Since when did keeping kids off of porn sites become everyone else's problem and not the problem of parents? Oh, right, that's just a bullshit reason to make accessing porn more difficult and a security risk since they can't just make porn illegal.
post
you're allowed to say PORN on the internet
shitfuck
Reported for language
We needed a national online govt forum where we could sue for freedom of speech violations by mods etc. Unfortunately our government lacks leadership or progressives so
I'm picturing a discord-like server run by USPS and boooooooooy what a cluster fuck that would be
(Mostly because of the users, but also because of the way the current and previous administrations have repeatedly hamstrung USPS)
I more mean something organized like Reddit or Lemmy, with multiple aids for translating into other languages and disability access and allowing for an audio mode or text mode. Eg instead of going to my city's Reddit, I'll go to their actual official forum page. Instead of viewing my rep's stupid Twitter, I can view their actual offical forum account.
And yeah it'll be a fucking mess, legal nightmare, and expensive. But we need it as much as we need the post office and everything else.
Not in Britain
"You got a loicense for that???"
Not only are they censoring porn, they're censoring the word itself!
Why you think the net was born? P*rn, p*rn, p*rn!
wow, they actually, properly, fully did this shit. Amazing.
So glad I left that shithole. My friends are aparantly using VPNs, which is the same fucking thing I had to use to access WIKIPEDIA in TURKEY.
Well, maybe not properly
I hope he sues and wins
I don’t want to know anything more about this man other than he has a lot of tattoos, likes porn, and isn’t afraid to say it.
We can also surmise that he's bad at computers.
I'm sure he could probably figure out a VPN or a site that doesn't give a fuck about UK law, but chose to stir shit anyway.
Well it at least seems he doesn't care about privacy, if he chose to upload a selfie to get past the check.
You can assume anything you want, but that doesn't make it true. This guy wanted to stir the pot. I'll assume he just wants to bring attention to this dumb law.
King Of Ink Land King Body Art The Extreme Ink-Ite has written to his local MP to air his grievances.
Holy shit. That's his legal name?!
For King of Ink Land, this is particularly tricky as the system believes he’s wearing a mask – but it’s actually his tattoo-covered face.
So is it first name 'King of Ink Land', last name 'King Body Art The Extreme Ink-Ite'? Or is there a middle name in there?
The King of Ink Land, who is now considering using a VPN, was attempting to access a live webcam site when the issue arose.
Whoa whoa whoa. "The" King of Ink Land? That's his name, not a title!
Godspeed, King of Ink Land. I sincerely wish you success in this fight.
There's no such thing as "legal names" in the UK.
People don’t need to file paperwork to change their name? They just start using a new one on legal documents?
Correct. We can have as many names as we like too.
However there's various documents available that are proof that one is using a name. So for example my bank wouldn't let me change my name unless I present something like a deed poll. Said deed poll is literally just a print out with some stock phrasing and the signatures of two witnesses.
We don't have a central database that covers everyone in Britain (unlike, say, Sweden). If I want to change my name I can just start using the new one. Amusingly lots of people in the UK don't know this and are sure it's not the case. I ended up switching banks because the final straw was how poorly the staff were trained on the subject. My new bank and the DVLA did not have similar weird ideas, thankfully, so now my name is updated on my driving licence, etc..
I mentioned how my deed poll is a print out earlier because so many people seem to think it needs to be something notarised, or on special stationery, or something (usually they're not sure what, they just think it seems wrong). When they consult the law they tend to then have a bit of a laugh with me because the law is indeed a bit mental (such as at the registry office when I got married a few months ago).
Let this man watch porn without giving out any of his personal information. I too want to watch porn without giving out any of my personal information. You do too, if you watch porn.
The people making the rules know this. They just … in their Christian nationalist hearts believe porn shouldn't exist. And since there's too much precedent to simply make it illegal (they've tried before). So here they're trying to make watching it as painful and degrading as humanly possible.
In other words, you're not wrong - just preaching to the choir.
Christian nationalists say that porn shouldn't exist while watching a lot of porn and they would get mad if someone took away their porn. They only want others to not watch porn.
They all have Sunday brain. Living one life Sunday morning that's just disconnected from their choices they make the rest of the week.
But, that's indoctrination for you. The most infuriating part is when otherwise good & great people decide that calling themselves Christian, setting themselves up as human shields for all the abusive controlling monsters among their number. They'll say the monster is 'a sinner' and 'doesn't represent our values' while rushing to the defense of Christianity. They'd rather white-wash the Christian label than fix the structural abuse done by by 'their neighbors' (but it's never their church that's the problem).
Christian nationalists say that other people shouldn't watch porn but that they've figured out a curious caveat within the faith that exempts them, personally. Then they establish special repositories of pornographic material that serve as an incentive for membership and a form of blackmail against turncoats.
Porn becomes a more direct means of patriarchal control - both in how it restricts which senior members are allowed to buy it and (in turn) which women are allowed to sell it, and at what price. It is a form of societal monopsony intended to make sex work a privilege afforded to elites at below market rates.
Yeah. Except these “Christians” also love to rape children. It’s pure projection on their part.
They're usually (usually) not the same individuals, but the evil ones deliberately use the "good" ones as a shield. They're a happy to rally as Christians to any attack from outside the religion, but will write off abuses they see internally as "not my church".

From here
It's all part of the plan. Only this time they let the cousins across the pond do the first significant move.
The line about "educators and public libraries" gives away the real game; this isn't about actual pornography at all.
The "pornography" they're referring to here is any form of media that portrays LGBTQ+ people in a neutral or positive light.
The age old problem of "if you remove rights from criminals, you can just change the definition of crime to encompass the people you don't like"
Don't forget people of any color but white having any kind of fun. That's shameful, too!
🙄
Dude needs to just upload a pic of Norman Reedus.
You've met with a terrible fate, haven't you?
I'm confused, can't literally anyone just generate an AI selfie to submit for the censorship?
A couple news cycles ago was just talking about how AI video and image generation has progressed so far that it is really difficult for any system to tell it is AI in some cases. This seems like the perfect usecase for that.
Or does it need to link to a real person ID or something?
Selfie doesn't work, you need to turn your head left and right to follow instructions.
But yeah, there's a bunch of avatars that will bypass it
The simplist answer is that this guy could buy some high-coverage foundation and a make-up sponge. He could change his appearance in other ways too if he likes - get a wig, fake nose, etc.
In the US you submit your ID, no face scan that im aware of (yet).
In states that have started this requirement (at least in Virginia), they do have ID as an option, but the default is a face scan. I don’t think an ID is better. In fact, it’s even more personal information being exposed.
I don’t know the technical terms, but my internet provider sometimes routes my internet through Virginia, and even though I live in Wisconsin, I’m forced to adhere to Virginia law online because of it. It’s very annoying. I
He knows that video games where you can pose the character can bypass it, right?
Iirc death stranding and a few others have been shown to work.
Alternatively VPNs work.
Or piracy.
On one hand this guy has a hell of a hobby that seems like it steps on everything else in his life. On the other its amazing dude exists to fuck with normative behavior and policies that exist to keep people down.
hmm, something tells me that facepaint will come into style in the next 10 years...
I'm honestly already thinking about anti-AI recognition make-up.
“Ah good, finally have some alone time. Just gotta go put on a full face of caked-on concealer before I can jork it.”
Thankful for them trying to protect our virgin eyes from the ravages of a dirty word, but the extra letters r n are too triggering, and they've scarred our delicate, snowflake lives.
Is there some remedy they can offer to atone for inflicting this trauma on us?
They just need to support alternate verification paths for people like him, and people who have otherwise been disfigured.
They should sue for discrimination if steps are not quickly taken to support their situations.
It’s funny how this turns into the gov needing to provide equal access to porn.
I think they do provide ID verification too
Or maybe the government needs to keep their hands off other people's dicks?
Out of curiosity, what does the law say exactly? Is distributing porn without age verification illegal? Like, if I set up a a 'take one, leave one' free porn box, would using it be illegal?


top 96 comments