Big shoes => big feet.
post
Alternatively, perhaps the shoes were winter boots that were meant to be worn with several pairs of socks or some kind of insulation. This theory, Penn writes, is supported by a preserved letter that refers to socks and underpants being sent to a soldier stationed there. Historians also know that archers from Syria lived at Magna, and it’s safe to assume that these men would not have been accustomed to the cold climate of northern England, he adds.
I think this is my favorite theory
Archaeologist Flint Dibble covered this, interviewing the actual archaeologist who works with this stuff. She definitely has ideas.
They had big feet?
Biggus Dickus' shoes.
Maybe part of a psy-op?
Spread rumours the fort is defended by giants, have your troops bring these out to leave tracks... Don't know how feasible that would be though, both in terms of leaving tracks in places you wouldn't be observed doing so and in terms of them being believable enough for an actual tracker to believe.
I mean ... maybe they had to keep some uniforms there for new recruits. and the biggest sandals rarely got used and got left behind when Rome abandoned the isles ?
Weren’t they expected to provide their own equipment unless they were at least a certain rank?
New recruits were provided basic equipment, and the cost was deducted from their pay. Sandals would fall under this for sure.
Or maybe they are finding raw materials. Perhaps they would make shoes as needed, and they had soles cut to a huge size so you’d be able to trim them down to whatever size was needed.
Since May, archaeologists working at Magna have unearthed eight massive leather shoes that each measure more than 11.8 inches long.
So four pairs? Was there one gigantic dude there that kept losing his shoes?
11.8 inches is about 30 cm or size 47 in the european system. Which is big but not unheard of. I personally know 2 people wearing similar shoe sizes. Very possible it's just one guy who kept losing shoes.
We are longer on average now, so I'd argue size 47 is also more common now though. Making the 'it's just one guy'-theory even more likely.
That is a size 13 US which is a relatively common shoe size among men with big feet. Looking at the photo I could tell it was about the size of my shoes.
A mens shoe isnt really particularly large until you get to the limited sizes, like 14 or 15, where dudes have like two shoe options to choose from at any given shoe store. Pretty much every mens shoe is made in sizes up to a 13 consistently
11.8 inches is about a foot.
"It's not 12", but it smells like a foot."
I'd never really thought about this, but most people's feet are significantly shorter than a foot, aren't they?
You mean 29 31/32 cm
Big dick is the likely explanation.
Spoiler alert: it was the main clown college in the Roman empire.
But seriously, that's interesting.
Gigantic? Massive? I was expecting hilariously big sizes, turned out to be my shoe size. Wtf. Is that insane that this particular fort had conscripts that were selected just because they were taller? Other cultures have preferred taller, bulkier soldiers, why this can't be the case?
That shoe’s sole was 12.6 inches long, which is roughly the same size as a men’s 14 in the United States, reports Live Science’s Kristina Killgrove.
That is smaller than my shoe size, those scientists have a dumb frame of reference.
Not my fault everyone else has weird and tiny feet.
Considering 6' people were rare 150 years ago, I'd imagine a size 14 would have been crazy 2,000 years ago.
Kind of rare, but not exactly unheard of. Kinda like anyone taller than 6' 8" these days. If you saw them, you might think "Wow, they're tall" but you wouldnt think of them as freakish.
Combine that with this being a Roman fort, and the fact that being a soldier was probably a pretty common job for big/strong men, and it's really not that surprising. Kind of a nothing story really. Imagine a bunch of future archeologists scratching their heads over finding a bunch of large shoes in an NBA locker room.
They were also shorter on average than modern humans. https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/17072/what-was-the-average-height-of-roman-men-and-women
They also lived shorter on average. Some of them still reached a very old age. The average really doesn‘t tell us that much about the extremes that existed.
That's because of high infant/childhood mortality rates skewing the average. If you take away anyone who died before age 5, the average age shoots up to like 70+ in most places. Not too different from today.
It's not size 14.
One of my sons wears size 14, despite not being freakishly tall (he's 6'2" and strongly buit). He usually has to put in a special order. His hands are also massive. We've never had a conversation about cock size, though I'm somewhere in the normal range, whereas my wife's dad was reputed to be a tripod, so it could go either way, or somewhere in-between.
Time-travellling clowns.
And I'm still wondering why they are still wondering. So they are digging out oversized Caligae. You know that Caligae are? They are sandals. And they are digging them up at a fort at Hadrians Wall. Up in Scotland. Where things get cold occasionally.
Now imagine soldiers, standing guard or patrolling in the cold, wearing sandals. What would they do? They'd wrap up their feet in something warm, like lamb furs. Or cloth. But wadded up feet don't fit into standard-sized sandals designed for bare feet. Solution, rather obvious, is having oversized sandals that fit feet and insulation.
They probably hired tall dudes as guards
Just at that spot, though?
Or alien clowns. I suppose we'll never know 😁
Oh come on archaeologist this is easy. Clearly they belong to Biggus Dickus.
all 3 comments