Y'know what I asked for that one fair play

As a tall person this made me chuckle.

That's what the transphobes would like the world to believe, yup :(

They do, and want to fix them to turn them back into women. That's how the right talks about them.

They know about trans men, but they view them all as easily manipulated, wayward girls, who's fertility is being stolen by the evil trans agenda.

Just look at the cover of Abigail Shrier's Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. It's the most mask off libidinal shit you've ever seen

The fact that it's a "Craze", that it "Seduces" and that the cover has a Norman Rockwell style image of a little girl with a gaping hole where her ostensible womb ought to be. Sigmund Freud would have a field day with this trash!!

They are terrified that a woman in a male body is still more masculine than they are.

There's going to be a lot of people that don't vote for various reasons, and while I want them all to vote, I understand that the opposition isn't doing enough to make encourage people to vote.

If you think this bitch is a republican plant based on her transphobia then whewwwww buddy are you gonna be shocked when you discover how many top ranking dems are actually Republicans.

Calling out bigotry is not divisionism. The big tent party has enough room for everyone that wants to join, the only problem is there are too many empty chairs reserved for moderate Republicans that don't like trump, as a result, there's no seats for trans folk.

Well if she's a republican plant then what's the problem with not voting for her?

For sure, but it's hard to overstate just how much influence the DNC has. Every blue is better than every red, but by resolving to vote blue no matter what their actual positions are, we are trading short term harm reduction for long-term harm multiplication.

Before long we're going to have the DNC force in a candidate who wants to jail trans people, and they will be slightly preferable to the republican who wants trans people executed. I want to avoid that eventuality, and that means demonstrating that being against human rights loses you the leftist vote.

No. It's literally a bad strategy. Elections are about to turn out. The best way to win elections is to get your base to come out to vote. When you literally threaten their lives and threaten the lives of people they care about they're going to stay home.

You know why you preach to the choir? Because that's how you get them to sing.

Its not. In a 2-party system, the parties geneally move to equalize around a 50-50 split of the population. However, in a country where around half the eligiable voters show up, voter turnout is a much bigger lever to pull. Obama and Trump both figured that out. Alienating your base is the opposite of smart.

It depends on how they gain people from the other party. The Democrats could gain them by giving them better health-care, or fewer wars, or by making the rich pay taxes, or by providing affordable housing, or by improving their jobs.

But the Democrat strategy is to gain them by supporting genocide, and attacking marginalized groups.

Its semantics but please elaborate on what you like done. Just so I know what we are talking about.

Trans rights is clear to me. Trans people are afforded the same rights as everyone else and cant be discriminated against base on their gender identification.

Are we saying, no funding for any country that participates is genocide? No trade?

What if we just said america shouldnt make weapons of war? Do you even know who the neo-libs were?

You would think!

You would really think.

No, it's more effective to do it before voting day so more people abstain and Trump gets to keep his supermajority. That way, he can amend the constitution and run for a third term. That's OP's goal.

OP will claim to be a leftist and an ally. They will claim it.

Yes, because they're so well organized.