differences to get overly tribal over?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    We are all the same race we are just different colours. Can you imagine any other animals fighting over their looks.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    .... that is not how race works.

    we already ARE the same race. we constructed differences to divide us, elevate ourselves and put down outsiders without having to accomplish anything.

    Imagine a world where everyone taller than 6 feet is considered a different social class. that's race.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I get it and agree mostly. I definitely think socioeconomic classes are more of a defining/dividing line than a heritage you happen to share with someone.

    Only <1% of any humans DNA differs, but I think a better point is that everyone is atleast 50th cousins or something (Granted if you share a heritage its much closer)

    But also if you told someone like my girlfriend that race isn't real she'd probably sock you. She's experienced it and its very real to her.

    When we started dating I would actually try to talk about how I don't understand why she would side with someone solely because their skin was dark like hers and it would be a point of contention. She would literally associate with someone that objectively did something she thinks is reprehensible because of literally only that. She grew up very wealthy and never hurt anyone, guy on the news was someone in and out of prison who literally fired first on the guy that revived him with narcan--but they happen to have the same color of skin.

    As a boy other Latinos would literally antagonize me for "acting white" because I would rather read during recess than play football/soccer--because being educated is associated with being white; we were the children of poor families with gangbangers as role models so we must obviously be destined for different things /s

    I feel like a lot of racial issues are cultural and self-perpetuating. But my girlfriend in particular was the only black woman in a white conservative town, people would open doors for her friends and close it when it came to her, If I visit her hometown she doesn't want to be out for long, etc. So I get why it is very important to her.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • socially constructed things are very real. I don't know who the fuck let that fart out in our society, to make people think that when they hear "it's a social construct" they hear "it's not real!" pretty frustrating

    what it means is that it's an arbitrary thing based on mostly nothing except history and all it would take to change it is for us to act differently towards it.

    but the history behind it is very real, so we can't just eliminate race by pretending it isn't real. we have to acknowledge the impacts, respect the differences, and work towards making the idea of race obsolete. that'll probably take a few thousand years lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The discrimination is real, no question about it.

    The thing that's not "real" is that this is solely about skin color.

    In the USA race is defined quite closely along the lines of "continent of origin" (or of origin of the ancestors), because the USA Is a country with worldwide immigration. Thus the groups are larger.

    Compare that to Europe, where world-wide immigration only started picking up in the last two decades. Here people can discriminate just as easily within what would be considered the same race in the USA. For example, many people in Austria really hate Serbians. Many Serbians really hate Croatians. Many Croatians really hate Albanians and so on.

    This is also visible in the meaning of the words "race" and "racism". Before WW2 "race" was commonly used in Europe as in the "German race", the "English race" or the "French race". And while the term "race" fell out of use after WW2 and was subsequently re-imported from the USA with the USA-meaning, the original meaning lives on in the meaning of "racism".

    For example, if a French man hates all the English, this wouldn't be racism in the USA (since both are from the same "race" by US-definition), it would totally be racism in most European languages.

    The "social construct" part of the discrimination is along which lines discrimination happens. There's nothing "natural" about discriminating along the lines of US-race. Discrimination can happen just as viciously along any other line.

    And that certainly doesn't mean people don't suffer from it. But it also means that making sure everyone is as equal as possible (e.g. by eliminating US-race) won't stop discrimination.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Race was invented by them to divide us. They'll just invent something else.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Indian hate goes up whenever india related policies go into effect, trump tarrifs india and no one gived a fk since all day see is normalized indian hate for months prior

  • source
  • parent
  • Absolutely. Religion, language, country of origin, gender, age, there’s no shortage of useless ways to divide people. Our differences aren’t the issue, the issue is the rich and powerful exploiting our differences to pit us against each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Tell me you don't know what the nazies did in Eastern Europe without telling me you don't what the nazies did in Eastern Europe. Or how the Irish were considered in the USA, or the italians...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Or the Irish in the Uk, or whoever in whichever country. For me, my family (wife and kids) come first, then my neighbourhood, my village, my minucipality, my country and so on. It's the same for everyone, which is fine as long as you acknowledge it and act accordingly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (25 children)

    There is only the human race. Any differences in appearance is less that a % of genetic difference.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

    The modern concept of race was invented in 1684 by this guy:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Bernier?wprov=sfla1

    It's been utter bullshit from the start

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    "Our"

    I've ever only seen Americans and random racists use the term that way. Most of us agree that we're one race.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Are you kidding? I've heard Scots and English vilely denegrate Welsh, Germans denegrate Saxons, English denigrate black people...on and on and on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Might be a German thing, but race and racist don't have the same base for nothing. You don't talk like that here and I've only heard it in the us. Maybe Scots bite their tongue taking to a German about those things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Plural of anecdote... Yes I know, forgive me for not documenting all the times I've heard it. Maybe people posture, depending on the surrounding people. Maybe they feel more free to be more honest as tourists. Perhaps both.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Black people denigrating blacker people, Indians denigrating darker Indians, and so on. Yeah, we're tribal, evolved that way.

    These people all bent over the word "race". Meh. Give it a rest. The word used to be in common parlance, now I never here it IRL, despite being told us Southerners are the most racist people on Earth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I'm in the deep south and I hear it a lot, from every race.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    People use the word "race" in conversation? Hard to get my head around! Not doubting you, but we don't talk like that. OTOH, we're seriously race (heh) mixed in NW Florida. My block is a nearly perfect cross-section of black, white, Asian demographics for the area. LOL, my wife being the 1% Asian rep. :)

    No Hispanic folk, but they were really rare before 2004. No joke, there were hardly any Mexican restaurants before they flooded in to save us from the destruction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    OTOH, we're seriously race (heh) mixed in NW Florida

    Maybe you're so used to it, you don't notice. Or maybe it's said in other ways, eg, "Certain races do this thing or think that way." Or maybe it's more subtle, "That's just their culture." "That's just how their people are."

    It's also maddening when discussing medical issues. "Why does my race have to be brought into it?” "Because certain ethnicities have problems with this particular medical condition moreso than others." "Because I'm more susceptible to x and I can't do y with you."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No! Don't even hear the subtle shit anymore. Which is both weird and heartening. I get the feel that people who wish to speak like that don't say it to me. I'm pretty redneck in certain contexts, maybe the long hair makes then shy? :)

    OTOH hand, I rarely get the impression that I'm being "felt out". Only time that happens is when someone wishes to express a liberal view. :)

    And yeah, I get the medicine thing. And yeah, we need to talk genetic history! My first wife was a pale redhead, notorious folks for pain-killer resistance. OTOH, we got medical professionals who think black people don't feel pain as whites do, stuff like that. What a mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I'm glad you don't hear the dog whistling. It gives me hope, although Ron Got I DeathSentence.

    I don't get "felt out" either. It's just said, bluntly or subtly, sometimes because people think I'll automatically agree, others because they're poking.

    Edit because fur baby bumped my hand: it's a mess, agreed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    There's no logical difference, but there's all the emotional difference in the world. We evolved to be suspicious of that tribe over on the other mountain. And well we should have been! They might just come over and slaughter us for our women and land.

    Besides, we didn't evolve to operate in groups larger than about 150. Past that, other people become objects in our minds. We can't be truly close to more than that many people. What is the Monkeysphere? ( <- solid article on all this)

    It's why I understand the immigrant hate. Earth's population has more than doubled in my lifetime. "Who ARE all these people and why are they from another tribe?! It was already crowded!"

    Only way we get over the hate ironically consists of two seemingly opposed plans:

    • We need less people, or at least spread 'em out. Mammals get freaky when crowded.
    • Get different sorts of people mixed up. People hate the idea of immigrants, "Meh, the ones I know are great people. It's those others who are bad guys."

    We'll get there. There have been massive strides in my lifetime alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We'll get there. There have been massive strides in my lifetime alone.

    If we don't extinct ourselves and a bunch of other species, first. Maybe. The current race toward devolution gives me pause to doubt, however.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We're not going extinct. Humans are the toughest beasts on the planet, the AR-15 of animals. Not the best at anything, not by a long shot, but we're perfect multi-purpose lifeforms. Hell, we survive in every ecosystem on Earth. Insects can't even claim that!

    But yeah, I've commented enough in the past on what we're taking out with us. Lived through seeing 73% of animals go POOF! since 1970, seen my local ecosphere crashing out over the last 5. I want to cry and scream! And no one is aware. When I talk about it IRL, people are captivated, "You're right. Hadn't noticed that. Wow." You can see their gears turning, truly a new thought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We're not going extinct. Humans are the toughest beasts on the planet, the AR-15 of animals. Not the best at anything, not by a long shot, but we're perfect multi-purpose lifeforms. Hell, we survive in every ecosystem on Earth. Insects can't even claim that!

    I do believe climate science. And I do think a nuclear world war would decimate humans. I do hold hope, and recognize very real potentialities.

    You can see their gears turning, truly a new thought.

    And right back to football, video games, occasionally maybe standing somewhere publicly with a clever sign.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    LOL, I'm a child of the Cold War. You can't tell me about global thermonuclear war fears! :) Weirdly, us teens just accepted it was a thing that could happen any second. Whatever.

    And don't be so cynical! Educating people like that, showing them how things have changed for the worse in their experience has impact. But you gotta follow through with solutions they can work with! "And that's why I don't use pesticides or herbicides. Notice the frogs are back on our block? Seen all the dragonflies? Check out my ponds. They double as mosquito control!"

    I think we're missing the trees in this forest of doom. We're powerless to fight the megacorps, and bitching about them only makes people feel more powerless. But we can teach people to chip away, give them actionable goals. Put the idea in their heads that, "This isn't normal or right and you've experienced this!", without being preachy. It's hard.

    I've seen massive social and environmental progress in my life. It all started with grass-roots talking points. Don't say "fag", don't toss your cigarette fag (heh), pick up trash that's not yours, and on and on.

    Don't lecture or lay blame, no guilt trips, talk about the problem in a personally, emotionally understandable way they'll internalize, give them a solution they can act on right now, today.

    Maybe I'm still an idealist. So it goes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    There's no logical difference?

    My particular health risks would beg to differ.

    There's differences, but basing your opionion of someone on their race (bigotry and racism) is "philistine, backward thinking".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Got me there! I was referring to the previous post saying we're so genetically tight as to be scientifically indistinguishable as "races". But yeah, a couple of base pairs coding for a misfolded protein is certainly a difference!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Idk man. The Sneetches “got really quite wise on that day”, but they still never guillotined Sylvester McMonkey McBean.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    nah... equally looking people, indistinguishble from each other, have managed levels of hate high enough to attemp genocide

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Right. Like, can you imagine what society would be like if we let bald people vote? /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    There's still Religious bigotry... That's worked as an alternative for eons

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We'd still find ways to focus on what makes us different and fight about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No we'd come up with something else. We need to gene edit everyone to edit out the tribalism gene and replace it with a "we're all in this together" gene.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • i read a story when i was a kid ... it went something like this

    we all draw a circle around ourselves and the people we want to care about. that is our group. different people draw different circles, some draw it very small and only care about themselves, others care for their family, and other draw an even bigger circle

    what i'm wondering is why people draw circles of a specific size. i.e. what causes it that people care about the 300 people in their environment, but not about the other 10 billion people on earth?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago*

    Let me tell you a bit bout a guy that I've seen.
    A man known as Sylvester McMonkey McBean.

    Every now and again he'd head towards the beaches
    Carting along his machine, for the sneeches.

    When did Dr. Seuss get so woke...

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    People will argue about something else. You can change the parameters of the simulation but you can't change the outcome.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Twist, it is a completely novel race, no one looks normal anymore

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • all people have like 99.9% of their DNA in common, that hasn't stopped them from waging wars in the past.

  • source
  • Hahahahahaha no, look at India.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    I wish, but no.

    For one, they would blame religion.

    Barring that, they would find any other differences among us to blame.

    Barring that, rich people will use their power and influence to make sure we find some way to blame each other instead of them.

    The main reason why we refuse to blame rich people for our problems is because most of us want to be the rich people causing the problems. Until we can get that idea out of most of our heads, we shouldn't expect these problems to be solved.

    I don't have much hope, personally.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Bosnia would like to have a word.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Lol wot. You think we wouldn't get all caste system in this piece son?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Any small difference in personality is gonna be used to justify what is wrong with the world.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Look. I live in a small town. The people one town over are dumb as fuck and ugly inbreeds.

    They say the same about us.

    See the problem? What we need is for the fucking psychologists to step up their game and develop bulletproof tests for sociopaths.

    Keep them out of positions of any power and we're well on our way for a golden age of humanity.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    A see a few people here saying “they” when we should be using “we.” Just by using “they” you’re exhibiting the mindset of “they, not me” and “us vs them.” Racism is just one facet of it.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    No, you don't need genetic differences for racism.

    In fact, in most European languages the words "race" and "racism" are talking more about nationalities than about genetically different population groups.

    For example, if you read German articles from the 1920s, they often talk about the "German race", the "French race" or the "English race". In most European languages the word "race" fell out of use after WW2 and the American meaning of the word "race" was re-imported later on. But the meaning lives on in the meaning of "racism".

    For example, in German a white person from Germany who hates everyone from France irrespective of their skin color is still a racist, while in the USA that wouldn't qualify as racism.

    That's because neither the word "race" nor "racism" have a clear definition. "Race" is used entirely to discriminate "them" vs "us". So "race" determines whatever group people in a country want to discriminate against.

    In the USA this was clearly a "we, the while ex-european people" vs "them, the black former slaves" and "them, the asians" and "them, the south americans".

    So what would happen if suddenly everyone had the same skin color? People would just shift to the next best thing to discriminate.

    Instead of discriminating against black people, just do what has been done in Europe for millennia: Discriminate against slavic people. (The term "slave" comes from "slavic", because it was so common to keep slavic people as slaves.)

    And if nations, religions, languages and regions of origin would also disappear as things to discriminate against, then it would shift to the next thing: people who went to a different school, have a different education or best of all: other types of poor people.

    The issue is that humans are heuristics-based beings. Prejudices the result of learning. I've had 5 crappy HP printers, so I conclude all HP printers suck. Some friends have had terrible experiences with Fiat cars, so I avoid Fiat cars. I read in the newspaper that Nestle is destroying the planet, so I eat something else.

    The problem is that if this is applied to humans, they get unfairly judged for things that are often completely out of their control. The core mechanism that we humans function on happens to be severely destructive in this context. But that's also why it's hard to impossible to get rid of racism and similar forms of discrimination because they are so centrally embedded in how we humans function.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    The rich are the ones that made race into a problem. Racism isn't organic, it was constructed by colonialism.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Nah they would just invent new races. What's the point of race? What does it mean exactly? Notice that the races in the US at least roughly align with economic classes.

    That's not an accident. Obviously without the concept of races, people would still have different skin color and hair, but the implications would be entirely different. Culture, neighborhoods, etc. wouldn't be separated. And most importantly, it would be ever so slightly harder for rich people to make the majority feel like they're in the same group as them as opposed to some "other".

    So if there was only one race, the rich would need to invent new ones.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›