Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's bid to continue leading the Democratic Party when it takes control of the US Senate in January continued to falter Monday night as a key machinists' union asked the New York senator to step aside and allow "a new generation to lead Senate Democrats."

In a letter, Brian Bryant, international president of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM Union) thanked Schumer for "many years of leadership, friendship, and unwavering commitment to working people" before telling him that "after thoughtful discussions," the IAM Union Executive Council had opted not to support Schumer's push to remain as the Senate leader.

"With the utmost respect and appreciation for your service, we respectfully urge you not to seek another term as Senate
Democratic leader," Bryant wrote. "We also encourage all returning and newly elected Democratic senators to join together through a fair and open process to select a consensus leader who can unite the party, build on your legacy and carry forward a bold vision for working people."

The letter came hours after Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told reporters that he was considering a challenge to Schumer, after initially saying he was not interested in running for the Senate majority leader post following the party's electoral sweep last week.

Candidates who won Senate seats include several outspoken proponents of Medicare for All, such as Sens.-elect Abdul El-Sayed (D-Mich.), Troy Jackson (D-Maine), and Peggy Flanagan (D-Minn.), and others who centered in their campaigns the need to decisively take on billionaires and worsening economic inequality.

A decision by Schumer to step aside in favor of "new leadership," said Bryant, would allow the party to "turn this moment into lasting progress."

He wrote that the party must push to pass the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, restore collective bargaining rights to all federal workers, reinstate Affordable Care Act and give "every American the healthcare they need, and pass "meaningful rail safety legislation."

"Our country is at a critical crossroads and a moment of extraordinary opportunity. This week’s elections sent a clear message: Working people are demanding change," said Bryant. "The IAM Union’s Workers vs. Billionaires movement reflects a growing desire for an economy and political system that puts working families ahead of wealthy special interests. We have a tremendous opportunity to build on this momentum, but doing so will require fresh ideas, new energy, and a new generation of leadership."

Bryant's message made clear that "it's time" for Schumer to step aside, said author and commentator Don Winslow.

"The Democratic Party will make a catastrophic mistake if they lock out all of these voters for a man who has been in political office for 51 years," said Winslow.

The letter came after Schumer's support among senior Democrats appeared to crack on Monday, with Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) telling reporters, “We need a conversation about leadership going forward because we need new energy and ideas."

But later that evening, the senator said that he expected Schumer to become Senate majority leader and plans to back him.

Van Hollen, who has reportedly received a steady stream of phone calls since last week from voters calling on him to take the helm of the party in the Senate, reiterated Monday evening that he believes there should be "a full caucus discussion" about the path forward.

"I am in listening mode," he said of the possibility that he could challenge Schumer. "There are clearly lots of people around the country and a number of our members, quite a few of our members, who want to have this discussion... I haven't closed the door."

He also told Semafor: “I am listening to the thousands of people who have been calling for change, but especially listening to our members, but in particular to new members who have just come off the campaign trail. So what I've said from the very beginning is, we shouldn't have a coronation.”

Van Hollen also met Monday with Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), who has not endorsed Schumer.

On Monday afternoon, Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), who is also facing calls from newly elected progressive lawmakers to step aside in his push to become House speaker, released a statement saying that "Democrats are united and ready to lead."

But several representatives-elect, including Melat Kiros (D-Colo.) and Adam Hamawy (D-NJ) suggested that even if Jeffries secures the top post in the House, he will have to contend with many new members of Congress who will be pushing for far-reaching action.

"It's about the agenda, an agenda that actually reflects the priorities of the American people," said Kiros. "We might have different ideas about how to accomplish certain things but we all agree that we have to reduce costs for working families, we all agree that we have to root out corruption in government, we all agree that our foreign policy has to reflect our values. And in order for us to be able to do that we need an agenda that's bold enough to meet that vision. And so what we're demanding is an agenda, it's not about the individual."

"We, as progressives, want to build," she added. "We want to accomplish things, we want to work together with this caucus to actually get work done, and we haven't had that conversation yet."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
44 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] [S] 93 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

Democrats and leadership have lost so much ground in unions. New leadership that actually respects workers not sucking off corporations is needed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Unions are like anything else democratic...

    When people feel like they don't need to pay attention to leadership elections, shitty people get elected to leadership.

    At least the Machiniests seem to know what's up.

    But don't forget how many endorse Republicans and neoliberals to the determent of their members.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    Because the institutions that are supposed to protect them have lost the trust of the people they're supposed to be representing. Institutions live and die on trust. If we don't figure out how to foster those relationships of trust at scale, people will continue to find a comfortable lie to live in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    He can't step down. The Israeli's haven't given him permission to do that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 66 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    If he and Jeffries end up in leadership, then that's a slap in the face of the voters who are very clear about their desire for new leadership.

    They really do think the voters are stupid and they don't have to justify their actions to us.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    The voters and the millions of people specifically demanding that they step down. This is getting more attention than they're used to and that's a good thing. Even Jefferies is trying to make us think he actually wants to do something.

    Let's make the demands much louder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 21 hours ago

    It's not that we are stupid, they know the ones that support them are stupid, or greedy, and the ones that vote for them as the safe choice are stupid.

    They know we are the smart ones, that's why they sabotage us.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    Power is never ceded willingly. If we've already established that Schumer and Jeffries operate in bad faith a la Sinema and Fetterman, then the pressure must come from those newly elected reps and those on the ballot in 2028.

    It's imperative that Democrats distance themselves from Israel as much as they can by '28, and that's impossible if Schumer and Jeffries are still leading.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 19 hours ago* (5 children)

    It’s sounding more & more like our best bet to replace Schumer is Van Hollen.

    If you have Democratic senators, you can sign the below petition and it will be sent to them as a letter/email from you:

    https://resist.bot/petitions/PMHONJ?ref=a2a69496-d365-42e3-baf9-90bdf97610f0&channel=apple

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 18 hours ago (4 children)
  • [–] 7 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

    Fuck yeah he is! I don’t agree with his positions on everything (I’m definitely further left than he is), but on the most time-sensitive issues at present, he’s right where we need a senate leader to be.

    And more importantly, he seems to be the most ethical senator who is open to considering the role.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

    Where isn't he far left enough? This is a genuine question because my knowledge of the man is a 5min read through his Wikipedia page lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    Well, for starters, I’m an anticapitalist, so I find fault with most politicians (clearly not to the extent that I won’t vote for them though).

    With that caveat in mind, the biggest complaint I have is actually with his current stated position on Israel. He currently opposes BDS (which is hardly surprising even for the most progressive Democratic politicians), and hasn’t come out in support of a complete arms embargo on Israel. He’s one of those politicians who pretends there’s a difference between the practical application of Israel’s use of “defensive” and “offensive” weapons.

    That being said, I think he can be moved farther left, because he cares more about representing the will of the people (or at least, the appearance of representing the will of the people) than Schumer or any of the other AIPAC-owned senators do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 18 hours ago

    No amount of complaints will convince a conservative to voluntarily give up power. They must be forced out of power.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 18 hours ago* (14 children)

    Ha, Democrats hate unions, good luck.

    In the 1950s, union workers were almost 50% of the workforce.

    Today, they are 10% (mostly government employees, ironically). Democrats say that they are pro union, sure. Just like Republicans say that they are for smaller government.

    They're bOtH lying. When Rs are in office, government still balloons; when Ds are in office, unions are still squashed.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 17 hours ago (11 children)

    The democrats refused to make unions easier. And set up free trade agreements that make outsourcing easier.

    The Republicans enacted sweeping legislation and legal changes to limit unions' effectiveness, then appointed anti-union judges and took executive action against unions.

    These two things are NOT the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 17 hours ago (8 children)

    Honestly, as someone who hates the “both sides” argument, watching the US and us here in Canada still hold onto the “both bad but one worse” bit while other countries are aggressively protesting is kinda saddening. The original commentor did, with the sponge-text, accept that they are not equally bad but they’re very right in saying that establishment Democrats, or the LPC here, are also actively trying to harm the working class. As a Canadian it’s actually worse because we literally have a well-known party, the NDP, who is always fighting for us even when they’re massively outnumbered and we just pretend they’re not there.

    We’ve accepted the lesser of two evils for too long. It’s about time we start fighting for something that’s actually good for us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

    The problem is, not-voting your way out of it got us 8 years of Trump.

    If voting your way out of it doesn't work, then not voting your way out of it is even worse. You're going to have to come up with a third option, because neither side is going to be willing to cede power

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

    I’m not saying that the solution is to stick your head in the sand, I’m saying there’s no real tenacity between the two of us. Neither country actually fights for anything. The US had nothing but the limpest possible protests against the most insane shit and, like I said, up here we literally have a third party that Canadians refuse to vote for despite them being super available.

    We’re not trapped in an abusive relationship, we’re here voluntarily. The good news is that that means we still have some level of control but the bad news is that it also means way too many of us are full-fucking-stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 16 hours ago (2 children)

    There were many protests that never got a minute of media coverage. You would see piles of people in the streets on insta/twitter that would magically vanish and never be touched by any oligarch owned media (all of them)

    I'll openly admit we never dialed it up to France, but if we assemble in the streets, even at no-kings masses, and politicians don't fear, nothing can happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 13 hours ago (1 child)

    Yea, land of the brave and home of the free needs to get to it. If your movement can be shutdown by a lack of mass-media coverage then it wasn’t a fuckin’ movement, it was a little day out in the sun.

    And yes, you’re right that without consequences nothing will happen. My biggest frustration these days is simply things like why we started this conversation, which was that with no prompting the classic “but at least one is slightly less horrid than the other!” crap came up again. We are so fucking scared to have vaguely strong feelings on a subject, to the point where our entirely culture is built on shutting someone down for yelling when someone else hits them.

    I’m sick of it, and we need to start saying “great, and that’s nowhere near good enough” instead of the usual “hurray, we corrected 1% of the damage and get to feel good about ourselves so let’s stop there.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    Yea, land of the brave and home of the free needs to get to it. If your movement can be shutdown by a lack of mass-media coverage

    The lack of mass media coverage just kept you from hearing about it. Didn't have any effect on it happening.

    What we need is a general strike, which won't happen now that the midterms went blue.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

    The Ultimate panel of the current penultimate Penny Arcade comic, as of the writing of this comic, has your third way answer.

    Edit 3: https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2026/11/06/musical-scares that is the comic in question.

    Edit: etymologists help me out. Why is it that Prime refers to first in all cases, except mathematics, and ultimate refers to the last thing, except for sometimes in mathematics?

    And yes, I did have this thought because I started thinking about what the antithesis of Optimus Prime (First Best) would be, and was coming up with Pessimus Ultimate (Last Worst.)

    Did mathematics use Greek as a base rather than Latin or something?

    Edit 2: just realized that a prime number might be called that because it's the first number that is only divisible by itself on an infinite timeline, but that still doesn't help with ultimate, as some of the time that's just a best guess.

    Edit 4: wait, does that mean that there's a possibility that Pessimus Ultimate actually did/does exist? Would they make Megatron look competent or useless?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago*

    The NDP have not been fighting for us for awhile. They are no longer the party fighting for the people but want more imigration. I'm jot against igrstion but we can't be letting anyone in like we have been and my God we need infrastructure plans. You can't bring in so many people and go here you are we haven't built up any infrastructure for the new people so have fun.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago

    Yah they are. The left never reverses what the rifht does. They just keepnit the same. Its like they all have plan and one party is the face and one is the heel. But the storey they are playing out is the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

    NAFTA was a Reagan project. It was just signed by Clinton who felt it was better to shove what limited worker protections he could into it, rather than torpedo 15+ years of diplomacy just because it was started by the other side, and was objectively a shitty deal for the workers everywhere.

    Not saying that Dems are innocent, just that there are frequently times they get the blame for Repugnicunt fuckery.

    Just like that poison pill they shoved into the Big Bullshit Bill that's gonna royally screw working class people all over That's gonna get blamed on the blue wave, despite the fact that most of the people that voted for it got replaced and weren't Democrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago

    Ive never been in a union, I have organized a few collective bargaining meetings. One was even successful!

    I consider myself a solo union, I know that sounds stupid. But, what i mean is, if I make a request, company level, pay, etc. If I am serious about it, my position entering the meeting is that I no longer work there, and practice brutal honesty/radical candor. If I leave with a job, it went my way. If it does not, no big deal, said what needed to be said and they get to stew in it.

    Admittedly, this only works well in roles youre pretty integral to a successful team or operation. Much more difficult to do in most roles. That is why unions are so crucial. One cashier not showing up to work for a week is not a big deal. 250,000 cashiers not working for a week is a legit problem for companies. Unions banding together is the ultimate move.

    Unions paid my uncle for 2 years when his legs got crushed in a mill accident. Negotiated him back on with a raise in an administrative role when he could not stand and perform the same role.

    99% of people are "workers" and we are all pro worker. Unions are the only pro worker entity.

    Democracy and Unions just make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 21 hours ago

    Narrator: “He didn’t.”

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago

    sadly, no single organization's entreaties can beat the bottomless purses of corporate sponsors

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 18 hours ago

    "Hear, Hear." The other problem, there are plenty union members who are MAGA fucknuts.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    A democrat by any other name is still a democrat. People demanded Pelosi step down, so we got Pelosi in blackface. The oligarchy will always defend it's existence

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments